tryggvie

I think that the MAC is an ok product, jsut takes time to tweak it and master it. However it does not compare well to UAW (Unique Article Wizard) as it is a far superiour product. the UAW gives you no messy text, you don't have to fix every article that comes out of the system and it automatically sends to hundreds of directories at once (or a certain number each day, you choose). The MAC can only submit to 10 directories at a time.

I use the UAW every day and I'm loving the power of it!

Kazooli

Using article writers can seriously change the density of your keywords and impact negatively the output of your article. In my humble opinion it is easier to put a good effort in writing a unique article and then move on to the next.

Replacing words can easily be done by using your word processor and spending additional time concentrating on the same article it is not something I would recomend.

Sincerely,
Kazooli

Justin1

The videos make it look very basic, although I checked out the super over hyped sales page because I am always looking for new article products.
I prefer SE Nuke, it has an extremely powerful inbuilt spinner, creates newly designed articles for 11 of the biggest article sites out there, also does all the big web 2.0 sites, submits, then you go back and submit the feeds and bookmark everything. Now you can get backlinks at over 490 sites automatically, its simply orgasmic lol........

E-supreme

I have purchased MAC when it was first launched and think it is well worth the price. With new updates from feedback received its guaranteed to get there!

You can easily add your own syntax as you are going along and this will allow you to alleviate time wasting in the future.

I agree it is not perfect yet but I stil tink itwill get there. In my opinion nothing can compete with it in terms of article submission and creation.
All other article creators you have to readover and change bits here and there.

santella

I am glad I found this discussion. I bought the product a few days ago and found that although it might churn out 1000 articles, they do not make sense. I have thought long and hard about requesting a refund, but seeing others feeling the same way, makes me realize that I am not alone in my thinking. I would rather keep my reputation as a good writer, than to tarnish it by sending out articles that make no sense.


santella

Rappaport

I bought this at the launch and I haven't even had time to use it yet!
LOL!
I hope it works as described, because if it does, my content factory will be on overload.

Geoff Carter

If you wish to be recognised as an expert in your field,
then you simply must write the articles.

Some trusted experts may be able to do it for you too,
but a piece of software cannot do it like you can.

Readers can tell instantly when several articles are written
by 'different people' - the energy is different and so credibility
is reduced. It's tough to be at the top for us all, so don't ruin
your reputation by using a bit of software to write hundreds
of articles.

I ordered MAC, tried it but did not used the articles, so sought
a refund.

In this case, less really is more. But it's all a matter of choice;
and I made mine.

HCLee

I was curious too after reading the sales page and was also skeptical about how great this software is and there appears to be too many holes in it to believe all the hype. Like nothing is shown how this spinning is done and an example of how the spun article looks like compared to the original. Thanks for sharing it here.

xtreme newbie

Just bought it 2 days ago but haven't used it yet.

yoshiko

I bought MAC, tried to use it for three days straight, and ended up getting a refund for it.

It was easy to use. But as the synonyms database is very lacking at only 8,000 words, you have to key in your own synonyms for the system to capture and keep. It takes too much time to calibrate the system and it actually took much more time for me to craft one para than to rewrite it on my own.

And when you highlight on entire phrase, the MAC does not have the ability to interpret and rewrite the phrase either.

But let me qualify, I may have greater expectations of the MAC than it could deliver and for its price, it is ok. Just that I realised it does not blend in with my overall article writing strategy.

dlnunez

The sales page gives you the impression that Article Marketing is going to be a piece of cake with their software.

It's an article spinner without the brackets {|} and such. I found it useful to some degree but overall still to buggie. It has potential to be better than many spinners out there once they work out all the bugs.

I asked for a refund. I don't have time to mess with things or wait for an improved version.

bluenetworx

I found Mass Article Control to be terrible, I bought it and then refunded it three days later.The spinning software is poor quality, you can't embed word synonyms inside changes sentences and the submission side only does 10 sites.

richnicol.co.uk

Its a brillaint piece of software, i would highly recommend it, it genrates 1000 articles from the one article inputted in the creator and they are very good articles also. Does this so quick, if you buy the add on you can submit your article to 20 websites at once, happy days

esham

Purchased and tried.... My rating is 4/10. Yes it can generate alot of article but still l have to review and rewrite almost all of it. The modified articles sentences sound funny. Even i'm not English language born person but still the auto modified sentences really need to rewrite personally by "human". Changing the word to alternative synonym indirectly screwed the grammar.

The software - Mass Article Creator itself still have bug issues to fix and need to improved further. To make it at least workable, i have to do alot of pre setting ( changing common sense word, etc ). Almost feel like it better for me to rewrite myself everything.

Noctilus

Aww clearwater thats such a cute pic (your avatar I think its called) sorry nothing to do with the post but just had to compliment you on the pic choice.