![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: , , .
Posts: 143
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Hi, I was looking at the number of searches on some keywords but there seems to be differing results by Google KeywordToolExternal and Aaron Well's SEOBook keyword-tools. I understand that the mechanism or logarithms behind these 2 are different. What intrigued me was that the differences of quite off between these 2 keyword tool. Logically speaking, any user who, for example keyed in "soccer shoes" in the Google should be consider as 1 search whether in SEOBook or Google. Or rather, which is more accurate? Thanks, Patrick |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: , , .
Posts: 1,184
Thanks: 63
Thanked 92 Times in 84 Posts
|
Not really positive on this, but they use different searchengine results, and I think Google uses both search and content results, so impressions (Adsense) are added in their results. So even though most people swear by Google's tool I tend to use SEO book and wordtracker results. Alan |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Franck Silvestre War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Guadeloupe (Caribbean Sea)
Posts: 3,387
Blog Entries: 51 Thanks: 42
Thanked 165 Times in 92 Posts
|
Google is its database (and other things nobody knows), while wordtracker use dogpile and a few other search engines, and meta tags. That's why it's different. In fact, you should use wordtracker numbers as an indicator of the popularity to compare between your projects or different keywords. |
| >> Click Here To Register To The QuickStart Offline Income Webinar << | Affiliate Marketing Training Kevin Riley said: "Franck, glad to see you bringing out MORE and MORE GREAT stuff" | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Trust Christ Alone War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,014
Thanks: 63
Thanked 808 Times in 392 Posts
|
I gave up on paid keyword providers a while back. They just aren't accurate. Google's own KW Tool is sufficient, if you know how to apply the volumes.
|
| Read this SURPRISING REPORT Before You Buy ANY WSO! Click Here FREE REPORT: Split Test Your Landing Pages the Easy Way | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: , , .
Posts: 143
Thanks: 15
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Trust Christ Alone War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,014
Thanks: 63
Thanked 808 Times in 392 Posts
|
learningbase: Search the forums for the word GTEF and you'll find several very lengthy posts from me on the subject, and the actual formula I use and teach. |
| Read this SURPRISING REPORT Before You Buy ANY WSO! Click Here FREE REPORT: Split Test Your Landing Pages the Easy Way | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Southern California
Posts: 709
Thanks: 483
Thanked 221 Times in 125 Posts
|
I agree with Steven. I use the search volume and competition numbers as a general guideline and nothing more. I have used many, many keyword tools and find they all return very different numbers. Of all the keyword tools I have used (both free and paid) the one I like and continue to use on a pretty consistent basis is Micro Niche Finder. It's not free, but it organizes everything I generally need in one nice place and makes research more efficient (for me, at least). |
| Last edited by Kevin Koop; 07-08-2009 at 03:05 PM. Reason: forgot a word | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Trust Christ Alone War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Central Florida
Posts: 3,014
Thanks: 63
Thanked 808 Times in 392 Posts
|
Kevin: MNF is the only paid tool I use, too. |
| Read this SURPRISING REPORT Before You Buy ANY WSO! Click Here FREE REPORT: Split Test Your Landing Pages the Easy Way | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| google, keywordtoolexternal, keywordtools, seobook |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |