100K Single Opt-in or ~30k Double Opt-in?

13 years ago

At those numbers, I'd want double opt-in... By the way, that's a misnomer. It's confirmed opt-in. They are not opting in twice. They're just confirming their single opt-in. FYI.

The reason I'd want to confirm them is to keep spam complaints down. At higher numbers, you might get enough of them to trigger a flag at your autoresponder service and/or trigger a filter at a major ISP on the receiving end.

But, other experienced marketers swear by single opt-in, so take what I'm saying with that grain of salt. It's just my preference. I think if you're super careful early on, you can probably do single opt-in and be ok on the spam complaints. Just don't hammer the list members as soon as they get on the list. Ease them into things so the spam complaint chances are diminished. Then open things up once you're past the first few emails to the new people.

John

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3678510].message }}

LB

13 years ago

Single optin is always the way to go whenever possible. You'll just make more money assuming all other variables are equal.

The idea that confirmed optin is better because "you only get people who want to be on your list" was pushed relentlessly starting a few years back by the gurus who were at the time selling their own services and private-labeled autoresponders.

Most of the "gurus" these days are all single optin as are just about any big company you can think of.

The exception is if you feel you are going to be doing really aggressive marketing and are worried about complaints.

If you are getting 100k optins but only 1/4 of them are confirming as in your example, I would say something is amiss. The confirmation rates should be much higher than that in most cases.

I've been running single optin only on just about all of my lists for years and have not had an issue.

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

Tired of Article Marketing, Backlink Spamming and Other Crusty Old Traffic Methods?

Click Here.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3678543].message }}

Alexa Smith

Banned 13 years ago

Originally Posted by johngarrett

I know this topic has been beaten to death a little

It has.

Originally Posted by johngarrett

I know there are other factors involved

There are.

And those "other factors" are what ultimately determine the answer to your question.

Originally Posted by johngarrett

but generally speaking, if you were in our situation what would you do?

Switch to single opt-in.

But I'd do that, in my case, knowing what I send out, knowing that I have 5 single opt-in lists in different niches (as well as 3 confirmed opt-in lists), and that I get very, very few spam reports, and my autoresponder company has no problem with my running single opt-in lists.

Originally Posted by johngarrett

The only thing stopping us from using single opt-in is the risk of being blacklisted by ISPs (is that a real risk and what would we have to do to avoid that?)

This depends on whether you're using a commercial autoresponder service. If you are, that solves part of that problem (although you'd still have the problem, if you get an unacceptable level of complaints/adverse reports, that they might not accept single opt-in lists from you).

Personally, I think confirmed opt-in is overrated and (in some niches) unnecessary. But it all depends on what you're sending out, what the market/niche is, and how you're attracting the opt-in in the first place.

Originally Posted by LB

Single optin is always the way to go whenever possible. You'll just make more money assuming all other variables are equal.

I agree with this.

Originally Posted by LB

If you are getting 100k optins but only 1/4 of them are confirming as in your example, I would say something is amiss. The confirmation rates should be much higher than that in most cases.

And I definitely agree with this, and the huge disparity in the numbers here is ringing some alarm-bells.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3678586].message }}

johngarrett

13 years ago

First I'd like to thank everyone for their great advice, I really appreciate it as we are kind of new to this aspect of internet business.

Originally Posted by Alexa Smith

Originally Posted by LB
If you are getting 100k optins but only 1/4 of them are confirming as in your example, I would say something is amiss. The confirmation rates should be much higher than that in most cases.

And I definitely agree with this, and the huge disparity in the numbers here is ringing some alarm-bells.

Okay, so here is exactly what I'm doing. People from my Youtube video are clicking my overlay call-to-action ad and landing on my squeeze page with the promises of another video. They see the image of a video there (along with my copy) and click on it, which brings up the lightbox popup. My text on that form says "Just one second, simply enter your name and email and we will immediately email you the link to the video". And here we are, only 1 out of 4 are going back to their email and opting in. What could possibly be causing this?

Also, how possible is it that our email subject line is the problem? I originally was going to put something about 'your free video' or something of the like but was afraid it would be thrown in with spam, so I went with a more generic welcome subject line.

Thanks again.

Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679007].message }}

skorpion

13 years ago

Originally Posted by johngarrett

First I'd like to thank everyone for their great advice, I really appreciate it as we are kind of new to this aspect of internet business.

Okay, so here is exactly what I'm doing. People from my Youtube video are clicking my overlay call-to-action ad and landing on my squeeze page with the promises of another video. They see the image of a video there (along with my copy) and click on it, which brings up the lightbox popup. My text on that form says "Just one second, simply enter your name and email and we will immediately email you the link to the video". And here we are, only 1 out of 4 are going back to their email and opting in. What could possibly be causing this?

Also, how possible is it that our email subject line is the problem? I originally was going to put something about 'your free video' or something of the like but was afraid it would be thrown in with spam, so I went with a more generic welcome subject line.

Thanks again.

Personally, I'd use single opt in in that case. Just my opinion though.

I switched over from double to single about 6 months ago and have noticed ZERO increases in bounces or spam complaints. Just an increase in opt ins/revenue.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679033].message }}

Alexa Smith

Banned 13 years ago

Originally Posted by johngarrett

They see the image of a video there (along with my copy) and click on it, which brings up the lightbox popup. My text on that form says "Just one second, simply enter your name and email and we will immediately email you the link to the video". And here we are, only 1 out of 4 are going back to their email and opting in. What could possibly be causing this?

Ummmmm ... the fact that you're not being honest with them?!

You're telling them to enter their name and email address and you'll immediately send them something, and then you're not sending it? I wouldn't confirm my opt in, either, and honestly I'm surprised that 25% do.

I don't mean it rudely, I promise. But the figures you gave just made no sense unless you were somehow misleading people, and lo and behold it turns out you are, from what you've said. :rolleyes:

You could, of course, try single opt-in (and I probably would, but definitely using a commercial autoresponder, and not my own IP!).

Please don't take this the wrong way, but it may make a rather poor quality list, this procedure, however you look at it.

Apologies for not being more helpful (or optimistic).

[ 3 ] Thanks
2 replies

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679074].message }}

johngarrett

13 years ago

Originally Posted by Alexa Smith

You're telling them to enter their name and email address and you'll immediately send them something, and then you're not sending it? I wouldn't confirm my opt in, either, and honestly I'm surprised that 25% do.

Well, I'm telling them if they give me their email I'll email them the link to the video. Then they get an email telling them in the subject that their video link is inside, they open the email and it says:

'Thank you for your interest in our videos, and you're one step away from receiving your first of many free videos. But before we begin sending you these videos, we want to be certain we have your permission.

Confirm by clicking the link below

Then when they click that link it takes them to a thank you page that also has the video on it. That's not really so misleading is it? I'm telling them to give me their email so I can send them a link to the video, then I send them an email with a link that brings them to the video. This is what my form told them to expect. And I'm delivering on my promise, no? Are you saying it would be better if I worded my form something like 'Just sign up for our newsletter and we'll immediately email you a link to the video'? So that they know they are 'signing up' for something?

Thanks again for the insight, Alexa.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679214].message }}

johngarrett

13 years ago

Originally Posted by Alexa Smith

Please don't take this the wrong way, but it may make a rather poor quality list, this procedure, however you look at it.

So if I made it single opt-in and sent them to the free video page immediately then it would result in a better list? Because we were leaning toward single opt-in anyway. That being said, do you see a problem with single opt-in using the method I mentioned? Would it be a more profitable list if we told them up front that they are signing up for something?

(sorry for so many questions, but I value your opinion and you really know what you're talking about).

Thanks yet again Alexa.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679304].message }}

Alexa Smith

Banned 13 years ago

Originally Posted by johngarrett

So if I made it single opt-in and sent them to the free video page immediately then it would result in a better list?

It'll very clearly result in a far bigger list. That might be "better"? (It won't be "worse", anyway?).

Originally Posted by johngarrett

That being said, do you see a problem with single opt-in using the method I mentioned?

I still don't know enough about what you're doing to guess this.

Originally Posted by johngarrett

Would it be a more profitable list if we told them up front that they are signing up for something?

Probably not, I think. It might be smaller, more profitable "per person" but not more profitable overall?

From what you've said, I do think you should be looking at single opt-in, probably. But I'm not sure exactly how you're building the list and what you're going to do with it when you have it, so it's easy for me to say that, right?

:p

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679329].message }}

johngarrett

13 years ago

Originally Posted by Alexa Smith

From what you've said, I do think you should be looking at single opt-in, probably. But I'm not sure exactly how you're building the list and what you're going to do with it when you have it, so it's easy for me to say that, right?

Thanks again, Alexa, that is what we're gonna do. I mean, we've been running at around 1000 a day that single opt-in, so I'm figuring why screw around with confirmed opt-in and get one third that. We're definitely not planning on abusing them with offers by any means and we've been using Aweber so hopefully we won't run into too many complaint problems. We plan on treating them very carefully actually so we shouldn't.

Thanks again, you and everyone else have been extremely helpful.

--John

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679396].message }}

Jack Duncan

13 years ago

John,
Great work taking action and setting up a great lead gen system.

I have an idea for you that you might want to try...so you have a truly definitive answer.

Create 2 lists.

One is confirmed and the other is not.

Then simply split test the code (rotate 50/50).

Every other visitor would be confirmed optin.

Send them the exact same content at the exact same time. Post-optin, treat them as one list so that the only variable in the test is the two types of optin subscribers.

See which one makes you more money.

That's really the best way to test this...

All the best,
Jack Duncan

[ 2 ] Thanks

Signature

[Breakthrough] 5Â¢ Buyer Traffic Source
(On Sale Today...)

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3678694].message }}

Coby

13 years ago

I use both, but mostly I use un-confirmed single opt-in. Most of my IM lists are single-optin. It depends on the niche and it also depends on the freebie. It it is an ebook or a freebie that might not be so "hot" I usually run single opt-in, but I have a few lists where I use the confirmed opt-in process simply because they are getting software, and I have even been changing these to single opt-in as well as I go along...

I think the best option was mentioned right above me, do both and test to see which has the greater ROI.

Good Luck

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature

.

Click Here To Get A FREE Affiliate Marketing Software

.

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3678800].message }}

Ken Leatherman

13 years ago

I absolutely concur with Alexa, after reading your post # 7 in this thread. I'm very certain if I landed on your YouTube video and then clicked the layover, I would be expecting to receive what you promise and not a request for my e-Mail address before I can get it.

Rethink it man, your using smoke and mirrors to get people to sign up to your list or in more simple language your blowing smoke up their a** . People are not stupid, and now you won't ever get those other 3 out of 4 to sign up for anything you offer. They will remember you as the guy who tried to trick them.

Ken Leatherman

The Old Geezer

[ 3 ] Thanks

Signature

Ghost Writing Services Coming Soon

So Check Out My WSO

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679144].message }}

E. Brian Rose

13 years ago

You are going to get arguments from both sides when you ask questions like this, so the best thing for you to do is your own testing. You should split test for a month or two, using two different accounts with a major autoresponder service.

You will know fairly quickly if single opt-in is resulting in the same number of sales. You will also know if that method results in more spam complaints.

[ 4 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Founder of JVZoo. All around good guy :)

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679350].message }}

johngarrett

13 years ago

Originally Posted by E. Brian Rose

You should split test for a month or two, using two different accounts with a major autoresponder service.

You will know fairly quickly if single opt-in is resulting in the same number of sales. You will also know if that method results in more spam complaints.

Now is a month or two good time-wise or can we get accurate testing data in less time if we have good traffic? I mean, 3 of my youtube videos have a total of over 10 million views over the past year, they get over 1.8 million views per month steady, over 60k per day. We've been testing various methods of monetizing this traffic but haven't settled on anything yet, so we're trying to build a list.

By the way, I thought your name looked familiar, I mentioned it to my father in law (also my partner) and he said he knows you, and attended your 4 day seminar last month (now he's working on his own webinar). Small world.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679511].message }}

Jake Gray

13 years ago

I wouldn't risk it at those types of numbers.

As for the double opt-in, they are just confirming their opt-in to your list. So, to put it in simple terms, it's basically a single opt-in, not double.

Jake

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3679403].message }}

iSoftware

13 years ago

IMHO, you should be more concerned with 1)revenue/subscriber and 2)list responsiveness than the size of your list.

When you start hitting the 25k+ range in aweber for instance (if that's if you use them), they should assign you an "optimization rep" who should be helping you through these questions.....

Compare your stats (as a rough estimate) to the Direct Marketing Association's annual Response Rate Study (just google it).

PS
I neglected to ask if you are actually using a 3rd party service or mailing in house?

[ 2 ] Thanks

Signature

All-New Software: Here's How To Get KDPerfect Book Review Traffic...

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3680095].message }}

mizesean

13 years ago

Originally Posted by johngarrett

Hey guys

We launched a list building project yesterday using a steady source of traffic that should remain constant over the next several months. We're currently using double-opt in and if the rate remains the same will have a 25k double opt-in list in 4 months. Statistically we would have a 100K single opt-in list in the same period of time should we decide to change over.

I know this topic has been beaten to death a little, and I know there are other factors involved, but generally speaking, if you were in our situation what would you do?

The only thing stopping us from using single opt-in is the risk of being blacklisted by ISPs (is that a real risk and what would we have to do to avoid that?)

Also keep in mind that a very high percentage of our single opt-ins would be real email addresses since we are sending a free gift to their email address.

Thanks in advance for your expert advice. You guys really know what you're talking about.

John,

Assuming an equivalent source of leads (I don't want anyone to take this out of context), and assuming the lead source tends to be "clean" (I'll explain "clean" in a sec) I would choose 100k single optin everytime.

Logic: With single opt in you get more leads. Even accounting for the fact that the ones that would not have double opted in (these are the "extra" leads you get by doing single optin) are not as high quality - you still get ALL the leads that would have double opted in, PLUS all the leads that would NOT have. You just have to have the stomach for a few more spam complaints, etc.

My definition of "clean": a lead source that generally doesn't produce spam, fraudulent, or likely-to-spam complain.

For example: article marketing, CPA leads, referral leads, solo email ads from reputable sources - these might be "clean" meaning that the bulk of the people opting in know what they are doing and why.

But if you are doing something like rented a million lead list from a company that although they might technically have opt in permission - is really more like spam - then you know that the spam complaint rate for those subs is going to be higher. Or if you are doing something like co-op leads who don't know who you are - they are going to be more likely to complain.

Hope this helps!

Sean

[ 3 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Have you thought about starting a group coaching program, but don't know how?

If so, Watch This YouTube Video: Group Coaching Program

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3680160].message }}

johngarrett

13 years ago

Originally Posted by moneykws

I neglected to ask if you are actually using a 3rd party service or mailing in house?

Yeah, we're using Aweber, although that might change.

Originally Posted by mizesean

But if you are doing something like rented a million lead list from a company that although they might technically have opt in permission - is really more like spam - then you know that the spam complaint rate for those subs is going to be higher. Or if you are doing something like co-op leads who don't know who you are - they are going to be more likely to complain.
Sean

Actually it's neither of the things you mentioned and to tell you the truth I don't know (and won't know until soon when we start to send out emails/offers to the group) how good the list will be. The traffic comes from 3 or 4 Youtube videos of the same theme, which is slightly adult in nature although contains no nudity or any explicit material whatsoever. We tell them they can have the next video in the series (one we couldn't put on Youtube (we probably could have but it might have gotten slapped with an age restriction)) if they give us their name and email address. We'll find out soon how receptive a list like that can be, but the sheer numbers involved certainly work to our advantage. We'll see.

Thanks for the advice.

Thanks
1 reply

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3680237].message }}

mizesean

13 years ago

I'd go with single optin at first, and only switch if spam complaints begin to be a problem.

Another option is to use a different autoresponder with single optin for the initial optin from the youtubes.

Then once someone is on your "other autoresponder list" you employ methods (for example, free gift optin, additional videos with optin) to get people to go to your aweber account (again single optin).

For all practical purposes, your aweber list will be double optin, and have the highest responsiveness, but you will still have a master list with everyone on it, which will produce sales, and can be abandoned (or old leads abandoned) over time if necessary, while keeping your aweber list clean

Sean

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

Have you thought about starting a group coaching program, but don't know how?

If so, Watch This YouTube Video: Group Coaching Program

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3680280].message }}

da3gan

13 years ago

My advice is to go single opt in BUT make sure you mail that list at least daily - this will clean the list of those that don't really want to be there, create more sales/profits, and reduce spam complaints due to the self cleaning oven effect and consistent communication (which creates an expectation in the minds of the recipients of how often to expect stuff from you as well as the ISPs).

You'll get far less spam complaints mailing a list growing that fast twice a day via single opt in than you would with a double opt in list you mail to with less consistency.

The only time I've ever had a big spam complaint issue personally, was when I was generating about 2000 leads per day via CPA networks, left for vacation, without setting up twice daily emails, for 10 days and then started mailing again.

[ 1 ] Thanks
1 reply

Signature

http://www.TheHomeBusinessAgency.com

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3680352].message }}

johngarrett

13 years ago

Originally Posted by da3gan

My advice is to go single opt in BUT make sure you mail that list at least daily - this will clean the list of those that don't really want to be there, create more sales/profits, and reduce spam complaints due to the self cleaning oven effect and consistent communication (which creates an expectation in the minds of the recipients of how often to expect stuff from you as well as the ISPs).

Now I'm sure it's possible to do in Aweber, but might it be a good idea to send out an initial email and then only send daily emails to those who haven't opened their initial emails rather than pester those who were receptive and opened the email without unsubscribing? I don't want people to think I'll be emailing them every day when I might only plan on sending email 3 times a week.

Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3681825].message }}

popopdc

13 years ago

I think double-opt-ins are better. You'll have to play around with it though. In my experience if the user makes it past the email submit/single opt-in, they will most likely fill out the second page.

[ 1 ] Thanks

{{ DiscussionBoard.errors[3682939].message }}

tsuccess

13 years ago

I would go for the lesser one. The list would be more responsive and if you ever allow people to send to your list they would be more apt to work with you because your list is double opt-in. What traffic methods are you using to build this list?

[ 1 ] Thanks

Signature