You are screwing yourself...

27 replies
If we can't, or won't, invest the necessary time to read a thread why are we here?

I don't know if this was mentioned but...
The quoted statement began a reply in a popular thread.

You, like me, have seen the same or similar comments numerous times in many threads.

It implies the poster is "too busy" or "too lazy" to read the thread.

The "good stuff"-beyond the OP-is often on reply seven, nine or eleven; sometimes on page three of a hot thread. (These are NOT literal numbers.)

Every time you read the OP and dash off a reply without going deeper into the thread you potentially pass up information which could add to your personal knowledge store. You're effectively screwing yourself.

Of course if you're replying to only increase post count it doesn't matter. You aren't interested in gaining knowledge...

And that brings us back to the initial question: "...why are we here?"

Elmer
#screwing
  • Profile picture of the author RobinSkeen
    If the original post sparked my interest, I do read the replies to see what others think. I also read replies to see if the point I thought of was brought up by someone else. You're right about the buried information Elmer. I've found some gems.
    Signature
    Thesis Theme Customizing | Budget PLR | Free Motivation Guide
    A man is not old until regrets
    take the place of dreams." -John Barrymore
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329435].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Adam Carn
    Good point Elmer, but imagine this, you just notice a thread with a real good topic, you read the original post and are itching to ask a question or make a comment BUT the thread has 200+ posts. Now if you're quite busy it could be a daunting task going through all of them.

    But that's no excuse and I do agree with you.

    Thanks,
    Adam
    Signature
    Taking a break...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329562].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
      Elmer, Good points and so true.

      I've seen it happening more and more here lately.
      So, I deceided I would help out the next person that posts by placing all
      the previous posts in this thread together for them to read.

      Have a Great Day!
      Michael
      Originally Posted by Elmer Hurlstone View Post

      If we can't, or won't, invest the necessary time to read a thread why are we here?

      The quoted statement began a reply in a popular thread.

      You, like me, have seen the same or similar comments numerous times in many threads.

      It implies the poster is "too busy" or "too lazy" to read the thread.

      The "good stuff"-beyond the OP-is often on reply seven, nine or eleven; sometimes on page three of a hot thread. (These are NOT literal numbers.)

      Every time you read the OP and dash off a reply without going deeper into the thread you potentially pass up information which could add to your personal knowledge store. You're effectively screwing yourself.

      Of course if you're replying to only increase post count it doesn't matter. You aren't interested in gaining knowledge...

      And that brings us back to the initial question: "...why are we here?"

      Elmer
      Originally Posted by RobinSkeen View Post

      If the original post sparked my interest, I do read the replies to see what others think. I also read replies to see if the point I thought of was brought up by someone else. You're right about the buried information Elmer. I've found some gems.
      Originally Posted by BIG Mike View Post

      I don't know if anyone brought this up, but the ones that don't read the entire thread and comment anyways are usually elected politicians or those running for office.
      Originally Posted by Adam Carn View Post

      Good point Elmer, but imagine this, you just notice a thread with a real good topic, you read the original post and are itching to ask a question or make a comment BUT the thread has 200+ posts. Now if you're quite busy it could be a daunting task going through all of them.

      But that's no excuse and I do agree with you.

      Thanks,
      Adam
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329645].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Elmer Hurlstone
        Thanks Michael,

        You've saved me time as I review the responses.

        One question: Is this a service you'll be providing for all threads?

        Adam,

        A valid point--to a point. The super-long threads are exactly the ones where there is greater possibility of benefit. And, as they are not all that common the potential loss of time may be repaid by the reading.

        Although that will not always be the case...

        Sometimes a thread does go astray.

        Big Mike,

        I don't know if you said this, but...

        Robin,

        Thanks for the contribution and corroboration.

        Elmer

        PS. Be careful when creating and writing a post title. You may not care for the auto-generated tag.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329708].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
          Elmer, a lot depends on the nature of the thread itself.

          For example, if somebody asks...

          "I am considering doing XYZ. What do you think of the idea?"

          If I think it's just a flat out bad idea, I am going to respond telling the
          person so and I'm not going to allow myself to be influenced by the
          opinions of others.

          Having said that, I will still read the thread to see how other people feel
          if for no other reason than to mentally note who I would not want to do
          business with, especially if XYZ was unethical IMO.

          While I agree with what you said generally speaking, I don't think it's a
          hard and fast rule for every scrap that gets posted here.

          I mean let's face it, some of the stuff that gets posted is just pretty
          bad. And to waste more of my time reading what other people have to
          say about something that is horse manure in the first place is just not
          my idea of a productive use of my time.

          And yes, I did read every reply to this thread before posting this.

          I usually do, but sometimes, as I pointed out, there are exceptions where
          you just don't need to know what other people think.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329737].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
          Elmer,

          I'm not sure I can keep up with all the threads so I may need to out source
          this task... Any one interested?

          Have a Great Day!
          Michael
          Originally Posted by Elmer Hurlstone View Post

          If we can't, or won't, invest the necessary time to read a thread why are we here?

          The quoted statement began a reply in a popular thread.

          You, like me, have seen the same or similar comments numerous times in many threads.

          It implies the poster is "too busy" or "too lazy" to read the thread.

          The "good stuff"-beyond the OP-is often on reply seven, nine or eleven; sometimes on page three of a hot thread. (These are NOT literal numbers.)

          Every time you read the OP and dash off a reply without going deeper into the thread you potentially pass up information which could add to your personal knowledge store. You're effectively screwing yourself.

          Of course if you're replying to only increase post count it doesn't matter. You aren't interested in gaining knowledge...

          And that brings us back to the initial question: "...why are we here?"

          Elmer
          Originally Posted by RobinSkeen View Post

          If the original post sparked my interest, I do read the replies to see what others think. I also read replies to see if the point I thought of was brought up by someone else. You're right about the buried information Elmer. I've found some gems.
          Originally Posted by BIG Mike View Post

          I don't know if anyone brought this up, but the ones that don't read the entire thread and comment anyways are usually elected politicians or those running for office.
          Originally Posted by Adam Carn View Post

          Good point Elmer, but imagine this, you just notice a thread with a real good topic, you read the original post and are itching to ask a question or make a comment BUT the thread has 200+ posts. Now if you're quite busy it could be a daunting task going through all of them.

          But that's no excuse and I do agree with you.

          Thanks,
          Adam
          Originally Posted by Michael Mayo View Post

          Elmer, Good points and so true.

          I've seen it happening more and more here lately.
          So, I deceided I would help out the next person that posts by placing all
          the previous posts in this thread together for them to read.

          Have a Great Day!
          Michael
          Originally Posted by markshields View Post

          I know when I do reply to a post I always read the thread to see what has been said and what hasnt before I submit a reply as there is no point in providing worthless information
          Originally Posted by Elmer Hurlstone View Post

          Thanks Michael,

          You've saved me time as I review the responses.

          One question: Is this a service you'll be providing for all threads?

          Adam,

          A valid point--to a point. The super-long threads are exactly the ones where there is greater possibility of benefit. And, as they are not all that common the potential loss of time may be repaid by the reading.

          Although that will not always be the case...

          Sometimes a thread does go astray.

          Big Mike,

          I don't know if you said this, but...

          Robin,

          Thanks for the contribution and corroboration.

          Elmer

          PS. Be careful when creating and writing a post title. You may not care for the auto-generated tag.
          Now that is funny...lol!
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329750].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author markshields
    I know when I do reply to a post I always read the thread to see what has been said and what hasnt before I submit a reply as there is no point in providing worthless information
    Signature

    All My Secret Strategies Exposed - http://www.OneMillionIncome.com

    View My Blog For $1000 + FREE Info - http://www.MarkMcCulloch.info

    Decide Your Own Income - http://www.DecideYourIncome.eu

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329680].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Frank Donovan
    Good points, Elmer. The forum format is, essentially, a group discussion.

    When someone starts a thread, it's usually in order to begin a discussion on a subject with potential interest to a wide and disparate group of marketers. Any of these may make subsequent points that move the discussion in a particular direction.

    Someone having the arrogance to choose to bypass these contributions runs the risk of repeating a point or missing a vital turn in, or addition to, the subject under discussion.

    It's disrespectful to the other contributors and readers.

    If you're determined not to have your opinions swayed by other contributors, you're missing out on an important facet of forum membership. I'm always learning - and often from the most unexpected sources.


    Frank
    Signature


    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329810].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author edmltw
      To create a Significant Impact on others...

      Ed
      Signature

      Need A Easy, Drag and Drop Website Creation Platform?
      Click Here To Find Out More

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329844].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Elmer Hurlstone
        Originally Posted by edmltw View Post

        To create a Significant Impact on others...

        Ed
        Certainly a valid viewpoint, Ed.

        Just remember not to confuse "significant" with "beneficial". They are not synonyms.

        Elmer
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329865].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author edmltw
          Noted

          Have a great day ahead Elmer!

          Ed

          Originally Posted by Elmer Hurlstone View Post

          Certainly a valid viewpoint, Ed.

          Just remember not to confuse "significant" with "beneficial". They are not synonyms.

          Elmer
          Signature

          Need A Easy, Drag and Drop Website Creation Platform?
          Click Here To Find Out More

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329891].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BIG Mike
    Banned
    [DELETED]
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329903].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Elmer Hurlstone
      Originally Posted by BIG Mike View Post

      i didn't read all the comments because it slows me down when I'm building my post count up
      Get to work, Slacker!

      You need over 2100 to hit 10K

      With a bit of work you can make it over the weekend.

      Elmer

      Back to our regularly scheduled programming...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329923].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
        Originally Posted by BIG Mike View Post

        i didn't read all the comments because it slows me down when I'm building my post count up
        Originally Posted by Elmer Hurlstone View Post

        Get to work, Slacker!

        You need over 2100 to hit 10K

        With a bit of work you can make it over the weekend.

        Elmer

        Back to our regularly scheduled programming...
        Or, you could give your log in info to Steven W. and break 10K in about 2 hours?

        Back to work I go!
        Michael
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329931].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author la dominatrix
        Originally Posted by Elmer Hurlstone View Post

        Get to work, Slacker!

        You need over 2100 to hit 10K

        With a bit of work you can make it over the weekend.

        Elmer

        Back to our regularly scheduled programming...
        Especially if you do not read all the threads. However I have found some of the best info these posts have to offer hidden deep in threads. Sometimes I research one topic say "traffic" and read for two or three hours and copy and paste the best of the threads and keep them on my hard drive for future reference.

        There are some fantastic gems in the copywriting forum I could spend a day in there easy.

        Equally there are some hot threads that I have found worthless it depends what you are looking for
        la dominatrix
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329953].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author George Wright
    My Mama used to say of some people, "They are so busy trying to figure out what they are going to say next they don't have time to listen." That might apply here.

    George Wright
    Signature
    "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329936].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author actionplanbiz
    what ever catches my attention, then ill read it. but im not going to read a 400 post thread before i reply =D
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1329968].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Frank Donovan
      Originally Posted by actionplanbiz View Post

      what ever catches my attention, then ill read it. but im not going to read a 400 post thread before i reply =D
      But what would you be replying to? In such a thread, the conversation would have almost certainly moved on a fair distance from the OP.

      And why would you expect anyone to read your post?



      Frank
      Signature


      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1330018].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author actionplanbiz
        Originally Posted by Frank Donovan View Post

        But what would you be replying to? In such a thread, the conversation would have almost certainly moved on a fair distance from the OP.

        And why would you expect anyone to read your post?



        Frank
        My reply wouldnt necessary be towards the OP. if its an interesting statement or question i would answer it no matter if someone already mentioned it.

        and why would you expect no one to read peoples posts?
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1330319].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Frank Donovan
          Originally Posted by actionplanbiz View Post

          and why would you expect no one to read peoples posts?
          Er..because of this:

          Originally Posted by actionplanbiz View Post

          ... but im not going to read a 400 post thread before i reply =D


          Frank
          Signature


          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1330335].message }}
          • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1330350].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Frank Donovan
              Originally Posted by actionplanbiz View Post

              Er.. because its a current active thread...
              Not sure I'm following your logic. Any thread you're replying to is technically active, but I was referring to your hypothetical 400-post thread and reacting to your statement that you'd cherry-pick a post to reply to, regardless of whether the point you were making had already been made and/or responded to elsewhere in that thread.

              I was simply remarking that if others were to follow that practice, you shouldn't necessarily expect any post/reply you make in that thread to be universally read.

              Whatever. Given your previous statement, I suppose I should feel honoured that you've at least responded to my posts in this thread.

              All the best,

              Frank
              Signature


              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1330543].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Killer Joe
                I haven't taken the time to read all the other responses as obviously mine will be the best, in fact I didn't even read the entire OP, but let me just say this...

                Thanks for sharing. Great post.

                KJ

                :rolleyes:
                Signature
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1330584].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author actionplanbiz
                Originally Posted by Frank Donovan View Post

                Not sure I'm following your logic. Any thread you're replying to is technically active, but I was referring to your hypothetical 400-post thread and reacting to your statement that you'd cherry-pick a post to reply to, regardless of whether the point you were making had already been made and/or responded to elsewhere in that thread.

                I was simply remarking that if others were to follow that practice, you shouldn't necessarily expect any post/reply you make in that thread to be universally read.

                Whatever. Given your previous statement, I suppose I should feel honoured that you've at least responded to my posts in this thread.

                All the best,

                Frank

                i am not one of those that says "I don't know if this was mentioned but..."

                i believe that replying with the same point that's already been made still makes a difference in most cases.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1331220].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Michael Mayo
    I just witnessed this happening in another thread and thought that I should give this thread and ethical bump!

    Have a Great Day!
    Michael
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1330204].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Black Hat Cat
    Banned
    Originally Posted by Elmer Hurlstone View Post

    Every time you read the OP and dash off a reply without going deeper into the thread you potentially pass up information which could add to your personal knowledge store. You're effectively screwing yourself.

    Elmer
    Alternatively, if every time you read a long thread that adds nothing to your knowledge base, you've effectively screwed yourself because that time could have been used to set up another income stream, or to improve one you already have.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1332149].message }}

Trending Topics