JV Giveaway Could Be Illegal - Do You Promote?

by 3 comments
These last couple of days, a discussion is going on whether the Ultimate Giveaway and the Juggernaut Giveaway are run with a legal license or not.

The giveaway manager is said to be using an alias to hide his (pseudo)identity, known for previous hacking attempts. The giveaway manager himself states this is definitely not true.

I've posted the message that was broadcasted on my blog. You can read it - and some comments - here: New JV Giveaways.

Personally, I try to stay objective. As long as it isn't 100% sure this guy is a scammer, I feel I should give him the benefit of the doubt: I promote the giveaway like I usually do, but I encourage people to read the blog post before they sign up, and decide for themselves whether to join or not.

I'm really curious to know how others deal with this situation, and what the impact of this accusation is, especially since the accuser is more known than the accused.

So, let me know how you handle this: do you promote the event or not and what are your reasons for your decision?

#internet marketing #giveaway #giveaways #illegal #joint venture #promote
  • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
    For me, if there is any controversy or negativity at all, I don't promote it,

    My reputation is more important than making a few bucks.
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Lockwood
    Why get involved with this? Do you really think the software publisher is making up the allegation?
    • Profile picture of the author Johnny Slater
      The person in question has stolen 3 scripts that we know of, Giveaway Manager, Simple Member Pro, and Ultimate Giveaway. Brad is very carefull not to make any statements unless he can back it up. If Brad says his software was stolen you can bank on it.. he has code built into his script that tracks valid users.

      Other than that.. if there is even a small chance that the guy could be running illegal software I wouldn't go anywhere near it. My reputation is too important to take chances on others in these types of situations.

Next Topics on Trending Feed

  • 14 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }} 5

    Hi, I'm quite new on internet marketing and I decided to start writing lots of articles related with psychology/personal development tips niche (non-published). However, after writing 40-50 articles I started to read a lot of niche sites and I'm a little confused that probably my articles are getting too broad for this niche. Since I didn't target it for a specific mental health pathology I believe that I went too broad and will be very hard to monetize. I would appreciate any suggestions

  • 2 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }} 5

    There is a fine line between being respectful and offensive to one's point of view and in advertisement it can either lead to effective marketing or a lot of trouble. As they say that one man's controversial idea is another man's offensive idea. Sometimes resorting to provocative campaigns are totally worthwhile if they help you to increase your sales and establish a sustainable brand name in the market. But does that only work for big corporations like Apple, Coca-cola to take risks like these? Can small brands or startups consider such tactics for their advertisement plan as well without destroying their amateur brand legacy? These intriguing questions always pop up in my mind and I think that whether is it a good idea to create advertisements that are beautiful and genuine to attract customers which has a greater possibility of going flat with minimum response from the market or to go for calculated controversial ad campaign against your competitor to gain a lot of public attention?

  • 1 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }} 5

    I scour the WaFo to see if there are any unique methods, etc. that maybe I haven't thought of. Sometimes there are! But one thing that I haven't seen much of is posts that will bring you BACK TO THE BASICS. No matter WHAT level of knowledge you think you are at... if you are not getting clients consistently and bringing home paychecks... then you need to re-gather.