Does anyone use Amazon S3 to host videos?

by troy23
18 replies
I am trying to prevent video theft via some of the browser download plug ins available.

I wondered if using Amazon S3 would get around this problem.

Sure I could put them into a membership site, but I don't think it would prevent a member downloading and perhaps selling it on themselves.
#amazon #host #videos
  • Profile picture of the author Gary Rambo
    If somebody is determined to steal your videos there's not much you can do about it regardless of where they are hosted. They don't actually even have to download them to get a copy if they are streamed and if they have the right software/knowledge.

    About the only thing you can do is to watermark your videos so at least you can provide some proof that they're your videos that someone has stolen or are selling them illegally. But even that has its limitations.

    I used to worry about it, but now...not so much. Nothing I can do about it.

    Gary
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2152109].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tecHead
    garovich is right; not much you can do to stop a knowledgeable & determined thief when it comes to multimedia. This is one of the reasons musicians have not embraced the whole online world so much for "selling" as opposed to just using it as exposure.

    As long as you host your vids/music online, there will be a way for someone to steal them.

    You're only alternative is to package your multimedia up into an .exe self contained projector that requires a license to access. That license would need to be attached to that user's machine so they can't redistribute the media to others without them acquiring a license, as well.

    That is possible; yet, not what you're asking.

    HTH
    PLP,
    tecHead
    Signature
    Learn Everything You Need to Know About CryptoCurrencies
    Automation is the primary conduit to successful relaxation
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2152254].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dan C. Rinnert
      Originally Posted by tecHead View Post

      You're only alternative is to package your multimedia up into an .exe self contained projector that requires a license to access. That license would need to be attached to that user's machine so they can't redistribute the media to others without them acquiring a license, as well.
      The downside of that is reducing your prospect base by eliminating Mac and Linux users as potential customers.
      Signature

      Dan's content is irregularly read by handfuls of people. Join the elite few by reading his blog: dcrBlogs.com, following him on Twitter: dcrTweets.com or reading his fiction: dcrWrites.com but NOT by Clicking Here!

      Dan also writes content for hire, but you can't afford him anyway.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2152273].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author tecHead
        Originally Posted by Dan C. Rinnert View Post

        The downside of that is reducing your prospect base by eliminating Mac and Linux users as potential customers.
        Not if you use a wrapper app that can distribute end product on MAC architecture; like MDM Zinc.
        Signature
        Learn Everything You Need to Know About CryptoCurrencies
        Automation is the primary conduit to successful relaxation
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2152356].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
        Originally Posted by Dan C. Rinnert View Post

        The downside of that is reducing your prospect base by eliminating Mac and Linux users as potential customers.
        Yeah, I'm gonna miss those three people. :p
        Signature
        "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2245471].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Marty S
          You can try and protect your video content all you want, but really there is no cure. Anyone can just run your video and screen capture their own copy of it.

          Buying any kind of software to prevent this will just add more frustration. The one mentioned above (Bill Myers) has a very rudimentary player with it too, which looks kind of 2005. If someone wants to copy video content from you, they will.

          As for water-marking - I used to do it, and it is the least you should do. I do find however, new video producers tend to make their watermarks too big, to the point of them looking unprofessional.



          On the other hand, small watermarks are easily blurred or cut-out by unscrupulous video thieves. I have even had some of my Youtube productions ripped by screen capture content thieves and then had the ripper's own logo (URL) over top of mine. Sadness.


          This is one of the reasons that I prefer to brand my videos now, rather than watermark. I find the look more professional as the logo and theme of your site becomes integral to the video - impossible to rip off as well.


          For instance the series I do for Paddy Power Poker is well branded and hence we are able to encourage embedding without concern for viewers being confused as to the source. > YouTube - How to play low pocket pairs against Tom Dwan


          Same for this video where I have switched to a standard (keynote) background so as to make all future videos for this site consistent, branded and recognizable > YouTube - Holdem Indicator adds HUD

          The idea is that branding will deter thieves because they cannot remove the source of the video without the video being deconstructed to make no sense at all, and therefore no value - even to a content thief. This is just as true for private member videos as it is for videos you put on Youtube.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2246164].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kevin Riley
    Originally Posted by troy23 View Post

    I am trying to prevent video theft via some of the browser download plug ins available.

    I wondered if using Amazon S3 would get around this problem.

    Sure I could put them into a membership site, but I don't think it would prevent a member downloading and perhaps selling it on themselves.

    I use Bill Myers' bandwidth protection script for video lessons. Works great. The code doesn't reveal the link to your Amazon video, so no one can download it. Also, you can set access to only from your domain.

    Sorry. Don't have the URL on this machine. But a quick Google should find it.
    Signature
    Kevin Riley, long-time Warrior living in Osaka, Japan

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2152398].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author stask
      Don't know if you already use Amazon s3, but an easy way to have a very good (easy to operate) front end to upload videos to s3, and simple ways to code video players, including the locking protection you are asking about, check out BITSONTHERUN Video transcoding, management and streaming - Bits on the Run

      You can upload a video and it'll transcode in many different ways at once (your setup) and will automatically upload to your s3 account if you want. Even will allow their one line of code video player to play both flash and on iPads and iPods. Costs as little as $8 month. A really nice service.

      I don't use the protection features, but I know they are there as others at "bits" have asked about them. There is a forum there if the settings aren't apparent.

      Oh, another cool thing is that because you can have all those different transcode options, the bit rate can be automatically adjustable. Which means the flow of the video adjusts (while playing) for the best possible picture quality for a given internet connection moment to moment. It downgrades and upgrades the video flow as needed. Built in watermarking too if you want that.

      Think there is a one month free trial. I don't think they have an affiliate program.

      Good luck.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2152493].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Kevin Cotter
    Check out this program.

    Secure Amazon S3 Video Streaming for WordPress - S3FlowShield

    Think it's just for WordPress but im not sure.

    Kevin
    Signature
    Blog Feeder WSO
    Finally Drip Feed Your Blog Posts For A Year. You Pick The Time And Days!
    Keyword Junkies Make Keyword Research Easy. WSO Running Now!!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2152516].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author WillR
      Originally Posted by Kevin Cotter View Post

      Check out this program.

      Secure Amazon S3 Video Streaming for WordPress - S3FlowShield

      Think it's just for WordPress but im not sure.

      Kevin
      I use a custom script that was created specifically for my membership site by the same guy who put together S3 flowshield, Wilson, and I have no hesitation in recommending him. His work is excellent and he knows the whole S3 thing inside and out - how to protect and encrypt and do a whole lot of other stuff you may want to do. I couldn't be running the complex membership site I am now with over 8GB worth of downloadable content without the help of Wilson and his specially designed scripts to help protect all my S3 content.

      On the other hand, if someone is super keen about copying your video or mp3s they will just do a screencast or a recording of your video or audio and re-upload it - there is absolutely NOTHING you can do to prevent that from happening besides never posting your content online in the first place.

      There is no one solution that will offer you 100% protection however you can put in place a lot of stuff that will deter 99% of the a-holes out there.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2246176].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author troy23
    Thanks for all the replies.....food for thought there.
    Kevin - that looks like an interesting product...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2153390].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Amy Carczak
    I had a friend tell me how "secure"
    his encryption was ..."impossible to
    crack he told me".

    So I watched his video ...oops, silly
    me, I had Camtasia going at the same
    time ... so much for his super encryption.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2153420].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jim90677000
    Totally agree with your worries...I have the same concerns, but sad to say, I yet to come out with a feasible solution till date.....
    Signature

    ‘The best time to plant a money tree was 3 years ago. The NEXT best time is NOW !’ ..... http://making-money-guide.net.....http://wickerchest.net

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2245454].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ~kev~
    Does anyone use Amazon S3 to host videos?
    About a year ago I tried hosting some of my videos at amazon - I found their video feeds to be terrible slow. The feed was pausing every few seconds to load, play for a few seconds, load, play for a few seconds, load, load, load,,,,,,. A 3 - 4 minute video would take 5+ minutes to play, because of the slow loading issues. After playing around with a couple of videos, I gave up an decided to stick with youtube.

    As for people downloading your videos, if the person knows what their doing, their going to get your video.

    Youtube has been wanting to offer pay-pre-view video rentals. But the problem is how to stop people from downloading the videos. As soon as developers put stop measures in place, someone releases some kind of new video downloader software. Its like a cat and mouse market.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2246322].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author WillR
      Originally Posted by ~kev~ View Post

      About a year ago I tried hosting some of my videos at amazon - I found their video feeds to be terrible slow. After playing around with a couple of videos, I gave up an decided to stick with youtube.
      All good and well but not an option for those of us with products who are charging for the information in our videos. Hosting them on Youtube is not an option.

      I host plenty of videos on Amazon S3 and I know from viewing the page source that 99% of the big product launches you are watching these days are all hosted on Amazon S3. I have never had a problem with the speed or delivery of the videos. The problem would more likely be in the player you were using to embed the videos or if you were using mp4 files. A lot of mp4 files have an issue whereby they won't start playing until the whole file has been downloaded first. It is a problem not many know about but it will screw up your videos if you don't fix it.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2246342].message }}

Trending Topics