The good, the bad and the ugly

by 5 comments
Hi everyone, I'm still relatively new here and trying to find my way around so I hope this is the right place for this post.

I've been studying Rich Schefren, Dan Kennedy and Frank Kern quite a bit... they seem to be great guys to learn Internet Marketing from.

However on other forums, I get the feeling that people think they are 'fakes', 'MLMers' and 'con artists'....

You guys obvioulsy understand this industry much better than me and i'd like your feedback please...
#internet marketing #bad #good #ugly
  • Profile picture of the author Aaron Moser
    That's mostly because other forums are filled with negative people. Don't listen to it.
  • Profile picture of the author Meanna Blog
    Originally Posted by Tom Borowski View Post

    As for the names you mentioned: Dan Kennedy's "No B.S." books are gems, highly recommended. Rich Shefren's manifestos are great reading too, I can't comment on any of his coaching offers though. And Frank Kern makes entertaining videos
    Cool thanks, any more names you'd recommend??
    • Profile picture of the author Meanna Blog
      Originally Posted by Tom Borowski View Post

      For list building and basically the whole IM enchilada, Jimmy D. Brown. For affiliate marketing Chris Rempel (chris_surfrider on this forum).

      There are more of course, but it really depends on what approach to Internet Marketing you want to take.
      Thanks for these. I have a niche. It's one that I am passionate about, but the people in that niche don't (by nature) have a stack of money. So i'm looking at ways to sell them small affordable information products on how to succeed in that specific niche.

      I am also very integrated in that niche so I already have a lot of trust. My next step is how to maintain that trust by selling worthwhile products and not just loads of crap...

Next Topics on Trending Feed

  • 1 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }} 5

    The debate never seems to end in my circle of professional acquaintances. Would you rather be paid for projects based on an hourly or fixed rate?Argue as we may, we never do seem to come to a conclusion. I myself am of the opinion that there is no “right” or “wrong” answer necessarily. That being said, I have met many freelancers that are very passionate about one side or the other. For those that prefer fixed rates, they will often ask their hourly rate-preferring counterparts why they would ever be excited to trade their time for money. On the other hand, those that prefer hourly contracts wonder why anyone would agree to a project that may end up requiring much more effort than originally anticipated-- effort that would essentially go unpaid. I personally believe one’s preference for fixed or hourly contracts stems from the way that he or she views work. The individual that sees his or her completed task as product tend to favor fixed rate projects. They feel comfortable pricing a project based on the perceived value that the finished project will bring to the client. Those that see their availability and time as the primary product being offered to the client feel most comfortable billing a client in a similar manner. Interestingly enough, a couple of close friends of mine recently completed projects that they chose to bill using their preferred method. One, a web designer, typically bills clients a flat rate for projects he completes. Another friend, a graphic designer, prefers to bill hourly. Both recently completed projects where they ended up regretting the billing method that they chose! My web designer friend recently landed a gig where he was asked to do a complete redesign for an academic organization. He was thrilled when the client agreed to a very high fixed rate for the project. He was anticipating that the project would run somewhere between 3-4 months. In the end, the project ended up taking almost 6 months! After taking a look standard hourly rates in industry, he found he could have very easily made an additional 50% over the course of the project had he chosen to bill hourly. My graphic designer friend prefers to bill hourly. She has come to expect that clients will ask her for various edits. She offers as many edits as the client asks for as each of these edits is done on the clock. A recent project left her shocked and upset however when the client gladly accepted a project that was done in under a half hour. She ended up selling what she described as an “awesome, professional poster” for less than a quarter of what she would typically make. All this to say, no billing method is perfect in my opinion. As a developer, I tend to favor flat-rate projects. At the same time, I’m sure I can find freelancers doing similar work that prefer hourly billing. Which do you prefer and why? Do you have any personal anecdotes that would help me understand your reasoning?

  • 2 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }} 5

    Hi, Im currently working for several clients, helping them with their Local SEO. I believe Local SEO is the best way local businesses can build a strong online presence, and im sure you all agree with this statement. People these days dont use the local yellow pages for searching for companies or places to buy products or services, they use the internet, and in particular, Google, thats why local SEO is so important, if you build a good rank in your location, customers will came to your place very fast. But local SEO is not an easy thing to do, it can get very complicated in big cities or states, specially if your competition is working on their SEO as well, so we all need to be updated with our techniques and make some efforts for improving everyday.