4 replies
I have site with manual and Automatic content
which one is better ?
what do you think ? manual or automatic ?
#automatic #manual
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    I'm not quite sure what you mean by "automatic content". When I've seen this term used before, it's referred to something like autoblogging, wherein the content posted on your site isn't original, anyway?

    For me, as a general rule of thumb in internet marketing, from my own experience, "manual" has always been better, safer and more reliable than "automatic" for all functions connected with running my IM business, not just in relation to "content" on my own sites.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3321823].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author idhay30
    Thanks alexa,
    automatic content use **Robot plugin
    Manually I write the content
    but there is positive thing use robot = efficiency time
    manually = need time to write the content.....
    wich ones do you usually use ?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3321866].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      Originally Posted by idhay30 View Post

      wich ones do you usually use ?
      Manual only, myself ... but it wouldn't help me (with my sort of sites) to re-use anyone else's content. I do see that it can be time-saving, of course, if you just want "content" without much/any quality assessment, though.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3321880].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ivatel42
      OOh there are big debates about this on one forum that I belong to

      My personal choice is manual. I think you have to think long term and unique content because you never know what Google will do next It might be time saving and if you do want to go that route make sure that you add at least some intro text to the articles so that yours are at least a little unique

      Thanks
      Lynne
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3321894].message }}

Trending Topics