![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: , , .
Posts: 160
Thanks: 29
Thanked 20 Times in 14 Posts
|
After the MSN Loophole fiasco, I am a bit reluctant to buy any CR products. However I have heard good things about Chris Rempel's Conduit Method ebook. Is there anybody making a real full time income with the conduit method? I just would like to avoid wasting months on a nother useless system. Any input from somebody who has actually bought and implemented the system would be appreciated. Thanks AC |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi, I am just going to try this method. But i don't know it will be useful for me or not. before i start can anyone here who tried this? |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: , , USA.
Posts: 950
Thanks: 21
Thanked 17 Times in 15 Posts
|
I purchased the Conduit Method. As you probably already know, it has to do with running product review sites. The principles are sound. Look at Amazon.com - makes money even during a recession -- and they include reviews everywhere on their site. I don't follow his plan to the "t," but I have review sites that do generate sales. Another course, IPK or Info Product Killer has some really unique twists for building review sites focused on Amazon products.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2006 Location: , , USA.
Posts: 420
Thanks: 20
Thanked 77 Times in 38 Posts
|
Conduit method is legit. I do a form of it with my review blogs. I make more with those than I ever have with other types of affiliate marketing. Honesty sells. Who knew? FYI, this course is free in the War Room. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: , , .
Posts: 95
Thanks: 16
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: May 2004 Location: , , .
Posts: 357
Blog Entries: 1 Thanks: 35
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
Conduit method works if you work on it. Getting traffic is the main challenge, as always.
|
| | |
| | #7 |
| Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Yes I agree the truth is refreshing and sells thats always what I go for when reviewing a product!
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: , , .
Posts: 72
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
I haven't read about the "MSN Loophole" but don't get carried away because Conduit method is good as what others are saying.
|
| | |
| | #9 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Scotland
Posts: 418
Thanks: 60
Thanked 243 Times in 46 Posts
|
I wouldn't compare MSN Loophole with Conduit method really, Conduit method basically deals with online buying behavior, and is not really just about traffic, it's more about the buying process while MSN loop hole more like a quick trick to get traffic
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 11
Thanks: 13
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Just a quick question to anyone who is having success with the Conduit Method. What Title text seems to get the most clicks from Google? I've put up five of these review pages per the book and I'm on the first page of Google results for searches like "PRODUCT NAME review" and "PRODUCT NAME complaints" which is great, but I'm not really getting any traffic. I'm using the Title text suggested in the book, but it is not converting well to click throughs from search results. Right now I'm using: PRODUCT NAME Review - Consumer Report (With Feedback and Complaints). Suggestions for a better Title text?? Thanks! |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 62
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
I started using the conduit method when it was first released about what 5-6 months ago. I used one of the templates that Chris included in a VIP report as well. This was back in early October. I got halfway done with 1 conduit site (listed about 10-15 products) did some SEO, and had one 3 word keyword ranked in google on the first page. I stopped working on this site bout October 15th. So 1 conduit site halfway done with only 1 page ranked on the first page of google. No adwords or ANYTHING else. Took me about 2 days of work. From when I started till now I have made $650.... To me that is proof. If a half assed conduit site can make sales not being touched nor SEO loved in 4 months and still make money the method is a legit money maker. In fact I have made half of it in the last 2 months, even with my Search result rankings farther down the list. If you are willing to put in the work and build conduit site after conduit site and follow up with SEO love I have no doubt you can turn this into a cash cow. Just be prepared to do more in terms of "writing reviews" and such. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Northern Europe
Posts: 249
Thanks: 6
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
| The problem with the so-called "Loophole" was that it simply didn't work, even if you did everything as specified in the report. And this was a product endorsed by Cris Rempel.
|
| | |
| | #13 |
| Digital Emperor Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: NC
Posts: 1,008
Thanks: 251
Thanked 111 Times in 91 Posts
|
I thought about buying this system, but then you've got to buy the VIP package and it all looks like what his Lazy Marketer should have been.
|
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Patient SEO War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Zagreb, Croatia.
Posts: 120
Thanks: 12
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Nick Arthur War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: The original Perth (Scotland)
Posts: 436
Thanks: 80
Thanked 42 Times in 32 Posts
|
It's a solid method, but like anything else it requires work which some people are afraid of. I have made, and continue to make money from the conduit method. The problem is that so many people don't 'get it' or don't listen to what they're being told. The conduit method is about reporting the facts and ranking for long tail product names. I can't comment on the loophole method yet but I doubt very much that Chris would market something that doesn't work. I'd imagine the problems with it are more to do with implimentation than the method itself. Nick |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| conduit, making, method, money, real |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |