Go Back   WarriorForum - Internet Marketing Forums > The Warrior Forum > Main Internet Marketing Discussion Forum
Register Blogs FAQ Social Groups CalendarHelp Desk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-28-2009, 11:10 AM   #1
SERP Elite
War Room Member
 
lanta99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia, United States
Posts: 421
Thanks: 188
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via AIM to lanta99 Send a message via Yahoo to lanta99 Send a message via Skype™ to lanta99
Default Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Hi guys,

Anyone know of a (preferably cheap) stock photography website where I can purchase high resolution stock photos and put them on my website?

I checked out istockphoto, fotolia, and a couple other major ones but neither lets me go above 800X600 resolution whereas I need it to go up to 915X500...and I found out about that AFTER I shelled out about a hundred bucks purchasing some of their photos.

By not letting me go above 800x600 I mean in their TOS it specifically says that webmasters may not use their pictures on a web site with the photo resolution of 800x600 or greater.

Oh, and sxc.hu doesn't have the selection that I need in case anyone was thinking that.

Thanks
George

PS. In their policy is says that I can use it for larger than 800x600 if I make "substantial changes" to it. Does placing a water mark count as "substantial changes"?

--Live SEO Challenge--
lanta99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 11:16 AM   #2
www.eCoverNinja.com
War Room Member
 
KarlWarren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United Kingdom.
Posts: 6,051
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 199
Thanked 521 Times in 237 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile  View Member's Twitter Profile 
Contact Info
Send a message via Skype™ to KarlWarren
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by lanta99 View Post
PS. In their policy is says that I can use it for larger than 800x600 if I make "substantial changes" to it. Does placing a water mark count as "substantial changes"?
Only their support department could tell you. All they are worried about is people being able to take the photos from your site and use them. The policy is to protect them and their photographers - not so 'retarded' if you're a photographer and want to earn a living.

eCoverNinja - Sales Page Graphics & Layout Specialist

KarlWarren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 11:29 AM   #3
Warrior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

maybe you should try punchstock
musman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 11:34 AM   #4
Beware - Straight Talker
War Room Member
 
Andyhenry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 9,502
Blog Entries: 26
Thanks: 1,225
Thanked 4,702 Times in 1,582 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile  View Member's Twitter Profile 
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

I use Shutterstock.

Are you new to IM? Read this:
Andyhenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 11:35 AM   #5
Portuguese Warrior
War Room Member
 
Fernando Veloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Good Old Europe
Posts: 4,013
Blog Entries: 7
Thanks: 1,660
Thanked 1,054 Times in 705 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile  View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via Skype™ to Fernando Veloso
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Don't understand your problem. We've bought Big resolution pictures from Istock and no problem.



Fernando's Internet Marketing Consulting service, "SEO Google Trust",
is fully booked right now - Please check back in July/August. Thank you!
Fernando Veloso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 11:35 AM   #6
SERP Elite
War Room Member
 
lanta99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia, United States
Posts: 421
Thanks: 188
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via AIM to lanta99 Send a message via Yahoo to lanta99 Send a message via Skype™ to lanta99
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlWarren View Post
Only their support department could tell you. All they are worried about is people being able to take the photos from your site and use them. The policy is to protect them and their photographers - not so 'retarded' if you're a photographer and want to earn a living.
Hm..well thanks for the heads up, I'll send them an email about that. Anyways, the reason I was frustrated was because they buried the 800x600 rule deep in their TOS instead of plainly stating it on their purchase page.

--Live SEO Challenge--
lanta99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 11:35 AM   #7
SERP Elite
War Room Member
 
lanta99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia, United States
Posts: 421
Thanks: 188
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via AIM to lanta99 Send a message via Yahoo to lanta99 Send a message via Skype™ to lanta99
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fernando Veloso View Post
Don't understand your problem. We've bought Big resolution pictures from Istock and no problem.
Well if you look at their policy it says that for web use the picture may not be larger than 800x600. (I know, no one looks there right?)

--Live SEO Challenge--
lanta99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 11:39 AM   #8
SERP Elite
War Room Member
 
lanta99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia, United States
Posts: 421
Thanks: 188
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via AIM to lanta99 Send a message via Yahoo to lanta99 Send a message via Skype™ to lanta99
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by musman View Post
maybe you should try punchstock
Hm...I really don't think that $250 per photo will be in my budget.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Andyhenry View Post
I use Shutterstock.
No luck, they have the same max size of 800x600 for web use.

--Live SEO Challenge--
lanta99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 11:42 AM   #9
Portuguese Warrior
War Room Member
 
Fernando Veloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Good Old Europe
Posts: 4,013
Blog Entries: 7
Thanks: 1,660
Thanked 1,054 Times in 705 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile  View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via Skype™ to Fernando Veloso
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by lanta99 View Post
Well if you look at their policy it says that for web use the picture may not be larger than 800x600
Oh Never saw it and never saw a discussion about it elsewhere.

Guess they can sue 1 million users for that %stupid% rule - cause now we use at least 920px wide pictures to headers.



Fernando's Internet Marketing Consulting service, "SEO Google Trust",
is fully booked right now - Please check back in July/August. Thank you!
Fernando Veloso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 11:44 AM   #10
SERP Elite
War Room Member
 
lanta99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia, United States
Posts: 421
Thanks: 188
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via AIM to lanta99 Send a message via Yahoo to lanta99 Send a message via Skype™ to lanta99
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fernando Veloso View Post
Oh Never saw it and never saw a discussion about it elsewhere.

Guess they can sue 1 million users for that %stupid% rule - cause now we use at least 920px wide pictures to headers.
Ok, I'll just pretend that I never saw the rule then if they sue me I'll direct them to your website too

--Live SEO Challenge--
lanta99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 11:55 AM   #11
Lee Dobbins
War Room Member
 
cashcow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: , , .
Posts: 2,796
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 637
Thanked 837 Times in 579 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile  View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

I think you can use the photos from BigStockPhoto:

Royalty Free Photos, Download Stock Photos and Images Stock Photos Royalty Free Downloads

Lee

cashcow is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 12:00 PM   #12
www.eCoverNinja.com
War Room Member
 
KarlWarren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United Kingdom.
Posts: 6,051
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 199
Thanked 521 Times in 237 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile  View Member's Twitter Profile 
Contact Info
Send a message via Skype™ to KarlWarren
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

How are you planning on using the images?

Displayed in full on your website? or for another purpose? i.e. integrated into a web header?

If it's the latter, there would be no problem at all seeing as making a header from the image would constitute a 'significant change'.

Have to taken a look at dreamstime.com?

Kindest regards,
Karl.

eCoverNinja - Sales Page Graphics & Layout Specialist

KarlWarren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 12:16 PM   #13
Portuguese Warrior
War Room Member
 
Fernando Veloso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Good Old Europe
Posts: 4,013
Blog Entries: 7
Thanks: 1,660
Thanked 1,054 Times in 705 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile  View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via Skype™ to Fernando Veloso
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Stock photo sites need to update that rule: 2-3 years ago the Header standard size was 800px wide BUT NOW they are bigger, at least 920px wide.

They should upgrade those rules. Just like everybody else.



Fernando's Internet Marketing Consulting service, "SEO Google Trust",
is fully booked right now - Please check back in July/August. Thank you!
Fernando Veloso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 12:23 PM   #14
SERP Elite
War Room Member
 
lanta99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia, United States
Posts: 421
Thanks: 188
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via AIM to lanta99 Send a message via Yahoo to lanta99 Send a message via Skype™ to lanta99
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by cashcow View Post
Thanks!

They just got a new customer!

--Live SEO Challenge--
lanta99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 12:24 PM   #15
SERP Elite
War Room Member
 
lanta99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia, United States
Posts: 421
Thanks: 188
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via AIM to lanta99 Send a message via Yahoo to lanta99 Send a message via Skype™ to lanta99
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by KarlWarren View Post
How are you planning on using the images?

Displayed in full on your website? or for another purpose? i.e. integrated into a web header?

If it's the latter, there would be no problem at all seeing as making a header from the image would constitute a 'significant change'.

Have to taken a look at dreamstime.com?

Kindest regards,
Karl.
It will be displayed in full as the background for one of my tabs script.

Unfortunately, dreamstime has the same policy.

Thanks,
George

--Live SEO Challenge--
lanta99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 12:29 PM   #16
SERP Elite
War Room Member
 
lanta99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Virginia, United States
Posts: 421
Thanks: 188
Thanked 87 Times in 27 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via AIM to lanta99 Send a message via Yahoo to lanta99 Send a message via Skype™ to lanta99
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Also I have an unrelated question.

I've been avoiding all the stock photos with white backgrounds because my website's theme is dark / black.

But are all the white background stock photos transparent?

~George

--Live SEO Challenge--
lanta99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 12:46 PM   #17
www.eCoverNinja.com
War Room Member
 
KarlWarren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: United Kingdom.
Posts: 6,051
Blog Entries: 1
Thanks: 199
Thanked 521 Times in 237 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile  View Member's Twitter Profile 
Contact Info
Send a message via Skype™ to KarlWarren
Default Re: Stock photogrophy...Retarded policy??!?!?!!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by lanta99 View Post
Also I have an unrelated question.

I've been avoiding all the stock photos with white backgrounds because my website's theme is dark / black.

But are all the white background stock photos transparent?

~George
No, they are usually supplied in jpeg format which doesn't support transparency. It's very unlikely to find a stock "photo" with transparency. Most designers could remove the background for you for a very small fee. You might find someone here, or on elance etc. You'd probably find someone to do it for less than $10.

eCoverNinja - Sales Page Graphics & Layout Specialist

KarlWarren is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  WarriorForum - Internet Marketing Forums > The Warrior Forum > Main Internet Marketing Discussion Forum

Tags
photogrophyretarded, policy, stock

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:33 AM.