Spin Percentage for Magic Article Rewriter

13 replies
Any MAR users here? What spin % do you shoot for when preparing an article for rewrites?

Thanks in advance!

Jeff
#article #magic #percentage #rewriter #spin
  • Profile picture of the author J23
    I use SE Nuke not MAR so I'm not sure if MAR works in a similar way or not, but I always go for around 30%. That's what they suggest doing for best results. (Obviously the higher % you can get, the better.)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2027267].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Aaron Elliott
      I always aim for 250-300%, and have them written at high quality just like any other regular article. You can then also post them on article directories, I post all spun articles on the top 3 directories.

      And I get them to write the articles with thebestspinner, this makes word spinning as simple as clicking a button - and reviewing.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2027367].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Marty S
        I use MAR and find it among the top programs available right now. But, its not really the software that makes the difference here, it's how you use it, because there are several that can do the job.

        The 30% difference is rather standard for a process where you are rephrasing each (or most) sentence(s), and then spinning synonyms within it those sentences. This strategy can be used for certain situations.

        However, to jump to the next level in percentile change - like 100%, then start using the spinner by rewriting in paragraph chunks, not individual sentences. Yes, you are really rewriting the article here, but if you start with paragraphs, then select some sentences within that paragraph to change, then select some synonyms to spin within each sentence, you will have many VERY unique versions and quality articles.

        It really just depends on what you are planning to do with the article to determine how much rewriting work you should put into it.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2027399].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author jjbalagosa
          Originally Posted by Marty S View Post

          I use MAR and find it among the top programs available right now. But, its not really the software that makes the difference here, it's how you use it, because there are several that can do the job.

          The 30% difference is rather standard for a process where you are rephrasing each (or most) sentence(s), and then spinning synonyms within it those sentences. This strategy can be used for certain situations.

          However, to jump to the next level in percentile change - like 100%, then start using the spinner by rewriting in paragraph chunks, not individual sentences. Yes, you are really rewriting the article here, but if you start with paragraphs, then select some sentences within that paragraph to change, then select some synonyms to spin within each sentence, you will have many VERY unique versions and quality articles.

          It really just depends on what you are planning to do with the article to determine how much rewriting work you should put into it.
          Awesome technique Marty! I do this with whole sentences and change synonyms for words and phrases within each sentence variation. I try to make 3 different variations of each sentence. This gives me a roughly 80% - 95% spin on average.

          Question, when you are recreating paragraph chunks are you leaving the original paragraph in there as well? And, how many different variations of each paragraph do you write?
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2027491].message }}
  • Originally Posted by jjbalagosa View Post

    Any MAR users here? What spin % do you shoot for when preparing an article for rewrites?

    Thanks in advance!

    Jeff

    No offense intended but, Article Spinners are ALL junk!!! There is No better spinner than the human brain. Give it a try and read through the article, you'll notice the sentences are completely off. Spinners change words for synonyms and do not place the words in context with the sentence, so your end results is a bunch of garbage.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2027731].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author whateverpedia
      Originally Posted by ContentArticleWriter View Post

      No offense intended but, Article Spinners are ALL junk!!! There is No better spinner than the human brain. Give it a try and read through the article, you'll notice the sentences are completely off.
      Rubbish. The spinners themselves are good, it's the users of them who are junk. Lazy writers who use a push-button methodology produce what you are referring to. If you take the time to do it properly, on a paragraph and sentence level.

      Spinners change words for synonyms and do not place the words in context with the sentence, so your end results is a bunch of garbage.
      Wrong again. It is the users that produce that garbage, not the spinning tool. Those people are just too lazy to take the time to do it properly, or they have poor writing skills in the first place.

      If you got garbage out of spinning software, it's beacuse you put garbage in, or expected it to the work for you.

      A hammer in the hands of someone who knows how to use it can build wondrous things, however they are extremely dangerous in the hands of an imbecile.

      A good tradesman never blames his tools.
      Signature
      Why do garden gnomes smell so bad?
      So that blind people can hate them as well.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2027828].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author jjbalagosa
        Originally Posted by whateverpedia View Post

        Rubbish. The spinners themselves are good, it's the users of them who are junk. Lazy writers who use a push-button methodology produce what you are referring to. If you take the time to do it properly, on a paragraph and sentence level.



        Wrong again. It is the users that produce that garbage, not the spinning tool. Those people are just too lazy to take the time to do it properly, or they have poor writing skills in the first place.

        If you got garbage out of spinning software, it's beacuse you put garbage in, or expected it to the work for you.

        A hammer in the hands of someone who knows how to use it can build wondrous things, however they are extremely dangerous in the hands of an imbecile.

        A good tradesman never blames his tools.
        Thank you for that, Whateverpedia. I've been through the whole "spun articles are crap" debate several times, and am really tired of it. So I didn't want to get into it.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2028273].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Chris Hunter
      Originally Posted by ContentArticleWriter View Post

      No offense intended but, Article Spinners are ALL junk!!! There is No better spinner than the human brain. Give it a try and read through the article, you'll notice the sentences are completely off. Spinners change words for synonyms and do not place the words in context with the sentence, so your end results is a bunch of garbage.
      Dude, you've obviously never worked with The Best Spinner of MAR or any number of CURRENT article spinners that are available nowadays.

      The NEWER spinners are just a tool that allows YOU to spin the article WITH YOUR BRAIN into articles that are both unique and extremely readable, without losing the relevance or usefulness of the content.

      People that are just trying to simply click a few buttons to replace synonyms are JUNK SPINNERS.

      For a content writer, you really should be looking at these tools with a curious eye because they could really help you in your writing, especially getting more from what you've already written.
      Signature

      Ok, sure. You can follow me on Twitter - http://twitter.com/Chris_Hunter ;)

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2028893].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RCormacko
    Recently, I've been going for 3 versions of each sentence in the articles, which gives about 200%. I've been thinking that it might be better to have more versions of the title, though, and maybe more of the first few sentences.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2027753].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jjbalagosa
    Thanks guys! Some solid methods here. Now that I think of it, there could be a market for article spinning techniques. :p

    So far writing multiple variations on sentences & paragraphs, then picking synonyms for 2 - 4 words or phrases per sentence, seems like a winning combination.

    I've always loved writing. But now I'm really starting to love rewriting as well. Here's why:

    • When I write from scratch, I can pump out very high quality 400 - 500 word articles in roughly 15 minutes or so.
    • I know they're decent because I've never had one rejected by ezine, goarticles, or articlesbase.
    • One reason is that I use Dragon Naturally Speaking, and another is I really know my niches.
    • But when I do rewrites I can take up to an hour or more crafting a "seed" article for an article rewriting tool like MAR, PAR, and The Best Spinner.
    • That time is absolutely worth it because that hour of work can yield upwards of 100+ articles for just one keyword. All highly unique, coherent, and most importantly readable.
    • Also, rewriting challenges my creativity. I am forced to come up with multiple ways to say the same thing. A lot of times, it is actually harder than writing from scratch.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2029357].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author magentawave
      Between Magic Article Rewriter (with the latest version of Magic Tokens) and The Best Spinner, which one do you think would be better for a VA in the Philippines to use with imperfect English skills and slow internet connection?

      Thanks
      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2111099].message }}

Trending Topics