Search Engine Loophole

[callmestrip]

Question...

Has anyone purchased the search engine loophole and tried it? Were you successful?

The ICP thing or whatever is really confusing to me. Anyone else overwhelmed or confused with the process?

[callmestrip]

Nobody has tried the search engine loophole?

[callmestrip]

Exactly, there was way too much investment required with the loophole.

They must be cashing in big with it though. It is number one in marketing on clickbank.

I had to get the refund though

[mikecowles]

I'm going to launch a video series next week as a wso on how I've gotten several top rankings on the search engines, including doing one in a day with less than an hour of work. It's not available for sale yet, but you can read the salesletter and email me if you want me to tell you when the wso goes live.

The site is One Hour Google- How I Got a Top Page Rank on Google in One Day with Less Than One Hour of Work!

-Mike Cowles. <><

[chris_surfrider]

Exactly, there was way too much investment required with the loophole.

Even though this is false, even if that statement were true - think about what the process does...

Ranking very highly for incredible keywords systematically, automatically, and getting tons of free traffic for as many sites as you want.

Compare that "investment" with how much it would cost you to get that kind of traffic with PPC.

Once again - the "free" mindset is preventing people from seeing major results.

Well, back to submitting articles, I guess...

-Chris

P.S. By the way, we've added tons of followup resources to the course, including a quick-start guide that clearly explains and outlines how the ONLY necessary "expense" is domain name registration.

Try and find one GOOD IM strategy that doesn't involve registering domains and owning sites...

[GeorgR.]

everyone and their mama is doing MSN loophole right now, cheez

[Jakehyten]

Originally Posted by callmestrip

Exactly, there was way too much investment required with the loophole.

They must be cashing in big with it though. It is number one in marketing on clickbank.

I had to get the refund though

LOL. WAY too much investment?

Is this statement made assuming the product works or doesnt work? I got the program and Bought EVERYTHING the recommended and you dont even HAVE to do that. Total cost was a little over $300 and I bought high end extra stuff.

So assuming it works how is $300 too much of an investment?

I dont even know why i would write this and argue though because its that exact attitude that makes this stuff profitable for the people actually willing to put in the work and do it.

[lpstoops]

Originally Posted by Jakehyten

LOL. WAY too much investment?

Is this statement made assuming the product works or doesnt work? I got the program and Bought EVERYTHING the recommended and you dont even HAVE to do that. Total cost was a little over $300 and I bought high end extra stuff.

So assuming it works how is $300 too much of an investment?

I dont even know why i would write this and argue though because its that exact attitude that makes this stuff profitable for the people actually willing to put in the work and do it.

Elequent, and well spoken.


Questions: How would this product work if you were to create a network of other IM'rs with this product and link through their blogs?

[chris_surfrider]

I dont even know why i would write this and argue though because its that exact attitude that makes this stuff profitable for the people actually willing to put in the work and do it.

Bingo!

This applies to virtually everything else as well.

This doesn't mean to say that we sell our blueprints or education in HOPES that only a few will actually enact it. (It wouldn't matter if everyone did - the process would still work)

Rather, it's just the 80/20 rule at work.

As usual...

-Chris

[Jakehyten]

Originally Posted by lpstoops

Elequent, and well spoken.


Questions: How would this product work if you were to create a network of other IM'rs with this product and link through their blogs?

There was someone on here who was talking about that in a thread. I think it was george. Do a search. The only thing i think would be people probably not wanting to share their sites for fear of being copied. reasonable.

[callmestrip]

Originally Posted by chris_surfrider

Even though this is false, even if that statement were true - think about what the process does...

Ranking very highly for incredible keywords systematically, automatically, and getting tons of free traffic for as many sites as you want.

Compare that "investment" with how much it would cost you to get that kind of traffic with PPC.

Once again - the "free" mindset is preventing people from seeing major results.

Well, back to submitting articles, I guess...

-Chris

P.S. By the way, we've added tons of followup resources to the course, including a quick-start guide that clearly explains and outlines how the ONLY necessary "expense" is domain name registration.

Try and find one GOOD IM strategy that doesn't involve registering domains and owning sites...

Back to submitting articles, I guess..??? Are you making this statement to me?

You need to be careful man, making statements like this could ruin your reputation and your product.

Try and find one GOOD IM strategy that doesn't involve registering domains and owning sites?????

I am more focused on list building and making products. and NO **** you have to register a domain and own a site.

I started this thread just to see if anyone was successful with the strategy. I just wish I knew before hand that there was going to be other investments. And yes I know how huge a #1 spot on any search engine would be.

I am NOT trying to say the product doesn't work, or its crap. My very first IM guide was yours.

Not trying bash the loophole and apologies if it seemed that way

[chris_surfrider]

I'm not making the "submitting articles" statement to you, or at you.

My point is that the fear of investment is what cripples many people in this industry - who wonder why they're seeing very little, if any, results by ONLY using "free" methods.

I am more focused on list building and making products. and NO **** you have to register a domain and own a site.

Well then what's the problem?

That's all you need for the Loophole strategy - which, by the way, is an ideal traffic-gen method for list-building.

The rest of the tools/resources are optional, and was clearly described as such.

I'm not singling you out and sorry if I came across that way. I'm just baffled and quite honestly disturbed at how people are so opposed to investing in their business.

Thanks

-Chris

[Jeremy Kelsall]

You could probably implement the whole plan, outsourcing everything that needs to be done for no more than $300 bucks if you are frugal

I'm getting my strategy together now and will be implementing it here shortly...why? Because the products that Chris sells work! Period.

[coco28]

Originally Posted by Jeremy Kelsall

You could probably implement the whole plan, outsourcing everything that needs to be done for no more than $300 bucks if you are frugal

I'm getting my strategy together now and will be implementing it here shortly...why? Because the products that Chris sells work! Period.

I would agree with this. Chris has an excellent reputation and I have bought a few of his products, including MSN Loophole. I don't believe Chris would compromise his reputation by selling his peers a turkey, and that is one of the reasons why I bought MSN Loophole.

I don't anticipate having to spend any more than $300 to implement this, and it is an extremely scalable system...

[callmestrip]

Originally Posted by chris_surfrider

I'm not making the "submitting articles" statement to you, or at you.

My point is that the fear of investment is what cripples many people in this industry - who wonder why they're seeing very little, if any, results by ONLY using "free" methods.



Well then what's the problem?

That's all you need for the Loophole strategy - which, by the way, is an ideal traffic-gen method for list-building.

The rest of the tools/resources are optional, and was clearly described as such.

I'm not singling you out and sorry if I came across that way. I'm just baffled and quite honestly disturbed at how people are so opposed to investing in their business.

Thanks

-Chris

That was the whole reason why I wanted to do it. Get the number 1 spot for whatever and link to a squeeze.

[chris_surfrider]

Your money-site could actually be the squeeze page, too.

Many of mine are.

Works great, and has been an effective additional traffic source for me.

I don't have nearly the network of sites that Dave does, but this is definitely an alternate source that most marketers overlook (MSN in general).

-Chris

[Black Hat Cat]

Originally Posted by callmestrip

Exactly, there was way too much investment required with the loophole.

I had to get the refund though

Why didn't you just send one email? $5,898.00 is way more than enough to cover the expenses involved with the loophole, lol.

[affhelper]

Originally Posted by blackhatcat

Why didn't you just send one email? $5,898.00 is way more than enough to cover the expenses involved with the loophole, lol.

Hehe...nice one