| | ||||||||
| |||||||||
 |
10-22-2008, 08:05 PM
| #1 |
| HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: TX
Posts: 353
Thanks: 5
Thanked 16 Times in 14 Posts
|  Traditional SalesPage vs Web 2.0
Has anyone tested traditional salespages vs a Web 2.0? If so let us know your experience with both. I define a traditional sales page with mostly copy. A Web 2.0 page would have audio, video, podcast, etc. Are your traditional sites still working or is it time to change? |
|  |
|
10-22-2008, 08:37 PM
| #3 |
| Godson of The Godfather War Room Member  Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: The NorthEast Kingdom - Vermont, USA
Posts: 2,163
Blog Entries: 25 Thanks: 786
Thanked 1,065 Times in 441 Posts
| Re: Traditional SalesPage vs Web 2.0
I hope the consensus will be for Web 2.0 designs... much more pleasing to the eye IMHO - Jared |
| TelekineticMarketing.com helps you connect with other IM Entrepreneurs like never before. Be FIRST To Join TM For FREE -> Private Mastermind Groups for IM Entrepreneurs | |
|
| |
|
10-22-2008, 08:41 PM
| #4 |
| The Ethical Marketer War Room Member  Join Date: May 2006 Location: Wisconsin, USA
Posts: 6,066
Thanks: 1,750
Thanked 3,029 Times in 1,341 Posts
| Re: Traditional SalesPage vs Web 2.0
I have not tested, but one thought comes to mind: It may depend, in part, on the target market. As in their previous exposure to each type of site, which medium is best for selling a given item, the visitor's computer (heavy video and audio may bog a slow connection down), and their expectations. No idea if these really mater, so we come right back to your question. All the best, Michael |
| | |
| |
 |
|
| Tags |
| salespage, traditional, web |
| Thread Tools | |
| |
 |
