Poll: Quality PLR - Would you pay more for limited availability?

I Voted #1 because no matter how much I pay, if it's plr I'm going to rewrite it.

George wright

I too voted for #1.

I voted #2 as I'd much prefer the distribution rights to be limited.

I agree with some of the replies that however high quality the article, it still needs to be re-written in one way or another to suit personal purposes. I'd prob pay a bit more for higher quality articles so the re-edit work is not so extensive but as far as paying more for limited articles, I wouldn't go further than Option 2 (assuming this is the mid range price).

$9 an article in packs of 5 is not that bad IMO if the work is according to custom specs but not in sets of 10.

Thanks for the feedback guys - it seems I missed an option which is $1 an article in packs of 5 ($5) with limited distribution.

Of course its a numbers game - you should always rewrite PLR to a certain extent which is always much easier to do with good quality structured content so you want to pay less than paying someone to write for you specifically.

From the other side I need to charge enough to cover the time I spent researching and writing the articles...

Hi guys

i vote for unlimited because i always change it to suit me and when i have no one even realises that i have actually used plr.

kind regards


sam
X

I generally pay around $3 an article for a completly unique article so I wouldn't actually pay that for PLR because I would more than likely have to change it around anyway.

I think if someone is to sell PLR content for artciles it would have to be an extremely low price for me to consider buying it, like around 25-50 cents an artcile, however if the PLR is of a great quality then I would consider paying higher. I'm not a fan of mass distribution PLR so it would have to be limited. That's just my view though.

Best of luck with your venture!

This is an interesting poll, indeed!

I personally don't think that rewriting PLR is necessary (unless you want to tweak the article for a different keyword or put some unique twist on it) and I always wondered why when "everyone" says it should be rewritten that "everyone" also says that you should only buy it when the distribution is limited.

Anyway, I agree with Tina, nobody is going to pay $9 for a PLR article and i would think even getting $3 would be a hard sell no matter how much you limit the distribution but i also see that a couple of people have voted for that so what do I know?

I sell my packs for $13 ($9 for WSO) for 10 articles and limit the distribution to 100. Seems to work fine for me.

When I buy PLR, I usually do like to buy limited edition stuff, but the most important factor for me is quality and I have purchased plenty of Tiffany Dow's unlimited PLR because of that.

Lee

I agree that this is an interesting topic and I was actually surprised that, even with the current limited sample, so many have gone for the unlimited distribution. That said, perhaps I shouldn't be so surprised since it is also what I have noticed tends to actually sell better.

Will

Really? That is interesting to hear. I always sold limited distribution because I always "heard" that was what people wanted. Shame on me for not testing that out myself!

Lee

Same here. $9 too steep, $1 is okay

Very interesting results. So am I guessing that there would be great value in $1 per article AND limiting the amount?

Would that entice you to buy any more? I've gone down the limiting road myself so it is interesting to see how this thread has progressed.

How about article packs per month on a membership basis, does anyone like the idea of paying per month for xx number of articles on a certain niche when you know they are quality articles.

For example $10 per month for 12 articles or $24 per month for 30....

I'm glad this has generated some discussion and it's interesting to hear from people like Will and Lee who are actually selling PLR themselves.

The membership option is one I considered but personally I'd prefer to pay as I go for articles that I actually want than to pay a fixed price per month for packs that I might never end up using.

It seems that the unlimited distribution for $1 an article is the most popular route and I might go that way for starters. I might test some higher priced limited distribution too just to see what works.

I get the feeling from reading this thread that people have come to expect PLR to be poorly written and in need of a complete overhaul. That is the very reason I decided to write my own because PLR shouldn't need to be completely rewritten. Sure, tweak the title and add in your own keywords but it only needs to be changed enough that the article doesn't end up in the supplemental list. And if you want to use it for autoresponders then well written copy hardly needs to be changed at all.

I am interested in the quality that people get when they pay $3 for unique articles - that seems like such a small fee for the writer to charge. Although I suppose if you can turn out three in an hour that must be near to minimum wage.

I'm so happy with the set that I just wrote that I'm actually loathe to sell it at all and might just use it myself lol

If you buy packs of 5 articles for $1 or $3 or $9 you still got to rewrite to make it unique. So why not get 149000 PLR articles as mentioned below in my signature for dirt cheap price.

I've seen many WSO's with limited quantity, so to see more folks endorse unlimited quantity is a little surprising. This is great feedback. Thanks, Mrs. S for starting the thread.