Go Back   WarriorForum - Internet Marketing Forums > The Warrior Forum > Main Internet Marketing Discussion Forum
Register Blogs FAQ Social Groups CalendarHelp Desk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-29-2008, 06:03 AM   #1
Senior Warrior Member
War Room Member
 
dbarnum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Ohio, USA.
Posts: 5,696
Blog Entries: 46
Thanks: 185
Thanked 144 Times in 110 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Myspace Profile  View Member's FaceBook Profile  View Member's Twitter Profile  View Member's YouTube Profile
Contact Info
Send a message via Yahoo to dbarnum Send a message via Skype™ to dbarnum
Default Seizure of 141 privately held domains in Kentucky..?

Hi,

I've been trying to somewhat follow this info (details here: BoycottKentucky.com ) and just wondered if someone here could sum it up in non-legal jargon. We don't do gaming / porn topics, but it doesn't seem right to take private domains away because they compete with your state's industry. But as a speed-reader plus not being an attorney, maybe I'm not at a good site to get the other side of the picture.

Also, is this for people who live in the state and own the domains? Since domains have a global reach, I'm interested in this aspect. I mean a state cannot block domains from showing to its residents, correct?


Thanks for any help. Trying to get the whole picture of domain rights and blocking them in certain areas.

Need help? 100+ Ways / Support / Fiverr / Rootbeer Break / Warrior4Hire Specials! Get customized help:



Give us a try, check out & bookmark: MAP / Top Tasks at: 2011 / our blog
dbarnum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2008, 06:12 AM   #2
Senior Warrior Member
 
greenovni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,022
Blog Entries: 2
Thanks: 9
Thanked 95 Times in 42 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile 
Default Re: Seizure of 141 privately held domains in Kentucky..?

kentucky domain seizure - Google Search

Lost of information there

The State of Kentucky claims that

" a domain name/website is subject to jurisdiction anywhere in the world from which it can be viewed. He said domain names are virtual “property” and that they are anywhere and everywhere."

Thus can be seized if they run afoul of Kentucky law.

Defense argued that the domains are not in Kentucky and that they are not property, that they are just letters and numbers that enable people to find websites, like the letters and numbers that make up the address of a house. Taking away the address doesn’t take away the house or the ability for someone to visit it to gamble.

In short. The Governor of Kentucky wants to seize domain names of websites he does not like because they are "anywhere and everywhere"


Last edited by greenovni; 10-29-2008 at 06:20 AM. Reason: More information
greenovni is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2008, 06:31 AM   #3
HyperActive Warrior
War Room Member
 
primuskannan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: India
Posts: 157
Thanks: 46
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile 
Default Re: Seizure of 141 privately held domains in Kentucky..?

Apparently the judge has denied the motions of the domain owners and a further decision is expected on Nov 10th

Domain Name Journal - The Lowdown from DNJournal.com

But cant see how Kentucky's jurisdiction extends over the rest of the world and will see a shift in domain registrations to non us registrars.

If this prevails then all states and foreign governments will seek to seize domains for their own suppressive purposes and defeat the idea of a free internet.

Kulasekaran

primuskannan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2008, 11:45 AM   #4
Senior Warrior Member
War Room Member
 
bgmacaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta GA Metro Area, USA.
Posts: 3,643
Blog Entries: 5
Thanks: 311
Thanked 925 Times in 644 Posts
Social Networking View Member's Twitter Profile 
Default Re: Seizure of 141 privately held domains in Kentucky..?

My non-lawyer take would be that such a demand would violate the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) and Commerce Clause (Article 1, Section 8, Clause 3) of the US Constitution.

bgmacaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2008, 11:49 AM   #5
HyperActive Warrior
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Out Behind The Barn
Posts: 171
Thanks: 14
Thanked 10 Times in 8 Posts
Social Networking View Member's FaceBook Profile 
Default Re: Seizure of 141 privately held domains in Kentucky..?

I think we're all just sitting back assuming that this won't stick. It would be bad for EVERYONE (not just domainers) if it did.

Don't Miss Your Chance To - Make Your Weight Loss Products SELL BIG!
Eric Engel is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

  WarriorForum - Internet Marketing Forums > The Warrior Forum > Main Internet Marketing Discussion Forum

Tags
141, domains, held, kentucky, privately, seizure

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:53 PM.