Unique Article Wizard-Is It Worth It?

28 replies
I'm pretty sure people have heard of the Unique Article Wizard service, and I was wondering if I could get some reviews on it. The only reason is because it has a 67 dollar monthly fee, and I'm not too keen of the monthly recurring payments. Anyone have anything they would like to say about it?
#article #unique #wizardis #worth
  • Profile picture of the author Jeremy Kelsall
    It is more than worth it if you have the time to use it and you use it on a regular basis...

    If you only want to do a couple to a few blasts a month look at a service like isnare.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[715843].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author BillyMac856
      Yea thanx alot. I too was on the fence with UAW and 67/mo is quite a bit as I'm just getting started with IM. I don't have a problem with 67/mo. but my experience level doesn't yet warrant that price I think, I've also heard its tricky to use it the right way. I have "Instant Article Wizard Pro" right now, but I find that it returns junk, if it even returns anything at all. 7.00 1st. month and 27.00/mo after. I'm getting rid of it I think. Thanx for the advice
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1249743].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CashResolution
    Thank you for the share. I will check out isnare because I will not be doing that much with it for right now. Anyone Else?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[715886].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CashResolution
    I am looking at Isnare and was wondering if it is unique content that goes out, or is it just the same article?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[715902].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Gunter Eibl
    I can second what Jeremy says. You need to use it continuously. One submission won't do it but that is true for any submission service out there, no matter what name it has.

    The more articles you submit the more success you will notice. The advantage of UAW is that the articles don't get so easily removed as duplicate content by search engines so they stick longer.

    Gunter
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[762974].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
      Originally Posted by Gunter Eibl View Post

      The advantage of UAW is that the articles don't get so easily removed as duplicate content by search engines so they stick longer.

      Gunter
      There is no duplicate penalty - I wish people would stop spreading that myth around when it comes to article marketing. UAW can not control no search engine or the placement of your articles, this is a misleading statement that newbies may take it for what it says.

      I mean no disposition but facts are:

      * The article submitted is up to the article directory if they accept the article or not
      * Articles being posted by publishers is 100% upto the publisher if they want to post your article
      * Search enigines listing your article is a decision based on the search engine.

      UAW or no other websites controls this but by your statement you are saying that UAW does control this.. I realize you use UAW and want to push it as it is in your signature but to make statements of facts that are not facts is not right...

      James
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[763004].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author BigHef
        Originally Posted by TheRichJerksNet View Post

        There is no duplicate penalty - I wish people would stop spreading that myth around when it comes to article marketing. UAW can not control no search engine or the placement of your articles, this is a misleading statement that newbies may take it for what it says.

        I mean no disposition but facts are:

        * The article submitted is up to the article directory if they accept the article or not
        * Articles being posted by publishers is 100% upto the publisher if they want to post your article
        * Search enigines listing your article is a decision based on the search engine.

        UAW or no other websites controls this but by your statement you are saying that UAW does control this.. I realize you use UAW and want to push it as it is in your signature but to make statements of facts that are not facts is not right...

        James
        He means there are more instances of your article indexed in Google when using UAW, compared to just blasting one article. Which is correct.

        Your post is way, way too harsh, and quite ironic considering you are pushing your own similar UAW service in your own signature.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[789055].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Gunter Eibl
        Hi James

        - I said something about a penalty?
        - I said UAW controls something?
        - I'm pushing something?
        - I post wrong facts?

        Strange, I can see nothing of that in my post but thanks for proof-reading.

        Gunter
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[791131].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tonystai
    James,

    I don't think that is what Gunter was trying to say. I think he was saying that because of the spinning mechanism within UAW, content is more unique than just putting up the same article at 100 places.

    The affect of this is that the Search Engines may choose to display more versions of your article from different locations because they aren't identical.

    I agree that it is important to distinguish between the "duplicate penalty" myth and the choice of the Search Engines to only display 1 or 2 copies of the same article from the highest ranking site(s).

    My preference is to have many versions (albeit similar) of the same article distributed on the chance that Google will decide to display 10 or 15 of them. On the flip side, without variation, Google will likely only display 1 or 2 in most situations. I guess this is where you have decide, as an author, if this is a "penalty" or not.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[764002].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michelle Adams
      Depends what you expect it to do for your business.

      I used it for low rate backlinks but quickly realised that was a very expensive way to go about this..silly in fact! As for the spinning aspect, well I found that time consuming to actually work through and also am privy to the fact there is no off site duplicate content penalty. The price tag to me didn't justify it given all the other ways I could put that money to use to increase backlinks and traffic. Just my opinion...I'm sure there are others who use it for all manner of ways to make money, it just didn't suit my needs. Knowing what you expect the outcomes are for your business by using it is important to get specific reviews on that perhaps?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[764863].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Johnny999
        Hello, from my experience Unique Article Wizard brought my ecommerce site from nowhere in Google to page 2 .... it seemed to get my site tons of attention .. but that also could have been from other things, not sure. Was worth the $ for me.

        BUT, two months ago and now currently Google has dumped my site from search results for keywords .. from almost 1,000 unique visitors per day to less than 5! Last time the banishment lasted 14 days then mysteriously my site reappeared .. after I stopped article submissions. This time, its only been 2 days and I'm waiting to see what happens and will continue the submissions to see if UAW is the cause.

        Is this banishment a result of Unique Article Wizard???? Does anyone know or heard of incurring some sort of penalty from UAW?!?!?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[786993].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author anwar001
        Originally Posted by Michelle Adams View Post

        Depends what you expect it to do for your business.

        I used it for low rate backlinks but quickly realised that was a very expensive way to go about this..silly in fact! As for the spinning aspect, well I found that time consuming to actually work through and also am privy to the fact there is no off site duplicate content penalty. The price tag to me didn't justify it given all the other ways I could put that money to use to increase backlinks and traffic. Just my opinion...I'm sure there are others who use it for all manner of ways to make money, it just didn't suit my needs. Knowing what you expect the outcomes are for your business by using it is important to get specific reviews on that perhaps?
        May I know what methods do you use to build links which are less costly than UaW?
        Signature
        Get Hundreds of Super Targeted Traffic in Any Niche from Facebook - 3 Step Organic FB Marketing

        25 Guidelines For Massive Affiliate Success - Whether you are a beginner or an expert, read these principles and refer back to them many times
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[918705].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Michelle Adams
          Originally Posted by anwar001 View Post

          May I know what methods do you use to build links which are less costly than UaW?
          Sure. I use AAS. One off payment, loads of features. Angela's backlinks are also worth investing in IMO, great value.
          Hope that helps.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[919361].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Mark-Dickenson
            I was looking into UAW as I have a bunch of articles I ordered I need to get out...trying an article blast on a few sites as this months experiment

            The last few days I have feverishly been trying to find a good Article Submitter. Purchased two of the popular ones but nothing has come close to the Article Drip Robot...but I recently had problems with it...but I guess an update is comming out next week to solve the issues
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[919598].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author PaulusD
      Originally Posted by tonystai View Post

      James,

      I don't think that is what Gunter was trying to say. I think he was saying that because of the spinning mechanism within UAW, content is more unique than just putting up the same article at 100 places.

      The affect of this is that the Search Engines may choose to display more versions of your article from different locations because they aren't identical.

      I agree that it is important to distinguish between the "duplicate penalty" myth and the choice of the Search Engines to only display 1 or 2 copies of the same article from the highest ranking site(s).

      My preference is to have many versions (albeit similar) of the same article distributed on the chance that Google will decide to display 10 or 15 of them. On the flip side, without variation, Google will likely only display 1 or 2 in most situations. I guess this is where you have decide, as an author, if this is a "penalty" or not.
      If you are not sure, and you want to understand what duplicate content is and how spinners , mass submission etc. can KILL your article marketing business... Read Allen Graves' ARTICLE MARKETING HANDBOOK. You will be glad you did.

      I would just like to say that I used the UNIQUE ARTICLE WIZZARD for three months, and it did next to nothing for our business. Submitting to the right directories and using proper linking strategies is what will get results. I know...I learned the hard way. And lastly, I am not an affiliate of Allen Graves' , I don't promote ANY IM products at all, I am just putting out some good advice.

      Good luck to all of you.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1249186].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Bobb30
    If you use it, use it like crazy. There are no limits on the articles.

    It takes some time to format an article -- takes me about 20 to 30 minutes.
    The resource box takes the longest -- save often!

    If you submit one to two articles a day, set them to distribute at 50 a day,
    you will find after a couple of months you have articles EVERYWHERE!
    I have checked Google for my keywords and found my articles listed under
    article directories I've never heard of!

    So it is pretty cool. But you are right, it is pricey.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[787189].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author KelvinLee
    I find it too expensive especially for those of you who are just starting our with tight budget. You definitely can do a lot of thing with $67 a month.

    I am using Article Drip Robot and it only cost $27 per month and you can get to submit to 126 sites.

    If you are not planning to submit constantly, then I suggest you can save the money up and simply submit to Ezinearticles, ArticleBase, Article Dashboard, Web Site Pro and a few other high PR article directories manually to get backlinks.

    If you are submitting a lot of articles monthly, Article Drip Robot is good and it provides prompt service.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[788854].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author anwar001
      Thanks for mentioning article drip robot. I just came to know of this service I guess. Will try to check it out as I was looking for some cheap submission service.

      Originally Posted by KelvinLee View Post

      I find it too expensive especially for those of you who are just starting our with tight budget. You definitely can do a lot of thing with $67 a month.

      I am using Article Drip Robot and it only cost $27 per month and you can get to submit to 126 sites.

      If you are not planning to submit constantly, then I suggest you can save the money up and simply submit to Ezinearticles, ArticleBase, Article Dashboard, Web Site Pro and a few other high PR article directories manually to get backlinks.

      If you are submitting a lot of articles monthly, Article Drip Robot is good and it provides prompt service.
      Signature
      Get Hundreds of Super Targeted Traffic in Any Niche from Facebook - 3 Step Organic FB Marketing

      25 Guidelines For Massive Affiliate Success - Whether you are a beginner or an expert, read these principles and refer back to them many times
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[918727].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author AndyMi
    UAW has worked for me and continues to produce results so it gets my vote.

    Andy
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[789191].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WahbReview
    It works, for me, as advertised (what a shocking thing).

    I use it in conjuction with needanarticle.com amd have excellent results.

    I need rankings/traffic on multiple sites (always expanding) so the monthly is justified, for me.

    I can't compare it to any other product as this is the only one I use.

    The creation of the resource box is a pain (but neccessry) and I find I use copy/find/replace in a text editor as an alternative to the inbuilt tool.

    Being able to schedule and re-schedule is a great facility (not too many a day).

    Stats are provided (emailed) which is another nice touch.

    Instructions are simple to follow and learning curve is shallow.

    Can't speak to levels of support as I have never needed it.

    Bottom line - well worth the monthly (for me).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[790504].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mailcold
    It would be nice if someone can compare UAW with the tool "Automatic Article Submitter" by Milan Kosanovic. "Automatic Article Submitter" is only one time payment of $97.00 compared to monthly subscription of $67.00 of UAW
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[920728].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michelle Adams
      Originally Posted by mailcold View Post

      It would be nice if someone can compare UAW with the tool "Automatic Article Submitter" by Milan Kosanovic. "Automatic Article Submitter" is only one time payment of $97.00 compared to monthly subscription of $67.00 of UAW
      I've used both and found the monthly payment of UAW too much, I couldn't justify it for my particular needs.

      Automatic Article Submitter does have a spinner you can use manually. The one off fee is what I like, and how it auto registers so many accounts and all the email verifications are done automatically too, that saved me hours of work. I've been following Mark Mason's video tutorials of AAS and they're pretty good...the most recent one shows how the auto sign up and email verification works. You can see it on Mark's blog at Masonworld.com.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[921890].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Pelician
      Originally Posted by mailcold View Post

      It would be nice if someone can compare UAW with the tool "Automatic Article Submitter" by Milan Kosanovic. "Automatic Article Submitter" is only one time payment of $97.00 compared to monthly subscription of $67.00 of UAW

      Recently, i saw a post from Allen Grave to advise us not to subscribe to UAW. He mention that UAW caused a lot of troubles to the article directory owners as well as blog owners in the past. I would definitely listen to Allen Grave as he is one of the most well respected article marketer i ever came across in this forum.

      Pelicia
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[971595].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author rody
    Originally Posted by guitarpw View Post

    try article writer pro...
    does anyone know if this is any good?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[927807].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author raphaelgaga
    Bottom line, it has helped me generate lots of backlinks. That was my primary goal and this goal was accomplished using this software. Also its owner runs his business well so if you have customer service issues, they will get back to your promptly. Recommended.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1114678].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author int-mark
    I used UAW and it said that you would proabbly get in the region of 500 - 1000 backlinks but then when I checked to see how many artcles were in the search engines there were no where near as many. Maybe this is because my article wasn't good and wasn't accepted. I don't know. Can anyone think of the reason for this?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1115648].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author diggy20
      I've been using both UAW and AMAutomation and I think I'm more happy with the results I'm getting with UAW. Although UAW is a little more expensive, I find that I get quite a bit more backlinks with it. Just make sure you are using spun articles as it makes submitting articles to a UAW a lot easier.
      Signature
      SENuke too expensive? Create powerful automated web bots using UBot. Use discount code: BOTSALE before you buy.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1117656].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author silverbax
        I use UAW for backlinks and then create 2.0 backlinks into those pages. It works great for backlinks. Traffic, I get some from UAW, but not really a flood of buying traffic, at least not yet, and I have used the service for several months. I get all my sales from other sources, INCLUDING non-UAW articles.

        - You have to use it consistently (as in, at least one article a week, but do as many as you can, If you can do 20 a day, do 20 a day)

        - Your own articles will almost always outrank UAW articles in Google, but I have had articles from UAW that I never heard of, saw, or linked to show up in Google on page 1 for highly competitive keywords. The only problem? Usually UAW spun articles are designed by the site owners to monetize with ads, and that means you 'liitle' link might be way down, hidden or hardly even noticeable. For example, let's say you have a spun article on 'fishing lures'. You might have dozens of great articles out there that have obvious backlinks, but those might not be the ones on Google's top 10. So does it really help to have a page in the top 10 of Google, that when people read there's little chance of them getting to your site?

        - backlinks, backlinks, backlinks. Works great. Forget what anybody ever tells you about nofollow, duplicate content on multiple sites, etc. If you stop to think about it, Google can't possibly penalize for those things on a broad basis, because they would wipe out all the AP stories, newspaper sites, legit blogs, etc. They might slap a site or an IP individually, but trying to do that on a broad basis? Forget it.

        - I have read several places that state you should 'blast' your articles out at 50 a pop. I have tried every amount imaginable, and for me the best is about 20 a day. There are a lot of article directories that simply won't pick up an article right away, or won't be an actual directory at all, but a free blog that gets shut down. But whenever I blast out 50 or more a day, I never get the amount of total successful submissions as I do with 20 a day. I have submitted two articles of the same length and topic, one at 50 a day and the other at 20, and the 20-per-day will get almost twice as many successful posts. Might be anecdotal, but it's my experience.

        - As far as someone's site appears on page 1, then falling to page 50, then page 1, then not in the index at all, etc.; Google's hardly consistent. You have to think of it as if the search results are a huge vat of sludge and a big Google arm comes in a constantly stirs it, trying to get the good stuff on the top. And now, imagine there isn't just one vat but hundreds and hundreds of vats. That's what your dealing with. Over time, you should be able to stick consistently, but day to day, you can just forget it.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1118442].message }}

Trending Topics