![]() | | ||||||||
| |||||||
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools |
| | #1 |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Does anyone use a 30" Monitor/Display? If yes, does it really help improve productivity? And what is your opinion on having multiple desktops. The extended ones where you keep moving the mouse and it appears on the other screen. |
|
| | #2 |
| SEO & PLR Guru War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: London, Manchester, UK
Posts: 774
Thanks: 281
Thanked 113 Times in 55 Posts
|
Does it help productivity, OK so how do you explain this one? I am going to be loving some of the replies here. I use a 20" display moved up from a 17" and that improved productivity so perhaps if I went to a 30" display productivity would multiply 10 fold... is that a good enough excuse to buy one? I am actually going to be buying a new 24" display soon so I will post back with my feedback. As for multiple displays, I do think this makes life a lot easier for IMers. I used to do this when I had the space and it just meant multi tasking was much easier. However it does get more tempting to play Counter Strike Source whilst pretending your doing some Internet marketing work. =P Either way, the dual screen is a great benefit for IMers and it looks good |
| Sticky PLR - Quality, Affordable PLR **Coming Soon** Grab You Free PLR Health Articles Now **4 Articles Per Month** ***Market Samurai - No.1 Online Marketing Software - Read Review*** | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Lancashire, United Kingdom.
Posts: 1,534
Thanks: 218
Thanked 209 Times in 177 Posts
| Not sure if it would improve productivity but it would sure make the movies more enjoyable.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Trust Establisher War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Long Island, NY.
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 526
Thanked 170 Times in 127 Posts
|
IMO dual monitors would be more productive then just 1 large monitor due to the increase in available work space.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 54
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
My main system has 4 19in monitors, but I have used multiple monitors for years. I believe it does improve productivity, even more so than 1 really large monitor. The productivity comes simply due to being able to view open applications at the same time when needed, especially handy when doing web design and viewing output in multiple environments (FFox, IE). Also handy for research and articles and many other work processes. I am reminded of this thread, check out Andy's setup at post 45. Dual-Screen Productivity |
|
"To know that you know, and to know that you don't know - that is real wisdom." - Confucious | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| No excuses - Just do it War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Sydney
Posts: 3,319
Thanks: 766
Thanked 1,365 Times in 686 Posts
| |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Advanced Warrior Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 601
Thanks: 264
Thanked 189 Times in 134 Posts
| |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Montreal, QC, Canada.
Posts: 621
Thanks: 163
Thanked 160 Times in 55 Posts
|
Yes ![]() Since you can have more windows opened at the same time, but as was mentioned earlier, it is even better to have 2 monitors... |
| | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 211
Thanks: 45
Thanked 30 Times in 28 Posts
|
I've dual monitors but thats basically because i am also a forex trader, but if i had a 30" monitor my productivity sure would decline because i am a sucker for movies. And i am not sure if dual monitors would increase productivity i feel like it would compromise your focus ... but thats just my opinion
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: NY
Posts: 89
Thanks: 17
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
I personally use 1 24" monitor. I really want to get a second but right now, there is no need for it. I have many things open at once and sometimes one screen gets too clustered. I also have a 2 port KVM switch ( recently downgraded from a 4 port ) |
| | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| HyperActive Warrior |
I actually have two systems on my desk, but both are fairly *old* (ie more than five years) so I devote one system to skype, music and other minor stuff that doesn't need much of a fast system to run, and use my main PC for work stuff. It works. I would like a new system, but I would feel quite guilty since my online earnings barely make $200pm. Kenneth |
|
Purely Coffee Beans - The only way to drink good coffee!
| |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| AT gmail DOT com War Room Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 6,947
Blog Entries: 4 Thanks: 1,740
Thanked 5,485 Times in 2,510 Posts
| Quote:
A massive monitor will dramatically improve productivity for VISUAL work. Graphics, video, web design. Multiple monitors will dramatically improve productivity for ANYONE. I found that programmers get kind of lost on a monitor over 24", and at the time you pretty much couldn't get anything bigger than 27". So my general rule of thumb was to put three 21" monitors on their desks, then one 21" with the biggest two monitors I could afford on the graphics people's desks. I couldn't effectively measure productivity for the graphics people (no engineering component at all there), but I found that two monitors made about a 30% improvement in productivity for programmers, and three upped it to right around 50% - which is pretty damn good for a $600 investment, considering what you can bill for programming work. The graphics people were a lot more expensive, and it was just impossible to measure the results. But they were a lot happier, and honestly, when you can't measure someone's work output... just look at how happy they are. Happy people do better work. Watch out for flatscreens, which have a native resolution just like laptops. Get the highest one you can, or you'll just end up with blocky, crappy displays that I believe would actually hurt productivity. | |
| Donate to the Darklock Liquor Fund Hey; I got nothin' to do today but smile, 'n-da, 'n-da, doo-da, and here I am. | ||
| | |
| | #14 |
| Opposer Of Oppression Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Singapore.
Posts: 52
Thanks: 1
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
|
To me, more screen real estate increases productivity when you don't have to keep changing windows when you are working on a certain project... like writing an article, where you have Word on one half of the screen and a web browser with all your research material on the other half of the screen. However, it is a double edge sword. It can also decrease productivity when you utilise a larger screen to have distractors (like twitter, facebook, msn, etc.) open at the same time. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: Beautiful South Florida
Posts: 24
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
I use a 37" as my main screen and a 20" widescreen as a secondary monitor. Would a bigger monitor help you? It depends on what you're trying to do with it. Do you find yourself switching between windows all the time? Do you need a spreadsheet, calculator, MP3 player, and Mozilla open and visible at the same time? I like to keep my music, instant messages, calculators, and brushes/palates open (for photoshop, etc.) on the smaller screen and have the bigger one for my workspace. I can get just as much work done on my 15" laptop, I'm just switching between tabs/windows more often. ~defy |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Copywriter War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: The Dark Basement
Posts: 553
Thanks: 10
Thanked 57 Times in 40 Posts
| Quote: | |
| | ||
| | |
| | #17 |
| Advanced Warrior Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Romania
Posts: 814
Thanks: 124
Thanked 105 Times in 68 Posts
|
I think you have to be careful if you are going to use 2 monitors...I've seen that plenty of people use the second monitor to so they can keep their IM window open, their website's live stats, the email notifier etc... So if your not careful you might find yourself doing less work because you will always be looking at the stats, sales, messages etc.. |
|
"Nothing in this world that's worth having comes easy..."
| |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Ross Carrel War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Tampa, FL/Vegas, NV
Posts: 356
Blog Entries: 1 Thanks: 4
Thanked 60 Times in 39 Posts
|
Huge fan of the dual setup. I have one 23" and a 19" next to it. It really helps for screencast especially with powerpoint. It's also great for graphics work. Less moving around all your tools and whatnot. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Posts: 743
Thanks: 245
Thanked 52 Times in 31 Posts
| |
| | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: TX
Posts: 58
Thanks: 25
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
I have two 21" monitors at my day job. One 19" at home. I am MUCH more productive when I have room to spread out, but like others have mentioned, I also have to be careful not to let the extra room lead to distraction.
|
| | |
| | #21 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: The Left Coast, USA
Posts: 477
Thanks: 250
Thanked 165 Times in 112 Posts
|
I have dual 22" monitors and there's a significant productivity boost when I use them correctly. Conversely there's a decline in productivity when one is stuck on the WF as it has been for the last week I'd take two smaller monitors over 1 any day and I think 2 30" monitors would be too large of a field of vision. |
| "Test fast, fail fast, adjust fast." Tom Peters | |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Ungrateful S.O.B. War Room Member Join Date: May 2006 Location: Ellijay, GA, USA. (Talk about being in the woods!)
Posts: 1,393
Thanks: 253
Thanked 57 Times in 45 Posts
|
I added a second monitor last Christmas when my son gave me a dual monitor graphics card. I have been extremely pleased to be able to have one monitor rotated so that I can view full page documents in portrait mode on one monitor, and in full size landscape mode on the other monitor. Even though I wind up using only one window most of the time, as senility seems to be keeping me from multi-tasking, I also think the second monitor makes it a lot easier to switch between Windows as there is a greater definition (or delineation if you prefer) between the objects. Kirk |
| "We are not here to sell a parcel of boilers and vats, but the potentiality of growing rich beyond the dreams of avarice." Dr. Samuel Johnson (Presiding at the sale of Thrales brewery, London, 1781) | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| No Silver Spoon War Room Member Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Bottom of the World
Posts: 157
Thanks: 0
Thanked 102 Times in 9 Posts
|
I've been using a 5 monitor setup for over a year now, graduating from a dual - then 3 monitor setup some years back. I use 4 screens for work, and a separate matching screen of the same size for my 7 security cameras. I would use all 5 monitors for work if I could because of the hugely improved productivity I get from the extra real estate, but my main PC only takes 2 dual graphics cards... so the fifth screen runs off a separate PC. I do current work on the center screen, Outlook sits on the left-hand screen, and the other two hold reference stuff or any of the graphics programs I use like PageMaker, Dreamweaver and Photoshop. For all multiple screens I bought the same brand in standard format (4:3) HP 19" instead of widescreen. The advantage here is that all windows open to fill the screen exactly without distortion, wasted edges or having to resize. I use Ultramon to get the cursor and windows working across all screens, and it's ideal for flicking windows instantly from one screen to another. I often have a dozen windows stacked up on one monitor - all open window tabs can be viewed at the bottom of each screen they are in, so this means no lost windows. Another reason for using multiple monitors is that I've started using RoboForm with the only browser that works with it - Firefox. FF is extremely slow to open compared to Chrome, or my previous favorite Opera (I'm a speed freak!) So I can be working on another screen while RoboForm and FF yawns its way through the log-in process. Here's an example of why I haven't gone to a large screen. For a while I was going to switch to Mac after a series of Windoze disasters. I have a 24" iMac which I use for videoconferencing to various family members round the globe, and a while back I experimented using it instead of multiple screens with the object of eventually using 3 Mac 30" screens. It was a waste of time. Each window I opened on the iMac came up in a different place on the screen, and after opening a few windows they became impossible to find or use in any sequence. It only took a few minutes to return to my multiple PC monitors. Good luck with your choice! |
| | |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Advanced Warrior Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: West Sussex, UK
Posts: 601
Thanks: 264
Thanked 189 Times in 134 Posts
| |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: May 2009 Location: London, UK
Posts: 28
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
We all use 2 monitors here, and I find it near impossible to return to 1. Those of you on a MAC; that use Spaces to its full capacity; combined with dual monitors - will know exactly what I am taking about. Huge difference in productivity levels. |
|
Live SEO Chat with real SEO/PPC Management experts 24x7-365. The only SEO Agency open 24x7. We never close.
| |
| | |
| | #26 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: Ohio, USA.
Posts: 382
Thanks: 8
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
|
I have one 24, The 24" iMac. That apple display is far better than anything I have ever seen. If you want to buy that monitor by itself from apple, it's $899. I actually got a headache the first day I had it cause it was so bright and sharp. Killer colors on that thing too. I could definitely see having another 24 at some point. It would look ridiculous I think, but awesome.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA
Posts: 647
Thanks: 6
Thanked 37 Times in 33 Posts
|
I used a second monitor with my laptop for awhile. I had to take it down as I would end up playing movies or hulu on the side one distracting me from my work. :P
|
| | |
| | #28 |
| Kezz Bracey War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Australia
Posts: 1,291
Blog Entries: 5 Thanks: 323
Thanked 596 Times in 291 Posts
|
It all depends on what kind of work you do really. I good litmus test is to ask yourself: A) How many windows do I usually have open at a time? and B) How much time do I spend switching between those windows? If you have high answers to both those questions, dual monitors are a win for you. |
| | |
| | |
| | #29 | |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
| |
|
| | #30 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: , , .
Posts: 1,719
Thanks: 391
Thanked 886 Times in 390 Posts
|
I've always loved my dual monitors, and could never go back to a single monitor. It makes things much faster to be able to just spread out the programs I'm working with. However, I've always been very jealous of Chris Pirillo's setup: |
| | |
| | |
| | #31 |
| Senior Warrior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: US of A
Posts: 2,190
Thanks: 47
Thanked 257 Times in 211 Posts
|
24" @1920 x 1200 will display 2 pages. That's as big as I would go... then I'd double triple or quadruple displays and make sure you have the hardware to drive them all. At some point the movement of your head and eyes across a flat plane becomes tiresome. With multiple displays you can move and tilt them as needed. The Anthro Cart Wrap is a nice set up Elevate Wrap: Electric Table, Video Editing Furniture, Design My monitor arm actually cost more than my monitor! |
| | |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Senior Warrior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: US of A
Posts: 2,190
Thanks: 47
Thanked 257 Times in 211 Posts
|
24" @1920 x 1200 will display 2 pages. That's as big as I would go... then I'd double triple or quadruple displays and make sure you have the hardware to drive them all. At some point the movement of your head and eyes across a flat plane becomes tiresome. With multiple displays you can move and tilt them as needed. The Anthro Cart Wrap is a nice set up Elevate Wrap: Electric Table, Video Editing Furniture, Design My monitor arm actually cost more than my monitor! |
| | |
| | |
| | #33 |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I just installed the Ultramon software and the ability to switch windows with a single click or shortcut is amazing.
|
|
| | #34 |
| HyperActive Warrior Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: , , .
Posts: 257
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
30" is way too big. I use two 19" wide screen and would like to upgrade to two 21" Two monitors are the way to go and ideally the same model. Or at the very least, same size and height. |
|
Marketing Laser Glasses | |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Mastermind Marketer War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: , , Israel.
Posts: 1,335
Thanks: 362
Thanked 296 Times in 130 Posts
|
I believe that the productivity will get down. Since you have more space on your screen it probably will lead to you having multiple applications up and running which can only decrease productivity... Igor |
| | |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Sales Writer/Coach Join Date: May 2009 Location: Muar, Malaysia
Posts: 59
Thanks: 8
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
I don't know if 30" will improve the performance; but it'll DEFINITELY improve the ego! :-) lol. It'll impress friends no end! BUT TWO x monitors will DEFINITELY increase productivity. I have 2 x 22" and when I use my 17" laptop I feel CRAMPED. Bill |
| Bill Oliver (B.Bus. Banking & Finance, Computing) Sales Writer/Marketing Coach, Resume: www.billoliver.net NICHES: Financial Sector, Sales & Services, Brick & Mortar SMEs. btw I'm an Australian living in Malaysia & a 1978 Fiat X1/9 owner. | |
| | |
| | #37 |
| Active Warrior Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 54
Thanks: 1
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
Here is some information that I'd posted last year regarding multiple monitors. I thought the information worth reposting again: I think Dual Screen / Multiple Monitors are one of best PC configurations to improve productivity in so many ways, especially with flat panel monitors making more space available on the desk. Just a few tips from my perspective:
![]() ... Also I believe there are solutions that allow you to use another PC's monitor over a network as though it were part of 1 PC (without the need for special video cards?) but I haven't actually tried this. |
|
"To know that you know, and to know that you don't know - that is real wisdom." - Confucious | |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Psychology KING War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 154
Thanks: 279
Thanked 41 Times in 18 Posts
|
It's weird to me that nobody mentions the financial side of the equation. Two months ago I was still having a three monitor setup (I couldn't fit more onto my desk). Two 20'' and one 19''. I was veeeery happy with that and I miss my third monitor. I gave the 19'' away when the old CRT of a family member broke down. Sucked. Anyway, I wanted to get the most for the smallest budget. So, I made the following calculations: I wanted as many pixels as possible for as little money as possible. Let's take a look at what we have here: 19'': 1440x900 --- 110 20'': 1680 x 1050 --- 144 21'': Can't find any offer for that one right now. 21.5'': 1920 x 1080 --- 175 22'': 1680 x 1050 --- 130 23'': 1920 x 1080 --- 170 24'': 1920 x 1080 --- 220 26'': 1920 x 1200 --- 300 30'': 2560 x 1600 --- 1500 All prices and specs are taken from hardwareversand.de - Startseite 1. We can already see that a 30'' would be absolutely stupid to buy if you simply want more pixels. I agree, for movies and games a 30'' is awesome, but it does not equate to productivity. 2. A year ago the prices were a lot different. I probably would've picked something else than two 20'' screens. Hmm, let's see... 3. I will not care about the fact whether or not you have a second graphics card. I will just assume that four monitors are a possible setup for you. 4. Two 19'' give you 2880px for just 220. Two 22'' however will give you a whopping 3360px for just 40 more (260). This is an awesome deal, that's 480px more for just 40. That's at least on AIM/ICQ/MSN window in width. 5. Three 19'' give you 4320px for 330. Three 22'' give you 5040px for 390. That is 720px more for 60 more. Sounds good to me, but let's see what four monitors would do... 6. Four 19'' give you 5760px for 440. Four 22'' give you 6720px for 520. That's 960px more for just an extra 80. 960px equates to a normal browser window. One browser window more, that's not bad, is it? This is 0.08 per added px if you take the four 22''s. 7. In case you wonder: I've worked with 22'' instead of 20'' since they are cheaper on that particular site. If you find a good deal for 20'' then go for them, they sport he same amount of pixels. 8. Two 23'' give you 3840px for 340. Two 22'' give you 3360px for 260. 480px more for 80? Doesn't sound that great to me. That's 0.16 per added px if you take the 23''s. 9. Three 23'' give you 5760px for 510. Three 22'' give you 5040px for 390. That's 720px more for 120. Still 0.16 per added px if you take the 23''s (which makes sense if you think logical... But I still had to calculate that with my calculator, stupid me )10. Four 23'' give you 7680px for 680. Four 22'' give you 6720px for 520. That's 960px more (again a whole browser window) for an extra 160. 11. Just to play around: 2 x 30'' = 5120px --- 3000 3 x 30'' = 7680px --- 4500 4 x 30'' = 10240px --- 6000 Conclusions: I don't know, but SOMEHOW the 30'' does not strike me as a very good investment if you want pure pixels over movies and prestige. ![]() I'd personally take 4 x 23'' for 680 if I had the money. I know it would be damn worth it and I would feel like god having this setup running. 7680px stupidly much and since I have a million windows oen I would be in heaven. If you only want two monitors then go for the two 22'' for 260. Taking two 23'' is tempting but it's 80 more for 480px. You have to decide. (To be honest, I'm a bit confused what I would take myself right now. Just give me the four 23'' and I'm happy! )Also, keep in mind that more pixels do not beat more monitors. If I had the choice between 3 x 19'' and 2 x 23'' I would always take the 3 x 19''. A lot of people work with their windows maximized and on three 19'' you can have three windows maximized, on two 23'' you can only have two. Additionally do not forget that more monitors help you getting windows "out of the way". Sometimes I do not want to care about my instant messenger windows and "ban" them onto my third monitor (well, when I had one anyway...). They are still there if I want to see them but they do not distract me anymore. This does not work as good with a two monitor setup. Ok, that was long. I hope I could help you all a bit! |
| | |
| | |
| | #39 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Detroitish
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I just upgraded to two monitors and love it, right now I'm participating in a WSO webinar and its great to have the webinar up in one monitor and my browser open in another. It also works well for plr rewrites. Peace Dave |
| | |
| | #40 |
| Super-Net-Marketing-Hero War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: USA
Posts: 318
Thanks: 76
Thanked 27 Times in 22 Posts
|
I found this on amazon you might find it interesting :P I'll probably get 2 of these for a new computer I'm soon gonna buy: |
| Article writing services still available! | |
| | |
| | #41 |
| Lateral Marketer War Room Member Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 155
Thanks: 19
Thanked 41 Times in 23 Posts
|
I use a 30" lcd that I got about a year ago for 1k from tiger direct. I use it for a lot of gaming though also. It's nice |
| | |
| | #42 | |
| Psychology KING War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Hamburg, Germany
Posts: 154
Thanks: 279
Thanked 41 Times in 18 Posts
| Quote:
| |
| | ||
| | |
| | #43 |
| Banned War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 107
Thanks: 22
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
Ive got a 30inc apple hd display. Its awesome. I think it helps, since things are way less cluttered. |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| does anyone use a 30, improve, monitor or display, productivity |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |