48 Hours = 80 Unique HUMAN Written Articles

[Platinum Matt]

Is there a *need* for getting articles done FAST?

And I don't mean 1 guy putting out 80 crappy articles and I don't mean them using software either...

We're talking say a 10 man team creating 80 articles between them over the course of 48 hours. With SEO factors taken into account etc.

Would this be a service that YOU would be interested in?

And how much would this be worth to you?

Also, would smaller packs say of 25 or 50 done within 24 hours be interesting?

See what's put me off using Warrior writers in the past is that they usually take an eternity to deliver (because the good ones are busy and the bad ones are just, well bad)

Just wondering... your thoughts would be appreciated.

[CliveG]

I would have thought that there would be a demand for such a service. Some people new to Internet Marketing read that they need, for example, 80 articles to get started sucessfully (I'm not going to comment on whether this is actually correct or not!) and stop because they believe it to be a huge hurdle. A service that fixes that particular problem is likely to be in demand.

However, I have never liked the economics of having articles written for you. Good ones have a too high initial cost (not per article but in total), but are probably worth what you have to pay. Cheap one are frequently poor and do not achieve their purpose.

Personally, I might use such a service occasionally; not sure what I would be willing to pay though. Smaller packs would also be attractive as would a package of an article per day for a month; I'm not sure that there is a genuine need for such a large number of articles all at once.

[Platinum Matt]

Ok, great feedback! thanks for your thoughts.

[igorhelpsyousucceed]

This kind of service would suit all the newbies and
newcomers in IM. People tend to have an idea that
quantity gets sales, so instead of trying to convince them
otherwise, why not make money?

Igor

[ikontent]

I might look for packs of 10 or 20; when I'm playing around with a new niche, and want to try out a little article marketing fast...

50 / 80 / 100 or more - sure, but it's more likely to be phased out over a month or more rather than overnight. A service that guarantees this kind of periodic article pack suits me better.

[wwesley]

i think there is definitely a need... only thing is the the numbers are too large. this would be different if it is for a bigger project.

[David McKee]

No question - this is a good idea and I would do both, that is, offer small, medium, and large packs. Use a pricing scheme that rewards buying more, etc.

I am on another thread that is all about "Article-Bots" which I am strongly against. I can't stand the sites these software bots create, not to mention I think it is blatant plagiarism.
(http://www.warriorforum.com/internet...-thoughts.html)

I know there are some who think I am nuts or worse, but to me a quality article is one that was written by a human being, gives good and useful information, and fulfills the purpose for which it is intended.

Dave McKee

i don't buy the idea of getting your articles written by someone else.in most of the cases the writers you hire have no knowledge of the particular subject so they just copy the articles from article directories and other sources.

by hiring many writers you can get the quantity for sure but ultimately it's the quality which matter and an experienced person can certainly provide better quality than a writer who writes on any topic for money.

as far as buying article packs are concerned,i would like to first buy them in smaller quantity say packs of 5 or 10 articles .if they convert then i would go for the larger packs.

[Aristocratic]

Originally Posted by David McKee

No question - this is a good idea and I would do both, that is, offer small, medium, and large packs. Use a pricing scheme that rewards buying more, etc.

I am on another thread that is all about "Article-Bots" which I am strongly against. I can't stand the sites these software bots create, not to mention I think it is blatant plagiarism.
(http://www.warriorforum.com/internet...-thoughts.html)

I know there are some who think I am nuts or worse, but to me a quality article is one that was written by a human being, gives good and useful information, and fulfills the purpose for which it is intended.

Dave McKee

I can see your point in a way if someone is taking an article they have no rights to and rewriting it to pass off as their own work, but if you take an article that you wrote and turned into a spin article (again something you wrote only meshed together), then I wouldn't call it plagiarism. It is what it is: rewriting.

[crissanteiro]

I generally don't like the idea of having someone else write my articles, because they are not my thoughts. I like to put my name on my ideas and my experiences. That way my content reflects me. This doesn't mean it cannot work for other people.

However, I have hired people on two occasions to write for me and was not happy with their writing skills either. So I have stayed away from this.

[David McKee]

I need to clarify something here: There are more than one "ArticleBot" software out there and I was confusing the two. The real ArticleBot that takes an article that you wrote and turns it into a spin article is here: ArticleBot V1.0 | Submit Your Articles to More Than 450 Article Directories Completely On Autopilot For Massive Backlinks while the one that plagiarizes content is this one: Article Bot: Content-Generator.

I must apologize to you here as well as this was my fault for not clarifying the two.

David McKee