![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| I.C.Hope War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,515
Thanks: 446
Thanked 227 Times in 181 Posts
|
When spinning an article, I presume it can only be spun so much. I have spent just over 45 mintues syntaxing an article to be spun. There are in total about 5 paraggrahs of text, I wrote a new paragraph for each one then also changed some words throughout for a little more unqiueness. How many articles would I really get out of my efforts? It's probably a difficult question, but maybe we can share some PAR tips in here also. Thanks Dudes and Duddettes Best Wishes Intrepreneur. |
|
I want a good keyword researcher, not for min sites but for tech articles. Hit me up if you've got those skillz!
| |
| | |
| | #2 |
| One Man Army War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,890
Thanks: 93
Thanked 309 Times in 182 Posts
|
Secret to getting lots of spins is to nest your spin operators. I can't remember sytax because i stopped using it due to it being a buggy piece of crap but it should do this for you if you highlight a section inside an already spun line. |
| | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| article-writer-pro.com War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: , , United Kingdom.
Posts: 1,330
Thanks: 23
Thanked 124 Times in 106 Posts
|
What you need to be carefull of with PAR and other similar spinners is that they CAN leave massive footprints. You have the right idea with the spinning 'paragraphs' part but if you just spin elements within the paragraph Google will be able to identify that as spun content because it has visible holes throught it. I've tested various spinning methods myself recently and have come to the conclusion that you are much better spinning paragrpahs or blocks of content AND ALSO then spinning complete sentences. Google compares a web page with ANY other ONE web page to find similarities in contextual structure. There are millions of identical sentances on the internet. It would be impossible for there not to be and Google knows this. If you spin your articles in such a way where not more than one or two sentences match other articles then you'll find they stick rock solid in Googles index. I've tested this myself. I'm actually writing all this as we speak in my new user manual for AWP. I've wasted so much time a few years ago spinning one article well only for them to disappear for ever. My new method works great and makes perfect sense when you think about it. If you are using PAR then set it up like this....... Intro: Each article will display one of the blocks below. Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 Block 5 Middle: Each article will display one of the blocks below. Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 Block 5 Conclusion: Each article will display one of the blocks below. Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 Block 5 Then for EACH sentence, add another two variations changing the structure of the sentence completely. This will take you quite a lot of time but I can assure you, do this correctly and you'll be able to create thousands of unique articles that will be highly unique and that WILL stick in Googles main index. My system is a bit more durable than this but it can't really be done in PAR unless you change your strategy a bit. |
| INDEX CHECKER v2.0 SOFTWARE: Probably the most accurate Google index checker available WATCH THE DEMO VIDEO TODAY PC Desktop Application - Built-In Backlink Verification Feature - Supports Proxies - Integrate Into Your Backlinks Indexer Account - Includes Proxy Scraper Software - Extremely Accurate ONLY $17 ONE-TIME FEE! | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| article, par, power, question, rewriter |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |