Underground Traffic Blueprints

RedHat39 · 07-12-2010, 07:17 AM

Been getting a ton of emails about the launch of Jeremy Gislason's and Simon Hodgkinson's Underground Traffic Blueprints tomorrow.

However the problem I have with this product right off the bat is that in the preview video on "article espionage" they rip off a freely available technique for finding niches by searching for articles that are popular on EZA, ArticleBase, and SearchWarp. In fact the "code" as they call it was even posted here on WF by Jack Duncan. So I know that's rehashed material.

Currently on their testimonials page there are about 40 well known IM'ers, some of which are regulars here on WF, touting how great this product is. I would like just one of these gurus to actually post a real review.

I'm probably going to buy this tomorrow anyway, but in the mean time if just one of these gurus who has had pre-sneak access could reply with the legitimacy of this not being rehashed material that would be great.

07-12-2010, 07:17 AM	#1
RedHat39 I Wanna Be A Cowboy War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Kingsport, TN, USA. Posts: 366 Blog Entries: 2 Thanks: 66 Thanked 113 Times in 77 Posts Social Networking Contact Info	Underground Traffic Blueprints - Rehashed or Not? Been getting a ton of emails about the launch of Jeremy Gislason's and Simon Hodgkinson's Underground Traffic Blueprints tomorrow. However the problem I have with this product right off the bat is that in the preview video on "article espionage" they rip off a freely available technique for finding niches by searching for articles that are popular on EZA, ArticleBase, and SearchWarp. In fact the "code" as they call it was even posted here on WF by Jack Duncan. So I know that's rehashed material. Currently on their testimonials page there are about 40 well known IM'ers, some of which are regulars here on WF, touting how great this product is. I would like just one of these gurus to actually post a real review. I'm probably going to buy this tomorrow anyway, but in the mean time if just one of these gurus who has had pre-sneak access could reply with the legitimacy of this not being rehashed material that would be great.