Best Profile Page Software?

[GuerrillaIM]

Hey Guys,

I have been looking around the forum and the internet at software that automatically creates accounts and pages on sites like squidoo, hubpages, blogger etc...

I heard the SENuke does this but I think it's a bit pricey to buy just for this feature.

Can anyone recommend to me a piece of software that does this standalone for a one off price or reasonably low monthly fee?

Thanks

[FrontLineMentor]

Originally Posted by GuerrillaIM

Hey Guys,

I have been looking around the forum and the internet at software that automatically creates accounts and pages on sites like squidoo, hubpages, blogger etc...

I heard the SENuke does this but I think it's a bit pricey to buy just for this feature.

Can anyone recommend to me a piece of software that does this standalone for a one off price or reasonably low monthly fee?

Thanks

Most sites need email verification which
needs you to login to your email and
manually approve it..this is to avoid
spam registration

But I think we can use roboform to
automatically fill in our details..
at least can save lots of our time
filling in the same information
over and over again..

[GuerrillaIM]

Originally Posted by FrontLineMentor

Most sites need email verification which
needs you to login to your email and
manually approve it..this is to avoid
spam registration

But I think we can use roboform to
automatically fill in our details..
at least can save lots of our time
filling in the same information
over and over again..

These days most automated software can break the captcha and logs into your emails and confirms subscriptions also.

[Andy Fletcher]

I'm currently working on software like this but it's a while off so to help out a fellow Warrior -

http://www.warriorforum.com/warrior-...le-avatar.html

Cheers,

Andy

[Kurt]

Originally Posted by Andy Fletcher

I'm currently working on software like this but it's a while off so to help out a fellow Warrior -

http://www.warriorforum.com/warrior-...le-avatar.html

Cheers,

Andy

I second this suggestion by Andy...Check out fellow Warrior Ankur's LinkWheel program.

[GuerrillaIM]

I saw that software and was tempted to buy it. I had a couple of concerns though. The amount of sites it posts to are fairly low and there is no content spining feature available yet.

It is however top of my list as it will easily allow me to generate some social pages and then build backlinks to them to increase the weight of their links.

Are there any pieces of software out there that work with more sites and possibly contain a spinning feature?

[ankur sharma]

Thanks Andy and Kurt for recommending my software.

[Kurt]

Originally Posted by GuerrillaIM

I saw that software and was tempted to buy it. I had a couple of concerns though. The amount of sites it posts to are fairly low and there is no content spining feature available yet.

It is however top of my list as it will easily allow me to generate some social pages and then build backlinks to them to increase the weight of their links.

Are there any pieces of software out there that work with more sites and possibly contain a spinning feature?

I was one that actually suggested to Ankur NOT to include spinning. There's a number of other options for spinning and I think Ankur should focus on what his software is intended to do.

Here's why spinning is wrong for this situation anyway...A spun article is the SAME article that uses word substution to "fool" search engines. They don't fool real people though.

Spun articles aren't unique information. They are the same info, with unique text strings only.

Why would one want to link the the same articles? It won't pass human inspection and with 2.0 properties, this is an important aspect.

I hope Ankur doesn't include a spinner and just focuses on the main benefit of his software.

[Andy Fletcher]

Originally Posted by Kurt

I was one that actually suggested to Ankur NOT to include spinning. There's a number of other options for spinning and I think Ankur should focus on what his software is intended to do.

Here's why spinning is wrong for this situation anyway...A spun article is the SAME article that uses word substution to "fool" search engines. They don't fool real people though.

Spun articles aren't unique information. They are the same info, with unique text strings only.

Why would one want to link the the same articles? It won't pass human inspection and with 2.0 properties, this is an important aspect.

I hope Ankur doesn't include a spinner and just focuses on the main benefit of his software.

There are plenty of spinning options that could be included without degrading the quality of the article. Even if the only spinning it does is allow each sentence to have two variations, that's more than enough to make 14 different versions unique.

[Kurt]

Originally Posted by Andy Fletcher

There are plenty of spinning options that could be included without degrading the quality of the article. Even if the only spinning it does is allow each sentence to have two variations, that's more than enough to make 14 different versions unique.

Liike I said above, it doesn't make the INFO unique, only the text strings. There's a big difference.

"George Washington slept here" is still the same as "Here is where George Washington slept", no matter how you "spin" it. <pun intended> And using a spinner in this manner is linking to the exact same info, regardless if the words are change.

Take this test: Post two spun articles and two truly original articles. I'll bet you $1000 I can figure out which is which, as can any thinking human being. L:inking spun content to the same spun content is asking for trouble when posting on 2.0 sites.

And again, there are plenty of programs that already spin. Use them to spin if you wish, and then use Ankur's program to add them to the 2.0 sites. This leaves Ankur's time and effort to be spent keeping up with all the changes the 2.0 sites do routinely.

[GuerrillaIM]

I mean a spinning feature like in AMA. I usually take my AMA templates and mod it to work with other programs and sites.

Perhaps the author could team up with someone who has already written this code?