Article spinners are pathetic - I just about fell out of my chair

[Ryan700]

Just did a search for one of my articles from EZA's and found one published that made my eyes water from laughing so hard! It's a woodworking article if you're interested.
Precision Woodworking Tips - How to Cut Wood to Length Accurately With Your Miter Saw | Buy Blowers Vacuums

If you want to see the original it is at:
Precision Woodworking Tips - How to Cut Wood to Length Accurately With Your Miter Saw

Too bad he didn't include my links.

[John M Kane]

It is fitting they have it on the "Blowers" page, eh?

Butt would not it having give economic the finances you're best happiness earnings back to yourself compensations find for they trying Amazon Forester store line shops of make?

[UBotBuddy]

So what does this have to do with Article Spinning?

This is nothing but a bad Scrapping job and a bad stealing job.

[bertuseng]

You have to admit, it's pretty funny in a sort of pathetic way.

[Frank Bruno]

OMG see I what mean you...

Reading stop I had it as so pathetic!

Article spinner You in the hands wrong and what thats get... lol

Frank Bruno


===============

Original version.....


OMG I see what you mean...

I had to stop reading it was so pathetic!

Article spinner in the wrong hands and thats what you get... lol

Frank Bruno

[mhendenterprises]

Intreresting. I've seen articles written like that and just assumed that English wasn't the writer's first language. It looks like what I was reading was a spun article. Eye opening.

[UBotBuddy]

Well, in my Professional Spinning Opinion running an article through some kind of program that might do spinning just to get one copy is not really a spinner. Plus, it is a complete waste of time.

From my analysis, it looks like they read it and made changes (and not very good ones) as they were reading.

A "Normal" spinner would not waste time on a single article to spin. If anything, it is a program that is doing simple replacements. Heck, I don't even spin unless I am going to do five or more and even then I really have to justify it.

[reapr]

Again the spinner is as good as the product and person that does the spinning.

This is just an attempt to get backlinks.

Some spinners are good out of the box others can't fight themselves out of a wet paper bag but still almost all need to be tweaked or trained by the author providing the spinner has that ability and most do.

I have seen so many of these poorly spun articles in the last few months that within the first sentence I hit the delete button and move on to the next.

I use to accept about 80% of articles it is now down to under 50%.

[abdhamidmatsain]

I find the ethics of contents syndication on the internet an unexplored territory.

[JMPruitt]

People will always find a way to prove their point,and ignore any evidence that proves them wrong, it is human nature.

Article spinning is a heated topic around here and nobody really changes their mind. every thread I have seen on the topic is the same regurgitated arguments with nobody listening to each other.

My .02 cents-- article spinning works if it is HUMAN CONTROLLED. the problem is the lazy marketers who want everything automated. The same reason all these crappy get rich programs sell. people are lazy and want to get by without doing any real work.
I use spinning to create content without having to write everything from scratch. However, I personally write every line and word that gets spun. Also I PROOF READ
everything before it gets posted online. That is my name and reputation online, why would I want to put up something that makes me look stupid?

[UBotBuddy]

I could not have said it any better JMPruitt!

[AndyBlackSEO]

Yes. That article was just processed using a script that scrambles the words and replaces random synonyms. A real spinner used properly will always produce good results.