| | ||||||||
| |||||||||
 |
10-08-2009, 04:58 AM
| #1 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member  Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: United Kingdom.
Posts: 4,877
Thanks: 921
Thanked 719 Times in 318 Posts
|  High Court Injunction Twitter...
Just noticed this www.pcworld.com/article/173008/uk_high_court_serves_injunction_over_twitter.html About time stuff like this was stepped on lol I like the bit at the end where it says Twitter could not imediately be reached. Looking at the article, I think that was half the blokes problem, (That he couldn't reach them) Kim |
| | |
|  |
|
10-08-2009, 07:02 AM
| #2 |
| Self Made War Room Member  Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 2,746
Blog Entries: 4 Thanks: 780
Thanked 1,628 Times in 403 Posts
| Re: High Court Injunction Twitter...
Sign of the times. There's two questions that come to mind from that article: 1) How valid is an injunction served through Twitter? When you get served, there needs to be evidence that you actually received the document. How can they prove that with a DM? 2) Even the court can't get Twitter to respond faster than a week later. I imagine a couple of blokes sitting on the beach doing customer support on a laptop like "dude, I'll get to those emails later, Family Guy is on." LOL |
| Ron Douglas - MBA, CFA, NY Times Best Selling Author. As seen on Good Morning America, Home Shopping Network, Fox, ABC, NBC, People Magazine etc. - Discover how I sold 1.1 million books and ebooks CLICK HERE - Forget micro niches - Go Mainstream - $5.8 Million Case Study IT Outsourcing | Copycat Recipes | Best Traffic Course | |
| |
|
10-08-2009, 09:51 AM
| #3 | |
| I have a lame list. War Room Member  Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: One Second into the Future
Posts: 4,256
Blog Entries: 1 Thanks: 810
Thanked 2,175 Times in 1,003 Posts
| Re: High Court Injunction Twitter... Quote:
If it was viewed. I don't even really read my DMs anymore. Most of the time, I can't even open the tab on Twitter. Just times out or something. And then usually it's just full of "join my mafia" and "I just took this quiz" garbage that's not even worth it anyway. DMs used to be good for exchanging quick messages with people, but now they are completely useless. | |
| Click here for the MOST FUN PRODUCT CREATION GUIDE for Procrastinators since forever. Dan's content is irregularly read by handfuls of people. Join the elite few by reading his blog: dcrBlogs.com or following him on Twitter: dcrTweets.com but NOT by Clicking Here! ----------> [Free WSO] The Lamest WSO in the History of the Warrior Forum ☺ <---------- | ||
|
| |
|
10-08-2009, 10:03 AM
| #4 | |
| Lethal SEO Kung Fu Master War Room Member  Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Mason, MI 48854
Posts: 3,669
Blog Entries: 39 Thanks: 1,519
Thanked 1,216 Times in 594 Posts
| Re: High Court Injunction Twitter... Quote:
But I have been making a concentrated effort to block anyone who spams my DM or Timeline with blatant pitches and that includes the Mafia requests too. After about 3 days effort my Timeline and dm's are pretty clean now. Now when someone follows me I check them out and block them immediately if they offer no value or are spammers. But what I liked about the article was that Blaney didn't even bother contacting Twitter before taking this matter to court. He said his reason for doing so was that it takes Twitter up to a week to reply to an inquiry. My question is this... How long does it take a matter to be heard in court after you file the papers? Surely it's longer than a week? | |
|
Looking for an extremely affordable SEO service program from the vendor with the most testimonials on the forum? If so end your search right now by clicking here! Check out our affiliate program while you're at it!
| ||
|
| |
 |
|
| Tags |
| court, high, injunction, twitter |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
 |
