Internet Domain Names to Undergo Major Shakeup Published: Friday, 17 Jun 2011

13 replies
News Headlines

Brand owners will soon be able to operate their own parts of the Web -- such as .apple [AAPL 320.26 -4.90 (-1.51%) ], .coke [KO 65.62 0.13 (+0.2%) ] or Philip Morris' [PM 68.48 0.96 (+1.42%) ] .marlboro -- if the biggest shake-up yet in how Internet domains are awarded is approved.

After years of preparation and wrangling, ICANN, the body that coordinates Internet names, is expected to approve the move at a special board meeting in Singapore on Monday.

Today, just 22 generic top-level domains exist -- .com, .org and .info are a few examples -- plus about 250 country-level domains like .uk or .cn. After the change, several hundred new domains are expected to come into existence.

The move is seen as a big opportunity for brands to gain more control over their online presence and send visitors more directly to parts of their sites -- and a danger for those who fail to take advantage.

It will also change the way search engines like Google [GOOG 485.02 -15.35 (-3.07%) ] find results, and the way organizations use search-engine optimization to improve the visibility of their websites in search results.

"As a big brand, you ignore it at your peril," says Theo Hnarakis, chief executive of Australian domain name-registration firm Melbourne IT DBS, which advises companies and other organizations worldwide about how to do business online.

"We're advising people to buy their brands, park them and redirect visitors to their existing site, at the very least," says Hnarakis, whose more than 3,500 customers include Volvo, Lego and GlaxoSmithKline [GSK 41.36 0.18 (+0.44%) ].

If the change is approved on Monday, applications are likely to open in January for a 90-day period before closing again, potentially for years.

It will cost $185,000 to apply, and individuals or organizations will have to show a legitimate claim to the name they are buying. ICANN is taking on hundreds of consultants to whom it will outsource the job of adjudicating claims.

"The commercial participants are the most active, aggressive and articulate members of our society," ICANN CEO Rod Beckstrom told Reuters in a recent interview, saying trademark owners in particular were anxious about how the new regime would work.

As well as big brands, organizations such as cities or other communities are expected to apply.

Domains such as .nyc, .london or .food could provide opportunities for many smaller businesses to grab names no longer available at the .com level -- like bicycles.london or indian.food.

The new domains will also change how ICANN works, as it will have a role in policing how domains are operated, bought and sold. Until now, it has overseen names and performed some other tasks but has been little involved in the Internet's thornier issues.

To prevent so-called cyber-squatting, domain owners will be expected to maintain operational sites. ICANN will have to approve transfers to new owners at the top level.
#2011 #231 #domain #friday #internet #jun #major #names #published #shakeup #size #text #undergo
  • Profile picture of the author Cee
    So they'll be apple.apple and pepsi.pepsi is that what this article is saying :confused:
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4091913].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author VanessaB
    It's going to be very interesting to see if the companies that don't take the 'measure' of purchasing their 'brand' now will still end up being protected from domain squatting later, despite this implied warning that they won't be.

    Seems contradictory to me, seeing as how 'brands' have been historically protected from domain name squatting already.


    -Dani
    Signature
    The Recon Report
    Reliable Results, Predictable Profits
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4091926].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
    This could be interesting... Imagine the odds: drink.coke, sniff.coke, shoot.coke

    But 185K to apply? OMG...
    Signature
    People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4092576].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author mrktxprt
      sniff.coke? shoot.coke? LMBO
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4092999].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author weblink29
        Originally Posted by mrktxprt View Post

        sniff.coke? shoot.coke? LMBO
        U.O.D.On.Coke
        Signature

        Nothing to see here folks.....move along.

        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4093019].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Conrad Stuart
      Originally Posted by Fernando Veloso View Post

      This could be interesting... Imagine the odds: drink.coke, sniff.coke, shoot.coke

      But 185K to apply? OMG...

      LOL you're crazy man
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4093228].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author sbucciarel
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Fernando Veloso View Post

      This could be interesting... Imagine the odds: drink.coke, sniff.coke, shoot.coke

      But 185K to apply? OMG...
      lol .... interesting indeed
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4093328].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author RichardF
    Seems pointless to me, but good for them if they can convince thousands of big brands to buy one for $185k. Some serious cash right there.
    Signature


    Need a writer who really understands the Internet marketing niche?
    Sales copy, autoresponders, articles, e-books, blog posts & more!
    Visit my WF thread -or- my website

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4092582].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Gene Pimentel
    The key statement here is "individuals or organizations will have to show a legitimate claim to the name they are buying."


    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4092917].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GeorgR.
    what about it is "pointless"?

    This is about 1000x better and makes much more sense...

    Imagine....drink.pepsi newyork.lawyer free.sex grocery.coupons internet.marketing - music.downloads sony.downloads apartment.rentals travel.london

    ..etc...this is truly a BIG change...however that fee is hefty.....i remember reading that they legitimated that change a while ago aka "let's give those smaller companies a chance who couldn't acquire a .com". Yes right. Like those "smaller companies" will have $185.000 to apply for such an extension.
    Signature
    *** Affiliate Site Quick --> The Fastest & Easiest Way to Make Affiliate Sites!<--
    -> VISIT www.1UP-SEO.com *** <- Internet Marketing, SEO Tips, Reviews & More!! ***
    *** HIGH QUALITY CONTENT CREATION +++ Manual Article Spinning (Thread Here) ***
    Content Creation, Blogging, Articles, Converting Sales Copy, Reviews, Ebooks, Rewrites
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4092936].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
      Originally Posted by GeorgR. View Post

      what about it is "pointless"?

      This is about 1000x better and makes much more sense...

      Imagine....drink.pepsi newyork.lawyer free.sex grocery.coupons internet.marketing - music.downloads sony.downloads apartment.rentals travel.london

      ..etc...this is truly a BIG change...however that fee is hefty.....i remember reading that they legitimated that change a while ago aka "let's give those smaller companies a chance who couldn't acquire a .com". Yes right. Like those "smaller companies" will have $185.000 to apply for such an extension.
      There, in bold. This is the killer. No one beside multi-million dollars companies will grab this.

      Plus, just like PT domain names, you have to own a) BRAND/TRADEMARK b) Legal Company to use that extension.

      But I am curious to see where this is going.
      Signature
      People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4093059].message }}

Trending Topics