SEO Link Robot vs Magic Submitter!

12 replies
Hey guys,

I'm thinking of making some software purchases lately and while I'm pretty sure I'll go with AMR for articles, I don't know whether to for SEOLR or MS for everything else.

I've read a lot of other threads but still can't seem to get a definitive answer as to how each one is different.

One thing I would like to know will it be possible to build link pyramids or large link wheels automatically or semi automatically and probably more importantly how user friendly are each of these.

Any input is greatly appreciated

Cheers
#link #magic #robot #seo #submitter
  • Profile picture of the author junilerick
    bump. Anyone?
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3768097].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BigNorm
    To be perfectly honest I've never used AMR or MS as I've never has to. I do use SEOLR though and have been happy with it's results. It is a little confusing at first but if you follow the steps outlined you can get quick quick at the process of submitting articles to directories and web 2.0 properties. It has also gives you the option of automatically creating link wheels with your articles. The links wheels are 5 spokes so if your looking for something bigger then you may have to try something else. You'll also be able to bookmark, syndicate your feeds and ping your urls with SEO LR as well. The only thing I don't like about it, is that sometimes you have to go back and resubmit an article even when it says it's been submitted. It does let you change your proxies but only one at a time, it doesn't have an automatic switch where you can load a bunch of proxies and let it run. Apart from those two little gripes, I'm very happy with the software.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3768709].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author junilerick
      Originally Posted by BigNorm View Post

      To be perfectly honest I've never used AMR or MS as I've never has to. I do use SEOLR though and have been happy with it's results. It is a little confusing at first but if you follow the steps outlined you can get quick quick at the process of submitting articles to directories and web 2.0 properties. It has also gives you the option of automatically creating link wheels with your articles. The links wheels are 5 spokes so if your looking for something bigger then you may have to try something else. You'll also be able to bookmark, syndicate your feeds and ping your urls with SEO LR as well. The only thing I don't like about it, is that sometimes you have to go back and resubmit an article even when it says it's been submitted. It does let you change your proxies but only one at a time, it doesn't have an automatic switch where you can load a bunch of proxies and let it run. Apart from those two little gripes, I'm very happy with the software.
      Thanks a lot BigNorm, that's the best answer I've gotten regarding software in a long time

      I believe the most attractive quality of SEOLR is its ability to auto create 2.0 propertires and a pretty decent jobs of a lot of other things as well. However, I've been hearing the article directory submission is not its strong suit. For that, I think I'll go with AMR as I've heard nothing but good things so far, sounds like it's basically the Scrapebox equivalent of article submission in terms of quality

      One thing I'd also like to know is does SEOLR creates profile links too?
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3769147].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author veeco
    SEOLR strong point is on the link wheel/mini network feature... if you think about Article Marketing, you can go on with AMR instead...
    Signature

    i work on web consultant and creative agency in indonesia..

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3769213].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kysersoze
    I have used SEOLR, SENUKE, MS and now SENUKE X. I found that with SEOLR there is a much larger learning curve than with any other one of the programs. SENUKE X, I have tried for 2 weeks and even though it has some cool features like scheduling campaigns and a diagram it has been buggy and crashes often. The interface is a lot cleaner than MS but MS offers more sites.

    I found MS to be easy to use, the learning curve for me was a lot less than the other programs. It has a nifty feature for profile links, you create a profile with no links and then one with your anchor text links, submit the original non linked one and 2 weeks later hit one button and it updates those profiles automatically and with a higher success rate for sticking with that method..

    I am still on the fence on SENUKE X vs MS but between MS and SEOLR, I personally liked MS a lot more. I would suggest you take advantage of the free trials, I am sure they all have one.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3770852].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kuya Jhay
      Originally Posted by Kysersoze View Post

      I have used SEOLR, SENUKE, MS and now SENUKE X. I found that with SEOLR there is a much larger learning curve than with any other one of the programs. SENUKE X, I have tried for 2 weeks and even though it has some cool features like scheduling campaigns and a diagram it has been buggy and crashes often. The interface is a lot cleaner than MS but MS offers more sites.

      I found MS to be easy to use, the learning curve for me was a lot less than the other programs. It has a nifty feature for profile links, you create a profile with no links and then one with your anchor text links, submit the original non linked one and 2 weeks later hit one button and it updates those profiles automatically and with a higher success rate for sticking with that method..

      I am still on the fence on SENUKE X vs MS but between MS and SEOLR, I personally liked MS a lot more. I would suggest you take advantage of the free trials, I am sure they all have one.

      heard that MS is really slow and database(s) hardly gets updated... is this true??
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3771176].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Kysersoze
        Originally Posted by Kuya Jhay View Post

        heard that MS is really slow and database(s) hardly gets updated... is this true??
        It is in fact slower than SENUKe X which can be a bit annoying. In regards to the data base, in all honesty none of these software's update their site lists from my experiences with any frequency. That's one of my big complaints with all of them. If I am paying a monthly fee, I would appreciate them adding new sites and deleting non working sites once a month at least.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3771648].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author veeco
          Yes... sometime i confuse what monthly fee are for ....
          Signature

          i work on web consultant and creative agency in indonesia..

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3774164].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Kuya Jhay
          Originally Posted by Kysersoze View Post

          It is in fact slower than SENUKe X which can be a bit annoying. In regards to the data base, in all honesty none of these software's update their site lists from my experiences with any frequency. That's one of my big complaints with all of them. If I am paying a monthly fee, I would appreciate them adding new sites and deleting non working sites once a month at least.
          based on ur previous post it seems u favor MS than seolr & senukex. do u still think its worth the monthly fee??

          are u using other tools besides MS??
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3776834].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Kysersoze
            Originally Posted by Kuya Jhay View Post

            based on ur previous post it seems u favor MS than seolr & senukex. do u still think its worth the monthly fee??

            are u using other tools besides MS??
            Kuya, they both have good things and also some negatives. MS is much more affordable and offers more sites in some modules. SENuke X has the nifty scheduler and wizard which looks great but had been a bit buggy. I'm still using SENuke X and decided to try it out for another month to see results.

            SEOLR, I guess I didn't give it much of a chance. I tried it for a period but the learning curve was a bit more than the other softwares and I didn't like the interface. I'm sure there are many people who have different opinions, I would of course listen to the people who are probably not trying to sell you a membership to any of them, probably get the most honest feedback.

            Good luck!
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3786559].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author junilerick
    Thanks for all the input!

    Anybody care to share to their results using either MS or SEOLR?
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3779380].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author stanl1234
    My two cents worth,
    I go with SEOLR Team for three reasons:
    -price
    -Steve's efforts in fixing the software bugs
    -the efforts towards continuous improvement ( Best Spinner,Article Submitter,fast indexer,Meta Indexer,VPN (HMA),proxy,De Captcha,forum,ect.

    I purchased this tool when it first came out at $157. This tool has worked consistently good. I save a ton of time. I like this product.

    Regards
    My review
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3793184].message }}

Trending Topics