jhiggins

So what's up with this content boss? Can't Google figure this stuff out anyways? And if they can, why not just use duplicate content? I get adsense income from "duplicate" content. Will spinning it in Content Boss do anymore other than waste my time?

Jonathan

Art Turner

My experience with Content Boss did not produce good results. Even with good input. Depending on your goals, as long as you don't duplicate content on several pages of a single site, there's no penalty.

jhiggins

These are my suspicions. Thanks!

Jonathan

Jon Alexander

My experience is the exact reverse. It does pretty much what it claims to do, and I've pushed a large number of sites up to page 3,2,1 of google for competitive and lucrative terms.

If you think you are making money with 'duplicate content', you need to have a little think and ask yourself how much more you could make with unique content.

because frankly, if you're making any money at all with dupe content, it's despite the fact, not because of it. Your posting on the other thread, by the way, tends to suggest to me exactly how much money you ARE making.

If you need it spelling out why dupe content isn't much use anymore, they cover it here:-

http://www.contentboss.com/unique-content.php

ExRat

Hi Jon,

Seems strange that when you talk about contentboss, you talk about 'them' in the 3rd person -

Yet the only posts I ever see here from you are promoting it.

http://www.warriorforum.com/search.php?searchid=759923

Your sig file has a direct link. You offer coupons for it as if it belongs to someone else.

Even more interesting are their whois details -

false whois details for contentboss

The country is marked as GB, yet the address is -

Albequece

Hmmmm

The owner's name is marked as either - P-CGC849 or Co and they have the most memorable phone number around -

01234567890

OP,

I wasted some money trying it out, and it is THE most awful synonym replacement tool you could ever encounter. If you want gibberish, go for contentboss.

blogbrain

Its not so much google but the disgrutled article writers you copied that will report you to google! Contentboss is a really clever re-writer. But what I really like is the autoblog feature, because after 3 months you could have thousands of articles automatically published and growing without pressing a finger!

Jon Alexander

yawn. I promote it because I think its a good tool. Like I've promoted lots of things in the past that have made the warriors a lot of money. Something the current 'crop' of vested interests seem to have forgotten. Easy way to show how wrong you are - give me some text, and I'll waste a few of my own wrangles to show you how good contentboss is. feel free.

Jeremy Kelsall

Jon,

Perhaps you have a special way of using it?

I tried Contentboss about 2 months ago I think it was when a group of Warriors and I were in a private chat and someone brought it up. I entered
3 or 4 different articles into it and the output each time was horrendous.

I didn't read the manual for it or anything, but it looked like a pretty straight forward type of deal -- enter content -- spin content -- done. Am I missing something?

Jon Alexander

I read the manual.

Give me some text and I'll wrangle it for you at 80%, 65% and 50% so you can see what it does.

Chris Lagarde

Let's all help Jon out. Since any critical review of Content Boss is met with negative comments from Jon, I've got an easy response.

Never, ever use Content Boss. The bad reviews of this product are easily found on this forum. Don't waste your time, effort, and especially your money on this dog product.

With a conscious effort on our part, we can help Jon out of the article spinner business which he does so badly.

Jon Alexander

so.. you dont feel up to the easy task of supplying me some content I'll wrangle for you to show you how wrong you are?

OK.

Suit yourself. I mean - I keep offering to show you for FREE how good it is, and rather than take that opportunity, you'd rather just diss it.. No doubt anyone with half a brain can draw their own conclusions from that.

Fair enough, It's not my fight, so I'll say bye bye.

ExRat

Hi Jon,

Really?

Are you suggesting that I didn't use your coupon and pay to trial contentboss?

Try looking here for your misleading recommendations (starting at comment #36) -

Article Rewriting Software?

See my review on page 2, post #96

And see the screenshot of my paypal subscription -

http://www.exrat.com/1/pic/contentboss.jpg

You owe me $19 I spent on this rubbish based on your misleading recommendation in this forum.

You think we're that dumb we haven't come across the 'discount coupon affiliate method' before?

And you call me a bull****ter?

Jon Alexander

I don't owe you anything.

Like I said, not my fight, and you keep ignoring my offer to show you how good it is, free, all you have to do is cut n paste a chunk of text you'd like me to wrangle fer chrissakes, so I'm outta here.

Although one question remains, if you didn't like it why didn't you ask for a refund? Don't bother. I've lost interest.

ExRat

Hi Jon,
Duh. I've already tried it and it's rubbish. Why would I want you to post an article here that has no resemblance to the gibberish that contentboss spews out, like you did in the previous thread?

Post #11
Post #13

Yawn. Another multiple bye-bye poster.
Duh. Because there is no refund policy on the product. I wonder why?

http://www.exrat.com/1/1087.gif

MsDebra

I agree with the description "horrendous". I just bought it yesterday and I've already cancelled by subscription. I hate I can't get my $24.99 back.

Marcus Paul

No refund policy? Red Flag right there.........

gareth

OK Jon "PLEASE" show us :-)

Glenn Leader

OK Jon,

I'll take up you challenge to get this matter sorted about the quality
of the output. What size article do you want, and where do you want
it sent? PM me with the details if you want to take me up on this.

Glenn

PS, not having any form of refund policy will seriously harm your business,
you should consider rethinking this. None of us likes giving refunds, but
not having one costs you more money than the refunds you'd have to
repay. Assuming of course, your refund rate is not through the roof.

Nigel Greaves

Yet another one here who's tried it and found it produced cr*p and is out of pocket.

Like MsDebra I cancelled within 24 hours and I wonder who else has done exactly the same. It's a nice little earner raking in $24.95 to produce garbage, especially when people don't use up your bandwidth for the rest of the month because the product is so lousy.

Jonathan, if you would like to see a piece of the garbage that Content Boss churned out let me know and I'll PM it to you. I can't say I recall anyone else promoting it on here apart from Jon Alexander which might tell you something.

Nigel

Heuristic

After hearing about how great Content Boss was, I decided to try it last month. I loaded up two high quality articles and it completely mangled them to the point that I needed to re-write each version extensively. That took me longer than if I wrote these from scratch. I canceled my subscription and chalked it up to a learning experience. I think we are a long way from "push button spinning" that doesn't require extensive human interaction.

Art Turner

Yeah, I'm another who threw money down this hole. Didn't like the "no refund" policy--and they really hammer it in--but was sure that if Jon could get the great results he posted here, surely I could too. Pasted some of my best articles and when it got through mangling them...er, sorry "wrangling" them...they were unrecognizable garbage. Cancelled the subscription immediately. Even if Google doesn't care, who wants to choke up the web with this stuff?

Art

Louis Raven

Roger, are you saying all spinners are useless or just that your experience was not good with Content Boss?

I read the samples on the CB website and they looked really good. Then again, I assume they spun loads before choosing that for an example a

I'm interested as I recently read a respected marketer was making a killing with pure dup content. And if that's the case.. a good spinner will be the icing on the cake.

Louis

Marcus Paul

Is anyone using The Content Solution?

Nigel Greaves

Have you read the thread or is this just the latest garbage post you're doing to get you up to 30?

Jon Alexander

anyone want me to 'wrangle' an article, pm me the original and I'll waste a couple of my own wrangles showing you how good it is. Anything up to 500 words is fine, and then you can decide for yourself. I've noticed that there are people on this forum who like to dis the 'Boss, and claim to have had less than satisfactory experiences with it.

Seeing as it's pretty much idiot proof, I can only assume they didn't bother to read the manual, and either tried to wrangle text without punctuation, or stuff with hard line breaks like this:

Jhiggins can't follow simple
instructions. That's why he
doesn't think the Boss is
any good. Of course, the multitude
of happy users would disagree.

Like I say, anyone wants the truth, PM me some text you'd like wrangled and I'll run it thru the boss for you. If you then sign up, it would be nice if you use my voucher code, although you don't have to, of course.

Robert T Jillie

Jon, is your offer still open to 'wrangle' an article?
I haven’t tried Content Boss yet but it is something I’m really considering.

Jon Alexander

yep, pm me whatever you like. I'll return it at 50% paraphrase and 75%

Nigel Greaves

Wrong on all three counts Jon. I read the manual, I had punctuation in the article I used and there were no hard returns in either.

It seems your theory is as flawed as Content Boss.

Jeremy Kelsall

Jon,

Make a video for us showing you putting an article in and what you do to make it come out with good results.

I "played" with that thing one night for over and hour and the result each and every time was an unreadable jumble of words that I would be embarrassed to associate my name with.

Make a quick video and show all of us doubters and nay sayers what we are doing wrong.

Jon Alexander

tell me more of this earth thing called 'video'.

failing that, here's a couple of screenshots.

This is an old plr aricle i had lying around. It's 80% paraphrase, and a total of 60% changed.

edit - here's the images hosted on image shack - I cant seem to make the forum show them proper size.

[img=http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/2722/picture1kq3.th.png]

[img=http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/292/picture2qb1.th.png]

Attached Thumbnails

   

Jeremy Kelsall

Jon, it is too small to read

Jon Alexander

how do I embed this fullsize??? here's the imageshack

[img=http://img17.imageshack.us/img17/2722/picture1kq3.th.png]

[img=http://img6.imageshack.us/img6/292/picture2qb1.th.png]

TLTheLiberator

I was very interested in buying access but now, with all the negative reviews I can't waste my time.

Thanks for the info!

TL

Jon Alexander

well done for making your own mind up!

(not)

there's a couple of images up above there - before and after. It may not be 'perfect' (what is??/) but I defy anyone to show me a better automated solution. In fact if anyone can, I'll sign up to it.

Mike Hersh

I can surly tell you that it's a waste of time. The best thing you probably can do is not using shortcuts for creating content.

lienadla

I was considering this product as well, good thing I found this thread.

hotpassion

Remember that : No Software or Tool Can write or rewrite readable article up to now. They are not human so their "products" still need your enery to check for mistakes, grammar spelling,... If you need good articles to put in your site and blog that for human being reading, not for SEs, the best ways are write the articles your self or hire some one to do it for you or copy from others's and rewrite them yourself(or outsource). If you just want for Search engine crawling and index your sites, blogs for new unique contents, some tools and software like contentsboss can help you that much.

Louis Raven

I couldn't read the results (easily) but could a complete ContentBoss-newbie produce the same clear results, Jon?

Is there a trial version? (goes to check).

Louis

Glenn Leader

This isn't the case any longer, there are systems that are human controlled
that product extremely high quality articles. You'd be hard pressed, it at all,
to tell the difference between the original and the rewritten version in terms
of their quality.

HTH

Glenn

Blase

I would like to thank the poster of this thread.

It reminded me to "CANCEL" my content boss subscription,
which expires on the 23rd.

Thank you

Benchlegs

Don't waste you time on ContentBoss. I tried it and was very disappointed in the results. I canceled after only 1 month.

Ken Leatherman

I have tried it and my results were not good at all. I selected some of my own articles which are on Page 1 of Google for the keywords I used and even if I say so very well written. I loaded the articles and set to 50%, 75%, 35% and I believe either 80 or 85%.

The results were completly pathetic with the exception of 1 and it left a lot to be desired. I went back to PayPal and canceled my subscription. I then contacted Content Boss by e-Mail and requested a refund. Wait! Don't Laugh!. Within about 12 hours I received a reply from them, asking me to send them my articles and let them spin them and they would consider a refund, (even though against their strict policy) if I didn't like them. After them spinning the articles they sent them back, saying they saw nothing wrong with them. Frankly they were hacked, sliced, diced and did not make sense.

I then e-Mailed them back told them, no way was I satisfied with their "Expert" effort, as the creator of the software. Then within 24 hours I received another e-Mail saying they did not agree with me but they were going to issue me a refund. Lo and behold I received a full refund of $24.95.

You may not be as fortunate as me and get your money back, so I strongly recommend against subscribing to this software. Don't waste your money and don't waste your time.

Jon don't ask me to send you the articles and you will "wrangle" them for me free, I have my own proof right from the owner/owners/programmers/ or what ever they were.

Ken
The Old Geezer

deslongs

thanks for saving my money... i will go the outsource route!

peterj

Glen Leaders Artifact. usually has WSO running somewhere

and

Power Article rewriter (powerarticlerewriter.com) has a trial version.

pete

Glenn72

It's been proven a number of times on this forum and elsewhere that duplicate content on multiple websites content isn't really an issue. The original article won't always rank the highest either. Other factors come into play such as backlinks, PR, relevancy and so on.

JackKnight555

I think I have read enough here to keep me away from this product, God knows Ive tried too many already.

topnotchservices

After searching for reviews I first came accross many thathad been written by the owner or affiliates which pained ContentBoss in a glowing light.

I was on the verge of parting with my money until I dug a little deeper on this and other forums and found that genuine users thought that the software was garbage.

Rather than 'Jon' trying to insult everyone who has tried and disliked his product (and thus screw up his affiliate income), he should take the feedback back to the makers and tell them to improve their product

UKTim29

I found it made each article half it's original size after spinning. It seemed the 50% difference just meant 50% of it had gone!

bob_sikorski

Hi Gang,
Well, I guess I'll throw my $.02 in.

Why would anyone buy a product that didn't provide a refund policy? Red Flag is waving my friends.

Forget about looking for a spinner that will provide articles that you can just copy and post. There isn't one. Show me a spinner that has logic and feelings and I'll buy it from you.

Bob

discuss4u

I agree with Marc. I have used contentboss for a few days and the result are quite bad if you do not edit them.

But it really save me some time. I can make an article with about 500 words in 5 to 8 minutes with the PLR in Contentboss, which is not too bad. It will take me at least 15 minutes even if I tried to rewrite a PLR article. And the "human edited" wrangled PLR passes copyscape.

What I observed is that the contents from the PLRs are more readable. It is not really readable if you try to throw an existing article to it and wrangle it! I will say it is just rubbish if you try to wrangle an existing article...

And I am now testing the autoblogging (just subscribed this yesterday). I think it will take me 10 days or so in order to reveal it is good or not...