Making Bank with Zero Original Content

stiznef · 10-18-2009, 02:41 PM

This is a question to anyone who may have tried this in the past.

It's been said time and time again that in order to get traffic using SEO that you need fresh content for your site as well as for articles pointing back to your site for link juice.

I recently read something where the "Guru" mentioned that duplicate content was nonsense.

My question is if one were to build a site and based on keywords that the site will be focused on, simply add duplicate content that you find on the net. Then purchase plr articles also surrounding the same keywords. Then launch a massive campaign adding more articles/videos to the site each day and continue to post articles to the different article directories for back links.

Would this work to get rankings?

Has anyone every tried this with absolutely zero original content and made and significant income?

Google seems to really favor websites that provide a ton of great information to people searching the web. If there is a site that has gathered a ton of information about a particular niche or product and has a ton of articles pointing back to it from different directories, even though none of the content is original. Wouldn't google still consider this an authority site because all of the information has been gathered together, thereby creating great content for the reader?

Anyone have an opinion on this?

stiznef · 10-18-2009, 04:23 PM

There must be someone who has an opinion on this???

JC-PureProfitsHQ · 10-18-2009, 05:00 PM

I know people who grab PLR products, repurpose them (by that I mean spinning the article) and post hundreds of them on a single blog -- drip fed over time. It works for for them. That's not 100% duplicate content though, so...

SMS recently had a report on this that you should definitely take a look at.

stiznef · 10-19-2009, 12:08 AM

What's SMS?

discrat · 10-19-2009, 05:48 AM

I heard of people who have used 100% PLR Content and then got their Adsense Account Banned. One particular Warrior here comes to mind.

To me, not worth it. I will continue using fresh and unique stuff

krisskrash · 10-19-2009, 07:53 AM

I feel original content is the best. I don't have much experience, but do you really want to filling up the internet with even more useless crap?

la dominatrix · 10-19-2009, 08:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stiznef

What's SMS?

Not what but whom
Do Not Pay For Another Article Or Video Until You Have Seen This Crazy Opportunity.

Michael Nguyen · 10-19-2009, 08:21 AM

Of course you can, just depends on your model of making money online. Eg I know I can take a PLR article with original title "How to get rid of acne" then do a massive back link campaign for "get rid of acne" given time the site will rank high in Google.

The most "relevent" result will appear right at the top.

relevent = lots of web2.0 backlinks

Michael

stiznef · 10-19-2009, 11:11 AM

Thanks everyone for the input.

10-18-2009, 02:41 PM	#1
stiznef Never Quit! Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: , , USA. Posts: 63 Thanks: 33 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Social Networking Contact Info	Making Bank with Zero Original Content This is a question to anyone who may have tried this in the past. It's been said time and time again that in order to get traffic using SEO that you need fresh content for your site as well as for articles pointing back to your site for link juice. I recently read something where the "Guru" mentioned that duplicate content was nonsense. My question is if one were to build a site and based on keywords that the site will be focused on, simply add duplicate content that you find on the net. Then purchase plr articles also surrounding the same keywords. Then launch a massive campaign adding more articles/videos to the site each day and continue to post articles to the different article directories for back links. Would this work to get rankings? Has anyone every tried this with absolutely zero original content and made and significant income? Google seems to really favor websites that provide a ton of great information to people searching the web. If there is a site that has gathered a ton of information about a particular niche or product and has a ton of articles pointing back to it from different directories, even though none of the content is original. Wouldn't google still consider this an authority site because all of the information has been gathered together, thereby creating great content for the reader? Anyone have an opinion on this?
	Free IM Course Created By $10,000,000 Earners Click Here Worlds First Completely FREE SYSTEM

10-18-2009, 04:23 PM	#2
stiznef Never Quit! Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: , , USA. Posts: 63 Thanks: 33 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Social Networking Contact Info	Re: Making Bank with Zero Original Content There must be someone who has an opinion on this???
	Free IM Course Created By $10,000,000 Earners Click Here Worlds First Completely FREE SYSTEM

10-18-2009, 05:00 PM	#3
JC-PureProfitsHQ Renegade Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: The Great White North Posts: 51 Thanks: 2 Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts Social Networking	Re: Making Bank with Zero Original Content I know people who grab PLR products, repurpose them (by that I mean spinning the article) and post hundreds of them on a single blog -- drip fed over time. It works for for them. That's not 100% duplicate content though, so... SMS recently had a report on this that you should definitely take a look at.

10-19-2009, 12:08 AM	#4
stiznef Never Quit! Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: , , USA. Posts: 63 Thanks: 33 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Social Networking Contact Info	Re: Making Bank with Zero Original Content What's SMS?
	Free IM Course Created By $10,000,000 Earners Click Here Worlds First Completely FREE SYSTEM

10-19-2009, 05:48 AM	#5
discrat Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Location: , , . Posts: 966 Thanks: 205 Thanked 137 Times in 95 Posts	Re: Making Bank with Zero Original Content I heard of people who have used 100% PLR Content and then got their Adsense Account Banned. One particular Warrior here comes to mind. To me, not worth it. I will continue using fresh and unique stuff

10-19-2009, 07:53 AM	#6
krisskrash Warrior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 11 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Re: Making Bank with Zero Original Content I feel original content is the best. I don't have much experience, but do you really want to filling up the internet with even more useless crap?

10-19-2009, 08:21 AM	#8
Michael Nguyen Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: London Posts: 1,029 Thanks: 60 Thanked 147 Times in 103 Posts	Re: Making Bank with Zero Original Content Of course you can, just depends on your model of making money online. Eg I know I can take a PLR article with original title "How to get rid of acne" then do a massive back link campaign for "get rid of acne" given time the site will rank high in Google. The most "relevent" result will appear right at the top. relevent = lots of web2.0 backlinks Michael
	WSO - Amazing Amazon Niche Site Formula Revealed > FREE 43 Page Amazon Report Reveals How to CRUSH and DOMINATE Amazon Niche Markets < DFY Keyword Research Service - Technical SEO Audit to Dominate your competition

10-19-2009, 11:11 AM	#9
stiznef Never Quit! Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: , , USA. Posts: 63 Thanks: 33 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts Social Networking Contact Info	Re: Making Bank with Zero Original Content Thanks everyone for the input.
	Free IM Course Created By $10,000,000 Earners Click Here Worlds First Completely FREE SYSTEM