Yesterday's Change By Ezinearticles - Will it hurt us?

by Tom E
42 replies
UPDATE 2 - July 15: Ezinearticles'"Most Viewed" list recently got shortened down to top 10, from top 15. They then added another top 10 list, called "More Related EzineArticles" which viewers see before the "Most Viewed" list.

In other words, at the bottom of any Ezinearticle, you now have to scroll through both the top 10 "Most recent articles" and top 10 "More related articles" before you get to Most Viewed. Since I have a lot of my articles in the top 1-3 of those lists, I originally guessed it would affect my bottom line, but it turns out it was temporary. "Most viewed" seems to be behaving a lot like its own self again - at least in my experience.
#change #ezinearticles #hurt #yesterday
  • Profile picture of the author Rob Barbour
    No. Like anything that changes on the web (and that would be everything) we adapt to it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313027].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Tom E
    I agree. So I welcome your creative suggestion then.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313038].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mcampbell075
    Oh I didn't know about that changes! Thanks for the update gr8tocre8!

    Well, of course it will probably give a negative effect especially to you that you have those top list. So once we submit our article it would be very competitive. So I guess we really need to do our best in writing our effective articles. And I think that would be the best thing that we can do.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313070].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Steven Wagenheim
      The only people it will hurt are those who abuse the system.

      I say it's about time they did this. I'm all for it.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313117].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Lance K
        Originally Posted by Steven Wagenheim View Post

        The only people it will hurt are those who abuse the system.
        I thought you didn't like blanket statements, Steven. :p
        Signature
        "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want."
        ~ Zig Ziglar
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313173].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author CDarklock
          Originally Posted by Lance K View Post

          I thought you didn't like blanket statements, Steven. :p
          Yeah, blanket statements are bad.
          Signature
          "The Golden Town is the Golden Town no longer. They have sold their pillars for brass and their temples for money, they have made coins out of their golden doors. It is become a dark town full of trouble, there is no ease in its streets, beauty has left it and the old songs are gone." - Lord Dunsany, The Messengers
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2320163].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Black Hat Cat
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Steven Wagenheim View Post

        The only people it will hurt are those who abuse the system.

        I say it's about time they did this. I'm all for it.
        You heard it here first, people....if you have/had a most viewed article, it's only because you abused the system.

        So speaketh the great steven
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2324198].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jeremy Kelsall
    Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

    As I'm sure a lot of article marketers have noticed, yesterday Ezinearticles made some big tweaks. Their "Most Viewed" list got shortened down to top 10, from top 15. They then added another top 10 list, called "More Related EzineArticles" BEFORE the "Most Viewed" list.

    In other words, at the bottom of any Ezinearticle, you now have to scroll through both the top 10 "Most recent articles" and top 10 "More related articles" before you get to Most Viewed. Since I have a lot of my articles in the top 1-3 of those lists, I'm guessing that this will affect my bottomline.

    Looking at my analytics, there's already a 20% drop since yesterday, but it could be a fluke.

    Would love to hear some opinions on this. Will this hurt marketers who target the Most Viewed list in the long run?
    Hint: From what I can tell the "more related articles" are selected by the tags
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313126].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom E
      Originally Posted by Jeremy Kelsall View Post

      Hint: From what I can tell the "more related articles" are selected by the tags
      Yep, I noticed the same thing. We just have to jump through a few more hoops with the new system. I think this could do the trick:
      1. Write article slated for Most Viewed
      2. Write a "shadow" article that features the same tags, etc, slated for "more related" list. Social bookmark that article/backlink it, so it will carry maximum weight to be the number one on "more related" list.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313734].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author genietoast
        Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

        Yep, I noticed the same thing. We just have to jump through a few more hoops with the new system. I think this could do the trick:
        1. Write article slated for Most Viewed
        2. Write a "shadow" article that features the same tags, etc, slated for "more related" list. Social bookmark that article/backlink it, so it will carry maximum weight to be the number one on "more related" list.
        I say keep it simple. Better to go big.

        It's always better to rank for the SERPS, not the "Most Viewed" list for some article directory. What happens if EZA decides to get rid of the "Most Viewed" category all together? If you're ranking well on the SERPs for your keyword, you don't care if they dance the Hokey Pokey.

        Use low-competition keywords with good traffic in your articles. Write good content. Then Backlink appropriately. Let it simmer and do its thing.

        You should be good to go.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2322362].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author enigmanic
      Originally Posted by Jeremy Kelsall View Post

      Hint: From what I can tell the "more related articles" are selected by the tags
      Jeremy,
      By tags, I assume you mean keyword/meta tags?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2314620].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author mlord10
    I don't think it will hurt if you adapt accordingly. I personally do not use getting listed in the "most-viewed" section as a part of my overall marketing strategy, although I have seen a slight influx in traffic when I get a few articles in there.

    I think writing quality content will still win out, and like Jeremy said above, you can always just optimize your articles so they will get in the "related articles" section.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313135].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Will Edwards
    Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

    Since I have a lot of my articles in the top 1-3 of those lists, I'm guessing that this will affect my bottomline.
    I can't see how. If you are in the top 3, then you are still in the top 10 ergo - no effect.

    Will
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313224].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom E
      Originally Posted by Will Edwards View Post

      I can't see how. If you are in the top 3, then you are still in the top 10 ergo - no effect.

      Will
      Will, the issue is that whereas before, readers only had to scroll through a "most recent" list to get to most Viewed, now they have to scroll through that one, plus the "more related" list to get to the Most Viewed. In other words, readers have to exert more effort, which generally means a drop in bottomline.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313743].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author T.I.M.
        Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

        Will, the issue is that whereas before, readers only had to scroll through a "most recent" list to get to most Viewed, now they have to scroll through that one, plus the "more related" list to get to the Most Viewed. In other words, readers have to exert more effort, which generally means a drop in bottomline.
        I'm scratching my head confused here. You can get on the most viewed list but you don't think you can get on the more related articles list as well :confused:
        Signature

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2313993].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Tom E
          Originally Posted by T.I.M. View Post

          I'm scratching my head confused here. You can get on the most viewed list but you don't think you can get on the more related articles list as well :confused:
          Getting on Most Viewed is just a matter of receiving enough views. Getting on the related list has no such requirement, so one has to get very creative.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2314294].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author T.I.M.
            Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

            Getting on Most Viewed is just a matter of receiving enough views. Getting on the related list has no such requirement, so one has to get very creative.
            I understand what you're saying totally man.

            Creative? You know your main KWs you're targeting. Read Jeremys' hint above again. Focus more in on what KWs you're targeting & ~voila~ you're related. Most views can be manipulated, EZA makes changes & there's still ways to do it.

            It's far less effort to make a "related" article than some of the time, effort & money people put in to getting most viewed.

            The biggest flaw I have in your complaint is you're acting like you're just a 1 trick pony. You can put in the effort & resources to get "views" but you can't put a little more effort on keywords & LSI to get into related category?

            C'mon man adapt & adjust, that's the game we play right? At the end of the day someone as aggressive as you are in marketing will probably clean up from these adaptations.

            I'm not trying to be a prick but I'm just saying you're whining about nothing.
            Signature

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2314881].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Will Edwards
        Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

        Will, the issue is that whereas before, readers only had to scroll through a "most recent" list to get to most Viewed, now they have to scroll through that one, plus the "more related" list to get to the Most Viewed. In other words, readers have to exert more effort, which generally means a drop in bottomline.
        Thanks for you explanation, but I don't really buy it. The benefits of being on that list are not just for human visitors, but for linking, and search engines really don't mind scrolling down the page.

        Will
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2315324].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author enigmanic
    I have one article on EZA that was making me $5-10 a day for about 4 months now. Suddenly yesterday and today, I made over $50 from that one article. I'm assuming it has to do with this change. If so, I like it!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2314615].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom E
      Originally Posted by enigmanic View Post

      I have one article on EZA that was making me $5-10 a day for about 4 months now. Suddenly today, I made over $50 from that one article. I'm assuming it has to do with this change. If so, I like it!
      Sounds like you got lucky with a Related Article placement. The new way they have it set up is making their Most Viewed list practically worthless to be on.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2314632].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author enigmanic
        Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

        Sounds like you got lucky with a Related Article placement. The new way they have it set up is making their Most Viewed list practically worthless to be on.
        Yes, Im noticing that with some of my niches, I got lucky and I'm now getting double or triple the sales/conversions I usually get. But on the flip side, I have a couple of niches that completed dropped since I had articles in the 12-15th positions.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2318456].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author mesya
      Originally Posted by enigmanic View Post

      I have one article on EZA that was making me $5-10 a day for about 4 months now. Suddenly yesterday and today, I made over $50 from that one article. I'm assuming it has to do with this change. If so, I like it!

      it's sound good, but my articles just give me lest visitor for my site.

      maybe I didn't know how to use and promote that..
      Signature
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2315284].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tyroneshum
    No one will be hurt and yes we should be just adapting to its changes as like what Google always does. Stick on relevant keywords and tags and that way, you'll be easily targeted again.
    Signature
    outsourcinglive.com
    Follow me on my 90 Day Challenge to rank no. 1 on Google
    ---------------------------------------------------
    Connect with me at: outsourcinglive.com/google-plus
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2314904].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom E
      Originally Posted by T.I.M. View Post

      I understand what you're saying totally man.

      Creative? You know your main KWs you're targeting. Read Jeremys' hint above again. Focus more in on what KWs you're targeting & ~voila~ you're related. Most views can be manipulated, EZA makes changes & there's still ways to do it.

      It's far less effort to make a "related" article than some of the time, effort & money people put in to getting most viewed.

      The biggest flaw I have in your complaint is you're acting like you're just a 1 trick pony. You can put in the effort & resources to get "views" but you can't put a little more effort on keywords & LSI to get into related category?

      C'mon man adapt & adjust, that's the game we play right? At the end of the day someone as aggressive as you are in marketing will probably clean up from these adaptations.

      I'm not trying to be a prick but I'm just saying you're whining about nothing.
      Settle down dude. You clearly missed the part where I responded to Jeremy's comment, and added a creative suggestion for which he thanked me. I'll save you the scroll-through:

      Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

      Yep, I noticed the same thing. We just have to jump through a few more hoops with the new system. I think this could do the trick:
      1. Write article slated for Most Viewed
      2. Write a "shadow" article that features the same tags, etc, slated for "more related" list. Social bookmark that article/backlink it, so it will carry maximum weight to be the number one on "more related" list.
      Next time, read the whole thread before making crass comments.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2315178].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author yongjj
    Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

    UPDATE: It's official, the "Most Viewed" list is, for all practical purposes, dead. Since Ezine implemented the change about a day and a half ago, my articles, which were all in the top 1-3 position on various Most Viewed lists, have gone from 150 click-throughs a day to under 30.

    As I'm sure a lot of article marketers have noticed, yesterday Ezinearticles made some big tweaks. Their "Most Viewed" list got shortened down to top 10, from top 15. They then added another top 10 list, called "More Related EzineArticles" BEFORE the "Most Viewed" list.

    In other words, at the bottom of any Ezinearticle, you now have to scroll through both the top 10 "Most recent articles" and top 10 "More related articles" before you get to Most Viewed. Since I have a lot of my articles in the top 1-3 of those lists, I'm guessing that this will affect my bottomline.

    Looking at my analytics, there's already a 20% drop since yesterday, but it could be a fluke.

    Would love to hear some opinions on this. Will this hurt marketers who target the Most Viewed list in the long run?
    The answer is No - It won't affect your articles in terms of CTR. First of all, you need to know why we're using EzineArticles.com. Most article marketers are relying on EZA to rank high in most search engines including Google.

    Most important thing is that you need to include the right keywords in your articles (including the title and the article body), so that it would be able to rank well in search engines.

    Most readers would find your articles from search page results based on a relevant keywords. In short, if your articles rank well in search engines, more people will read your articles as it can increase views of your articles and the CTRs.

    Jaden J.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2315936].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author cyberws
      Keep in mind that EZA regulates the amount of times you can use your keyword/keyword phrase in an article. So getting on the Most Related list isn't going to be done with keyword stuffing.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2315958].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author MsMotivation1
    Hmmm, I need to check into this to see what's going on with the articles.
    Thanks for the headsup
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2316061].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom E
      Originally Posted by Will Edwards View Post

      Thanks for you explanation, but I don't really buy it. The benefits of being on that list are not just for human visitors, but for linking, and search engines really don't mind scrolling down the page.

      Will
      Will,
      I agree, but the point of this thread was to decipher whether or not this new change will hurt the bottom line for articles that are on Most Viewed list. I wrote this post yesterday, and since then, the statistics speak for themselves: I went from an average around 150 click-throughs per day to half of that yesterday, and right now, I have zero clicks for today, whereas under the old system, I would have at least 40 by now.

      Yes, you get link juice for the 60 days your article spends on that list, but for someone like me, who found a unique way of dominating Most Viewed lists, earning good money on it, it is a challenge, because that extra income source has now dried up.

      So for that express purpose, Ezine's Most Viewed is dead.

      Originally Posted by yongjj View Post

      The answer is No - It won't affect your articles in terms of CTR. First of all, you need to know why we're using EzineArticles.com. Most article marketers are relying on EZA to rank high in most search engines including Google.

      Most important thing is that you need to include the right keywords in your articles (including the title and the article body), so that it would be able to rank well in search engines.

      Most readers would find your articles from search page results based on a relevant keywords. In short, if your articles rank well in search engines, more people will read your articles as it can increase views of your articles and the CTRs.

      Jaden J.
      See my answer above. I agree with what you say as well, but for profiting purely and directly from being on Most Viewed lists, it does hurt the bottom line.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2317349].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author jtoelle
        Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post


        Yes, you get link juice for the 60 days your article spends on that list, but for someone like me, who found a unique way of dominating Most Viewed lists, earning good money on it, it is a challenge, because that extra income source has now dried up.

        So for that express purpose, Ezine's Most Viewed is dead.

        How often does the Most Viewed list get updated, every 60 days? Doesn't appear to update in Real Time.
        Signature

        Use AutoRegram to Repost Viral content on Instagram.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2505631].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TimG
    Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

    UPDATE: It's official, the "Most Viewed" list is, for all practical purposes, dead, for the purpose of receiving CTR from being on the list. Since Ezine implemented the change about a day and a half ago, my articles, which were all in the top 1-3 position on various Most Viewed lists, have gone from 150 click-throughs a day to under 30.

    As I'm sure a lot of article marketers have noticed, yesterday Ezinearticles made some big tweaks. Their "Most Viewed" list got shortened down to top 10, from top 15. They then added another top 10 list, called "More Related EzineArticles" BEFORE the "Most Viewed" list.

    In other words, at the bottom of any Ezinearticle, you now have to scroll through both the top 10 "Most recent articles" and top 10 "More related articles" before you get to Most Viewed. Since I have a lot of my articles in the top 1-3 of those lists, I'm guessing that this will affect my bottomline.

    Looking at my analytics, there's already a 20% drop since yesterday, but it could be a fluke.

    Would love to hear some opinions on this. Will this hurt marketers who target the Most Viewed list in the long run?
    Although your clickthroughs may have dropped the real question is wwhat has your generated income done. If it has also dropped then there may be some cause for alarm but if your income has remained stable or dipped slightly then perhaps no real harm has been done.

    The "Most Viewed" section was actually more valuable to use when it was without the time based element (most viewed in 120 days, then 90 days then 60 days).

    However, what EZA discovered long ago was that the views for articles could be manipulated in order for someone to get their article in that status.

    For me personally, I'm still of the mindset to write an article with the intent to get it ranked in the top 5 of Google's organic search engine rankings. If that objective is accomplished then 80% of the time the article will land in the most viewed section anyway due to the traffic it will receive.

    Also, based on some research I was conducting today for the new "More Related" section I think it opens a door for us to do much better.

    For example, one article I was investigating by a well known author had as its "More Related" articles additional articles by the same author - That's right, this author had all 10 spots of the "More Related" articles filled with his content - I think that is pretty huge!!!

    Something else I've noticed is how dynamic that section is because everytime I click on a new article the "More Releated" articles seem to change.

    Perhaps the only real articles hurt in this were the "Most Viewed" 11-15 slots which were lost in ths shuffle.

    Right now, the best thing to do is focus on producing high quality articles that will rank in the top 5 on google and you will still get your page views.

    Next objective is to figure out how to lock up all 10 slots for related articles that you own whenever someone visits one of your articles.

    Respectfully,
    Tim
    Signature
    Article Marketing Soldiers - The Best Selling Article Marketing Product On The Warrior Forum Is Now Looking For Affiliates! Make Over $25 Per Sale With This High Converting Product.

    Make More Money And Spend More Time With Your Family By Becoming A Scentsy Consultant - I Provide Personal Assistance And Help With Growing Your Business.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2318791].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Lance K
      Tim, just thought I'd say thank you for the well thought out, informative, & cordial post. It's a breath of fresh air after seeing how some Warriors are interacting on other threads. Just hitting the "Thanks" button didn't seem like enough!
      Signature
      "You can have everything in life you want if you will just help enough other people get what they want."
      ~ Zig Ziglar
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2319016].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TimG
        Originally Posted by Lance K View Post

        Tim, just thought I'd say thank you for the well thought out, informative, & cordial post. It's a breath of fresh air after seeing how some Warriors are interacting on other threads. Just hitting the "Thanks" button didn't seem like enough!
        Lance,
        Appreciate the kind words - Sometimes we have to take a look at what is taking place and see how the changes can benefit us and move our o business forward.

        Bit of a side story here but I remember when I was a a seminar and the main speaker was talking about this brand new product we would all be getting that basically scapped content and built a site for you (this was back when scrappers were the in thing).

        I remember everyone was all ga-ga over the software except for me because I had no intentions of using it. Instead, I was asking questions on how it worked, what it looked for in the content it would scrape...etc

        My mind was focused on finding out how I could get my own content (article submissions) scrapped by this software so that it would end up on the hundreds/thousands of websites that users of the product would make.

        Naturally I was after the traffic it would generate through my resource boxes, the branding of my name that it would create though widespread exposure and the promotion of my articles.

        The moral of that little story is we need to find ways to ethically harness the changes that take place so that they don't just benefit the entity responsible for the change but also benefit our own online business.

        For every change that EZA has made over the years, the smart marketer has figured out how to increase the ROI on their own article marketing campaigns.

        This new change is no different and I actually believe it will help those that figure out how to take advantage of it.

        Respectfully,
        Tim
        Signature
        Article Marketing Soldiers - The Best Selling Article Marketing Product On The Warrior Forum Is Now Looking For Affiliates! Make Over $25 Per Sale With This High Converting Product.

        Make More Money And Spend More Time With Your Family By Becoming A Scentsy Consultant - I Provide Personal Assistance And Help With Growing Your Business.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2319292].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom E
      Originally Posted by TimG View Post

      Although your clickthroughs may have dropped the real question is wwhat has your generated income done. If it has also dropped then there may be some cause for alarm but if your income has remained stable or dipped slightly then perhaps no real harm has been done.

      The "Most Viewed" section was actually more valuable to use when it was without the time based element (most viewed in 120 days, then 90 days then 60 days).

      However, what EZA discovered long ago was that the views for articles could be manipulated in order for someone to get their article in that status.

      For me personally, I'm still of the mindset to write an article with the intent to get it ranked in the top 5 of Google's organic search engine rankings. If that objective is accomplished then 80% of the time the article will land in the most viewed section anyway due to the traffic it will receive.

      Also, based on some research I was conducting today for the new "More Related" section I think it opens a door for us to do much better.

      For example, one article I was investigating by a well known author had as its "More Related" articles additional articles by the same author - That's right, this author had all 10 spots of the "More Related" articles filled with his content - I think that is pretty huge!!!

      Something else I've noticed is how dynamic that section is because everytime I click on a new article the "More Releated" articles seem to change.

      Perhaps the only real articles hurt in this were the "Most Viewed" 11-15 slots which were lost in ths shuffle.

      Right now, the best thing to do is focus on producing high quality articles that will rank in the top 5 on google and you will still get your page views.

      Next objective is to figure out how to lock up all 10 slots for related articles that you own whenever someone visits one of your articles.

      Respectfully,
      Tim
      I'm right with you Tim. My brain has already gone wild with creativity. There is actually some really good money to be made on the "Related" list. All it takes is a little creativity, and taking action right now.

      It's funny, when this change first happened, I tripped, but now I'm seeing opportunities left and right.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2319803].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author TimG
        Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

        I'm right with you Tim. My brain has already gone wild with creativity. There is actually some really good money to be made on the "Related" list. All it takes is a little creativity, and taking action right now.

        It's funny, when this change first happened, I tripped, but now I'm seeing opportunities left and right.
        I feel the same way....definately believe there is an opportunity to capitalize on this recent change.

        Glad to hear that you've recovered from your initial frustration and are finding some ways to benefit from this.

        Respectfully,
        Tim
        Signature
        Article Marketing Soldiers - The Best Selling Article Marketing Product On The Warrior Forum Is Now Looking For Affiliates! Make Over $25 Per Sale With This High Converting Product.

        Make More Money And Spend More Time With Your Family By Becoming A Scentsy Consultant - I Provide Personal Assistance And Help With Growing Your Business.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2319868].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author 24 by 7
    Of course it will down the value of other articles, cause now i think other articles will get viewed only if person has put at least 50% same title in google for results.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2320003].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author terrapurus
    Originally Posted by gr8tocre8 View Post

    UPDATE: It's official, the "Most Viewed" list is, for all practical purposes, dead, for the purpose of receiving CTR from being on the list. Since Ezine implemented the change about a day and a half ago, my articles, which were all in the top 1-3 position on various Most Viewed lists, have gone from 150 click-throughs a day to under 30.
    Ezine articles simply adjusted their service in response to how people were using and abusing it. It was a widely known gray hat technique of submitting an article and then paying users (or even not traffic) to click on the article for a few cents per click.

    This pushed the article up into the most viewed list where it then gives a significant boost to organic traffic to the target URLs.

    I am with Ezinearticles on this one. If Ezine articles is to stay an authority site then it has to dilute the effect of spammers. If not, a Google slap is inevitable.

    I am not saying you were abusing their system - but you were getting traffic from a source that was being abused. And that is why they took action.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2320090].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author TimG
      Originally Posted by terrapurus View Post

      Ezine articles simply adjusted their service in response to how people were using and abusing it. It was a widely known gray hat technique of submitting an article and then paying users (or even not traffic) to click on the article for a few cents per click.

      This pushed the article up into the most viewed list where it then gives a significant boost to organic traffic to the target URLs.

      I am with Ezinearticles on this one. If Ezine articles is to stay an authority site then it has to dilute the effect of spammers. If not, a Google slap is inevitable.

      I am not saying you were abusing their system - but you were getting traffic from a source that was being abused. And that is why they took action.
      Over the years I've watched as EZA has made numerous changes and each time everyone was extremely concerned about how it would effect their online business, specifically the article marketing portion of that business.

      However, with nearly every change the marketers that were doing things on the up and up usually ended up flourishing in a more postive manner.

      Those that spent time developing ways to abuse the system in place instead of building a solid business base were the marketers that felt the most pain.

      This change is no different. In fact, it actually helps the folks that are doing things correctly.

      Respectfully,
      Tim
      Signature
      Article Marketing Soldiers - The Best Selling Article Marketing Product On The Warrior Forum Is Now Looking For Affiliates! Make Over $25 Per Sale With This High Converting Product.

      Make More Money And Spend More Time With Your Family By Becoming A Scentsy Consultant - I Provide Personal Assistance And Help With Growing Your Business.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2324212].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author shaggard
    Excuse me for being a bit confused by your question. Your original question was
    Would love to hear some opinions on this. Will this hurt marketers who target the Most Viewed list in the long run?
    Then when someone offered a no response you said
    See my answer above. I agree with what you say as well, but for profiting purely and directly from being on Most Viewed lists, it does hurt the bottom line.
    So, I am thinking you are not really asking if it will effect your bottom line because you have already determined that is will. However, you are really trying to discover ways to over come the change.

    I just want to clarify before I offer up an opinion.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2320158].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Tom E
      Originally Posted by shaggard View Post

      Excuse me for being a bit confused by your question. Your original question was

      Then when someone offered a no response you said


      So, I am thinking you are not really asking if it will effect your bottom line because you have already determined that is will. However, you are really trying to discover ways to over come the change.

      I just want to clarify before I offer up an opinion.
      Shaggard, when I first started the thread, it was a spur of the moment thing, as I had just discovered the Ezine change. Then, relatively quick, I started doing research, and realized that there are ways to massively benefit from this change. Sorry for the confusion - my end of this thread metamorphosed.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2322255].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author TheNewGuy2010
    It'll hurt folks that try to build their business around having the most view articles.
    Signature
    Retired Internet Marketer.
    Gone Fishing....
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2324202].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Tom E
    So after a month or so after this change, my numbers are pretty much back to what they were before the change. In other words, people either got used to scrolling past the "more related articles" list to the Most Viewed, or enough of my articles got placed on the "more related" list to make up for the difference.

    I'm back in Pleasantville - however, because the change had me tripped out, it made me go searching for additional ways to make money from articles, so now, as a result, I'm making more money than ever.

    Conclusion: Change is good.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[2409285].message }}

Trending Topics