Linklicious VS. LinkClaw... What's your Vote???

anthonyrude · 04-17-2012, 10:58 PM

What do you think is better linklicious or linkclaw?

The difference I see is that linklicious will create a short url and then ping that link which is supposed to give you a better chance at getting that link live.

Plus, linklicious will build you links through the onehourbacklinks service and they will pay for the onehourbacklinking service if you use their service.

I would love to hear some thoughts from people who have first hand knowledge on linkbuilding and what works and what doesn't. Let's keep the guessing and theories out of this thread please.

Also, what do you think about using the linklicious service to build the links and then use the linkclaw to get the regular (not the shortened version of the links) indexed? Would this be a waste or cause any flags at google?

Can't wait to hear your thoughts.

HKSEO Extropy · 04-18-2012, 08:53 AM

Linklicious does exactly what it says - gets your links crawled and found and increasingly indexed by google. (Indexing isn't required to improve your ranking, which is an important distinction most SEOs don't fully appreciate)

I'm not familiar with linkclaw but do see that they use RSS feeds. We actually removed RSS feeds from Linklicious at least 6 months ago because it ended up HURTING rankings. There is a lot more backstory here, but that was the net result.

You can see a case study comparing the efficacy of link crawling/rss feeds/doing nothing but link building. It's on a different forum, but you can find it by searching "case study crawling comparison"

Jamus McKenna · 05-01-2012, 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HKSEO Extropy

Linklicious does exactly what it says - gets your links crawled and found and increasingly indexed by google. (Indexing isn't required to improve your ranking, which is an important distinction most SEOs don't fully appreciate)

I'm not familiar with linkclaw but do see that they use RSS feeds. We actually removed RSS feeds from Linklicious at least 6 months ago because it ended up HURTING rankings. There is a lot more backstory here, but that was the net result.

You can see a case study comparing the efficacy of link crawling/rss feeds/doing nothing but link building. It's on a different forum, but you can find it by searching "case study crawling comparison"

Would be nice (& fair) to declare how "independent" your view is...

Doing research on this subject right now. Will hopefully be back with results soon.

Cheers,

Jamus

jamesdj1 · 05-06-2012, 01:54 PM

Great thread guys...any updates?

JScoppa · 05-13-2012, 10:34 PM

Would love to hear more feedback as I am a member at both....

04-17-2012, 10:58 PM	#1
anthonyrude Beach Bum Join Date: May 2009 Location: Clearwater Beach, FL Posts: 138 Thanks: 61 Thanked 36 Times in 26 Posts	Linklicious VS. LinkClaw... What's your Vote??? What do you think is better linklicious or linkclaw? The difference I see is that linklicious will create a short url and then ping that link which is supposed to give you a better chance at getting that link live. Plus, linklicious will build you links through the onehourbacklinks service and they will pay for the onehourbacklinking service if you use their service. I would love to hear some thoughts from people who have first hand knowledge on linkbuilding and what works and what doesn't. Let's keep the guessing and theories out of this thread please. Also, what do you think about using the linklicious service to build the links and then use the linkclaw to get the regular (not the shortened version of the links) indexed? Would this be a waste or cause any flags at google? Can't wait to hear your thoughts.

04-18-2012, 08:53 AM	#2
HKSEO Extropy Active Warrior Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Houston, Tx Posts: 81 Thanks: 12 Thanked 17 Times in 12 Posts	Re: Linklicious VS. LinkClaw... What's your Vote??? Linklicious does exactly what it says - gets your links crawled and found and increasingly indexed by google. (Indexing isn't required to improve your ranking, which is an important distinction most SEOs don't fully appreciate) I'm not familiar with linkclaw but do see that they use RSS feeds. We actually removed RSS feeds from Linklicious at least 6 months ago because it ended up HURTING rankings. There is a lot more backstory here, but that was the net result. You can see a case study comparing the efficacy of link crawling/rss feeds/doing nothing but link building. It's on a different forum, but you can find it by searching "case study crawling comparison"

05-06-2012, 01:54 PM	#4
jamesdj1 Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Las Vegas Posts: 552 Thanks: 27 Thanked 39 Times in 32 Posts	Re: Linklicious VS. LinkClaw... What's your Vote??? Great thread guys...any updates?

05-13-2012, 10:34 PM	#5
JScoppa HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 184 Thanks: 30 Thanked 57 Times in 48 Posts	Re: Linklicious VS. LinkClaw... What's your Vote??? Would love to hear more feedback as I am a member at both....