JustReviews

I have the Magic Article Rewriter and submitter, and yes they do both work very well, BUT I honestly haven't seen that many backlinks from them. Yes I've had (literally) hundreds and hundreds of articles accepted, but its not showing up in backlink checker. Are these article directories just totally ignored by Google?

JSHous

Last week I got both Mass Article Control (MAC) and Mass Article Rewriter (MAR). MAR is way better and easier to use. It submits to hundreds of directories while MAC submits to 10 unless you buy the upgrade. If you're choosing - MAR is the clear choice in my book.

juzanobo

Though articles are being accepted in article directories, this doesn't mean they are indexed immediately by search engines such as Google.

chini

content boss is absolute crap, i can't believe i didn't cancel by subscription, now i have to pay for a extra month.

Sheryl Polomka

I like the Magic Article Rewriter, but I'm not too keen on the submitter, I can't get the article accounts activated, so far I've managed to activate around 140 out of the 1200 or so article directories that it has.

Clint Butler

MAC is a decent program is you know what your doing, it was my first Article Rewriter and the learning curve was steep because you had to teach it more words for it to be effective. As for the submitter, if you upgrade you get to submit to 20 sites, EZine is in the list but you can count that one out and on average only about 10-12 directories actually accept submitions through the software on a run.

Being a new member of Content Boss I have found it to be a time saver when it comes to my SeNuke submissions, and lets face it I don't have the time being in the military to write and rewrite content all the time. I also use their AutoBlog feature, however I just started with that so can't tell to its effectiveness. I will say that it will come in handy during my upcoming deployment to Afghanistan ensuring my blogs are always fresh while I am away and have limited internet access.

I had the same problem, what good is having the links to all those directories if you can't get registered to them, I ended up just giving up on it and sticking with SeNuke.

magentawave

Sheryl,

I had that same problem using a domain email address that forwards to a gmail account (make sure gmail is IMAP enabled). It turned out that I had a spam protection thing on in my cpanel (Hostgator). When I turned that off it worked great and now have about 950 accounts activated. Worse case scenario, contact Alexandr and he will help you with this issue. Another thing; if an email address doesn't work (meaning your accounts aren't getting activated), then you will have to use a brand new email address with a fake identity when you create a new profile in MAS.

Steve

hippoxx

I use Magic Article Rewriter & submitter.
It is a little more work but with a little practice you can spin hundreds of good quality, very unique articles, that make perfect sense to the reader.

You can produce and submit hundreds of unique articles in an hour or two.
No manual subscription either.

Clint Butler

Does MAS spin your titles when you submit?

Mark-Dickenson

Yes it does

dmtaylor247

Content boss is rubbish, the quality is poor and you won't get your money back. Copyscape won't pass it, there are large chunks of original txt still left in it. The time it takes you to umangle it you might aswell of written an article.

Google will find ways of blocking this crap in the future!

Hyaku_Man

I just started the new version of MAR, and it is now one of the best tools out there. I'm very impressed. And if you use the magic tokens database (costs an extra one time $37), it is now better than Content Boss.

The thing about Content Boss is that the monthly fee is expensive, and the "wrangles" and autospins aren't even unlimited. You get a limited number of credits, and to spin an article well usually takes at least two credits. The CB autospinner usually spun my articles to 15%, sometimes only 11-12%. Seriously, if you just use MAR and save your own tokens as you go, your own token database will be able to autospin at 12-15% within a week. So Content Boss is pointless IMO. The magic tokens database can autospin at 40%+ and still be around the same quality as something from CB. Those autospun articles aren't wonderful, but for Web 2.0 properties, they're awesome. I just push a button and then cut and paste into SEnuke.

CB would be fine if it was a tool with a one-time price, but with MAR getting so good I can't see any justification for CB charging as much as it does on a recurring basis.

JSHous

I have MAR. I'm a new user.
I've not yet seen the benefit of tokens.
Not sure exactly how they work.
I use MAR for spinning...and it works great.
As for the submitter, I've seen a lot of
my articles are sitting in the queue
"waiting for review" after a week.

robp234

The only one that I have tried is Content Boss and I can say that I was less than impressed. I have not tried the other one. I personally use the best spinner and couldn't be more satisfied. It truly lives up to its name as far as I'm concerned.

niceweb

I thought Contentboss was okayish, but it is to expensive and you can quickly use the credits.

Nirvanos

I just bought content-boss, so I searched for threads on it here. I'm already dissapointed.


- I didn't realize it came with such a limited amount of spins
- None of the spins pass copyscape
- I've already spent my account's allowance by just testing it to see how it works, lol

Orlando Web Design

I have used the Magic Article Software extensively and here are my thoughts / concerns:

1. The Article Rewriting software is excellent. Highly recommend it. It's very intuitive and doesn't spit out "gibberish" as one Warrior incorrectly wrote. There is a bit of a learning curve (took me about 2 hours) but it works well.

2. The Article Submission Software, I have serious concerns about. Yes there are a list of 700+ directories (I think it is up to 1200 now) BUT and this is a big one, many appear to be owned by the same person / company (possibly the software owner). Some look alike and are run on the same directory script software. I haven't checked them all so I'm just reporting on what I have seen so far, but my gut tells me most are owned by the same person or company.

This leads me to believe these article directories were set up to sell people on auto article submission software. Technically the software accomplishes that, somewhat. I have had about a 42% submission success rate to these directories. The one's that are listed as being "under review" are broken pages.

I'ts possible that these directories have little value as far as quality goes. Definitely quantity versus quality here folks.

You cannot add your own directories to this software so this may render it useless for some people who are looking to place their articles in quality directories.

Hope that helps

Benhur

After reading all the post on this thread, I conclude that the best is MAR and MAS.
I really appreciate all you guys who put all your 2cents. Now its action time I have
to order MAR and MAS.

Dana Forsythe

I liked the way content boss was set up WAY better. I had magic article re-writer for awhile and hated it :-)

knowing25

I think MAR is better than CB, I have use it often times and it is help me to spin article with easy, also the creator is well nice update with every new good features.

ScottieScott

Hi All,

I have a couple more questions about MAR and MAS. I just watched a bunch of youtube videos on each of them.

The first question I have is how do MAR and MAS interact? Do you spin the articles using MAR, save them to a file, and then MAS goes to get them? Or does MAS just re-spin them according to how many directories it can actually submit them to?

The second question I have is for the current users of MAR/MAS. Once the articles are submitted for review, about what percentage get accepted? It looks like 1,200 directories turns into 650 accounts, with 250 submitted for approval. It seems that boasting about 1,200 article directories is a bit of a misnomer if only 50 (or some other lower number) article directories accept your articles.

Overall this sounds like a great tool, and hopefully I will be able to get it soon. I was just wondering about the above questions. I am not really deciding between this and another program, just thinking about how soon I should get it.

Thanks,
Scott

light_taurus

Looks like someone had a bad day