Would Information Marketers Benefit More From Using The Tell>Show>Do Teaching Model?

by @tjr
9 replies
I carpool to and from my day job, and when one of my roommates isn't able to give me a ride I take the bus. I don't mind the two hour ride too much, I have a large backlog of Kindle books to get through.

I have a lot of stuff of the IM and Freelance Writing stuff that is out there, and I'm noticing a...sad trend. A lot of people are either just regurgitating content with no organization at all, or they are trying so hard to be high brow that they never end up saying anything useful at all.

Now, developmental psychologists the world over will tell you that people learn different things in different ways. Can't argue that. But the authors I'm referring to (and I fear there are a lot more that I haven't read. I mean, just look at WSOs and the Classifieds section here) aren't writing their content to cater to one particular learning style. They're not catering to any learning style at all.

So my assumption is this: if a writer wants to teach to the largest audience possible, why wouldn't they be making use of the Tell > Show > Do teaching model? For those who don't get it:

Tell: Explain the concept that you are trying to teach. What it is, why it matters, how it will affect you, and how you will implement the information.

Show: This is where the writer/instructor proves that what they're teaching can work. They either demonstrate the concept on their own or point to verifiable, specific instances where the concept has been put to use.

Do: This is where the learner is prompted to try out the concept for themselves. They should be able to reproduce what was taught, either through a given activity or an outlined experiment that allows them to put the concept to work.

A lot of you will recognize this outline, whether you realize it or not. It's how most schools and most jobs train people. Almost everyone has been exposed to it. So why wouldn't an information marketer use this established structure to their advantage? Even if a specific student cannot learn from the model, it is a starting point that everyone will know of (and hopefully how to adjust from), and standardization is key.

Just my thoughts for the afternoon. Discuss, question and tear apart if you please!
#benefit #information #marketers #model #teaching #tell&gtshow&gtdo #tell>show>do
  • Profile picture of the author Randall Magwood
    Sometimes you just have to simplify marketing and just sell the product for what it is. No over-thinking required. Just sell it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10380549].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author @tjr
      Originally Posted by Randall Magwood View Post

      Sometimes you just have to simplify marketing and just sell the product for what it is. No over-thinking required. Just sell it.
      Sometimes. When you're selling something that's intent and claim is to educate, a little more effort and thought would be required. At least in my opinion.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10380584].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Steve B
      @tjr,

      "So why wouldn't an information marketer use this established structure to their advantage"

      Most likely because they haven't learned it themselves.

      I think most online marketers, especially new ones, are here because the barriers to entry are pretty non-existent. You don't have to have any training, experience, or knowledge of marketing in order to set up shop and begin selling whatever.

      I'm convinced that if a college-level education in Internet marketing were offered at no cost . . . most newbies would turn it down without much thought or hesitation. They come here to make the quick bucks with as little effort as possible.

      Steve
      Signature

      Steve Browne, online business strategies, tips, guidance, and resources
      SteveBrowneDirect

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10380587].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Raydal
    I would say that most don't have any training in giving instructions. They are
    marketers and not teachers. That's why when you work with a traditional
    publisher an editor foes through the material to make sure it is consistent
    and will make sense to the reader.

    I see a lot of poorly structured ebook for sure. Not much thought went
    into their outlines. (This is apart from the fluff used to beef up the word count.)
    Yet I see other who really try to use screen shots and SHOW you what
    they are talking about. so even if you don't catch the explanation, you
    can see the method in action.

    I taught school for close to 20 years, so I always say, if I can't explain
    something to you that I know, nobody else can. (It's not boasting if
    it's true.)

    -Ray Edwards
    Signature
    The most powerful and concentrated copywriting training online today bar none! Autoresponder Writing Email SECRETS
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10380648].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dlane1987
    I studied both psychology and education at uni, I have not heard of this particular model. Although i think you could be onto something, that is maybe some (not all) marketers could benefit from some better educational tools.
    Also often when someone is good at something and wants to teach that to others does not mean they are the best teachers.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10380670].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author @tjr
      Originally Posted by dlane1987 View Post

      Also often when someone is good at something and wants to teach that to others does not mean they are the best teachers.
      The solution is partnering with someone who can teach, and using your real world results as the proof that backs up their teaching.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10380682].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author dlane1987
        Originally Posted by @tjr View Post

        The solution is partnering with someone who can teach, and using your real world results as the proof that backs up their teaching.
        True but not always workable who gets the biggest cut, the person who can teach a bit better or the person who knows stuff. Probably the person who knows stuff, and then why would the person that knows stuff give any cut to someone who can teach better when he can get the same message across on his own and get paid more.

        Not saying it can't be done but ...
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10380689].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author @tjr
          Originally Posted by dlane1987 View Post

          True but not always workable who gets the biggest cut, the person who can teach a bit better or the person who knows stuff. Probably the person who knows stuff, and then why would the person that knows stuff give any cut to someone who can teach better when he can get the same message across on his own and get paid more.

          Not saying it can't be done but ...
          This is part of doing business though, negotiating. I'm talking about putting a better class of product out there. Takes work. Takes a bit of discomfort, in my opinion.

          Not saying it can't be done but...
          you say? Every JV in the history of business, online and offline, would disagree.

          Probably the person who knows stuff, and then why would the person that knows stuff give any cut to someone who can teach better when he can get the same message across on his own and get paid more.
          Better presentation leads to better results for the consumer which leads to more profit for the seller(s) which leads to a bigger pie to split.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10380693].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author writeaway
    Good post, OP.

    Thankfully, there are already many blogs that use that method.

    They use case studies backed up by STATISTICS

    Brian Dean and Moz are very big on ACTIONABLE information.

    It's one thing to claim to make $5000 in 48 hours, it's another to STEP THE READER through the process.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[10380696].message }}

Trending Topics