![]() | | ||||||||
| | #1 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
| I'm doing a lot of video for a continuity site and since I use a Mac, all my videos are Quicktime. Is that good for most viewers around the world or would I be better off rendering them in Flash? Thanks! |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Scotts Valley, California, USA
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
The last statistic I saw (dated about nine months ago, I think) had Flash player penetration at 99 percent of all internet-enabled computers while Quicktime penetration was at 64 percent. Unfortunately, I can't put my hands on where I saw the stat. Frank |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hey Frank, Thanks!! Mike |
| | |
| | #4 |
| DIY Internet Marketing War Room Member Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Brisbane
Posts: 4,917
Blog Entries: 10 Thanks: 7
Thanked 989 Times in 448 Posts
|
Hey Mike In general, the Flash video format is very good at playing as it streams down additional content. WMV Format, Quicktime and Real either require a streaming server to achieve the effect or do not do as good of a job. While they've improved, it still seams like these other technologies are behind in progressive download. Quentin |
| | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Drunken Greek War Room Member |
I would do them either in Flash or both, but not strictly Quicktime. I don't even have a Quicktime player installed, so if a site only has MOV video I never get to see it. And I don't want to install Quicktime for my own reasons (and really don't need to).
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Warrior Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Scotland, SD
Posts: 1,224
Thanks: 42
Thanked 277 Times in 180 Posts
|
I'm a Mac user too and although I personally like Quicktime movies, I convert all of mine to Flash just to make life easier. It is as close to a universal player as we are likely to find.
|
| | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Active Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: UK
Posts: 47
Thanks: 7
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Flash every time. Streams better, smaller filesizes, much greater penetration. If someone doesn't have QuickTime Viewer installed, it's like a 25Mb download and then they have to install it!
|
| | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Warrior Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 20
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Hi I have both Mac and PC and I use Quicktime on both without any issues.
|
| | |
| | #9 |
| The Old Geezer War Room Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: , , USA.
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 612
Thanked 641 Times in 240 Posts
|
As an Old Geezer I prefer the simplest way to watch a video. All I want it to do is have a play and pause button. Just so you know that is strictly my own feelings about it. If it plays and I can hear it, I'm good. I have no scientific research, studies, surveys, bailouts or polls to back up my preference except plain old experience. And I'm a viewer. ![]() Ken Leatherman The Old Geezer |
| | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Orangeville, Ontario
Posts: 2,906
Thanks: 1,311
Thanked 1,070 Times in 566 Posts
|
If you can't do flash you can always export an MP4 whici is pretty close to universal.
|
| | |
| | |
![]() |
|
| Tags |
| flash, quicktime, universally, viewable |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
![]() |