Is BING The Next Google?

115 replies
Is Bing going to become the next Google? I mean when Google came out Yahoo was number 1 and no one thought Yahoo would get booted to second best. In terms of PPC and other SEO tactics does anyone see the potential for Bing to become big? If so what are you doing to position yourself before people jump on board?
#bing #google
  • Profile picture of the author Dan C. Rinnert
    Could get interesting...

    Microsoft and News Corp. are in talks where Microsoft would pay News Corp. to have their sites de-indexed by Google and only show up in Bing's search results.

    Apparently, Microsoft may be working with other large sites for similar deals.

    So, the search engine wars could really just be beginning. Again.
    Signature

    Dan's content is irregularly read by handfuls of people. Join the elite few by reading his blog: dcrBlogs.com, following him on Twitter: dcrTweets.com or reading his fiction: dcrWrites.com but NOT by Clicking Here!

    Dan also writes content for hire, but you can't afford him anyway.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416219].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Daniel Molano
      Originally Posted by Dan C. Rinnert View Post

      Could get interesting...

      Microsoft and News Corp. are in talks where Microsoft would pay News Corp. to have their sites de-indexed by Google and only show up in Bing's search results.

      Apparently, Microsoft may be working with other large sites for similar deals.

      So, the search engine wars could really just be beginning. Again.
      If aything that will the downfall of Bing. Imagine all the bad publicity around that.

      Seriously, what do you prefer? Google's user oriented search or Bing's paid censorship?

      I know who's going to win that one. Besides, I like Google, they love my SEO.

      Not only that, but Google doesn't force any rankings.

      Why do you think Matt Cutts uses Wordpress instead of Blogger, or that one random site can beat Google themselves for a term they are targeting on their home page (http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...ss+solutions)?

      I'm definitely sticking to Google.
      Signature
      Como Ganar Dinero Por Internet - Spanish Make Money Online Site

      Daniel Molano
      - LinkedIn Profile
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421674].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author ForeignProfessor
        Originally Posted by Daniel Molano View Post

        If aything that will the downfall of Bing. Imagine all the bad publicity around that.

        Seriously, what do you prefer? Google's user oriented search or Bing's paid censorship?

        I know who's going to win that one. Besides, I like Google, they love my SEO.

        Not only that, but Google doesn't force any rankings.

        Why do you think Matt Cutts uses Wordpress instead of Blogger, or that one random site can beat Google themselves for a term they are targeting on their home page (business solutions)? - Google Search

        I'm definitely sticking to Google.

        Actually this has a very interesting international precedent. Google doesn't succeed everywhere. They fail miserably sometimes.
        Here in S. Korea the search engine rankings go like this:
        Naver - 74.47% of searches
        Daum - 14.47%
        Yahoo - 4.04%
        Google - 1.53%

        That was as of April this year.

        Now the interesting question is, why? Why is Google so goddamned weak here?

        One great reason: Naver and Daum both 'garden wall' their web properties. What this means is that they do not allow other search engines to index their results. These two web companies have massive local presences which have (1) The equivalent of a Yahoo Answers on STEROIDS which answers just about every question anyone has or has ever had, on Naver and (2) By far the most popular discussion forums for EVERY SINGLE TOPIC IN EXISTENCE on Daum.

        And this is ALL cut off from Yahoo or Google. They don't get access to it, they can't index it, so they miss out on SO many internet searches. They are gardenwalled out just like News Corp might do to Google in the English speaking world.

        Another great reason: Style. Google, at least, didn't adapt to the local style. Quite frankly locals like garish and complicated a lot more than they like simple fast and sleek. Check out: »õ·Î¿î ¼¼»óÀ» ¿©´Â ¹®, G¸¶ÄÏ for example. This site is owned by ebay but MY GOD it is a mess of disgusting .gif explosions and LOUD pictures. Ebay.com looks calm in comparison. The google.com search results here are quite frankly 'boring', and they are planning on changing them soon to make them similar to naver.com's search results. ie messy explosions of flash and gif. It'll be interesting to see whether that helps or not.

        Anyway, R. Murdoch and Newscorp may well be on to something wise (or at least profitable) with the garden-wall method of protecting web real estate and managing how this can turn a profit. It's been done already here in Korea. Maybe it's too late to try and introduce it into the English-language internet but it will be interesting to see how it plays out.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421755].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Dan C. Rinnert
        I disagree that Google has search results far better than Bing. There are lots of times where the top results are just junk. I think people become so ingrained with "Google! Google!" that they overlook this. They go to Bing, do a couple searches, see junk and conclude it's no good. Then, they go back to Google, and are blind to the junk results there, simply because they're used to it.

        In other words, they are typically not doing a fair comparison, but one that is rather subjective.

        Originally Posted by pheonix44 View Post

        This is what everyone said of Yahoo when Google came out. Things happen, just because something seems really hot today and like it will always be the standard does not mean it will.
        That's what always comes to mind when these discussions come up. Back in the day, I'm sure many people never imagined Yahoo! would be where it is today. People couldn't imagine anyone but Yahoo! being on top.

        Originally Posted by Daniel Molano View Post

        If aything that will the downfall of Bing. Imagine all the bad publicity around that.

        Seriously, what do you prefer? Google's user oriented search or Bing's paid censorship?
        I'd prefer the search where I find the things I'm looking for. As an end-user, what do I care why I can't find the results I am looking for in Google? The bottom line is they won't be there. So, I would need to go where they are.
        Signature

        Dan's content is irregularly read by handfuls of people. Join the elite few by reading his blog: dcrBlogs.com, following him on Twitter: dcrTweets.com or reading his fiction: dcrWrites.com but NOT by Clicking Here!

        Dan also writes content for hire, but you can't afford him anyway.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421907].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Daniel Molano
          Originally Posted by Dan C. Rinnert View Post

          I'd prefer the search where I find the things I'm looking for. As an end-user, what do I care why I can't find the results I am looking for in Google? The bottom line is they won't be there. So, I would need to go where they are.
          Sure, of course it could quite possibly work from their business perspective.

          I'm simply not endorsing paid censorship, because if that happens on a larger scale, corporations with huge budgets will take control of the search engines, and start making calls on what can and cannot be seen by the end-users, including their competition.

          If Bing is open to such arrangements (which we already know Google is completely against), then they will be open to all sorts of monetary incentives.

          That would basically destroy our internet businesses.
          Signature
          Como Ganar Dinero Por Internet - Spanish Make Money Online Site

          Daniel Molano
          - LinkedIn Profile
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1424154].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Anne Hays
      Banned
      [DELETED]
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1422049].message }}
  • I bought a new computer that had the Bing toolbar already on IE. I used it s few times, and HATED the search results it returned. I got rid of that thing and went back to google.

    So, I tried Bing, but went right back to google. If they are going to compete, they need to get better listings in their search rankings.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416224].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ebizman87
      Originally Posted by Charles Montgomery View Post

      I bought a new computer that had the Bing toolbar already on IE. I used it s few times, and HATED the search results it returned. I got rid of that thing and went back to google.

      So, I tried Bing, but went right back to google. If they are going to compete, they need to get better listings in their search rankings.
      This is the rEASON why I'd NEVER EVER use BING!!
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1420723].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ashley Wright
    Personally NO for me, I feel that Google has set its heights and personally I don't even think Bing will out rank Yahoo personally!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416241].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JasonP
    Well, this is something that only time will tell. Anyone remember Lycos?
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416250].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kay King
      I wouldn't discount Bing lightly. My sites have done well in Bing without any effort on my part.

      I've had mixed results with searches but I've seen improvement over time.

      I'd like to see TWO strong companies competing to provide best search and best custommer service.

      kay
      Signature
      Saving one dog will not change the world - but the world changes forever for that one dog
      ***
      One secret to happiness is to let every situation be
      what it is instead of what you think it should be.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416259].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Will Edwards
      Originally Posted by JasonP View Post

      Well, this is something that only time will tell. Anyone remember Lycos?
      Yes - and Alta Vista too!

      Will
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417173].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Sean Donahoe
    You know, I really like Bing and have found it to be pretty good with it's selections and quality of results. I have to play with it more but I like where it is going.

    Like most I use Google almost entirely but here is one thing I like about Bing, I can get my results as RSS... that opens up a ton of possibilities!

    All the best

    Sean
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416254].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WebFlip
    I do think Bing has skyrocketed compared to any other competition, although it is Microsoft.

    The thing about microsoft that many don't realize, is that they can dominate their market share. People can't anger Microsoft because they have such a large market share in computing, but beyond that, BROWSING. How many use IE as their default browser?

    Microsoft will always have Google in check because they can always "ban" Google sites or make it difficult for users to access Google over Bing.

    I know it may seem ridiculous, but They've always been aggresive in their takeover practices (save Yahoo) in the the past.

    I'm not sticking up for Microsoft (just ranting myself) but considering their makret share in not just OS but Browsers.

    Safe Travels,
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416255].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yourreviewer
    Sorry, a BIG NO. Google is light years ahead of Bing and Yahoo.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416307].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jbode
    Yeah, I think Google is way ahead of Bing... Since Google will be releasing its Chrome (online) Operating System that will give them a huge advantage + their search engine algorithm is much more advanced
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416415].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author zhunzi
      First things first, can Bing beat Yahoo
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416432].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author 808glass
        Originally Posted by zhunzi View Post

        First things first, can Bing beat Yahoo
        Bing (Microsoft) actually bought Yahoo search a few months ago.

        Bing + Yahoo: What Does It Mean For Users?

        If you really want to know which search engine is better take this taste test and post it back here:

        Blind Search

        enjoy, I've only ever picked Google
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416466].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author bazzais
          Bing are miles behind google in search technology.

          Compounded with that is the fact that its going to take more than technology to get google from the top of its its 'monopoly'. Google is synonymous with search, especially here in the UK with google ruling over all other search engines by a massive margin.

          Personally I feel sick when I even think that bing could be top dogs in search, as much as I hate the google empire, having Microsoft at the the top for both OS and search is a sickening thought.

          Ta

          Baz
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416499].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Ralf Skirr
          Originally Posted by 808glass View Post

          If you really want to know which search engine is better take this taste test and post it back here:

          Blind Search

          enjoy, I've only ever picked Google
          Nice tool, just showed me I rank much better at Bing and Yahoo.
          ;-)
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416544].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Wham
            yeah bing doesn't even come close to google. unless something somehow happened to google nothing is going to beat it. its not like google is going to ever sit around and wait for the competition to catch up, google will always stay ahead.


            bing has an ugly interface in my opinion as well...
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416577].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author reapr
              If this would come true I would give my left ... arm, leg or what ever. I don't think it will happen but I remember when altavista was all the rage so I hope I am wrong
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416591].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Gerard_1980
    When Bing first came out I saw an increase in traffic - but now its back to live.com times
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416439].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Shana_Adam
    Who can compete with big G. The amount of applications and tools in development in their labs is exponentially beyond the comprehension of the average human being. Every week I discover a new Google feature that can really help IM'ers.

    Problem is simplicity in itself is more valued than spending half the day trying to work out how to use these features.

    Anything yahoo can do google can do better....just remembered that song
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416500].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DogScout
    a lot of older users use Bing. They grew up on Microsoft. Probably why Bing is a better place to use PPC with medical advertisers. So while I wouldn't discount it, as the old MS users die off, unless there is a radical shift, so might Bing!

    Conjecture, admittedly. Lol.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416508].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author 1960Texan
    If you really want to know which search engine is better take this taste test and post it back here:

    Blind Search
    808glass




    Thanks for the link, this is a great time-saver.
    Will
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416626].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jasonmorgan
    a lot of older users use Bing. They grew up on Microsoft. Probably why Bing is a better place to use PPC with medical advertisers. So while I wouldn't discount it, as the old MS users die off, unless there is a radical shift, so might Bing!
    It's not just older users, but users who aren't very techy or are happy using what their computer came configured with.
    Signature

    I'm all about that bass.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416668].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416672].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kevin Regier
    I think right now they are too different for Bing to win out. Google has branded itself well and offers so many other services. With GoogleWave hitting the beta market now, and Google Chrome OS on the horizon.

    Well see it will be an interesting battle!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1416966].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
    Originally Posted by pheonix44 View Post

    Is Bing going to become the next Google?
    Yes, but not the way you think.

    If you look at Google Caffeine - which is definitely "the next Google" - you'll find that the search results there are subtly different.

    I spent several years working with Microsoft in various capacities. One of the many things I worked on was what would later become Bing. And the results Google Caffeine gets are strikingly similar to the ones Bing got when it was in early development.

    Bing really is a better search engine, in ways that Google very much sees and would really like to have themselves. But where Microsoft spent years figuring out how Bing should work to be a better search engine, Google has a ready-made roadmap: they can look at Bing, and try to get the same results on their own. They're doing a good job, and they'll be able to copy the things that make Bing better a lot faster than Microsoft could invent them.

    So Google is going to start doing more or less the same things Bing does, and it won't take as long as you think. You'll still go to Google, but you'll get all the benefits of Bing.

    Bing's a game-changer. It's altered the way search will look in the future, whether it's on Bing or somewhere else. But in the end, you're probably not going to switch search engines.

    It's important to remember that we all win in this battle. Bing and Google are not trying to win some abstract medal, they're trying to win a geek war - who can deliver the best search results? - and the ultimate victor is us. We get those better search results, no matter who wins, and in the end they'll both look pretty much the same.
    Signature
    "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417068].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Slin
    Bing and google seem to rank my sites about the same..I mean slight differences, but generally if one does well in one, it does in the other.

    So I don't know if it makes a big difference.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417101].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Sara Young
      One of my sites doesn't get any traffic from Google - I think it got penalized or something - but it does get a good amount of Bing searches. It might be interesting to test what converts better - Bing traffic or Google traffic. Because people who come from Bing do seem to buy...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417113].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author J smith
        Bing refuses to index any of my sites, much less rank them lol. Not sure why.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417136].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
    To be sure, we ain't heard the last of this.
    Signature
    Why do garden gnomes smell so bad?
    So that blind people can hate them as well.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417131].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WinsonYeung
    The search engine war will only benefit us as the internet marketer!
    Hopefully we can get better customer support from Google than. It's a wake up call to them once yahoo getting bigger
    Signature
    [WSO of The Day] Discount How To Generate 172.56% Positive Return OR build your List for FREE!

    "Case Study: Discover You Can Make $1371.66 With A Simple Blog Post by Clicking Here"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417157].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author claywalsh
    google has such a market share that I doubt bing will ever take over. BUT they may grab some market share...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417162].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mohsin Rasool
    Well I have been non-Microsoft LOL . Like and user Google Search every day.

    BUT i have to admit this:

    IMAGE search of BING is FASTER and More Productive that Google's ...
    and for Image search i often fire Bing to get results!

    Also sometime I see Google is SLOW, or taking so much time to respond..
    I go use BING and it always works fine and FAST...

    Thank God we have an alternative there...otherwise if Google sleeps we have too..
    but now for the Google's downtime we have BING

    Regards,
    Mohsin
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417185].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pheonix44
    Bing really is a better search engine, in ways that Google very much sees and would really like to have themselves. But where Microsoft spent years figuring out how Bing should work to be a better search engine, Google has a ready-made roadmap: they can look at Bing, and try to get the same results on their own. They're doing a good job, and they'll be able to copy the things that make Bing better a lot faster than Microsoft could invent them.
    I thought it was the other way around and microsoft could steal an idea faster then someone could make them.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417864].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
      Originally Posted by pheonix44 View Post

      I thought it was the other way around and microsoft could steal idea faster then someone could make them.
      Microsoft is the only company on the planet that has written a modern operating system from scratch.

      Everything else is running on a UNIX core.

      Who do you think is the big innovator?
      Signature
      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417899].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author MichaelHiles
        Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

        Microsoft is the only company on the planet that has written a modern operating system from scratch.

        Everything else is running on a UNIX core.

        Who do you think is the big innovator?
        Quoted for the GDMFING truth.

        All these linux freaks don't realize that it was based on a very old, pre-existing OS that could never attain a viable commercial foothold because the fact that it was "open source" meant it kept forking, and no single variant could sustain itself against the competitive landscape of all the other variants, let alone the competition of other OS developers.

        Kind of like... present day.

        It's good stuff, but it's not pure innovation, and it's never going to take over the desktop.

        The only chance any company has is when the technology platform of "the computer" finally dies and computing completely converges with some other mobile platform or home information processing and storage center.

        But MS still owns the desktop.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417915].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
          Originally Posted by MichaelHiles View Post

          All these linux freaks don't realize that it was based on a very old, pre-existing OS that could never attain a viable commercial foothold because the fact that it was "open source" meant it kept forking
          Well, to be fair... that's not why it couldn't attain a foothold.

          UNIX was 32-bit from the ground up. You could do a 16-bit UNIX (Mark Williams' Coherent was an excellent example, and Minix was decent), but you wouldn't be compatible with the vast majority of UNIX software because it implicitly assumed that all integers and pointers were 32-bit.

          It was a good 20 years before 32-bit systems were the norm in the consumer market, and that's when Linus Torvalds built the best damn open-source UNIX kernel on the planet. Although I am personally a greater fan of BSD - until then, the only open-source UNIX kernel on the planet - Linus took a vastly superior approach to the thread scheduler, largely because he didn't know how one "should" be built. If he'd had a few more CompSci classes before writing it, he probably would have borked it up just like everyone else did.

          In a related story, the reason Google works so well is that Page and Brin had no damn clue how search engines currently worked or were supposed to work. The algorithms that make Google the dominant search engine are based on elementary graph theory, widely regarded as a ******* child of serious mathematics, because they didn't know the "real" way to build a search engine was with much more CPU-intensive LSI techniques.

          So be nice to newbies, because that big idea that revolutionises the industry is NOT coming from an old hand, and when you first hear it you'll think it's stupid.
          Signature
          "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417970].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
        Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

        Microsoft is the only company on the planet that has written a modern operating system from scratch.

        Everything else is running on a UNIX core.

        Who do you think is the big innovator?
        I had a graphical OS before people even knew about "Windows" - the concept is old. (Keyword: Amiga OS )

        Didn't MS "steal" the idea from Steve Jobs back in the olden days?

        I dont like Apple (at all)...but if at all i would give them credit for being innovators when it comes to modern GUI based OSes.

        Otherwise i agree with you, i also think its horrible that MacOS now is only another Unix running on PC hardware - i did not like Apple but their OS and hardware ONCE was good. Not anymore.

        As for Windows...there are FAR too few changes back from the old Windows 98 days to today...and "basically" there are still so many flaws in Windows which have never been fixed.

        For example how each Windows PC still uses the registry etc. and so forth. We all use Windows, but i still think its a bad OS, far from optimized. Weaknesses are compensated with beefy hardware.
        Signature
        *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
        -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
        *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
        Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418345].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
          Originally Posted by GeorgR. View Post

          I had a graphical OS before people even knew about "Windows" - the concept is old. (Keyword: Amiga OS )
          Keyword: Xerox Star.

          Amiga stole it, too. Everybody stole it, except Xerox.

          As for Windows...there are FAR too few changes back from the old Windows 98 days to today...
          Before you go too far down this particular line of reasoning, I think you should know that I was on the Vista team at Microsoft. I helped ship that product. Every single time you run Vista, you're running some code I wrote. Not a lot, of course, but some.

          So if you want to make accusations about what did or didn't and should or shouldn't change, you'd best have done your homework. Because that's my product.
          Signature
          "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418480].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
            Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

            Keyword: Xerox Star.

            Amiga stole it, too. Everybody stole it, except Xerox.



            Before you go too far down this particular line of reasoning, I think you should know that I was on the Vista team at Microsoft. I helped ship that product. Every single time you run Vista, you're running some code I wrote. Not a lot, of course, but some.

            So if you want to make accusations about what did or didn't and should or shouldn't change, you'd best have done your homework. Because that's my product.
            CDarklock, that's impressive.

            But if i make a comment like that its not an accusation (and for sure not a personal one!)..its an observation. And i don't think anything is wrong with constructive criticism either. I also think if we start now with asking and listing what could be improved in future versions of windows, this thread would become very OT and *long*
            Signature
            *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
            -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
            *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
            Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418541].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
              Originally Posted by GeorgR. View Post

              But if i make a comment like that its not an accusation (and for sure not a personal one!)..its an observation. And i don't think anything is wrong with constructive criticism either.
              It still feels personal, though I try not to bite people's heads off over it.

              But I'm curious. If you take out the registry, then every program that uses the registry - pretty much all major applications written in the past ten years - is still trying to read and write the registry. How do you propose to handle that?

              Keep in mind that over a billion people need your solution to work every single time, without costing them any time or money.
              Signature
              "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418636].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
                Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

                It still feels personal, though I try not to bite people's heads off over it.

                But I'm curious. If you take out the registry, then every program that uses the registry - pretty much all major applications written in the past ten years - is still trying to read and write the registry. How do you propose to handle that?

                Keep in mind that over a billion people need your solution to work every single time, without costing them any time or money.
                CDarklock, exactly! I am aware that such radical changes can NOT be made quickly and the code and applications must be down-compatible, no question. I merely voiced my opinion that i don't like how it is at the moment (its a mess since program/OS data can basically be everywhere)...programs need to be "installed" etc..etc.

                Just as an example that there are some "quirks" (no offense!) in Windows for a long time and as an example that some things (as you say) indeed cannot simply be changed without breaking every application at the same time.
                Signature
                *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
                -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
                *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
                Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418725].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
                  Originally Posted by GeorgR. View Post

                  I merely voiced my opinion that i don't like how it is at the moment (its a mess since program/OS data can basically be everywhere)...programs need to be "installed" etc..etc.
                  Specifically, you said not enough was different.

                  If backward compatibility is important, then everything you used to have has to still be there. That's the only way to ensure backwards compatibility.

                  And since the old system is still there, some developers won't bother to learn the new one. They'll just keep doing things the old way.

                  Indeed, if you take the old system away, they'll complain that you're trying to ruin their business.

                  So yes, all that stuff is still there, and applications throw their data all over the place, and you have to install a lot of programs for no good reason. Because you can't force developers to do what you think they should.

                  Oh, wait... that's exactly what Apple does, isn't it? Must be why they dominate the market.
                  Signature
                  "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418895].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
                    Originally Posted by CDarklock View Post

                    Oh, wait... that's exactly what Apple does, isn't it? Must be why they dominate the market.
                    Market Domination should not be the criterium, a monopoly doesnt make Windows "better" - and it also should not free from constructive thinking and thinking where and what to make things better, where to improve.

                    Because you can't force developers to do what you think they should.
                    Actually, if someone can then it's Microsoft. Come on, MS releases a new OS, API or new ways to access hardware...and every h/w vendor and application writer better adapts to and support the new standards. If they dont they are out of business.

                    Its the vendors which write drivers and apps for the latest versions of Windows - and not Microsoft trying to adapt

                    From that point of view (example registry), MS could very well come up with a new way and slowly "force" all developers to support the new changes and maybe phase out "old methods" in time.

                    They could say, "hey developers, it makes much more sense to have all application data in the program folder instead of using the registry and countless other places..so better stop using the registry for data storage since we want to phase this out sooner or later"

                    Just one example.

                    Side note: I really think that MS needs to be scared by Google OS for various reasons and i am almost positive they are. Apple is (and was) always a niche thing, never main stream..and Linux is too "nerdy". I hope that good things will arise from this although MS wont like it.

                    Sun, a few years ago, might have had the same potential to make a "Java OS", this was before Google even existed. Time was not "ripe" probably for the philosophy of such a "net os" at that time...but it might have come now and Google knows this.
                    Signature
                    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
                    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
                    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
                    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419270].message }}
                    • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
                      Originally Posted by GeorgR. View Post

                      Market Domination should not be the criterium, a monopoly doesnt make Windows "better"
                      Reversal of cause and effect. A monopoly doesn't make you superior. Superiority makes you a monopoly.

                      MS could very well come up with a new way and slowly "force" all developers to support the new changes and maybe phase out "old methods" in time.
                      Are you actually proposing that Microsoft should use their monopoly power to control the products developers release?

                      Didn't they get in trouble for that once?
                      Signature
                      "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
                      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421000].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Darth Executor
          Originally Posted by GeorgR. View Post

          I had a graphical OS before people even knew about "Windows" - the concept is old. (Keyword: Amiga OS )
          You're mixing up "built from scratch" with "100% original". He was saying that Microsoft actually builds their entire OS from the ground up as opposed to taking the frame from another OS and building around that. Nothing is really original anymore.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419254].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author shmeeko69
          To be quite honest, I can't see Bing
          touching the sides with Google, as they don't
          seem to recognise some site addresses.

          If you want to find any website, then
          It's got to be Google's always my first port of call.

          Mark
          Signature
          The Rock n Roll of Marketing Reviews
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421089].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author keithng
    Bing is no where can beat Google in short time now ..

    I prefer Google anyway
    Signature
    Get GDPR Compliant On WordPress AND NON-WP Sites Shopify, ClickFunnels, InstaPage & HTML Everywhere! Get GDPR Compliant FAST! Professional Ecover Design Creator
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417881].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author troy23
    It's easier to get to page one in Bing and Yahoo than it is on Google. Ignoring Bing will lose you a lot of traffic.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417924].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author fitz10
      Originally Posted by troy23 View Post

      It's easier to get to page one in Bing and Yahoo than it is on Google. Ignoring Bing will lose you a lot of traffic.
      I think it is important to pay attention to Bing but for some reason my websites, articles, and blogs have all had a much easier time ranking on Google than Bing or Yahoo.

      Can anyone speak to PPC with Bing? I've never tried it and the great Google ban the other day has me nervous.
      Signature



      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1464588].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author FrankieTP2
    Let's wait and see if people start saying "Bing it!"
    Signature

    I Bet My Wife I Could Make $100 Bucks In Only 3 Days...
    WITH NO PRODUCT - NO LIST - NO JV'S and NO TRAFFIC.

    Here's What Happened... Click HERE To Find Out The Results!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417925].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Adam Carn
    I think it's silly, from MSN.com to Live.com to Bing.com. Make up your mind dammit! LOL.

    I've always been faithful to Yahoo.com. It's the ORIGINAL search engine, I think it's about time it reclaimed the throne. Go Yahoo!

    Thanks,
    Adam
    Signature
    Taking a break...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1417935].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pheonix44
    If this would come true I would give my left ... arm, leg or what ever. I don't think it will happen but I remember when altavista was all the rage so I hope I am
    I've been seeing alot of advertising on television promoting them lately.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418111].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JV3STUDIO
      Microsoft's clearly not giving up on search. I think their market share will continue to increase over the next few years, especially in the US. They're going to throw a lot of money on TV ads during the holidays. If they reach a significant % of the search market who knows what'll happen.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418164].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author butters
    Personally I cant see it happen, google is so much more then search and is so well in peoples mind that google is what they use and will always use. Normally when google do something its good so I'm sure they wont see microsoft as a real threat. Thats my oppinion anyway
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418173].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Platinum Matt
    Bing gets ONE chance.

    ONE search... If they don't produce equal or better results than google (i.e. giving me what I searched for) then I simply won't try them again.

    Bing had that chance with me, and no doubt millions of other people.

    Google aren't stupid.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418231].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sweetfranky
    I doubt it but I hope it overtakes Yahoo. Something new is going to have to come out of nowhere to take on Google, kinda like firefox against IE.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418252].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JustVisiting
    BING can be #1 tomorrow if WE, the internet users want it to be. Google is NOTHING without us. The POWER is in OUR hands. I think it's about time Google received a 'wake-up call'. It is far too big, with it's corporate fingers in far too many pies.

    Let's arrange a date when EVERYONE uses an alternative to Google? How about a Yahoo and BING day?

    Competition is good, it needs to be encouraged
    Signature
    "...If at first you don't succeed; call it Version 1.0"
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418294].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pheonix44
    BING can be #1 tomorrow if WE, the internet users want it to be. Google is NOTHING without us. The POWER is in OUR hands. I think it's about time Google received a 'wake-up call'. It is far too big, with it's corporate fingers in far too many pies.

    Let's arrange a date when EVERYONE uses an alternative to Google? How about a Yahoo and BING day?

    Competition is good, it needs to be encouraged
    Competition is always good otherwise they'll get to the point where they'll throw anything at us. Just look at Ebay, sure Amazon competes, but their system is different. If someone had offered real competition to them they would not think they were god and make it hard for sellers.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418403].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author robinincarolina
    Just had this exact conversation with a fellow marketer. He convinced me, google chrome.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418418].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author didiert
    Bing + Yahoo can make damage in google search engine %, but is very difficult to conquer google space in other concepts.

    Competition is really good for all users!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418487].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author natscash
    It could. But that would take a few years to play out. Google will not stay number 1 forever. I definitely like BING's commercials though.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418562].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PaulTobey
    Bing? Not likely. This month's stats are showing me 11,206 Google click throughs and only 36 for Bing. And, my optimization is actually higher for most keywords on Bing. If that doesn't speak volumes I don't know what does? Cheers.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418659].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Marian Berghes
    I think that so many people consider Google's search results better then Bing's just because you got used to the way google works...Bing is still somewhat of a mystery when it comes to exactly how websites get ranked and all that stuff.

    go try out Bing for a month everyday without ever going to Google...I can bet that when you go back To google (if you go) you will think that Bing had better search results in some areas at least.

    Bing can take google if they start building some apps around it...get people to use the apps and then they might start using the search too.

    And don't get so confident about Chrome OS, Microsoft already has for some time the Windows Azure project, witch is a way for developers to develop in the "cloud"...so we might see Microsoft competing with Google over the netbook market and cloud operating systems.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1418705].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author graham41
    I am going to check out bing now. Prefer being on page 1 of Bing than 20 of Google .

    Are there any Bing SEO experts?

    G
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419240].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author -prodigy-
    Originally Posted by Ashley Wright View Post

    Personally NO for me, I feel that Google has set its heights and personally I don't even think Bing will out rank Yahoo personally!
    Originally Posted by zhunzi View Post

    First things first, can Bing beat Yahoo
    Originally Posted by sweetfranky View Post

    I doubt it but I hope it overtakes Yahoo. Something new is going to have to come out of nowhere to take on Google, kinda like firefox against IE.
    As I understand it, MS and Yahoo! have already worked out a deal for MS to start providing BING results for Yahoo! searches beginning next year.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419479].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author misha39
    I think Bing can not beat Google. Bing doesn't have any new useful features compare to Google that can attract user
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419528].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tomsmart80
    This is a joke right?
    Google at present indexes 2.3billion pages
    Bing 1.1billion
    Google caffeine has over 3.4 billion to-date and the new googlebot is on hyperdrive.

    so your either working for Microsoft or stumbled your way into this forum by mistake

    Oh yeah and dont forget whats that other search engine in the number two position after google?
    Tell u what lets make that a competition
    first person with the right answer posted on this forum
    get an all expenses paid trip to the playboy mansion !!

    ok not really but what is it anyway?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419564].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ForeignProfessor
      Originally Posted by tomsmart80 View Post


      Oh yeah and dont forget whats that other search engine in the number two position after google?
      Tell u what lets make that a competition
      first person with the right answer posted on this forum
      get an all expenses paid trip to the playboy mansion !!

      ok not really but what is it anyway?
      Baidu I assume?

      Anyone know anything about it? Is it any good at finding web pages? Does it gives you useful search results or pages of spam? Are their workers well treated geniuses like at Google? Will it be 10x bigger than Google in ten years time?

      Oh, and can you forget about the bit where you said "ok not really"? Thanks
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1422091].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pheonix44
    This is what everyone said of Yahoo when Google came out. Things happen, just because something seems really hot today and like it will always be the standard does not mean it will.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419667].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fraserb
    Bing seems to be installed as a default on some new computers and I've also seen it installed on my own companies works machines.

    There seems to be a lot of hype about it in all the main PC magazines talking about Windows 7 and I certainly think that to ignore is is to do so at your peril.

    Look forward to hearing what others think.

    Fraser
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419686].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Geekybizness
    Well, Google is far ahead of Bing. It'll take a lot of time for Bing to do something Big. However, I like the Bird Eye View of Bing maps. Its awesome. Also mouse-over on the searches in Bing is cool. Has anybody heard of the so called Google Killer, "Blekko.com". Well, apparently, they have started their operations 2 years back, working secretively ( u can see only a puppet on their webpage). They have raised $20 million already in a bad economy like this. Investors must be seeing something big coming.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419706].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Lett
    Although BING won't beat google, everything still is possible and i still want to rank good at all search engines... So i own site "x". there is site "y". Site "x" ranks very good at google, but very bad at BING (actually, no results at all). Site "y", although for the particular keywords ranks ~300place in google, but in bing its number one. Why? How can i increase my rating at bing?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419733].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author scarpet1
    It is interesting because the profit model Google is using is working very well. The profit model Microsoft is using is getting hit hard in some areas ---like Linux in servers and Joomla and Wordpress in website building. If Linux ever gets some momentum in desktops then Microsoft will have thier hands full.
    Signature
    Quote" The goal of education is to replace an empty mind with an open mind."Malcolm Forbes

    Straight Talk Wireless
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419756].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author graham41
    A fewyears ago google was just a geek's dream, something new never to threaten the big boys. Things can change. We take IM for granted , 20 years ago nobody here would have ever thought that it could have evolved the way it has.

    Keep an open mind

    G
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419933].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author freudianslip27
    I think that google plays it smart with their ultra simple approach. I know there was the big battle before, but Google has their feet planted pretty firmly now, especially looking at their presence in YouTube and Adwords/Adsense as well.

    It would be nice to see Bing gain more of the share though. As a SEO guy, I hate having to rely so much on one search engine.

    Matt
    Signature

    WarriorForum Rules!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1419950].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fraggler
    It only takes one series of events for anything dominant to come crashing down. This could be from something someone else does that grabs peoples attention or imagination, or it could be something the dominant company does to itself in a error of judgement.

    One example is their attempt to move into Real Estate. This move is really upsetting a few very large companies who rely on the traffic to be exposed to their own advertising. Google wants people to view listings from 3rd party sites from their own web site. Google then gets the people viewing their ads, not the ads of the owners of the data. Googles revenue is from advertisers and by pissing them off with moves like this they slowly build up spite.

    Google is also very careful with how they handle personal data - their most valuable asset. If something happens and this data is used for something that a large majority of people are not happy with (bad judgement call) then these users will start looking for alternatives.

    The IM industry might also be what separates the results of Google to Bing. As IM increases in popularity and pointless sites make up the top 10 of Google, readers will look elsewhere to find uselful sites. Word of mouth will really play a part here.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1420031].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author williamrs
    I hope so, but I don't think so.

    I don't hate Google. On the contrary, I like their ideologies and how they support the Free Software movement (yes, I'm a programmer). However, I don't like the current situation of the internet...

    Google dominates everything! Search engine, Google reader, Blogger, Google Docs, FeedBurner, AdSense, Google News, YouTube, Jaiku, Orkut (biggest social network here in Brazil and also in India and Pakistan), Google webmaster tools, Analytics, Google translator, Chrome... And there are many, many other services they provide.

    But the point is: Google dominates the internet! I feel like a Google's hostage, it seems that I don't have where to run to. When they decide that rebills are not good, anyone promoting this kind of offers gets banned. If they get tired of zip/email submits you get banned. If they think your content is not relevant, you get banned. If they don't like the amount of content in your website, you get banned. If they think don't like your hair color, you get banned. And what can you do? Cry, I suppose, because Bing and Yahoo! have much less traffic and you can't profit from them as much you were profiting from Google. Now, in this exact moment, Google is fighting affiliates and we can do absolutely nothing about it besides keep running and trying to hide. It's sad.

    I hope Bing grows and steal a good percentage of Google's traffic. Then maybe affiliates (and all the other people and companies) working with PPC and SEO can stop struggling to run a simple campaign.

    But here is what makes me smile: we can change this situation, because we are who pay Google. They have a lot of speculative capital, but where does the real money comes from? Yes! It comes from our pocket, AdWords is the only service among all those owned by Google that makes some real money. If we move on to Bing Google will have problems. And don't care about the users, people follow the webmasters. If we take the good content to Bing, the average user will follow us. People look for nice content, not for sites with tons of backlinks or landing pages with tons of unuseful articles that were put there just to please Google.
    Signature
    Steal My Profit Strategy



    >> Download Now <<
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1420720].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JustVisiting
      Originally Posted by williamrs View Post


      But the point is: Google dominates the internet! I feel like a Google's hostage, it seems that I don't have where to run to. When they decide that rebills are not good, anyone promoting this kind of offers gets banned. If they get tired of zip/email submits you get banned. If they think your content is not relevant, you get banned. If they don't like the amount of content in your website, you get banned. If they think don't like your hair color, you get banned. And what can you do? Cry, I suppose, because Bing and Yahoo! have much less traffic and you can't profit from them as much you were profiting from Google. Now, in this exact moment, Google is fighting affiliates and we can do absolutely nothing about it besides keep running and trying to hide. It's sad.
      I hope Bing grows and steal a good percentage of Google's traffic. Then maybe affiliates (and all the other people and companies) working with PPC and SEO can stop struggling to run a simple campaign.
      WE make Google what it is. WE need to use OTHER search engines such as BING and YAHOO. If the TRAFFIC, ie: us, the users, go elsewhere; then that will impact Google.

      Less organic traffic will reduce their PPC business - because Adwords for Search relies on poaching organic traffic...but that's another story.
      Signature
      "...If at first you don't succeed; call it Version 1.0"
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421445].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author lacraiger
    garbage MSN repackaged with a little marketing = BING
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1420750].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steve Faber
    I can get great KW results in Google very quickly. In Bing, by contrast it can take me months, if I ever get any good placement at all for the same keywords. I tried that blindsearch though. That was pretty cool, and could be a valuable time saving tool for checking rankings.
    Signature
    For Killer Marketing Tips that Will Grow Your Business Follow Me on Twitter Now
    After all, you're probably following a few hundred people already that aren't doing squat for you.....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1420901].message }}
  • {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421650].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.

    Another great reason: Style. Google, at least, didn't adapt to the local style. Quite frankly locals like garish and complicated a lot more than they like simple fast and sleek. Check out: »õ·Î¿î ¼¼»óÀ» ¿©´Â ¹®, G¸¶ÄÏ for example. This site is owned by ebay but MY GOD it is a mess of disgusting .gif explosions and LOUD pictures. Ebay.com looks calm in comparison. The google.com search results here are quite frankly 'boring', and they are planning on changing them soon to make them similar to naver.com's search results. ie messy explosions of flash and gif. It'll be interesting to see whether that helps or not.
    wow...getting a seizure right now. It's like Homer Simpson designed it
    Signature
    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421765].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author shmeeko69
      I don't honestly see that happening.

      Whenever you try to find a particular website,
      it seems to struggle & doesn't seem to recognise
      even popular sites.

      If MSN Bing want to get a reasonable share of
      the market, then their search spiders will
      have to work alot better than at present.

      Mark
      Signature
      The Rock n Roll of Marketing Reviews
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421783].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Scott Ames
    I'm starting my own search engine. So far I have 5 sites indexed. Google and Bing should be worried.
    Signature

    Success consists of going from failure to failure without loss of enthusiasm. -Winston Churchill

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421786].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author stefanjames
    BING could be the next Google. One thing I do like about Bing right now is that advertising on it is VERY cheap right now because there is not too much competition.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421789].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author webagentspro
    It seems like Bing has a better algorithm. Although Google has a huge market so Bing will take at least a couple of years to compete Google.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1421790].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pheonix44
    BING could be the next Google. One thing I do like about Bing right now is that advertising on it is VERY cheap right now because there is not too much competition
    Which brings me back to the whole point of this thread.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1422026].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jazbo
    Google is part of the language of the world now. I don't see anyone breaking that monopoly soon.
    Signature
    CONTENT WRITER. Reliable, UK-Based, 6 Years Experience - ANY NICHE
    Click Here For Writing Samples & Online Ordering
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1422034].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pheonix44
    So would it not make sense to position yourself on bing when it comes to paid advertising? Afterall Google adwords is so expensive these days to make a profit.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1422344].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Johnlee04
    For me Bing should come with something next year to keep on track with Google's innovation.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1422349].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author carlo_sim
    This has really gotten interesting but i really think that Google will still be leading the search engine wars for now. But we will never know....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1422358].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rod Cortez
    A few points:

    Generally speaking, Google is light years ahead of Bing in many areas.

    Regarding search results: unless you've tested tens of thousands of keywords and their results on both search engines, it's nothing but pure speculation. Sometimes I get better results on Google and sometimes it's better on Bing, it all depends on the keyword or kw phrases that I type in.

    Like someone already posted it's something only time will tell. While improbable, the big G might make a tactical error or two while Bing plays catch up. Personally, I don't think so. I think Google is going to be the leader for at least the next decade. They're getting users hooked on their desktop search, video search, free apps, and finding new ways to reach people.

    Lastly, many ppc marketers and SEO marketers are finding new homes at Yahoo and Bing. Some are doing well enough where they were getting slaughtered at Google but have been able to make a go of it at Y and B. I know plenty of CPA marketers, who are going to KILL me for sharing this, that are making a killing (no pun intended) on Bing and Yahoo and showing Google the full moon.

    RoD
    Signature
    "Your personal philosophy is the greatest determining factor in how your life works out."
    - Jim Rohn
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1422372].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Zach Booker
      Originally Posted by Rod Cortez View Post

      A few points:

      Generally speaking, Google is light years ahead of Bing in many areas.

      Regarding search results: unless you've tested tens of thousands of keywords and their results on both search engines, it's nothing but pure speculation. Sometimes I get better results on Google and sometimes it's better on Bing, it all depends on the keyword or kw phrases that I type in.

      Like someone already posted it's something only time will tell. While improbable, the big G might make a tactical error or two while Bing plays catch up. Personally, I don't think so. I think Google is going to be the leader for at least the next decade. They're getting users hooked on their desktop search, video search, free apps, and finding new ways to reach people.

      Lastly, many ppc marketers and SEO marketers are finding new homes at Yahoo and Bing. Some are doing well enough where they were getting slaughtered at Google but have been able to make a go of it at Y and B. I know plenty of CPA marketers, who are going to KILL me for sharing this, that are making a killing (no pun intended) on Bing and Yahoo and showing Google the full moon.

      RoD
      QFT.

      To expand a little I know guys who go and blow 10 grand testing on adsonar and then once their at a good profitability level turn up the heat and kill it.

      Was Adwords easy from 03-08? Of course.

      Adwords, like most things Google does, just made it easy to put campaigns up. Now that the s.hit has hit the fan with Adwords the people who learnt, tested, and tracked simply move their stuff over and continue to expand.

      For many it's simply a blessing and the push they've needed.

      ...

      In terms of SEO though I will disagree to a certain extent because you do need Google traffic to make any real money with SEO. Sure you can rank a fnews and keep it there for "make money" or something in Bing and Yahoo! but I'll still beat you with a well built review blog ranking for "make money while you sleep" in all three search engines.

      Hopefully you see where my not so well worded example is going...

      ...

      As for the OP people won't just leave something they've used for a long time to go to something that might be 10% better at best.

      Google is a brand. Bing is a funny sounding name.

      People associate Google to getting the search results they need fast and easy. Getting people to convert to a busier looking site, which I dislike much more cosmetically, will be hard.

      Remember it's not about how easy it is for us - the marketers. But how easy it is for the user/consumer.

      Zach
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1424235].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Fraggler
      Originally Posted by Rod Cortez View Post

      Regarding search results: unless you've tested tens of thousands of keywords and their results on both search engines, it's nothing but pure speculation. Sometimes I get better results on Google and sometimes it's better on Bing, it all depends on the keyword or kw phrases that I type in.
      Search result relevance can only be determined by the person phrasing the question/query. What you might think is relevant could be absolute junk to the next person.

      A user won't leave something they are happy with. Like I said earlier, it is going to be things outside of the search engine market that will (if) bring Google down a peg or two.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1427286].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pheonix44
    Lastly, many ppc marketers and SEO marketers are finding new homes at Yahoo and Bing. Some are doing well enough where they were getting slaughtered at Google but have been able to make a go of it at Y and B. I know plenty of CPA marketers, who are going to KILL me for sharing this, that are making a killing (no pun intended) on Bing and Yahoo and showing Google the full moon
    I've known this for a while. You may think this sounds stupid, but I figured out how this whole PPC thing works or any type of paid traffic. If I spend x amount of money per visitor then each visitor will have a value to me no matter what. I can spend 100 dollars and pay 1.00 per visitor. If I make 200 dollars then each visitor has a value to me of 1.00 not including the cost to drive them. The lesser search engines allow you to get cheaper clicks, so even if you get less traffic you still make more money because you ROI per visitor is so much higher.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1422458].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mattlloyd
    Only time will tell. Eventually the users will reap the benefits from these competing search engines. People will only need to choose which one they like best.
    Signature
    Start your own info-marketing business, and scale from $0 to over $81K in under 12 months. Free webinar shows you EXACTLY what I did, and all my private numbers:

    https://WebinarConferenceMeetings.com/startyourowninfomarketingbusiness
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1424207].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pheonix44
    Sounds like what myspace thought before twitter knocked them off the map.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1424256].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Ross Bowring
      However good or plentiful Bing's advertising is, it's going to be hard to bump off the special place Google holds in the mind's of milions.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1424271].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author pheonix44
    I believe eventually they will come up with some sort of preprogrammed offline device people will be able to use at a low cost. Right now we have the Iphone with internet, but it is still out of reach for many people. If someone comes up with a cheap offline device programmed with a specific search engine that gives good results they may hurt Google.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1464481].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mya
    When I went to Bing, I really didn't like its search results, even though a good friend stands by it. I just didn't like it. maybe sometime in the future when it gets better than it is right now, but I don't see myself using Bing anytime soon.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1464611].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Winlin
    I jumped from Yahoo to Google and never looked backed... This "Bing Thing" , where is the "product differentiation" they seem to be offering a watered down version of something less than Yahoo.

    I don't get what they are selling, the market is very satisfied with "google" and "yahoo". If they are going to make a play they need to pitch something that shows they have a better product.

    What is their pitch anyway ?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1895846].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author candoit2
    Originally Posted by pheonix44 View Post

    Is Bing going to become the next Google? I mean when Google came out Yahoo was number 1 and no one thought Yahoo would get booted to second best. In terms of PPC and other SEO tactics does anyone see the potential for Bing to become big? If so what are you doing to position yourself before people jump on board?
    How many people are going to "google it" on Bing?

    Google passed Yahoo, but googling is branded into our vocabulary.

    That would be an amazing feat if Bing gets bigger than Google.
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1896002].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author CustomX33
    Not for some time, but hey, the bigger they are the harder they fall.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1896097].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Steven Downward
    I have not overly liked the search results from Bing. It just has not given me what I really wanted in the way of results.

    But from what Bing has set up for it's self, it is clear that they are here to stay and they want to be competition. So you never know what they might do to bump the Google giant. They have already started to set up major agreements with different companies so you never know what they will be able to do.
    Signature
    Jonathan Budd's 7 Figure Networker System, What's The Truth?
    How To Start An Online Business - Indepth Article Teaching You How With No Money
    Steven Downward's Personal Blog - Stories Of A Traveling Entrepreneur
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1896227].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Tomwood
    If Bing want to win they have to do more than create a better search experience that have to beat the Google cult and brand which has become part of are society and language.

    In my wifes country Bulgaria all the young people refer to Uncle Google which is pretty strong branding
    Signature

    FREE >>As We Thinketh << as a man thinketh for the 21st century The missing chapters are actually the best

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1897135].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tomsmart80
    Q:What is the most used search engine on the planet today?
    A:Google
    B:Bing
    C:yahoo






    ANSWER YOUTUBE!!!!!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1912628].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author frqhuss
    Definitely bing will lead on google because it has the potential to do so, But in first people may disagree and just love to use google but automatically they will turn themselves to bing with the results they will be getting in future from bing.

    It doesn't mean that google will be silent after lossing treir crown and kingdom they will work better on it and fight hard to stay on top, so there is something interesting in future in world of search engine wars....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1912787].message }}

Trending Topics