![]() |
| ||||||||
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
HyperActive Warrior
War Room Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 319
Thanks: 74
Thanked 69 Times in 42 Posts
|
If Google really wants to give searchers a good experience, then why
the love affair with article sites and other social sites? Every time Google does one of its infamous smackdowns, the reason they give is always couched in terms of providing a better search experience. Yet, we all know they give LOVE to sites like EzineArticles.com, Squidoo, Hubpages, Blogger etc. sites where anybody can pretend to be an expert on anything and usually do. There is almost no filtering and Google undoubtedly KNOWS that the biggest percentage of people providing content on these sites are doing it with an agenda. When I search for information online (not doing niche research), I am looking for accurate, impartial information, preferably from someone who knows what they are talking about. I can't imagine that anyone has even a remote shot at that when they land on an ezinearticle or a squidoo lens or a hub. If Google really wanted to give searchers a good experience where they could find what they were looking for as quickly as possible, I would think that instead of giving LOVE to these sites, it would simply change its algorithms to give zero credibility to these sites. While we might not like that as marketers, Google claims to be concerned with a good experience for searchers. Is a love affair with these types of sites consistent with a good consumer search experience? The only reason I can see for doing this is that these sites have one thing in common: multiple blocks of adsense. The combination of marginal content and lots of adsense spots means more money for Google. Truly content rich sites maintained by actual experts in any niche are not likely to have adsense on them...and with rich content, visitors would not be likely to click on the ads to leave. Am I alone in questioning Google's public motives? If you are searching for information for yourself, do you give any credibility to information on social and article sites? Robyn |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
PhpMembersScript.com
War Room Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: South Carolina, USA
Posts: 4,897
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 502
Thanked 828 Times in 535 Posts
|
They do not give love to sites as EzineArticles.com, Squidoo,
Hubpages, Blogger etc. They give love to sites that provide content and a great deal of it but before giving that love there must be backlinks built to those sites. Let's take EZA for one since many seem to think they are an authority site. You post 5 articles on EZA and 50 other authors do the same. Now those 50 authors + yourself bookmark your articles you just posted to 500 bookmark sites.. You and those 50 authors just created 25,000 backlinks to those articles. If you do that for 5 days then that is 125,000 backlinks that you and 50 authors just created for a glorified adsense site that mainly has marketers and competition for its traffic. Just think if you spent that time on your site doing the same thing, google would love you too... James |
|
Article Directory/Auto Syndication Coming | Upto 1800+ Authority Bookmarks WSO - Starts $8.77
Christmas PLR Pack - Articles, Templates, Graphics, Resources and More $8.97 MRR/RR Block SideWiki | Membership Script | WordPress Security | Facebook App Coming Soon |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| affair, cares, experience, google, love, search, search experience, sites, social, user search experience |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
![]() |