How effective do you think this is?

alexei_aus · 11-11-2008, 01:30 AM

Do you think it is effective to dominate front page of google with sites thank link to you?

Or is it better just to have your site rank number 1 on the top page of google?

Ryan Even · 11-11-2008, 01:33 AM

Ideally, your site ranks #1 and the rest of the sites on page 1 link to you.

alexei_aus · 11-11-2008, 01:40 AM

hmmmm. sounsd like a good option

its just using social network services you end up ranking their pages for your keywords....

affhelper · 11-11-2008, 01:45 AM

It's hard to do where there are all pages on the front page linking to you
Sometimes it does happen but Google quickly changes those results usually
within 2-3 days. In fact that will make your site jump on the #1 position fast
but those other links will drop.

Here is a scenario for you that I have experienced. I managed to get 3 sites
in one of my niches that ranked on the front page to link to my brand new
site. I paid for those links because I didn't have a choice. It was a competitive niche and articles by itself wouldn't do the job. After 2 months
my new site came up on the front page and higher than those that linked to
me. They actually started to drop in rankings because of that. They noticed
it and didn't let me have my links on their sites anymore, but it was too late

I backed up myself with some press release to keep the position. Now one
of the guys contacted me if he could buy a link from me ...LOL ...no way!

alexei_aus · 11-11-2008, 01:56 AM

can you tell me what services you had ranking in google?
digg?

lexilexi · 11-11-2008, 02:24 AM

I wouldn't feel so bad if it was my own social networking profiles ranking alongside my own sites on the front page of Google! (I have this happening for one term.) Also I tend to think (although this is just a theory) that users will choose from the top ten results, and if one of those results is (say) a Myspace page, the user will generally only follow it if they are a myspace user.
A good page title can often get you more clicks than other pages above you in google for your search term, because most people don't think of how their page title is going to appear in search engines - and it's often easy to out-do them.

11-11-2008, 01:30 AM	#1
alexei_aus HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 476 Blog Entries: 3 Thanks: 14 Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts Social Networking	How effective do you think this is? Do you think it is effective to dominate front page of google with sites thank link to you? Or is it better just to have your site rank number 1 on the top page of google?
	Google Adwords Melbourne Salon Software That Rules!

11-11-2008, 01:33 AM	#2
Ryan Even Advanced Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Las Vegas, NV Posts: 970 Thanks: 43 Thanked 43 Times in 36 Posts	Re: How effective do you think this is? Ideally, your site ranks #1 and the rest of the sites on page 1 link to you.
	*The "Secret Product Source"* Of Over 300 Warriors!** WSO Auto Relationship Building With Your List - Custom Weekly Newsletters Written For You!

11-11-2008, 01:40 AM	#3
alexei_aus HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 476 Blog Entries: 3 Thanks: 14 Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts Social Networking	Re: How effective do you think this is? hmmmm. sounsd like a good option its just using social network services you end up ranking their pages for your keywords....
	Google Adwords Melbourne Salon Software That Rules!

11-11-2008, 01:45 AM	#4
affhelper Senior Warrior Member War Room Member Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: , , USA. Posts: 1,635 Thanks: 87 Thanked 82 Times in 43 Posts	Re: How effective do you think this is? It's hard to do where there are all pages on the front page linking to you Sometimes it does happen but Google quickly changes those results usually within 2-3 days. In fact that will make your site jump on the #1 position fast but those other links will drop. Here is a scenario for you that I have experienced. I managed to get 3 sites in one of my niches that ranked on the front page to link to my brand new site. I paid for those links because I didn't have a choice. It was a competitive niche and articles by itself wouldn't do the job. After 2 months my new site came up on the front page and higher than those that linked to me. They actually started to drop in rankings because of that. They noticed it and didn't let me have my links on their sites anymore, but it was too late I backed up myself with some press release to keep the position. Now one of the guys contacted me if he could buy a link from me ...LOL ...no way!
	>> Affhelper.com - My Blog >> http://www.facebook.com/affhelper - My fanpage

11-11-2008, 01:56 AM	#5
alexei_aus HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Melbourne, Australia Posts: 476 Blog Entries: 3 Thanks: 14 Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts Social Networking	Re: How effective do you think this is? can you tell me what services you had ranking in google? digg?
	Google Adwords Melbourne Salon Software That Rules!

11-11-2008, 02:24 AM	#6
lexilexi HyperActive Warrior War Room Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: The Pod Posts: 321 Thanks: 116 Thanked 99 Times in 43 Posts Social Networking	Re: How effective do you think this is? I wouldn't feel so bad if it was my own social networking profiles ranking alongside my own sites on the front page of Google! (I have this happening for one term.) Also I tend to think (although this is just a theory) that users will choose from the top ten results, and if one of those results is (say) a Myspace page, the user will generally only follow it if they are a myspace user. A good page title can often get you more clicks than other pages above you in google for your search term, because most people don't think of how their page title is going to appear in search engines - and it's often easy to out-do them.
	"Don’t be distracted by criticism. Remember the only taste of success some people have is when they take a bite out of you." — Zig Ziglar