two twitter questions...
2) A philisophical twitter question -- I see that one can follow another person, ie: elect to RECEIVE msgs. That makes sense -- the receiver of the msgs has the control over what he/she RECEIVES. But there's no way, as the SENDER, one can have control over who is/are the receiver(s), right?!?
If that's so, how does the 'automated' twitter follower signer-upper I've seen work?!?
A basic 'problem' w/ IMing (compared to traditional, offline mrktng) is, the receiver of the mrktng msg(s) is in control of what he/she sees (receives). That is, there's no such thing as 'intrusive' mrktng online (essentially).
So, if the twitterEE is in control of the twitterER, then how can being followED be automated?
-- TW
...www.NateDesmond.com - A blog that explores the confluence of product design, marketing, and data analysis.
http://snipurl.com/MagicWSO
[$5 WSO!] Sorry, you're not fooling anyone! Text-to-voice apps - They're ALL CREEPY -- and they ALL SUCK! - CLICK HERE for the solution!
http://snipurl.com/MagicWSO
[$5 WSO!] Sorry, you're not fooling anyone! Text-to-voice apps - They're ALL CREEPY -- and they ALL SUCK! - CLICK HERE for the solution!
http://snipurl.com/MagicWSO
[$5 WSO!] Sorry, you're not fooling anyone! Text-to-voice apps - They're ALL CREEPY -- and they ALL SUCK! - CLICK HERE for the solution!