Disparities in Article Marketing Submission Quality
Perhaps you yourself have noticed the many disparities that exist in the concept and execution or process of online article marketing strategy. Even some of the well respected online gurus maintain that this is the quintessential online income methodology.
Essentially, nearly any online author, blogger, content creator, or webmaster can write an article of approximately 250 to 500, SPIN it efficiently (or not so thoroughly, in many cases), then issue different copies of that same material to basically EVERY article, blog, and web 2.0 directory on the worldwide web.
The expectation is that, almost immediately, newly acceptable back-links begin to emerge which push the presence of the page containing the anchor text into super-high Google rankings. Nonetheless, this seems to be another case in which the promise outweighs the performance of the concept.
Some people are making GOBS of money from this procedure, but usually, they are those who either sell the "spinning and rewriting" software, or those individuals who were fortunate or smart enough to create an "article submission" business, similar to the Unique Article Wizard program or even the upgraded Free Traffic System.
Even on forums like this one, you see that some authors will sell their services for close to pennies, whilst other writers demand per-article prices as high as $50. This shows some of the great disparity that exist in the article marketing pricing structure.
But, what about actual article QUALITY? As you read some of the results that come from Google searches for particular keyword queries, you can surprisingly see very poorly written content -- that is, not the KEYWORDS, which are great and satisfy online protocols very efficiently -- but the pieces of content meant for the viewers to read often contain grammatical errors with spelling typographical inconsistencies, as well.
Not to mention, by now the viewing audience is becoming quite wise to the use of spinning software that does a poor job... simply because the text goes online without the author taking the time to check the way it reads to human beings.
Straight from the spinner software, directly into online publication... here is a case where article submission acceptance does not actually mean that the writer has written a GREAT article. Whether your article marketing strategy includes content that is SPUN or not, professional proofreading and sound grammatical execution can go a long way in boosting your online presence.
What do you think?
Essentially, nearly any online author, blogger, content creator, or webmaster can write an article of approximately 250 to 500, SPIN it efficiently (or not so thoroughly, in many cases), then issue different copies of that same material to basically EVERY article, blog, and web 2.0 directory on the worldwide web.
The expectation is that, almost immediately, newly acceptable back-links begin to emerge which push the presence of the page containing the anchor text into super-high Google rankings. Nonetheless, this seems to be another case in which the promise outweighs the performance of the concept.
Some people are making GOBS of money from this procedure, but usually, they are those who either sell the "spinning and rewriting" software, or those individuals who were fortunate or smart enough to create an "article submission" business, similar to the Unique Article Wizard program or even the upgraded Free Traffic System.
Even on forums like this one, you see that some authors will sell their services for close to pennies, whilst other writers demand per-article prices as high as $50. This shows some of the great disparity that exist in the article marketing pricing structure.
But, what about actual article QUALITY? As you read some of the results that come from Google searches for particular keyword queries, you can surprisingly see very poorly written content -- that is, not the KEYWORDS, which are great and satisfy online protocols very efficiently -- but the pieces of content meant for the viewers to read often contain grammatical errors with spelling typographical inconsistencies, as well.
Not to mention, by now the viewing audience is becoming quite wise to the use of spinning software that does a poor job... simply because the text goes online without the author taking the time to check the way it reads to human beings.
Straight from the spinner software, directly into online publication... here is a case where article submission acceptance does not actually mean that the writer has written a GREAT article. Whether your article marketing strategy includes content that is SPUN or not, professional proofreading and sound grammatical execution can go a long way in boosting your online presence.
What do you think?
Sign Up HERE: http://hanfanapproved.com/hfslc/getYourEarlyBirdSpecialHERE/