Freelancer Won't Sign NDA - Skip Them?

52 replies
Hi guys, I've had a couple of freelancers say they won't sign an NDA - non-disclosure agreement.

What's your take on that? Really the task at hand is simple link building. I just don't want the list of links exposed or given away or anything of that nature.

Would you skip out on using a freelancer who won't sign an NDA if you wanted to use their services? What's your take on that. What do you think?
#freelancer #nda #sign #skip
  • Profile picture of the author bieke81
    I would. I only outsource to people I can trust, so if they don't want to give me the security I need (by signing the NDA) I can't work with them. It's as easy as that.

    Leslie
    Signature
    Taking it one day at a time!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996057].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author MarkH45
      Originally Posted by bieke81 View Post

      I would. I only outsource to people I can trust, so if they don't want to give me the security I need (by signing the NDA) I can't work with them. It's as easy as that.

      Leslie
      I agree with Leslie , with how competitive the freelance marketplace is I'm sure you can find a different freelancer who you trust and will sign the NDA.
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996073].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author WritingMadwoman
      It's curious that they won't sign one, in my opinion. Makes you wonder what other motives they may have for your work. I've never had a client ask me to sign an NDA but I certainly wouldn't have a problem with it.

      One time a potential client wanted me to sign a non-compete agreement for a particular niche but I had to refuse because I already have a website in that niche.

      But a non-disclosure is totally different, it just means respecting the client's privacy and protecting their sensitive information - which is something that all freelancers should be doing regardless of whether there is a signed agreement or not.

      Wendy
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996089].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author waken
    Hehe.. perhaps you have too many details and tiny ones in your NDA which to some people is some kind of a legal bind / constraint. And they were too sensitive when you touch about legal formalities with them of which they know little about. Some who signed don't even bother reading it or perhaps following..

    Just explain to them it's for filing purpose and a company procedures. Nothing to be worried.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996067].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ilike
    Yes, I would not work with them. It's quite standard to ask for this. What was their reason for refusing to sign it? Just curious...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996068].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Adeel_Chowdhry
    Originally Posted by MattSanti View Post

    Hi guys, I've had a couple of freelancers say they won't sign an NDA - non-disclosure agreement.

    What's your take on that? Really the task at hand is simple link building. I just don't want the list of links exposed or given away or anything of that nature.

    Would you skip out on using a freelancer who won't sign an NDA if you wanted to use their services? What's your take on that. What do you think?
    I run a link building service and no one has asked for an NDA on that before!

    I personally wouldn't even worry about that.. they use the same list of directories for everyone anyway... not biggie.

    Best regards,
    ~ Adeel
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996079].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author marciayudkin
      Hi guys, I've had a couple of freelancers say they won't sign an NDA - non-disclosure agreement.

      What's your take on that? Really the task at hand is simple link building. I just don't want the list of links exposed or given away or anything of that nature.
      When I refuse to sign an NDA, I always have a good reason.

      And if more than one has had this response, I would wonder if there is something wrong with the wording of the NDA.

      Marcia Yudkin
      Signature
      Check out Marcia Yudkin's No-Hype Marketing Academy for courses on copywriting, publicity, infomarketing, marketing plans, naming, and branding - not to mention the popular "Marketing for Introverts" course.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996093].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author stma
        Originally Posted by marciayudkin View Post

        When I refuse to sign an NDA, I always have a good reason.

        And if more than one has had this response, I would wonder if there is something wrong with the wording of the NDA.

        Marcia Yudkin
        That's my thought. I've read a few that mean they won't be able to work with your competitors, have to give you info they wouldn't normally share, etc...
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996100].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by marciayudkin View Post

        When I refuse to sign an NDA, I always have a good reason.

        And if more than one has had this response, I would wonder if there is something wrong with the wording of the NDA.

        Marcia Yudkin
        DING DING! MARCIA GETS IT RIGHT!!!!!!!!

        A LOT of foreigners will sign WITHOUT A MOMENTS THOUGHT, but have NO intention of honoring it, figuring you can't touch them. That is FACT, SORRY!!!!!! Some NON foreigners will sign it, WITHOUT a thought, because they DON'T CARE, and figure you won't sue anyway.

        In short, signing means LITTLE!

        But HEY, I had one company that asked me to sign a special NDA. I bet you heard of them. They practically OWN the LARGE capital city they are based in. Even the POLICE told me that. To give you an IDEA of how big they are, they traded over 4.2 million shares last friday, are on the NYSE, and outstanding stock is almost 17Billion. Somehow, I don't think you would call them a small business. ALSO, they have LOTS of lawyers!

        GUESS WHAT! I told them I would NOT sign! WHY? Because the wording was such that it would basically allow them to force me to work for NOBODY else! I crossed out HUGE parts of it, and what did THEY do?

        THEY HIRED ME! I did my job. I won't even tell you WHAT I did for them. You might have guessed who they likely are, but I haven't said. But they almost certainly are getting new business, lowering costs, and reducing fraud, because of what I did for them. There are a LOT of potential benefits.

        As for the NDA? What they had a right to cover is something I would not have disclosed ANYWAY! HECK, I have worked for companies and had potential access to patients, donors, customers, vendors, etc.... Did I copy it? NOPE!

        So what can you take away?

        1. NDAs that say people can't say that somebody purchased fast food from a standard place (like KFC, with no other specifics), or that say that michael jackson at one time purchased laundry detergent(with no other specifics), or that the signer can't add 2+2 anymore(like the one that BIG company wanted me to sign), are ILLEGAL! NDAs that say they can never use a standard method, such as javascript, html, etc.... are ILLEGAL! TECHNICALLY, they are unenforcible. STILL, they can be a NUISANCE!
        2. NDAs do NOT prevent or prove anything! They only may enforce your case should you decide to sue, if they break the contract.
        3. A person may decide not to sign because they are MORE honest.

        BTW I read ALL NDAs! SOME I sign, and some I start crossing things out, and make it clear I have to do so. NOBODY has not hired me because I didn't agree!

        BTW with me it is a GIVEN that I should not release vendor lists, customer lists, unique processes, etc.... I NEVER have! And that is a GOOD thing! I have had to deal with data that HIPPA, PCI, etc... would NOT allow me to release. I have dealt with some BIG companies! Ones over 100 years old, and ones well into the tens of BILLIONS USD!

        But there IS a limit! For example, I can tell you I worked for a company that even collected iron level stats for people. Out of respect for the company, I won't name it, though the law may allow me, and I doubt the company would care. I could MAYBE even tell you if a sex were more likely to have that. MAYBE even a race. If I started narrowing that down to a birth date, or even a person, I could be in SEVERE trouble. I wouldn't do that and, I didn't even really look at such data, so I doubt I could tell you if you gave me truth serum.

        As for that company, I could tell you the NYSE data because it is PUBLIC! The company could NOT forbid me to reveal that. But I wouldn't give you ANY data you couldn't get in PUBLIC reports.

        HECK, I once worked at a place and COULD have been on TV announcing various things. The company said not to. I DIDN'T! I wouldn't have anyway.

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996529].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Jesus Perez
        Agreed. If the OP will upload the NDA, I'll be happy to give my thoughts. Until then, everything is speculation.

        Originally Posted by marciayudkin View Post

        When I refuse to sign an NDA, I always have a good reason.

        And if more than one has had this response, I would wonder if there is something wrong with the wording of the NDA.

        Marcia Yudkin
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1015256].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author George Wright
      And that is why they won't sign it and that is why I don't blame them. If you can't work with them not signing then of course move on. However, understand why they won't sign.

      George Wright

      Originally Posted by Adeel_Chowdhry View Post

      I run a link building service and no one has asked for an NDA on that before!

      I personally wouldn't even worry about that.. they use the same list of directories for everyone anyway... not biggie.

      Best regards,
      ~ Adeel
      Signature
      "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996176].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Tyrus Antas
    There are many reasons why some won't sign, usually connected with lack of professionalism and experience. These people are also more likely to delliver work late or no work at all. Worse: sometimes they end up competing against you. I say skip them.

    Tyrus
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996099].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Damien Roche
    I'd be more concerned about the refusal to sign the NDA than the actual need to. Though I do believe it is unnecessary in this instance, just the fact that somebody you are offering work to has refused to sign it, tells me they're not worth working with.

    Ask them why, it could be something trivial like they don't have a scanner or printer etc.

    Personally, I'd sign an NDA without thought because, as Wendy said above, freelancers should already be respecting client privacy with or without a signature.
    Signature
    >> Seasoned Web Developer (CSS, JavaScript, PHP, Ruby) <<
    Available for Fixed Fee Projects and Hourly ($40/hr)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996103].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author marciayudkin
      Personally, I'd sign an NDA without thought
      Really? The way some NDAs are worded, you would be in for a *world* of trouble if you signed them and did a lot of work in that industry.

      You should never sign any legal document "without thought."

      Marcia Yudkin
      Signature
      Check out Marcia Yudkin's No-Hype Marketing Academy for courses on copywriting, publicity, infomarketing, marketing plans, naming, and branding - not to mention the popular "Marketing for Introverts" course.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996118].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Damien Roche
        Originally Posted by marciayudkin View Post

        Really? The way some NDAs are worded, you would be in for a *world* of trouble if you signed them and did a lot of work in that industry.

        You should never sign any legal document "without thought."

        Marcia Yudkin
        Sorry, I worded that part of the sentence without thought. What I mean is that I'd sign an NDA without thought IF that NDA was strictly regarding privacy of a client.- which all NDA's are, surely?

        I sign NDA's on rentacoder from time to time - the client can edit them but they have a default template which is strictly regarding basic non-disclosure.
        Signature
        >> Seasoned Web Developer (CSS, JavaScript, PHP, Ruby) <<
        Available for Fixed Fee Projects and Hourly ($40/hr)
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996146].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author WritingMadwoman
          Marcia, you bring up a good point - I need to clarify that I wouldn't have a problem signing one IF it was simply an agreement not to share the private data the client would be sharing with me.

          When it comes to agreeing not to work for their competitors and such, that's moving into non-compete territory, which is something else altogether.

          Obviously any intelligent freelancer would read the agreement carefully and not sign if it interfered with their ability to conduct their business, was too restrictive for specific reasons, etc.

          Wendy
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996164].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MakeMoneyTutor
    Well if the client does not believes you he force to sign the NDA but if its the policy under its terms then surely you would sign the NDA.
    Signature
    It’s possible to Make Money Online by using Google Starter Kit. Also find the best Work at Home Opportunities here
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996210].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author DeePower
      It all depends on how the NDA is worded. We provide business plan consulting services. Some of the NDAs we're asked to sign include a clause that says we won't work with another company in the same industry. That's not acceptable when the industry is defined too broadly. A couple of the NDAs said we couldn't tell anyone we were working or had worked for the company. That's not acceptable because our law firm and accounting firm need to know those types of things.

      Don't assume that the freelancer is dishonest just because they won't sign an NDA. Or that they have intentions of divulging any information you give them.

      Dee
      Signature
      FREE Pump Up Your Profits With PLR
      Are You a Writer? Then you need this FREE guide Convert Your Words to Ca$H Make Money Writing Online
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996337].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author marciayudkin
        Don't assume also that the freelancer understands what are obvious to you as the ramifications of the NDA.

        I have certain freelancers who work for me sign an NDA because I promise confidentiality to my client. Turns out various freelancers casually mentioned to me discussing assignments with family members. They assumed, I guess, that spilling secrets to family members doesn't count. I had to remind them of the wording of what they'd signed, and they got the point.

        Afterwards, I emphasized "including family members" when asking new people to sign the NDA.

        Marcia Yudkin
        Signature
        Check out Marcia Yudkin's No-Hype Marketing Academy for courses on copywriting, publicity, infomarketing, marketing plans, naming, and branding - not to mention the popular "Marketing for Introverts" course.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996364].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Scott Ames
    Originally Posted by MattSanti View Post

    Hi guys, I've had a couple of freelancers say they won't sign an NDA - non-disclosure agreement.

    What's your take on that? Really the task at hand is simple link building. I just don't want the list of links exposed or given away or anything of that nature.

    Would you skip out on using a freelancer who won't sign an NDA if you wanted to use their services? What's your take on that. What do you think?
    Skip! I see no reason they couldn't sign that. Unless what WritingMadWoman said is true "When it comes to agreeing not to work for their competitors and such, that's moving into non-compete territory, which is something else altogether."
    Signature

    Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm. -Winston Churchill

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996350].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kirbymurphy
    I'm also a broker for several lenders and I have run across Broker Agreements that were like debtor's prison. Extreme financial penalties for subsequent client actions not under my control. I refused to work with those lenders.

    Like several above have said, either they are unprofessional or they dislike something/s in the agreement. I would ask them why they won't sign.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996367].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sfrew
    As a lawyer I would have to say my first response would be to NOT use them. But, I would have to qualify that a little. What is it that they are not to disclose --
    is it what they did for you, or the knowledge they gained in doing the work. If it is the second, you are asking for a non-compete, and that may or may not be reasonable. A non-compete that is too broad may actually be putting the freelancer out of business.

    Furnish the NDA upfront. It should be specific on what is covered, how long it applies, and what the consequences of a breach would be. Have a lawyer draft it -- this is not something that DIY'ers should be messing around with if it is that important.

    Make sure you get the copyright to any tangible results. And expect to pay more for more restrictive terms.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996374].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Gabe77
      Originally Posted by Sfrew View Post

      As a lawyer I would have to say my first response would be to NOT use them. But, I would have to qualify that a little. What is it that they are not to disclose --
      is it what they did for you, or the knowledge they gained in doing the work. If it is the second, you are asking for a non-compete, and that may or may not be reasonable. A non-compete that is too broad may actually be putting the freelancer out of business.

      Furnish the NDA upfront. It should be specific on what is covered, how long it applies, and what the consequences of a breach would be. Have a lawyer draft it -- this is not something that DIY'ers should be messing around with if it is that important.

      Make sure you get the copyright to any tangible results. And expect to pay more for more restrictive terms.
      I agree. On the side of the freelancers, make sure you fully understand the NDA. The parameters should be specific.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996480].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
    Skip, skip, skip.

    Many people you can trust out there, just move on and find them And Tyrus is right, people who get scared with NDA usually mess everything.
    Signature
    People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996418].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author viralim
    I would look for a freelancer that does. If the NDA is specific to the task they're being hired for there shouldn't be an issue. Make sure that the NDA you provide isn't so restrictive but does enough to protect you.
    Signature
    Viral IM WSO: Keyword research, list building, backlinking tools. 50% off storewide! Promo Code: wso50.
    Don't get slapped by Google! Identify duplicate content & keyword density. Get this simple, powerful tool!
    >> CraigsList users, here's 100 other places to place your ads for FREE! <<
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996503].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tj
    Originally Posted by MattSanti View Post

    Hi guys, I've had a couple of freelancers say they won't sign an NDA - non-disclosure agreement.

    What's your take on that? Really the task at hand is simple link building. I just don't want the list of links exposed or given away or anything of that nature.

    Would you skip out on using a freelancer who won't sign an NDA if you wanted to use their services? What's your take on that. What do you think?
    Did you ever ask why they do not want to sign the NDA? If a couple of freelancers do not want to sign it then there can be also something wrong on your side.

    Timo
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996513].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Barry Walls
    Yip....skip them. There are more than enough good freelancers who will play ball on this point. Why risk it?
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996683].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dan Foley
      Seasoned --

      You did it right. "GUESS WHAT! I told them I would NOT sign! WHY? Because the wording was such that it would basically allow them to force me to work for NOBODY else! I crossed out HUGE parts of it, and what did THEY do?"

      If there is a portion of any agreement you don't like you can cross it out and initial it before signing. Just make sure both your and your client's copies are crossed out. Of course I am not a lawyer and this is not legal advice but, that being said, it has worked for me.

      A true NDA would only protect the client's information, not restrict your ability to do business. And yes, I have signed NDAs for Fortune 100 companies too.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996754].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TiffanyLambert
    I don't sign legal stuff period. Too many are worded with so much legal mumbo jumbo and I'm not paying a lawyer to go through it for me. Plus, as mentioned before, so many have sneaky clauses like you can't write about the same topic for anyone else, etc. Hard to do with IM! I have always refused and it never hurt my business.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996797].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Chris Grable
      NDA's are a double edged sword. What happens when you sign an NDA not to divulge a lot of "secrets" (don't forget... you don't know what those "secrets are yet") and then you find that you already knew everything on the list and now... you are prohibited from using your OWN intellectual capital?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996848].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author seasoned
        Originally Posted by Chris Grable View Post

        NDA's are a double edged sword. What happens when you sign an NDA not to divulge a lot of "secrets" (don't forget... you don't know what those "secrets are yet") and then you find that you already knew everything on the list and now... you are prohibited from using your OWN intellectual capital?
        Yep, I forgot to cover that, but that is ANOTHER thing. I have seen *****MANY***** here, HECK, AMAZON has done it, that talk about OBVIOUS stuff with PREVIOUS ART like it is some new thing they magically dreamt up! I have ACTUALLY had clients that told me a "new, and useful, idea", and they are trying to rack their brains trying to figure out how I can do it, and I tell them something like "That would take a lot of effort to implement fully, and test right, let's just use MYSQL, to do that, like everyone else!"! I mean SERIOUSLY, there is a LOT of stuff that has just been done before. And when people try to think stuff like that up, they almost ALWAYS forget something. HECK, I tried my dangdest once to get a customer switched from a system I designed, that was running for YEARS to one they wanted because of claims that it was more reliable, and it cost $250,000 less. GUESS WHAT! That database company forgot one VERY IMPORTANT THING!!!!!!!

        It is IMPOSSIBLE to read data on a database unless it has been LOADED to the database! The database was NOT more reliable. It was, in fact, LESS reliable! And that was especially true of loads.

        Other customers describe stuff to me and I say YEAH, I already put that in as an option!

        HECK, look at Amazon.com. They talk about one click ordering like it is so novel, etc... When they first did it, it wasn't even anywhere NEAR right! I still remember my firewall warning me that it was sending my credit card info over the line via a cookie. I'm almost surprised they didn't prosecute PAYPAL. I mean, outside of having to log in, all your info is right there and you can even have it send shipping info. Outside of the confirmation page, that you probably DO want, it is basically click here.

        Steve
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[996991].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Chris Grable
          Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

          Yep, I forgot to cover that, but that is ANOTHER thing. I have seen *****MANY***** here, HECK, AMAZON has done it, that talk about OBVIOUS stuff with PREVIOUS ART like it is some new thing they magically dreamt up! I have ACTUALLY had clients that told me a "new, and useful, idea", and they are trying to rack their brains trying to figure out how I can do it, and I tell them something like "That would take a lot of effort to implement fully, and test right, let's just use MYSQL, to do that, like everyone else!"! I mean SERIOUSLY, there is a LOT of stuff that has just been done before. And when people try to think stuff like that up, they almost ALWAYS forget something. HECK, I tried my dangdest once to get a customer switched from a system I designed, that was running for YEARS to one they wanted because of claims that it was more reliable, and it cost $250,000 less. GUESS WHAT! That database company forgot one VERY IMPORTANT THING!!!!!!!

          It is IMPOSSIBLE to read data on a database unless it has been LOADED to the database! The database was NOT more reliable. It was, in fact, LESS reliable! And that was especially true of loads.

          Other customers describe stuff to me and I say YEAH, I already put that in as an option!

          HECK, look at Amazon.com. They talk about one click ordering like it is so novel, etc... When they first did it, it wasn't even anywhere NEAR right! I still remember my firewall warning me that it was sending my credit card info over the line via a cookie. I'm almost surprised they didn't prosecute PAYPAL. I mean, outside of having to log in, all your info is right there and you can even have it send shipping info. Outside of the confirmation page, that you probably DO want, it is basically click here.

          Steve
          Yikes! Steve, did this hit a nerve?
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997074].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
            Originally Posted by Chris Grable View Post

            Yikes! Steve, did this hit a nerve?
            Well, I have never actually gotten caught up in any of this, but it has lately been made public about how many STUPID patents, etc, there are!

            There is an australian that CLAIMS he invented the wheel!

            There is ALSO an IDIOT that patented the idea of emulating a sound by clicking the speaker. DUH!!!!!! That is the ONLY way that speakers work!

            One person, on a plane, claimed to have patended the idea of linking a unique value, stored in a cookie to a record in a database. Everyone here, including this site itself, would be infringing THAT patent.

            It is just INCREDIBLE how stupid and/or dishonest some can be, etc...

            It is practically impossible to write any software without SUPPOSEDLY infringing someones patent.

            Steve
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997160].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Chris Grable
              Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

              Well, I have never actually gotten caught up in any of this, but it has lately been made public about how many STUPID patents, etc, there are!

              There is an australian that CLAIMS he invented the wheel!

              There is ALSO an IDIOT that patented the idea of emulating a sound by clicking the speaker. DUH!!!!!! That is the ONLY way that speakers work!

              One person, on a plane, claimed to have patended the idea of linking a unique value, stored in a cookie to a record in a database. Everyone here, including this site itself, would be infringing THAT patent.

              It is just INCREDIBLE how stupid and/or dishonest some can be, etc...

              It is practically impossible to write any software without SUPPOSEDLY infringing someones patent.

              Steve
              Understood!

              From my perspective this whole conversation smacks of being asked to sign your own rights away... in this case without even knowing exactly what you are signing away. From my perspective, the NDA would have to be extremely specific AND very narrow in scope. If involved limiting who I could work for or with in the future... the compensation would have to significant.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997189].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author seasoned
                Originally Posted by Chris Grable View Post

                Understood!

                From my perspective this whole conversation smacks of being asked to sign your own rights away... in this case without even knowing exactly what you are signing away. From my perspective, the NDA would have to be extremely specific AND very narrow in scope. If involved limiting who I could work for or with in the future... the compensation would have to significant.
                Yeah, with that NDA I spoke about, I probably would have signed it if they would pay me $8,000,000 up front. But wouldn't they want it signed FIRST? I figure $8 million is probably about what it would be worth at the current rate. of course I wrote a simple program once that made one company about $1.5 million, so who knows?

                Steve
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997278].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author RanD
        Originally Posted by Chris Grable View Post

        NDA's are a double edged sword. What happens when you sign an NDA not to divulge a lot of "secrets" (don't forget... you don't know what those "secrets are yet") and then you find that you already knew everything on the list and now... you are prohibited from using your OWN intellectual capital?
        That is just not true. NDA's are specifically designed to prevent disclosure of company secrets. It has nothing to do with what you already know. It simply means that you won't disclose anything specific to that companies business. It doesn't prevent you from using any knowledge that you already have, or even any knowledge that you gain. Only the details that are specific to that job.

        This is completely different from a non-compete clause, that prevents you from doing work in the same business, at least for a time.

        Provided that it is a standard NDA that contains no other agendas, which I assume is what the OP is talking about, there should be no problem with anyone signing one. You might want to ask them if there is something in the wording they object to, and see if it can be worked out. If they just refuse for no reason, find someone else.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997265].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author jiminic2
          If you're trying to build trust with people and expect to use them frequently, signing an NDA shouldn't be an issue with the freelancer. I'm considering becoming a freelancer myself and wouldn't mind signing an NDA.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997279].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Chris Grable
          Originally Posted by RanD View Post

          That is just not true. NDA's are specifically designed to prevent disclosure of company secrets. It has nothing to do with what you already know. It simply means that you won't disclose anything specific to that companies business. It doesn't prevent you from using any knowledge that you already have, or even any knowledge that you gain. Only the details that are specific to that job.

          This is completely different from a non-compete clause, that prevents you from doing work in the same business, at least for a time.

          Provided that it is a standard NDA that contains no other agendas, which I assume is what the OP is talking about, there should be no problem with anyone signing one. You might want to ask them if there is something in the wording they object to, and see if it can be worked out. If they just refuse for no reason, find someone else.
          You are right about the non compete clause/agreement... we were using the terms inappropriately. I will, however, follow my own advice with respect the NDA. Your example may be true in a situation where two teams of experts/lawyers have fully reviewed, modified and approved the agreement. A somewhat generic NDA between just us folks... once again... only if it was very specific and narrow in scope.

          Here's an example.... Walk into a major auto manufacturer and tell them you have a revolutionary idea. A design that will change the way cars are built. It will make them cheaper to build and double their fuel efficiency. But... Mr. Auto Executive... I want you to sign the NDA and a Non-compete. Think they will do it. Nope....because they don't know if they already have this idea... or maybe it exists on a shelf already in one of their R&D shops. They'd be foolish to sign your agreement as it has the potential to tie them up in litigation for sometime to come.

          I know my example is an extreme one but.... I think it makes the point.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997287].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author RanD
            Originally Posted by Chris Grable View Post

            You are right about the non compete clause/agreement... we were using the terms inappropriately. I will, however, follow my own advice with respect the NDA. Your example may be true in a situation where two teams of experts/lawyers have fully reviewed, modified and approved the agreement. A somewhat generic NDA between just us folks... once again... only if it was very specific and narrow in scope.

            Here's an example.... Walk into a major auto manufacturer and tell them you have a revolutionary idea. A design that will change the way cars are built. It will make them cheaper to build and double their fuel efficiency. But... Mr. Auto Executive... I want you to sign the NDA and a Non-compete. Think they will do it. Nope....because they don't know if they already have this idea... or maybe it exists on a shelf already in one of their R&D shops. They'd be foolish to sign your agreement as it has the potential to tie them up in litigation for sometime to come.

            I know my example is an extreme one but.... I think it makes the point.
            That is different. If you have this great new idea that is revolutionary, you would apply for a patent before doing anything else. If they already had that idea, it would already be patented, and you would not have been able to get one. At that point you would be talking more openly about the idea. You don't need an NDA just to talk about the concept, and you are already protected by the patent. You don't sign the NDA until you actually start working on the details of the project.

            A more accurate comparison would be an engineer starting a new job at an auto manufacturer (they all have to sign NDA's, btw). When they leave they can still use any engineering knowledge that they had before the job, and in fact, any knowledge gained on the job. They only thing that can't do is discuss how that knowledge was specifically used with the previous company.


            Seasoned:

            I don't want to quote your whole post, but you are talking about other agendas that I specifically said that I was not referring to. Making it more general to cover a greater amount of possibilities is an agenda. I assume that is not what the OP is doing, and I also assume that people are reading the NDA before signing.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997325].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author seasoned
            Originally Posted by Chris Grable View Post

            You are right about the non compete clause/agreement... we were using the terms inappropriately. I will, however, follow my own advice with respect the NDA. Your example may be true in a situation where two teams of experts/lawyers have fully reviewed, modified and approved the agreement. A somewhat generic NDA between just us folks... once again... only if it was very specific and narrow in scope.

            Here's an example.... Walk into a major auto manufacturer and tell them you have a revolutionary idea. A design that will change the way cars are built. It will make them cheaper to build and double their fuel efficiency. But... Mr. Auto Executive... I want you to sign the NDA and a Non-compete. Think they will do it. Nope....because they don't know if they already have this idea... or maybe it exists on a shelf already in one of their R&D shops. They'd be foolish to sign your agreement as it has the potential to tie them up in litigation for sometime to come.

            I know my example is an extreme one but.... I think it makes the point.
            I have heard of song writers, script writers, etc... that have RETURNED SCRIPTS, or refused delivery, UNOPENED! WHY!?!?!? Because they don't want to be accused of copying. Listen to any number of songs, and you notice parts are the same. The LAST thing you want is to be sent a song that is similar to one you JUST finished! It is better to just send it back.

            You REALLY do want to be careful with NDAs. Non competes are USUALLY no problem, but you should still be careful.

            Steve
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997338].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author seasoned
          Originally Posted by RanD View Post

          That is just not true. NDA's are specifically designed to prevent disclosure of company secrets. It has nothing to do with what you already know. It simply means that you won't disclose anything specific to that companies business. It doesn't prevent you from using any knowledge that you already have, or even any knowledge that you gain. Only the details that are specific to that job.

          This is completely different from a non-compete clause, that prevents you from doing work in the same business, at least for a time.

          Provided that it is a standard NDA that contains no other agendas, which I assume is what the OP is talking about, there should be no problem with anyone signing one. You might want to ask them if there is something in the wording they object to, and see if it can be worked out. If they just refuse for no reason, find someone else.
          WRONG! Ask any HONEST attorney, and they will tell you you have to prove EVERYTHING! With NDAs, you are PRESUMED GUILTY! THAT is why lawyers make so much, etc....
          And companys want them to be as general as possible! I have actually seen ones that say that ANY ideas ****YOU**** come up with during the time are property of the company, and they want YOU to develop them, explain them, assign patents, and help the company promote them. How is THAT for general, unfair, etc.... And YEP, it ACTUALLY said that! LITERALLY! BTW the most popular LEGITIMATE reason for NDAs is to prevent you from disclosing OR USING certain info learned at the job.

          A lot of NDAs are written such that a non compete isn't even needed.

          MOST NDAs include "other agendas" whether carelessly written, selected, through laziness, or dishonesty.

          In short, anything that the NDA includes, or seems to cover, is stuff you can NEVER use EVER, or for whatever term it specifies(some limit the term). If you do, and the company hauls you into court, you are PRESUMED GUILTY! You either have to PROVE that:

          1. You DIDN'T use/dcsclose it.
          2. You USED IT BEFORE discussing anything with the client.
          3. It is PUBLICALLY KNOWN
          4. It is OBVIOUS

          If you can not prove one of those, you are GUILTY! And HOW do you prove that certain things, that a PROGRAMMER may find obvious, are obvious, to a NON programmer? HOW can you prove you used it BEFORE discussing with the client, especially if that causes YOUR rights, or another NDA, to be violated? WHAT would they trust as PUBLIC knowledge? HECK, a lot of code may not look exactly like yours, even if it does the same thing in the same way. (a++;, $a+=1;, let a=a+1;, add one to a giving a., incr acc, (ldx 1, adx acc)) OK, that is a SIMPLE example, but some may claim those six instructions are different. They ALL say the same thing

          Don't forget, COMPANIES have spent MILLIONS to defend a claim over a couple simple little lines. The SCO fiasco was similar.

          Steve
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997323].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author kindsvater
      Originally Posted by TiffanyDow View Post

      I don't sign legal stuff period. Too many are worded with so much legal mumbo jumbo and I'm not paying a lawyer to go through it for me. Plus, as mentioned before, so many have sneaky clauses like you can't write about the same topic for anyone else, etc. Hard to do with IM! I have always refused and it never hurt my business.
      Tiffany - got some bad news for you ... you agreed to a bunch of "legal stuff" and "mumbo jumbo" when you signed up for this forum. (and when you buy products online, a car, a house, etc, etc.)

      Glad it hasn't hurt your business. For another Warrior, though, a good writer was fired for taking that position.

      Legal stuff
      Mumbo jumbo
      Sneaky clauses

      My feelings are hurt. You have no idea how much time and thought can go into a single sentence, and it gets ignored and casually tossed-aside as sneaky mumbo stuff.

      Seriously, though, it is impossible to evaluate why someone would not sign the OP's NDA without reviewing it. However, I read the original post as indicating the freelancers would not sign any NDA.

      If that is their position, move on. It's your business and you have a right to have your contracts signed and business protected. There are plenty of people who need the cash for which signing non-disclosure terms should not be a problem.

      Tiffany, you're right that there can be a lot of legal stuff and mumbo jumbo. Often, that's because the court's require it - which can be for your protection and benefit.

      There can be a contract with terms 'x'. Then a judge rules that because 'y' was not also mentioned someone got screwed. So then all the lawyers started adding 'x and y' to the terms. Then there's a ruling about 'z', and so on and so on.

      Usually, if you voice your concerns, and the buyer voices their concerns, it is easy enough to reach an accommodation that everyone can live with.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1013938].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
    Banned
    A professional freelancer would sign a NDA. I've signed many of them, including NDA's that would not allow me to display my work for their company in my portfolio. I've had to sign some before I would even be allowed to be briefed on the project. Not a problem with me. If I'm being paid well for a project, I'm not interested in disclosing the company secrets or competing with them, although a non-compete I would look over very carefully to make sure that I am not already doing something that they would consider competition. I would not allow a single project to impede my business.

    Make sure it doesn't sound like a whole bunch of legal crap and the language covers only what it is that you do not want disclosed. If they understand it, they are more likely to sign it. If they don't .... move on.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997280].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Chris Grable
      Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

      A professional freelancer would sign a NDA. I've signed many of them, including NDA's that would not allow me to display my work for their company in my portfolio. I've had to sign some before I would even be allowed to be briefed on the project. Not a problem with me. If I'm being paid well for a project, I'm not interested in disclosing the company secrets or competing with them, although a non-compete I would look over very carefully to make sure that I am not already doing something that they would consider competition. I would not allow a single project to impede my business.

      Make sure it doesn't sound like a whole bunch of legal crap and the language covers only what it is that you do not want disclosed. If they understand it, they are more likely to sign it. If they don't .... move on.
      I actually don't disagree.... I think what has me concerned is the example given by the OP.

      I just don't want the list of links exposed or given away or anything of that nature.
      If he is trying to keep the list of link sources secret and I am agreeing never to divulge them or use them... then no, I wouldn't sign. I may already know about and use them....

      If he is asking me not to divulge that he uses them... then yes, I would.

      Specific... and narrow.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[997318].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TheRichJerksNet
    For over 15 years I have developed websites and never once have I signed a NDA.. Yes I have had contracts with certain clients but those contracts was due to them paying a monthly fee for services. As far as a NDA, I have never signed nor will I ever sign one because the fact is it boils down to trust. If you can not trust me to do the work you want to hire me to do then fo not hire me at all... It's that simple.

    I have said it for years and will continue to say it because I also have a staff that I pay. Build trust with the people you work with, do not act like their "boss" but instead be their friend. Build a relationship up and a trust with those people that you work with. This will take you much further than some NDA which just tells someone "I do not trust you"..

    Notice I never said the words "work for" I said "work with" - Big Difference...

    James

    P.S. I respect my clients and I have never released any information about them including their website url without asking the client is it ok ....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1014162].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Collette
      If you've had several freelancers pass on the NDA, then I suspect there's some exceptionally restrictive clause in it. Or the wording may be so vague as to expose the freelancer to a broad range of risk.

      Most professional freelancers will sign a properly worded NDA. At the same time, it's worth keeing in mind that most professional freelancers wouldn't be in business very long, if they exposed their clients' proprietary information.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1014266].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rezbi
    Have you asked them why they won't sign?

    Maybe there's a legitimate reason which can be sorted out by communicating.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1014275].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JackPowers
      I recently signed a 33 page contract for a $1000 job, which means one of two things: I am dealing with someone who has been ripped off before OR I am being grossly underpaid!

      Sadly, I am inclined to believe the latter!
      Signature

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1014571].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author SteelDanno
    Not all NDAs are created equal and if I was a service provider, I personally wouldn't sign one unless it was extremely specific. Understand that some people get freaked out by legalese and to vet an NDA properly costs money for a lawyer.

    Also understand that having a signed NDA is one thing. Enforcing it is another story.

    So is it worth insisting that someone sign one?

    I used to use them a lot. Rarely any more.

    My 100 bucks worth :-)
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1014550].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cyberchick
    Originally Posted by MattSanti View Post

    Hi guys, I've had a couple of freelancers say they won't sign an NDA - non-disclosure agreement.

    What's your take on that? Really the task at hand is simple link building. I just don't want the list of links exposed or given away or anything of that nature.

    Would you skip out on using a freelancer who won't sign an NDA if you wanted to use their services? What's your take on that. What do you think?
    I'd say skip them. I recently signed up a PA and unless she would have signed the NDA she wouldn't get the job. It's a simple as that! You HAVE to protect yourself against all possibilities and an NDA will give you peace of mind to a certain degree.
    Monika
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1015323].message }}

Trending Topics