PeteNY

You can add your own articles to Brute Force SEO if you want to. Only thing it doesnt do is submit multiple spun articles like SENuke does. I assume because the Brute Force people didn't deem it necessary. If your
philosophy differs, Brute Force SEO might not be for you.

I wouldn't necessarily judge them by how many sites they submit to. And they both change month to month. But since you asked...

SENuke has 341 sites that are no-follow in the profile nuke. So if you don't count them as much, here is the general breakdown...

-Brute Force SEO-
47 High PR Sites
5 Main Sites
10 Article
13 Social
14 RSS
11 Video
------------
100 Total

-SENuke-
31 Websites
9 Article Directory Sites
8 Video Sites
21 Bookmarking sites
16 RSS Sites
---------------
85 Total (Not including the 341+ No follow Profile Nuke sites)

Stephen Meyer

Tried BF EVO last night. Out of the 47 High PR sites only managed a couple dozen. Also took note of the links put on these sites and will say this is not the right way to add a link. For links to remain they need to be relevant to topics and discussions. This is better done manually. The rest was OK but not all that great.

Not sure why neither of them don't submit to more do-follow web 2 sites. there are a lot of them out there.

At this point I'm thinking doing it the old fashioned way that is far less like spam and is the best option.

As far as the auto-articles BFE supplies, why? I'm not into duplicating someone else's work or promoting them. Write your own articles, that's by far the best way.

And the links in the RSS submission, I charge $30.00 a month to advertise other peoples links. So a nice discount off the $157.00 is in order.

The whole idea of social posting is to both create backlinks and to brand yourself. Sell yourself first and you can easily sell your product. You can get some backlinks with both of these programs but, from what I've seen, this isn't the way to brand yourself. Unless you don't mind appearing a little weird.

Should I decide to buy one of them I'm afraid BFE let me down just a little.

Have a nice day
Steve

ttippmann

Who is really having success with these when it comes to actual SEO? Seems like you can create backlinks in these profiles until you are blue in the face, but it seems that google doesn't find them very often. I subscribed to receive backlink notifications through google and noticed very few after several weeks of SENuke.

Anyone else?

HammedFawaz

SENuke really works for me. Its just what I need

PeteNY

I don't believe Google reports all the links they find. You might want to try Yahoo Site Explorer for a more accurate overall picture. But even with that, it does seem like only a small fraction of the backlinks show up.

I got my keyphrase to hit #1 in Google last month with SENuke. So, it worked for me. Hope to use Brute Force SEO with SENuke to do the same thing, with less effort.

bluenetworx

Profile Links for get picked up, I am totally convinced of that now. I have been using them and setting up weird user names, and then after a week or two searching in Google for that name, and I find loads of my profiles, even when back link checkers and Google alerts tell me otherwise.

Frank Bruno

Sometimes it takes time for your rankings in the SERPS to show up. Google finds your anchor text links but won't really give you any juice, sometimes right away, or a few weeks or even a few months later.


Frank Bruno

daveshu

I just cancelled during my 7 day trial of evo2, and cancelled my brute force linking loophole too.

The evo2 is poor, the linking loophole only created links on 45 sites out of 103.

At that rate I can build the links faster.

Going to try senuke too and maybe the link dominator.

robofx

It's about time more coders jumped on this bandwagon. Competition'll yank the prices of this type of software down to earth, where it belongs.

Stuff like SENuke and Evo2 will cost about $20 one-time payment when the dust settles, I'll bet. Hellelujah.

Teriss

Simply not true, that was your experience however many others get more links per run besides the links would have taken you a week of work to get -so enjoy the links on the house from Pete. Don't really appreciate people getting "freebies" and then making disparaging remarks about a product - its a slim thing to do.

Teriss

IF a coder could do the same job as EVO II - is he / she prepared to write 1 million pages to compete with this program? Let's see it.

Teriss

Did you check your AW stats? Try EVO II, it worked for me.

RocksIT

I had been using LinkingLoophole, i see some results so far, but not as much traffic/link love as i was expecting. Just signed up for the trial and installed EVOII, we'll see how it goes...

cg101

Also tried bruteforce and was just not that impressed

abs007

I have also cancelled my evo ii subscription. I will keep the linking loophole software as I like it however my only concern is that more work and focus will be towards evo ii and not linking loophole. I just hope that linking loophole remains a focus for pete.

I will await feedback of evo ii before paying the high price. The only downfall to evo ii is the lack of control. Saying this it may well be a positive side for many.

Black Hat Cat

Shouldn't you be in the Brute Force forum convincing people they aren't having the problems they know they are having instead of coming here to run cover? Is your first name "Baghdad" by any chance, lol?

daveshu

If that's aimed at me, I have to say that it simply IS true.

I don't care what you say other people experience, I've run the linking loophole dozens of times and I always get the same result - over 50% of the links don't work - and no, it wouldn't take me a week, it'd take me (or my low cost hired help) less than half a day.

I don't appreciate people coming here and complaining when people give honest reviews - are you suggesting that I should pay an inflated price for an inferior product, or that I just shouldn't say anything to save other people doing the same?

Either way it's pretty shoddy advice.

abs007

I have been a subscriber to the linking loophole software for over 3 months now. Yes you are correct in stating that you do not get all of the backlinks however out of the many times that I have used LL I can confirm that I get at least a 70% success rate.

It has kept me as a subscriber!! However im a little concerned that Pete has capped the software to 100 working sites. Its still a bargain but makes me think how many times I could use the software on the websites that I promote. It was great before as you get new links every month.

Im sure new links will still be added to replace the ones that no longer work but feel that this will cause many people to unsubscribe if they only have 1 or 2 sites to promote.

TommyBoy

I am staying with evo 2 for at least the first month to see if I see a noticeable difference with articles or youtube vids. But one thing I do like about it is that it pretty much does it's thing without me having to "help it along". It failed a couple times trying to set up an email address for me but that was it.

ARVolund

I just ran evo2 version 6.2 for the first time and while it dd run pretty well it did glitch a couple of times, as it did seem to have a java issue on a couple of sites. Overall it opened most of the accounts and while I have not run senuke yet (planned for tommorrow) it did seem to take awhile.

Most of the captcha seemed to work ok but it did seem to hang on the two word ones more than any of the others. To be honest this was the first time I have run a captcha defeating piece of software so I was pretty impressed on how well it did overall.

As far as the number of sites go the program reported 62 successful profiles. The update says there are now 97 total so it was successful right at 2/3 of them. Not sure about the stick rate as I will have to check back on them in a couple of weeks to see.

One thing I did not see was the extra links on the rss feeds. Not sure if I am just not looking in the correct place or maybe that was discontinued in the new version. If someone could send me an example I would like to see it for myself.

Overall I would say the automation worked pretty good. Is it worth the price? Not sure yet If the links stick then I would lean towards yes but I will have a better idea after I run my other test tomorrow and have something else to compare it to.

bishwajeet

SENUke is really cool with a lot of features

timbor

The only thing I do not like about SEnuke is the babysitting that you need to do sometimes...

I like the idea of not having to touch something once it is up and running.. I would like SEnuke to be like this as well... Just to fill out a form and press go.. and it does everything... and you can choose modules to use or not... that would be cool...

ARVolund

Well I ran SEnuke today and I found the experience quite different from evo2. The learning curve is quite a bit steeper. Honestly I think these two products are geared towards different markets. Evo2 is much easier to use but I think the results are not quite as polished as SEnuke making its target in my mind at least more towards people who do not have the time, inclination, or ability to master SEnuke. I think SEnuke is more geared to the professional or someone who has the time and ability to spend on learning the program in order to get the most out of it.

I did have a couple of glitches when running SEnuke, first off it could not seem to create the yahoo account and then after using gmail I ended up having to give google one of my cell phone numbers because the program seem to raise some flags creating all the accounts. I had an extra phone that is just basically backup so I did not have to give them my main number which to be honest I would have been reluctant to do. I did however receive an update today that was supposed to fix those issues according to the email but was not able to test it yet.

As far as the captcha solving went it did seem to do a better job but I was told at the beginning to stay off the computer while it was working in order for the auto captcha to work. I did not see that message from evo2 but I have to wonder if it would have been more successful if I had, that probably needs to be tested.

Most of the accounts and the posts/articles did get created just fine, I found them less spammy looking than the ones that evo2 created leading me to believe that the stick rates may be higher but only time will tell on that one. The total number of sites was less and some of the article sites did not go through but it did give me a reason for most of them and offered some solutions.

One thing I did love (once I figured it out) was the article spinner. that is a very cool piece of software to have included in the package.


Bottom line:

Learning to use SEnuke is a much more time consuming project than evo2. You really have to watch the videos to work it. For me it is going to be worth the time as I think the end result is better but if you do not have that time to invest then evo2 is probably a better program for you as you can get started pretty quick and with a lot shallower learning curve and even if SEnuke is better it will do you no good at all if it is not being used.

kimvalerio05

I have tried also Bruteforce SEO for 2 months including EVO 2, but still I prefer lexorsoft. The problem with Bruteforce seo/EVO 2 is that you still need time to configure. After running the software the result is about 40% to 60% only sometimes lower.

But to be fair with EVO 2, I love the auto capcha feature of the software, after you enter the data needed by the software you can leave it and continue what you're doing.

Specially authority sites very low turnout... I have not tried SEnuke yet so I can't say anything about it.

The reason why I like lexorsoft.net is that they do all the task manually and I got all the reports in excel format. The only job involve in my side is to provide my site url, my keywords, titles, and if needed articles for article submission.

4thstreet

I'm finding that since the last EVO update it has crashed almost every single time that I have used it. Nothing worse then letting it work 2 hours creating accounts and then crash as it starts to post.

whateverpedia

Sheesh @justeenwinters, why not tell us what you really think.

That is one hell of a rant, most of which is against the forum rules. "Attack" the product/service, not the people/person delivering it.

"Attack" of course means constructive criticism.

Your rant did contain one gem though that I believe needs to be recognized.

That's the funniest thing I've read all day.

BTW I am not a fan of BFSEO/Evo either.

mickdhill

Hi Guys,
SENuke sounds awesome to me, could you help me out with a couple of things:
1) What is the difference between the two differently priced versions.
2) I would like to use senuke to promote the many sites that I have created using site profit bot- would this work.

Cheers - Merry Christmas
Mick

jhess56

have not used senuke though plan on testing it out here shortly

i have been using linking loophole/brute force for a few months and like it quite a bit overall. i admit it is quite buggy but overall it gives you alot of punch on relative autopilot

to give a completely honest review its powerful software but especially the 2.0 module is really buggy. 5 sites total which i dont feel is enough to begin with.and alot of the time most of them dont work

bottom line, even if the 2.0 module doesnt work.its still worth it to me to pay the full member sub for it as its basically an automatic creator/confirmer for the linking loophole module and rss submission(not many rss aggs available anymore though which sux)

article module works well too though hopefully they will add in a spin/submit module like awa has and have way more sites to submit too

thats as honest of a review as i can give as a full member that doesnt do any affiliate promos for the product

ps-running evo right now,the auto capture is slow but a thing of beauty nonetheless

georgekosch

Ewffff!!! I am on the trial for SeNuke. I've used other programs for this but Se just rocks!! After watching the videos it super easy to use.

Can't say enough about how cool this "robotic" age is.

And, after my business partner spent three days in Yahoo answers answering and posting normal "human" questions and getting BANNED (argh!!!!) and then having her account cancelled. We'll now fight the good fight with robotics... thank ya!!

Tx again SeNuke!!

turbohips

I've used SENuke and canceled after my first month. I ran into many bugs and then the accounts would get closed down either after the next day or sometime within the week. I used different proxies and email accounts but all had the same aftermath. I'm still in owe how some people swear by it though. Perhaps they don't care to check the work after it's done a week later.

System Wide Solutions

All I can say is that with one run of Terry Kyle's linklist, and a few Brute Force SEO sessions, I am sitting at #1 for my product name as a keyword, competing against 700,000+ sites.

That is in just a little over a week. Not too shabby at all.

Brute Force kicks ass.

SENuke doesn't even compare... Having to solve my own captchas? Please... not anymore....

donnyh

lol SEnuke had auto-captcha solving long before Bruteforce did. Have you even tried it?

reapr

Interesting ... give the SENuke trial a try; not only will you find the captcha solving works great but you will have something to 'actually' compare!!!

Kirpo

Hey Kim,

How you doin.

I was researching EVO2 & SE Nuke when I stumbled on your post.

Are you able to provide the following info plus
any more you wish to add -

What services have you used?
What success have you received?
Which of their services is best for quick ranking?
Are they efficient & professional?

Cheers Kim, have a great day/night??

Peter ( from Perth in Western Australia)

Jim Denstedt

Well, there you have it. Reviews from all the Warriors using these 2 software programs. I have also made my mind up and will start with SEnuke! Thanks for all the great post on these 2 seo software programs!

Jim

LondonPaladin

I have been using EVO2 for a week now and I haven't had a chance to work with SEnuke just yet. I can say that my main page went from PR0 to PR1 this week. And every site I am promoting has had an increase in traffic - ranging from 17-200%. The higher number is of course for a new site that just jumped from 2 - 6 visitors in the last week.

I would be interested to see what traffic bumps I can get with SEnuke. I think both products are strong but do some different things.

Raygun

I would be interested to see what type of statistical results people are getting with either of these programs. Please let me know.

veeco

Hello,
i would like to know about payment scheme.. for $127 (SENUKE).. is it possible if the payment not in continuous basis instead case basis... i mean, when i want to use it, i'll pay for a month contract.. then i stop the subscription... in short, i use manual extend instead automatic billing.

is it possible ?

mybeech

interesting reads here.
so far it looks like senuke is far ahead

tivowatcher

I am actively looking for Beta testers for my new product that is a direct competitor to EVO and SENuke.

Please drop by my site to see the free "lite" version (video now posted too!) and sign up for it. You will then be automatically included in the phased Beta program for the "full" edition that offers an alternative to the "big guys".

Link is in the signature. I'd love your feedback.

-Dave

jogabs

How can i check my profile in linking bruteforce sites?

mikelangelo11

Then along came Web2Mayhem. It seemed to do almost everything Evo2 did and more and it cost less, so I canceled Evo2 and signed up with W2M. BIG mistake! That software was so buggy, it drove me crazy. There was very little automated about it. I honestly think I could have just manually created the accounts and copied and pasted the articles as fast as W2M did. No URL reports or anything. If I wanted to find the URL or RSS feeds, I had to log into each one and copy it.

robp234

I have tried both and SEOnuke is by far the best. Much easier to use and I saw better results. I'm pretty sure it's cheaper too!

helkay

I own and use SEnuke and am very happy with it.

reapr

I am still quite happy with SEnuke. It is updated regularly and the profile list is long.

Underground SEO

senuke is definately the software for me, I've had very good affiliate success with it, haven't tried Brute Force, but from what I hear it can be quite buggy, not that SENuke is still totally bug free! Nothing will ever be perfect with IM software though!

turbohips

I'd like to see proof for all of those that have said they received any SERP movement at all using these programs. I've tried SENuke for 3 months and it did absolutely nothing for my sites.

ianbong

Your software looks interesting. Not sure how it works though - still some manual registering/creating accounts needed I guess.