EZA tips - from a beginner!

8 replies
Hi All

I am very new to EZine Articles with only 10 published articles. However I have discovered a powerful technique for niche research. I am going to share, as it may be useful to other beginners.

1. Why you aren't getting much traffic

Some people complain that they don't get enough traffic from EZA. I would like to share one possible reason (there are many reasons, and this is just one ).

Now I believe in beginners luck - because I had a brilliant experience with my first article, in what I'll call "Niche #1". Check this out:

Days Live: 34 Days
Views: 321
URL Clicks: 109 (Likely to be mostly genuine visitors)
CTR: 34%

Now I am very pleased with that, and I got to #1 in Google as well for the main keyword.

Now I also have another niche which I care about more, #2 where I had this result, fairly conistently. Picking the best peforming article of those:

Days Live: 12 Days
Views: 29
URL Clicks: 5 (Could be just other marketers / article copiers)
CTR: 17%

So even taking the fact the Niche #2 article is younger into account, it has certainly not performed anywhere near as well. I have a niche #3 performing similar to #2, but you get the idea. Niche #1 is King, and the others are doing poorly (but not a disaster).

So.... Where is this leading....?

Well, there are many reasons #2 won't be working as well as #1 such as keyword competition in Google, the competition of the niche generally, they type of visitor etc. Way to much stuff to analyse. So in a minute I will tell you how to analyse the "net effect" of all that stuff as far as EZA is concerned.

So to address the point "why you are not getting much traffic" - it could be because you have picked a tough niche. Now I will tell you how to find out the easier niches to target

2. A simple powerful research technique

This tip may be standard or it may be clever and powerful and I should be selling it for $100 . I don't know! But anyway here it is.

  • Pick a niche keyword ... ok lets say "Dog Breeding"
  • Enter that phrase into the Google search at the top of the EZA site home page.
  • Make a note of the total number of articles - e.g. 2200 for "Dog Breeding"
  • Click the first article and make a note of the date published and the number of views.

E.g. the first one is ~/?Dog-Breeding-and-Newbies&id=3422104 and it has been viewed 24 times since Dec 14, 2009.

  • Work out views per day average. E.g. 24views/21days = about 1 view per day.
  • Based on an assumed click through rate, e.g. 30% work out the visitors to the site per day. E.g. 1 * 0.3 = 0.3 visits/day.
  • Now do this for the next 9 articles.
Now I didn't check the other 9 out, so lets assume the average of the 10 articles analysed so far is 0.5 visits per day.

You have 2 figures for "Dog Breeding". The 2200 total articles and the 0.5 visits per day expected traffic for an article in that niche. So I would say that is pretty poor

Do this for a bunch of niches, and then decide which one you think will generate the most traffic, or more to the point, which one will be most profitable to write articles for.

You can do this analysis in less time than it takes to write a couple of articles, so I think it is worth it.

I may write a piece of software for the War Room to automate this. If there is demand I will do it. Because with software you can analyse quickly very similar words for the same niche that would take ages manually such as "Dog Breeding" "Dog Breeds" "Dog Training" "Pedigree Dogs" "Pedigree Dog" etc. etc.

Hope this is helpful.
#beginner #eza #tips
  • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
    Hate to burst your bubble (I mean REALLY hate to) but this is not a fool
    proof method.

    Sadly, many articles at EZA have inflated views because of various black
    and gray hat methods that people use.

    Therefore, there is no way to tell, from these figures, if an article you write
    in a specific niche is going to perform anywhere near the articles you found.

    On paper, it looks good, but the reality is much different.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1571090].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author LIndaB
      Steven is right. And there are other problems as well. Some articles have much better headlines than others, and are much more apt to be viewed. So you would probably have to total every article in a niche to get an average (and as Steven said, those numbers could be inflated anyway).

      Another point to consider is that some people will have built backlinks to their articles, which will cause them to rank highly in Google. Those articles are obviously going to get more views, since they'll be getting a lot of organic traffic. Every article in a niche won't be promoted by the author. Many people only submit articles to ezine for the backlinks and don't care about the traffic. So they don't necessarily even optimize the article for a keyword they could rank for. So unfortunately, I don't think you have a foolproof method of figuring out niches this way.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1572273].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Shoaib
    Hey guys, at least let him get an "E" for Effort! At least he tried to share something with the rest of the Warriors. He did say he's very new to EZA (but forgot to add "so I may be wrong").
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1572486].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author theemperor
      Thanks for the feedback guys. Yes I agree like any research method, you can't take these numbers alone and make decisions purely on them. You have to apply common sense.

      But this is the same if you use the keyword tool in Google for example. You have to accept there will be inaccuracies sometimes.

      I do take on board the point about backlinks and headlines etc. Sure absolutely.

      Therefore, there is no way to tell, from these figures, if an article you write
      in a specific niche is going to perform anywhere near the articles you found.
      I disagree - you have the articles, you can see their writing methods and you can check their back-links. It should be possible for you to reproduce similar results, if not quite as good as you are not the first one to get there.

      I can totally see your points, and I would have mentioned them myself but the post was getting a bit long as it was. Perhaps I over sold it - it is not a killer method, but perhaps a handy indicator which I would rather know than not know. Call be stubborn, but I am going to keep on using it.

      But I am new to this so I may be wrong!
      Signature
      Learn to code faster, and remove the roadblocks. Get stuff done and shipped! PM me and I can help you with programming tutoring, specialising in Web and the following languages: Javascript ~ HTML ~ CSS ~ React ~ JQuery ~ Typescript ~ NodeJS ~ C#.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1572782].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Taylor French
    Pretty much any research method is going to be flawed in some way. Steven's right, though. A lot of people try to artificially inflate their numbers. Of course, your method is one to keep in mind. It's an interesting twist that might be worth at least trying.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1572804].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Victor Edson
    You're on the right track here. See what your competitors are doing to be successful, and do it. It takes some research, and hard work. But sticking with a plan you can and will be successful.

    Even though there are some flaws in this method, if you like it, check out Created by Camtasia Studio 5

    It's a video I found here on the WF a few months back that shows a little more detailed way of doing this.

    The real key to article marketing traffic is getting the right keyword, title, content, and resource box for a high ctr. Then building a few backlinks to get it ranked for your keyword.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1572885].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author M Thompson
      Part of the problem here is that EZA will get you a lot of views initially these come from a number of sources, competitors, listing on the front page etc and submissions to ezine lists.

      After that you are at the mercy of the search engines. Unfortunately generally less than 50% of articles submitted to ezine articles are indexed in google so half the articles won't get many more views while the ones that are indexed and get good rankings will get a good number of views
      Signature


      If you are serious about online marketing come and Join our free community The Foundation
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1572937].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author theemperor
    M Thompson - this is why I am going to stick to the strategy of writing articles for m blog as per normal (with keyword research) in a way that suits my blog readers (not EZA readers).

    Then once indexed in Google, I submit them as-is to EZA. Once in EZA I submit to other directories. Then the only time I waste is that of doing a submit (30 seconds) if the EZA doesn't get indexed or doesn't do well.

    This strategy is based on the majority advice of what I have seen on threads here and effectively I am "using" EZA rather than "working for" EZA.
    Signature
    Learn to code faster, and remove the roadblocks. Get stuff done and shipped! PM me and I can help you with programming tutoring, specialising in Web and the following languages: Javascript ~ HTML ~ CSS ~ React ~ JQuery ~ Typescript ~ NodeJS ~ C#.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[1573439].message }}

Trending Topics