War Room

Go Back   WarriorForum - Internet Marketing Forums > The Warrior Forum > Main Internet Marketing Discussion Forum

Featured Warrior Special Offer...
"Members Of The *War Room* Discover Secrets To Immediate Success!"
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-31-2009, 05:23 PM   #1
Laurence James
War Room Member
 
Lozzer100's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Thanks: 31
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Anonymous Ratings For WSO's

Hi Guys

I've been a member of this forum for quite some time and have bought my fair share of great information in the form of WSO's. However, sometimes I've been ripped off by service providers who just don't provide what they say they will - or by rubbish WSO's that are just a lot of rehashed, vague and badly written crap.

This is a great forum, and I've personally made $1000's from ideas I've read here - and it's a great community too - so I'm not having a go at the forum itself. However, it seems that in the rare instances when people do get ripped off, they don't feel they can post a negative review in case they get drawn into a longwinded 'tit for tat' slanging match that may end up damaging their reputation more than the unscrupulous seller they sought to expose.

So to remedy this and ensure that the 99% of decent, hardworking Warriors get continued access to great WSO's and service providers, I suggest we introduce a simple 'thumbs up' or 'thumbs down' ratings system for WSO's - available only to buyers of the product or service in question. This could be an anonymous system which enabled people to post their views without fear of appearing to 'shoot down' an honest but misguided attempt at providing value - but also allowed disgruntled buyers to post their negative review without fear of reprisal. The amount of buyers' 'thumbs ups' or 'thumbs downs' for each WSO could be posted next to the title.

This would have the effect of giving really great WSO's the chance to rise to the surface (such as everything that Jack Duncan provides for example) - whilst weeding out bad WSO's based on the testament of actual buyer experience. This is turn would help the whole Warrior community to both sell and consume excellent information on Internet Marketing - which is why I joined in the first place.

What do fellow Warriors think of this idea - or something similar?

Best wishes

Loz :-)
Lozzer100 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2009, 05:48 PM   #2
carbone33.com
War Room Member
 
Didier Faucher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: South West France
Posts: 921
Thanks: 148
Thanked 71 Times in 46 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile 
Default Re: Anonymous Ratings For WSO's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lozzer100 View Post
I suggest we introduce a simple 'thumbs up' or 'thumbs down' ratings system for WSO's
There's already a star ratings system.

EDIT:
It seems that the star ratings system has been removed.


Quote:
available only to buyers of the product or service in question.
How would you do that? It would need some linking between sellers
website/database and the Forum. Not easy to do, maybe even not possible.


See also this thread:
WSO report is worst thing I ever paid for - what to do?


Didier

Saya Mau Makan Angin - I Want To eat The Wind (Why not?)

* Unique Minisite Templates and Graphics For Rapid Action Profits, $7 Secrets Script, and More:
Get Your Copy --- Affiliate Program (instant commissions)
* Marketing Graphics Pro Vol.2: coming soon
Didier Faucher is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Didier Faucher For This Useful Post:
Old 07-31-2009, 06:01 PM   #3
HyperActive Warrior
War Room Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 479
Thanks: 159
Thanked 43 Times in 30 Posts
Default Re: Anonymous Ratings For WSO's

While I think factual, balanced feedback is important in the WSO section, I'm just not a big fan of the anonymous approach.

One - there's no obligation to bicker. Folks have the option to participate in a back and forth slanging match...or not. Two - introducing anonymity into the process just invites manipulation with competitors trying to tank someone's product and hiding their identities. It's just too tempting for the less savory among us.

Transparency is key. We have to stand up and be willing to mean what we say and say what we mean.

Cindy

aka Cindy Hohe
MizzCindy is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MizzCindy For This Useful Post:
Old 07-31-2009, 06:05 PM   #4
Tina Golden
War Room Member
 
TMG Enterprises's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,995
Thanks: 809
Thanked 452 Times in 333 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile  View Member's Twitter Profile 
Contact Info
Send a message via AIM to TMG Enterprises Send a message via MSN to TMG Enterprises Send a message via Yahoo to TMG Enterprises Send a message via Skype™ to TMG Enterprises
Default Re: Anonymous Ratings For WSO's

I agree that anonymity is not a good idea. Too open to potential abuse that way.

If a person gives a rational review, even if it is negative, why would that reflect upon their reputation?

Plus, a thumbs up or thumbs down button wouldn't give an accurate picture. If I bought a product that was too simplistic for me, I might not like it and get a refund but that doesn't mean it's a bad product - for the right market segment.

Tina G

TMG Enterprises is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TMG Enterprises For This Useful Post:
Old 07-31-2009, 06:05 PM   #5
LB
LB
War Room Member
 
LB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In the forest.
Posts: 2,323
Thanks: 69
Thanked 110 Times in 72 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile 
Default Re: Anonymous Ratings For WSO's

The star rating was removed for abuse (I believe). In other words, it's very easy to have your friends vote you up and your competitors down. Anonymous proxies, etc. add to the problem.

I like it as is.

Fall Down 7 Times, Stand Up 8.

Click to Visit
LB is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to LB For This Useful Post:
Old 07-31-2009, 06:11 PM   #6
Laurence James
War Room Member
 
Lozzer100's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 42
Thanks: 31
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default Re: Anonymous Ratings For WSO's

Thanks Guys

Some good points there. I didn't realise there had been a review system that had been withdrawn. I can see how such a system could be open to abuse :-)
Lozzer100 is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2009, 06:40 PM   #7
Senior Warrior Member
War Room Member
 
Kay King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Gulf Coast, USA.
Posts: 11,317
Thanks: 297
Thanked 738 Times in 452 Posts
Default Re: Anonymous Ratings For WSO's

The best review system is our own due diligence.

Research the buyer - look at posts/threads they've made. Look at comments in their previous WSO's (you can use Warriorplus.com to do that).

Taking the time to do that can save frustration - and money. It can also lead to some great buys.

kay
Kay King is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

  WarriorForum - Internet Marketing Forums > The Warrior Forum > Main Internet Marketing Discussion Forum

Tags
anonymous, ratings, wso

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 AM.