I have won a chargeback dispute.

by opiel
55 replies
It appears that I have won a chargeback dispute.

It took almost 3 months but I just received an email message from PayPal that the buyer's credit card issuer decided in my favor. I will receive reimbursement for $49.99 within 7 days.
#chargeback #dispute #won
  • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
    While I'll gladly stand and clap for pushing back
    against fraudulent chargebacks...

    ...the time/productivity loss for dealing with the
    BS makes it sort of a hollow victory, doesn't it?

    And I say this in commiseration, not to pee in
    your cornflakes.

    There's a special place in hell reserved for the feckless
    numbskulls and misanthropes who buy things, then decide
    it's easier to just call their credit card company and do a
    chargeback than to simply request a refund.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2273966].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author timpears
      Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

      There's a special place in hell reserved for the feckless
      numbskulls and misanthropes who buy things, then decide
      it's easier to just call their credit card company and do a
      chargeback than to simply request a refund.
      How do you know that a refund was never requested? I didn't notice that the OP said anything about that. It looks to me like you are jumping to conclusions. You know that when you assume, you make an ass our or u and me.

      (ass-u-me) just in case you missed it.
      Signature

      Tim Pears

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275103].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
        Originally Posted by timpears View Post

        How do you know that a refund was never requested? I didn't notice that the OP said anything about that.
        Somehow you've made that logical jump all on your own. I never implied that I was talking exclusively about the OP's chargeback.

        It looks to me like you are jumping to conclusions. You know that when you assume, you make an ass our or u and me.

        (ass-u-me) just in case you missed it.
        Physician heal thyself.

        : )
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275412].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author timpears
          Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

          Somehow you've made that logical jump all on your own. I never implied that I was talking exclusively about the OP's chargeback.

          Phsycian heal thyself.

          : )
          Then please point out to us where your basis was that people are charging back without first asking for a refund. If you can poing that out to me, I will agree with you. I may not see all that well, but I didn't see any reference to it.
          Signature

          Tim Pears

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275599].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
            Originally Posted by timpears View Post

            Then please point out to us where your basis was that people are charging back without first asking for a refund. If you can poing that out to me, I will agree with you. I may not see all that well, but I didn't see any reference to it.
            Tim,

            Let's try and establish a baseline of understanding here since you seem to be having trouble following the conversation.

            Do you agree that the majority of chargebacks against merchants are justified and warranted?

            Brian
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276031].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author l23bc
      Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

      While I'll gladly stand and clap for pushing back
      against fraudulent chargebacks...

      ...the time/productivity loss for dealing with the
      BS makes it sort of a hollow victory, doesn't it?

      And I say this in commiseration, not to pee in
      your cornflakes.

      There's a special place in hell reserved for the feckless
      numbskulls and misanthropes who buy things, then decide
      it's easier to just call their credit card company and do a
      chargeback than to simply request a refund.
      Tell me about it in my cpa movie site i used to have the pay by paypal 3.00 dollars to access the site and watch the contents.Yet had some customer around 3 weeks ago tried to chargeback my account on paypal for $3.00 no email or contact had to make 5 telephone calls to paypal to show that the items in question were non phyicial products and tangable items online. In the ending i won also like the original poster sent to paypal the time he access the site from awstats and original download details from server.

      If he just dropped me a line i would of just refunded them. but instead of a dispute in paypal they went back to the bank or card issuer over 3 whole dollars!!

      :confused: one born every minuite

      To the original poster,Congrates on your victory

      andrew
      Signature

      No Link here or Nothing to Promote Just a Old Happy Warrior User reading Topics

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2277295].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author affilorama-portal
    Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod

    There's a special place in hell reserved for the feckless numbskulls and misanthropes who buy things, then decide it's easier to just call their credit card company and do a chargeback than to simply request a refund.
    One consoling factor (though not much of a consolation): charge backs affect their credit rating, so the more charge backs they put in, the lower their credit score gets.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2273997].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author seasoned
      Originally Posted by affilorama-portal View Post

      One consoling factor (though not much of a consolation): charge backs affect their credit rating, so the more charge backs they put in, the lower their credit score gets.
      Funny, I don't see a section on the credit report for chargebacks. I COULD see a particular credit card company taking that into account but OTHERS? I doubt it.

      Steve
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2274655].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author azombay
      Originally Posted by affilorama-portal View Post

      One consoling factor (though not much of a consolation): charge backs affect their credit rating, so the more charge backs they put in, the lower their credit score gets.
      Please provide some proof of this? As an expert in credit repair I've never seen chargebacks even mentioned on one's credit report.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2274932].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author GuerrillaIM
      Originally Posted by affilorama-portal View Post

      One consoling factor (though not much of a consolation): charge backs affect their credit rating, so the more charge backs they put in, the lower their credit score gets.
      I am pretty familiar with credit reports and I question this statement as dubious. I do not think chargebacks affect personal credit.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2274954].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author cashcow
    That's good to hear - congrats!

    I actually just lost 2 of them even though I provided paypal with proof that the people downloaded the products.

    Lee
    Signature
    Gone Fishing
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2274918].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author poker princess
    Wow.. thatz a wonderful news. Moreover coming from paypal is really a big achievement
    Congratulations, my friend. Everything seem to have gone your way.
    Signature
    Poker Software
    Poker Blog
    Life is GOOD! :)
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2274934].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Caleb Spilchen
    Nice to hear. Finally people aren't getting away with this stuff
    Signature

    Canadian Expat Living in Medellin, Colombia

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2274966].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tecHead
    Originally Posted by opiel View Post

    It appears that I have won a chargeback dispute.

    It took almost 3 months but I just received an email message from PayPal that the buyer's credit card issuer decided in my favor. I will receive reimbursement for $49.99 within 7 days.
    Congrats.

    Finally proof of what I've been saying is possible for years.

    Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod

    ...the time/productivity loss for dealing with the
    BS makes it sort of a hollow victory, doesn't it?
    Victory is victory; however long it may take. If every long fought victory was viewed as hollow, how many battles resulting in victory would not have been fought to get us where we are today?

    PLP,
    tecHead
    Signature
    Learn Everything You Need to Know About CryptoCurrencies
    Automation is the primary conduit to successful relaxation
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2274968].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
      Originally Posted by tecHead View Post

      Victory is victory; however long it may take. If every long fought victory was viewed as hollow, how many battles resulting in victory would not have been fought to get us where we are today?
      A wee bit overdramatic for a $50 chargeback, dude.

      My point was simple enough...

      If you spend a half hour disputing a chargeback for $50, gathering the supporting docs and filing your response - you've just lost whatever profit margin you had on the sale.

      HOLLOW VICTORY.

      But hey, there's always a windmill that needs tilting.

      Feel free to ignore the rest of my post where I made clear that I'm on the OP's side of the issue.

      Brian
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275451].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author tecHead
        Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

        A wee bit overdramatic for a $50 chargeback, dude.

        My point was simple enough...

        If you spend a half hour disputing a chargeback for $50, gathering the supporting docs and filing your response - you've just lost whatever profit margin you had on the sale.

        HOLLOW VICTORY.

        But hey, there's always a windmill that needs tilting.

        Feel free to ignore the rest of my post where I made clear that I'm on the OP's side of the issue.

        Brian
        Over dramatic? I don't think so because its been the accumulation of small victories like this over the past decade+ that have paved the way for such things as specialized merchant accounts and PayPal even considering digital sales as legitimate.

        Back in 2001, if someone did a charge-back on you... you could pretty much just kiss the money good-bye because card not present transactions were considered the antithesis of commerce. That's why people still attempt it, today.

        If we don't have more people/Merchants stand their ground and fight back, (for even $5), we'll never get the behemoths like PayPal to legitimize our business model(s) in their eyes.

        But hey... to each their own.

        PLP,
        tecHead

        P.S.: No, I didn't ignore the remainder of your OP. I just addressed the part of that post that made the most negative impact.
        Signature
        Learn Everything You Need to Know About CryptoCurrencies
        Automation is the primary conduit to successful relaxation
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275652].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
          Originally Posted by tecHead View Post

          Over dramatic? I don't think so because its been the accumulation of small victories like this over the past decade+ that have paved the way for such things as specialized merchant accounts and PayPal even considering digital sales as legitimate.
          See, here's the thing... I don't disagree with you about the importance of pushing back against fraudulent chargebacks.

          But $50 in (sale) > $50 out (chargeback) > $50 out (dispute) > $50 in (reclaimed sale) is still a net sum of ZERO.

          I never said it wasn't a noble pursuit - what I said was that it feels like a hollow victory, even when you win a chargeback dispute.

          Back in 2001, if someone did a charge-back on you... you could pretty much just kiss the money good-bye because card not present transactions were considered the antithesis of commerce. That's why people still attempt it, today.
          True, and in 2001 fraudulent chargebacks on CC transactions were a fraction of the problem that they are today.

          If we don't have more people/Merchants stand their ground and fight back, (for even $5), we'll never get the behemoths like PayPal to legitimize our business model(s) in their eyes.
          This is a strawman. I never said people shouldn't vigorously defend chargebacks whenever it makes sense for them to do so.

          I said it's a hollow victory when we win because we incur the cost of the dispute. You've erected an argument around a difference of opinion that doesn't exist.

          We both agree that chargebacks are a problem.

          We both agree that folks have every right to vigorously defend themselves against fraudulent chargebacks and that it's a noble pursuit.

          So, surely we can agree that SUBJECTIVELY, as gratifying as it is to win a chargeback dispute, at the end of the day we still got pinched, right?

          Mine was merely an empathetic post based on the pragmatic, material issues of the particular chargeback in the OP.

          Best,

          Brian
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276102].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author tecHead
            Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

            See, here's the thing... I don't disagree with you about the importance of pushing back against fraudulent chargebacks.

            But $50 in (sale) > $50 out (chargeback) > $50 out (dispute) > $50 in (reclaimed sale) is still a net sum of ZERO.

            I never said it wasn't a noble pursuit - what I said was that it feels like a hollow victory, even when you win a chargeback dispute.



            True, and in 2001 fraudulent chargebacks on CC transactions were a fraction of the problem that they are today.



            This is a strawman. I never said people shouldn't vigorously defend chargebacks whenever it makes sense for them to do so.

            I said it's a hollow victory when we win because we incur the cost of the dispute. You've erected an argument around a difference of opinion that doesn't exist.

            We both agree that chargebacks are a problem.

            We both agree that folks have every right to vigorously defend themselves against fraudulent chargebacks and that it's a noble pursuit.

            So, surely we can agree that SUBJECTIVELY, as gratifying as it is to win a chargeback dispute, at the end of the day we still got pinched, right?

            Mine was merely an empathetic post based on the pragmatic, material issues of the particular chargeback in the OP.

            Best,

            Brian
            cool... cool... we're good
            Signature
            Learn Everything You Need to Know About CryptoCurrencies
            Automation is the primary conduit to successful relaxation
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276147].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
        Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

        A wee bit overdramatic for a $50 chargeback, dude.

        My point was simple enough...

        If you spend a half hour disputing a chargeback for $50, gathering the supporting docs and filing your response - you've just lost whatever profit margin you had on the sale.

        HOLLOW VICTORY
        Well in the time it took to make multiple posts arguing your point you could have invested it in something that would make you an additional fifty dollars. So whats empty? The OP deriving satifaction from giving pause to a potential fraudster that will think about trying to rip somebody else off in the future or your trying to win a point that gets you or anyone else the sum total of nada?

        The echo of that sounds really hollow. I don't know that you can put a dollar figure to a whole lot of things that most certainly are not hollow and frankly I can see tactical financial advantages beyond the individual transaction. So whatever the merits or your other points its not hollow.
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276210].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

          Well in the time it took to make multiple posts arguing your point you could have invested it in something that would make you an additional fifty dollars. So whats empty? The OP deriving satifaction from giving pause to a potential fraudster that will think about trying to rip somebody else off in the future or your trying to win a point that gets you or anyone else the sum total of nada?
          Man, you really have a chip on your shoulder, don't you?

          Re-read my original post.

          Mine was a post IN SUPPORT of the OP.

          Essentially, "I'm with ya.. even when we win, it still screws us, huh?"

          Somehow that makes you angry... OK... good luck with that.

          Brian
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276295].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author abednego
            Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

            Man, you really have a chip on your shoulder, don't you?

            Re-read my original post.

            Mine was a post IN SUPPORT of the OP.

            Essentially, "I'm with ya.. even when we win, it still screws us, huh?"

            Somehow that makes you angry... OK... good luck with that.

            Brian
            This is the internet. Everyone gets angry at everything. Its kinda amusing... and sometimes difficult to resist the urge to troll
            Signature

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276306].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
            Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

            Man, you really have a chip on your shoulder, don't you?

            Re-read my original post.

            Mine was a post IN SUPPORT of the OP.
            Nah Brian. Read it, understood it and had no chip. Like I said theres merits to your points but the HOLLOW VICTORY choice of words is off. Thats what I was trying to point out to you and why people are responding negatively to it. Your negative choice of words. OP has already stated that he spent 30 minutes or less on the procedure and he will make at least one person think again about trying to rip a seller so its not empty or hollow. No more hollow than our post here where we aren't getting any financial reward. He got the equivalent of a hundred dollars an hour for following it up. Not Kern money but not too shabby.

            Who said you weren't on the OP's side? Maybe you should read my post. I understood yours.
            Signature

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276431].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Kim Standerline
            I'd give it up as a bad job Brian.

            I'd think many of us got what you meant and for what it's worth, I think you were right

            Kim

            Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

            Man, you really have a chip on your shoulder, don't you?

            Re-read my original post.

            Mine was a post IN SUPPORT of the OP.

            Essentially, "I'm with ya.. even when we win, it still screws us, huh?"

            Somehow that makes you angry... OK... good luck with that.

            Brian
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2277029].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Robert Puddy
        Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

        A wee bit overdramatic for a $50 chargeback, dude.

        My point was simple enough...

        If you spend a half hour disputing a chargeback for $50, gathering the supporting docs and filing your response - you've just lost whatever profit margin you had on the sale.

        HOLLOW VICTORY.

        But hey, there's always a windmill that needs tilting.

        Feel free to ignore the rest of my post where I made clear that I'm on the OP's side of the issue.

        Brian
        Not fighting them costs you far more money than the sale itself

        If you have to many paypal disputes then your paypal fees go up. if your reciepts through paypal are low then your right, but for someone like me who generates larger amounts a month through paypal it can mean they drop me down a scale and i end up paying higher fees on all transactions.

        worth reading the smaill print in paypals TOS

        Maintaining your merchant rate
        After qualifying for Merchant rate pricing, all members are expected to:

        •Keep their PayPal account in good standing. Members may be downgraded to the Standard rate if a payment volume is not maintained in the previous calendar month, or if they have unresolved chargebacks.
        Oh and i never lose a paypal dispute (charge backs are different but get a 50 /50 success rate with them) because i always record the IP of the person downloading the purchase, the number of times they logged in and the last login date.

        Support staf have a simple rule to follow...

        If the customer asks for a refund through proper channels then give them one no questions...If they start a paypal dispute then fight everyone


        Robert
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276313].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
          Originally Posted by Robert Puddy View Post

          Not fighting them costs you far more money than the sale itself

          Robert
          Et tu, Brute? LOL

          No disagreement.

          Still feels like getting screwed when we win.

          Brian
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276338].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Black Hat Cat
        Banned
        Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

        A wee bit overdramatic for a $50 chargeback, dude.

        My point was simple enough...

        If you spend a half hour disputing a chargeback for $50, gathering the supporting docs and filing your response - you've just lost whatever profit margin you had on the sale.


        Brian
        So take a 30 minute lunch one day instead of an hour, and you've lost nothing.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276997].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Chris Worner
    You won the battle but not the war. Was the amount of time you spent in those three months fighting the charge worth the $49.99 or is your time worth more than that?

    Still, a it does show that PayPal are in fact human(sometimes) and not the money hungry monsters that they are always made out to be.

    Chris
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275037].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author opiel
      Originally Posted by skyfox7 View Post

      You won the battle but not the war. Was the amount of time you spent in those three months fighting the charge worth the $49.99 or is your time worth more than that?

      Still, a it does show that PayPal are in fact human(sometimes) and not the money hungry monsters that they are always made out to be.

      Chris
      Actually, my case was rather easy. I spent a total of about 30 minutes... that includes faxing a few pages to PayPal.

      From that point on... PayPal took over.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275658].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rob Howard
    I have won a few chargeback disputes before.

    It can happen when you have solid proof on your side. Namely, IP addresses of the download traced back to a location close to their shipping address.

    I try to track all downloads by IP and I always collect shipping address. Then if I get a charge back, I trace the IP and if it's close to the persons address, I submit the info to paypal and they tend to fight it for me and win.

    Rob
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275113].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Shannon Herod
    Fortunately, I have not had to deal with too many chargebacks in my career, knock on wood.

    But, chargebacks are for fraudulent charges. So, to win a chargeback you simply need to prove that the charge was authorize. If you are running a legitimate business that is not hard to do.

    There are many things you can do that will act as an electronic signature. These things coupled with IP tracking makes it very easy to win a chargeback.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275172].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
    Banned
    Hooray .... good for you. And don't believe it wasn't worth it. It's not like you spent 3 months of your time full time doing it. Answer a few questions and wait for a decision. That's about it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275182].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thatgirlJ
    That's great to hear!

    I'm currently fighting one -- worth $10

    It did take a bit of time to do screen captures of their IP and download, etc. I would have happily refunded this person's money (and it had a 110% money-back guarantee, so they were pretty idiotic in pulling this stunt instead).

    I figure if this is a first-timer, it will (hopefully?) scare them off from doing it in the future. I also don't want to just let it look like I am claiming I'm guilty (of fraudulently charging them the $10) because I want to keep my PayPal account healthy and active.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275195].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Active_One_2006
    Congratulations, miracles do happen!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275294].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author seasoned
    Originally Posted by Victoria B View Post

    Chargeback doesn't affect anyone's credit rating, there is no proof for such affirmation, but it's not a bad idea to implement that.

    Cheers!
    It is a VERY bad idea to implement it! I once had to deal with a company that kept charging me for what I didn't order. I probably had to do about 8 chargebacks before they got the message. I ALMOST cancelled my credit card! BTW cancelling your credit card CAN hurt your fico!

    Steve
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275313].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author roger123
    Congrats! I have a PayPal chargeback dispute going on .. it was a website sale. Though I have transferred the domain and given control of the website, PayPal says I'll have to wait for 75 days. It is ridiculous. I have stopped accepting payments by PayPal now.
    Signature
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2275728].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Crew Chief
      Originally Posted by affilorama-portal View Post

      One consoling factor (though not much of a consolation): charge backs affect their credit rating, so the more charge backs they put in, the lower their credit score gets.
      So then is it true that they are now dinging your credit score for refunds, exchanges and price adjustments?

      Originally Posted by Jenn Dize View Post

      That's great to hear!

      I'm currently fighting one -- worth $10

      It did take a bit of time to do screen captures of their IP and download, etc. I would have happily refunded this person's money (and it had a 110% money-back guarantee, so they were pretty idiotic in pulling this stunt instead).

      I figure if this is a first-timer, it will (hopefully?) scare them off from doing it in the future. I also don't want to just let it look like I am claiming I'm guilty (of fraudulently charging them the $10) because I want to keep my PayPal account healthy and active.
      Jenn, unfortunately, their is a dark side to IM and the people/jerks who pull these damnable tactics are not going to stop; ever! Just two months ago, I saw a thread on a BeeLackHat forum with instructions on how to hack a software app that a friend of mine's markets. Although the app was hack proof those arse wholes wouldn't stop trying.

      I joined in on the thread and suggested that they buy the software as opposed to stealing it and was IMMEDIATELY rebuked and rebuffed by the OP and those participating in the thread.

      Additionally, they had threads started with specifics on how to crack various software apps and how to get free products and downloads using refunds and charge backs. So as far as scaring them off; that's not going to happen. These low life miscreants could care less about being outed or put on blast by PayPal or the merchant.

      Originally Posted by tecHead View Post

      Over dramatic? I don't think so because its been the accumulation of small victories like this over the past decade+ that have paved the way for such things as specialized merchant accounts and PayPal even considering digital sales as legitimate.

      Back in 2001, if someone did a charge-back on you... you could pretty much just kiss the money good-bye because card not present transactions were considered the antithesis of commerce. That's why people still attempt it, today.

      If we don't have more people/Merchants stand their ground and fight back, (for even $5), we'll never get the behemoths like PayPal to legitimize our business model(s) in their eyes.

      But hey... to each their own.
      tecHead, I could not have said it better! PayPal's current model of addressing digital downloads was drafted by non Internet Marketers. And, it won't change until merchants start raising their voices. Just letting these instances go - dramatically skews the numbers these non Internet Marketers at PayPal crunch to determine if they need to adjust their policies.

      Giles, the Crew Chief
      Signature
      Tools, Strategies and Tactics Used By Savvy Internet Marketers and SEO Pros:

      ProSiteFlippers.com We Build Monetization Ready High-Value Virtual Properties
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276151].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author tecHead
        Originally Posted by Crew Chief View Post

        ...

        Jenn, unfortunately, their is a dark side to IM and the people/jerks who pull these damnable tactics are not going to stop; ever! Just two months ago, I saw a thread on a BeeLackHat forum with instructions on how to hack a software app that a friend of mine's markets. Although the app was hack proof those arse wholes wouldn't stop trying.

        I joined in on the thread and suggested that they buy the software as opposed to stealing it and was IMMEDIATELY rebuked and rebuffed by the OP and those participating in the thread.

        Additionally, they had threads started with specifics on how to crack various software apps and how to get free products and downloads using refunds and charge backs. So as far as scaring them off; that's not going to happen. These low life miscreants could care less about being outed or put on blast by PayPal or the merchant.
        Yeah, big problem. The ugly underbelly of the Internet tends to work just as hard to thieve as the hardest legit businessperson does to make a profit.


        Originally Posted by Crew Chief View Post

        tecHead, I could not have said it better! PayPal's current model of addressing digital downloads was drafted by non Internet Marketers. And, it won't change until merchants start raising their voices. Just letting these instances go - dramatically skews the numbers these non Internet Marketers at PayPal crunch to determine if they need to adjust their policies.

        Giles, the Crew Chief
        Of course, agreed. The more the digital goods transaction makes traction from big boys like Amazon, iTunes and the like... the more PayPal will have to pay attention to the legitimacy of that business model.
        Signature
        Learn Everything You Need to Know About CryptoCurrencies
        Automation is the primary conduit to successful relaxation
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276193].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ConnorMcCreesh
    Well done with paypal, i have had a similar issue with theft, though all i did was go to the bank and got it all back there and then
    Signature
    Hopper, The Instagram Scheduling Tool - Established Tech Startup with 1500+ Users.

    Hopper Affiliate Program: 15% Recurring Monthly Commissions. Thoroughly tested sales funnel. $10-$250+ Product Sales Prices.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276191].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author carlo_sim
    Hi,

    Won a chargeback dispute back then too! =) Contrary to popular belief, paypal was very accomodating and was easy to talk too. I think you just need to talk to them nicely in order for them to resolve your issues right away. =)

    Gian Sim
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276241].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author abednego
    Originally Posted by opiel View Post

    It appears that I have won a chargeback dispute.

    It took almost 3 months but I just received an email message from PayPal that the buyer's credit card issuer decided in my favor. I will receive reimbursement for $49.99 within 7 days.
    I'm very familiar with the chargeback process from the issuer. Was it a Visa or MC chargeback?
    Signature

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2276286].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mcmahanusa
    When there is a wrong to be addressed, it is the duty of each of us to fight it. "All that is necessary for evil to succeed is for good men to do nothing" (badly paraphrased, but you get the idea). Anyway, in my opinion, each victory by an online merchant makes it that much easier for others to prevail in their own contests on down the line.
    As an aside - think it's bad for online merchants? People go to restaurants all the time, treat their pals, charge it, and then dispute the charge. Many a restaurant owner, already struggling to survive, has had to eat (no pun intended) the bill.
    Signature

    Success is not to be pursued; it is to be attracted by the person you become - Jim Rohn

    Visit our beautiful gardens

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2277254].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author kbmciver
    Congratulations for winning your dispute. From my experience PayPal tends to wait you out to see if you give up over time.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2277666].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thatgirlJ
    Ugh, not that it matters and it's a bit off-topic to the OP, but it appears I've lost mine.

    Anyway, I sent a nice, but strong, e-mail to PayPal expressing my disappointment and the need for them to be more supportive of sellers with digital products when they are able to provide purchase and download IP that match the buyer's location.

    It's my hope that the more sellers make their position known, the faster PayPal will get with the times
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2279922].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Jenn Dize View Post

      Ugh, not that it matters and it's a bit off-topic to the OP, but it appears I've lost mine.

      Anyway, I sent a nice, but strong, e-mail to PayPal expressing my disappointment and the need for them to be more supportive of sellers with digital products when they are able to provide purchase and download IP that match the buyer's location.

      It's my hope that the more sellers make their position known, the faster PayPal will get with the times
      Don't hold your breath. Just Google Paypal scam or go to paypalsucks.com to see just how many people have expressed their dissatisfaction with Paypal
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2279994].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author tecHead
        Originally Posted by sbucciarel View Post

        Don't hold your breath. Just Google Paypal scam or go to paypalsucks.com to see just how many people have expressed their dissatisfaction with Paypal
        Originally Posted by Wikipedia

        ...PayPal operates in 190 markets, and it manages over 184 million accounts, more than 73 million of them active...
        Although subject to accuracy debates; bounce those numbers against how many actual complaints there are and the nay-sayers seem pretty infantesimal

        source: PayPal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
        Signature
        Learn Everything You Need to Know About CryptoCurrencies
        Automation is the primary conduit to successful relaxation
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2280982].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Dennis Gaskill
      To the OP, good for you! Chalk one up for the merchant.

      Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

      While I'll gladly stand and clap for pushing back
      against fraudulent chargebacks...

      ...the time/productivity loss for dealing with the
      BS makes it sort of a hollow victory, doesn't it?

      And I say this in commiseration, not to pee in
      your cornflakes.

      There's a special place in hell reserved for the feckless
      numbskulls and misanthropes who buy things, then decide
      it's easier to just call their credit card company and do a
      chargeback than to simply request a refund.
      As a bit of a wordsmith, I appreciate your use of the words "feckless" and "misanthropes" in your post.

      As an aside, I understood what you meant with the "hollow victory" verbiage. Some people seem not to understand the qualifier that preceded it; the sort of changes the meaning in a way that some seem to have overlooked. Perhaps you need to "dumb down" your posts.

      Originally Posted by seasoned View Post

      It is a VERY bad idea to implement it! I once had to deal with a company that kept charging me for what I didn't order. I probably had to do about 8 chargebacks before they got the message. I ALMOST cancelled my credit card! BTW cancelling your credit card CAN hurt your fico!

      Steve
      Steve, I agree with you. I once had a host that kept charging my card month after month even I was no longer hosting with them and had notified them by email and phone. They kept falling back on the position that I hadn't properly notified them because I didn't use their cancellation form on their site, but it wasn't for lack of trying, it simply didn't work. Every time I submitted via the form it timed out.

      I finally canceled my credit card on the recommendation of my bank instead of disputing and winning chargebacks month after month. They were obviously just being stubborn and unreasonable, but I'm pretty sure I cost them far more than in lost sales than they would have gained in keeping me strung out for a few months.

      Originally Posted by Jenn Dize View Post

      Anyway, I sent a nice, but strong, e-mail to PayPal expressing my disappointment and the need for them to be more supportive of sellers with digital products when they are able to provide purchase and download IP that match the buyer's location.
      One complaint does nothing, but an accumulation of complaints from multitudes of vendors will get their attention sooner or later . . . thanks for doing your part.
      Signature

      Just when you think you've got it all figured out, someone changes the rules.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2281192].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
        Originally Posted by Dennis Gaskill View Post


        As an aside, I understood what you meant with the "hollow victory" verbiage. Some people seem not to understand the qualifier that preceded it; the sort of changes the meaning in a way that some seem to have overlooked. Perhaps you need to "dumb down" your posts.

        .
        The "sort of" post wasn't the one that many people responded to but the later capped statement without the qualifier. At the end of the day words have a meaning even within a context containg a qualifier so theres really no reason to circle the wagons (as is I admit customary) and accuse dumbness on those who hold a different view of the word "hollow". People saw it differently despite seeing that Brian clearly was on the OP's side. Clearly the OP didn't find it hollow.

        At any rate theres a better way of determining dumbness. Its called an IQ test which despite its imperfections at least make an attempt at objectivity and it doesn't focus on somethings so hollow (couldn't resist) to measure intelligence. You might be surprised at how well some have done on it.
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2286874].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
          Originally Posted by Mike Anthony View Post

          The "sort of" post wasn't the one that many people responded to but the later capped statement without the qualifier. At the end of the day words have a meaning even within a context containg a qualifier so theres really no reason to circle the wagons (as is I admit customary) and accuse dumbness on those who hold a different view of the word "hollow". People saw it differently despite seeing that Brian clearly was on the OP's side. Clearly the OP didn't find it hollow.
          Another finger wagging lecture on rhetorical analysis... excellent.

          Thanks, Mike. Our lives are made richer by your guidance and wisdom.

          You may want to re-calibrate your metrics for "many" though... ya know, whenever you get through postulating on the whole "words have meaning" thing.

          Best,

          Brian
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2288567].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Mike Anthony
            Originally Posted by BrianMcLeod View Post

            Thanks, Mike. Our lives are made richer by your guidance and wisdom.
            Thanks Brian. I get that a lot (you know for an alleged dumb person mistakenly invited to Mensa). Always glad to help

            I'd get into the relativity of "many" but I am saddled with alot of work backload and as of today watching to see if Wade county becomes LJ -Wade county. Something we might agree on. Adios.
            Signature

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2288671].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thatgirlJ
    Oh, I'm not But, if I'm going to continue using PayPal (and I am...) I at least have to make my case.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2280062].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Tim_Carter
    I have had three chargebacks in five years. I won two out of the three.

    Hint ** If they don't follow the chargeback rules they will LOSE!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2280150].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author BrianMcLeod
    Originally Posted by Fouldini View Post

    The entire chargeback process is somewhat dubious, one reason I aim to keep my funds out of the reach of PayPal.
    PayPal is actually on YOUR side of a chargeback dispute with a credit card company. PayPal requests supporting docs from you, then contests the chargeback on your behalf.

    A PayPal dispute revolves around PayPal transactions using available PayPal account funds - a different beastie.

    A chargeback happens when the consumer calls their credit card company and disputes the charges. In recent years, the number of consumers doing this has spiked - particularly buyers who never even attempt to contact the seller to request a refund through existing customer support channels.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2280236].message }}
  • I just don't think it's worth the hassle, time and stress. It's just not an efficient business decision I guess.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2287396].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Mohammad Afaq
    not to pee in your cornflakes.
    Ewwww, nasty
    Signature

    “The first draft of anything is shit.” ~Ernest Hemingway

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2287434].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author khanhdom
    when i use to run an online game, I'd never won a dispute. Probably lost 20 out of 20 even though I had all the proof, but since it was a digital good, I pretty much couldn't win.

    fk paypal!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2289087].message }}

Trending Topics