Question about article writing?

17 replies
Hi

I have recently started writing content for my new blog, and have been submitting all of my articles to ezine articles as well as publishing them on my blog.
Just wondering if there is any downside to doing this? I realise other people may publish my articles on their sites, so it will no longer be original, will this devalue my content at all, or is it a good thing to do?

cheers
Angela
#article #question #writing
  • Profile picture of the author peejaydee
    You could publish it to your own site and wait until it has been indexed by Google before using it on Ezine. That way your site would be the original but the article would likely still be devalued.
    A better way is to write your high quality article for your own site and then take an element of it, not the whole thing, or even the whole subject, and write a newer, shorter article about this smaller element. This gives you a relevant second article to link from and a reason for people to click through from your resource box on Ezine to read more about the subject.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4159708].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by infomaniacs View Post

    Just wondering if there is any downside to doing this? I realise other people may publish my articles on their sites, so it will no longer be original, will this devalue my content at all, or is it a good thing to do?
    Hi Angela,

    There's no downside.

    What you describe is in fact the business model followed by many of the forum's more successful, professional article marketers.

    The fact that the article directory copies will be syndicated copies will limit their own SEO value to the directories in which you subsequently publish them, but not, collectively, in the long run, do your own site any SEO harm at all ... as long as you post all your content on your own site first, of course, and have it indexed there before submitting it anywhere else. You can see a large number of professional article marketers explaining in detail all their shared reasons for doing this in this very helpful thread (among others).

    There's a lot of misunderstanding about this. Many people don't quite appreciate the difference between "duplicate content" and "syndicated content", and I expect that by the time it's completed, your thread will fill with all sorts of weird, wacky and contradictory advice. I see that already - with only two replies made - one of the comments above is completely mistaken and offers entirely misguided advice.

    Originally Posted by infomaniacs View Post

    it will no longer be original
    It will be just as "original" as the day you posted it and Google indexed it!

    I think you're confusing "original" with "unique", aren't you?

    It's clearly true that it won't be unique, but that doesn't detract in any way from its originality, not for you and not for Google, so it doesn't detract in the long run from the original copy's SEO, either.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4159894].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
      Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      The fact that the article directory copies will be syndicated copies will limit their own SEO value to the directories in which you subsequently publish them, but not, collectively, in the long run, do your own site any SEO harm at all ... as long as you post all your content on your own site first, of course, and have it indexed there before submitting it anywhere else. You can see a large number of professional article marketers explaining in detail all their shared reasons for doing this in this very helpful thread (among others).
      Following this line of thought...

      SEO value (or 'link juice') is often a minor plus in any individual piece of syndicated content. The fact that the syndicated piece is likely to show up after the original, if at all, in the SERPs should not be a concern.

      From the SEO standpoint, you still get the link from the bio box.

      From a more important standpoint (IMO), you get access to the publisher's visitors. Real readers that you may not have been able to reach any other way. Get your article posted on a popular blog, website or even linked to in a forum post, and you get real, targeted readers - the kind that can actually put money in your pocket.

      I've never been able to pay a credit card bill with a search ranking - the banks keep insisting I use money...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4161435].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
        Banned
        Originally Posted by JohnMcCabe View Post

        I've never been able to pay a credit card bill with a search ranking - the banks keep insisting I use money...
        It's one of those "I wish I'd said that (and maybe next time, I will )" lines.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4161514].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author DanielDeus
        Originally Posted by JohnMcCabe View Post

        I've never been able to pay a credit card bill with a search ranking - the banks keep insisting I use money...
        I have heard that line before and my immediate thought was...

        "Surely the missing link between the search ranking and the money part is increasing site conversion?"


        * Daniel Deus
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4163680].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
          Originally Posted by DanielDeus View Post

          I have heard that line before and my immediate thought was...

          "Surely the missing link between the search ranking and the money part is increasing site conversion?"


          * Daniel Deus
          Too often that missing link IS missing, especially for new folks. They buy into the hype that "getting #1 rankings on Google" is the key to the vault, so they do all kinds of crazy things to get those magic rankings.

          They spin articles into unintelligible gibberish and spray them across the net in search of backlinks. They buy software to spam nonsense to blogs. They chase rankings for words that pop up in some research tool and wonder why no one clicks them, never realizing that they're using the tool improperly. And more.

          Then they wonder why they aren't making money, even though they've done the things and bought the tools they've been told will bring money in their sleep.

          The missing link is indeed conversion, aka 'getting actual, real people to buy stuff'.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4163868].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author HeySal
      Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      Hi Angela,

      There's no downside.

      What you describe is in fact the business model followed by many of the forum's more successful, professional article marketers.

      The fact that the article directory copies will be syndicated copies will limit their own SEO value to the directories in which you subsequently publish them, but not, collectively, in the long run, do your own site any SEO harm at all ... as long as you post all your content on your own site first, of course, and have it indexed there before submitting it anywhere else. You can see a large number of professional article marketers explaining in detail all their shared reasons for doing this in this very helpful thread (among others).

      There's a lot of misunderstanding about this. Many people don't quite appreciate the difference between "duplicate content" and "syndicated content", and I expect that by the time it's completed, your thread will fill with all sorts of weird, wacky and contradictory advice. I see that already - with only two replies made - one of the comments above is completely mistaken and offers entirely misguided advice.



      It will be just as "original" as the day you posted it and Google indexed it!

      I think you're confusing "original" with "unique", aren't you?

      It's clearly true that it won't be unique, but that doesn't detract in any way from its originality, not for you and not for Google, so it doesn't detract in the long run from the original copy's SEO, either.
      What SHE said. I've always done it this way and it's always been beneficial. Still is no matter what people are freaking out over the "google slap" about.
      Signature

      Sal
      When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
      Beyond the Path

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4163902].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author tomewer
    This is a real hot topic for people with opposite opinions! I am largely on the fence, but in logical terms don't understand why Google would penalize you for having syndicated content.
    Signature

    Quit your job and work on your own terms: Leaving Work Behind

    Follow me on Twitter | Connect with me on Facebook

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4160020].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author whitewave
      The earlier advice is the best.

      Put it on your site first and get it indexed.

      Once it is noted that you was first it does not matter who else syndicates it so if you want to let the world have it.

      That said, I prefer to write a new article to backlink to each of my new posts.

      Never underestimate the power of unique, quality content.
      Signature
      Writers 4 Rent.com * UNIQUE CONTENT WRITING *

      * Want the cheapest lowest priced articles in the world? THEN GO AWAY!

      * At Writers4Rent.com... UK or US Graduates write for us, under 48 hours turnaround time, 100% unique, NO SPINNING software
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4160432].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author AnniePot
      Originally Posted by tomewer View Post

      This is a real hot topic for people with opposite opinions! I am largely on the fence, but in logical terms don't understand why Google would penalize you for having syndicated content.
      Provided you have first published it on your own site, and waited until it has been indexed, this is 100% the correct method to follow. Why on earth would Google penalize syndicators? Do they penalize all the news services, for example Bloomberg, the Associated Press, Reuters, Scripps Howard, CNS etc.? Their news feeds are picked up and published all over the internet by thousands of diverse subscribing web sites. They don't employ people to re-write the content; it's published exactly as they receive it, with a byline to the source.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4161236].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author nzmegs
    Just a small newbie question? How do you know if your article has been indexed by Google. Does it mean it has turned up in the searches. How else do you know this has happened.

    Thanks for asking the question OP as I was wondering if I should submit my articles too. I do worry about my content being used here there and everywhere!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4160488].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      Originally Posted by nzmegs View Post

      How do you know if your article has been indexed by Google. Does it mean it has turned up in the searches.
      Yes - turning up in a search proves that it's been indexed. Just paste a ten-word excerpt from your article (preferably the end of one sentence and the start of the next) into Google between "inverted commas". If it shows up, it's been indexed.

      That takes longest to happen when a site's very new. And after that, the more frequently you update it, the more regularly the search engines will index the new content. (But if you're doing any sort of "article marketing", you'll always have a new article to post there anyway.)
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4160842].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author infomaniacs
    thanks for all of the very helpful replies, what you have said makes sense now
    I published an article on my blog last night, and checked this morning, and it has already been indexed by google, on page three. My blog is less than two weeks old, so I'm assuming this is pretty good?
    Off to write some more........
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4163306].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
      Banned
      Originally Posted by infomaniacs View Post

      I published an article on my blog last night, and checked this morning, and it has already been indexed by google, on page three. My blog is less than two weeks old, so I'm assuming this is pretty good?
      Yes indeed ... most promising ... good luck!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4163343].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author orlandosharessat
    Originally Posted by infomaniacs View Post

    Hi

    I have recently started writing content for my new blog, and have been submitting all of my articles to ezine articles as well as publishing them on my blog.
    Just wondering if there is any downside to doing this? I realise other people may publish my articles on their sites, so it will no longer be original, will this devalue my content at all, or is it a good thing to do?

    cheers
    Angela
    Hi Angela,

    Although high quality (exclusive content) is always king in the eye of Google, and other search engines, they do have a method of figuring which content is original and what is duplicate content. It really depends on how you go about it as to if it affects the value of the content on your blog (there is a method to the madness).

    So here is what Google and most search engines do when it comes to duplicate content. They usually view the content that was posted first and the site it was posted to as the original content and assumes all other content is duplicate content. So the trick to doing what you are doing is be sure to post the content on your site first and give it a little time before you post it to article directories like e-zine article and the like.

    I would suggest you give your articles at least a week to be crawled by Google's spiders before you consider posting it elsewhere. I hope this helps your Article Marketing Efforts.

    Happy Writing!
    Signature

    Affiliate links are not allowed!

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4163526].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author infomaniacs
      Originally Posted by orlandosharessat View Post

      Hi Angela,

      Although high quality (exclusive content) is always king in the eye of Google, and other search engines, they do have a method of figuring which content is original and what is duplicate content. It really depends on how you go about it as to if it affects the value of the content on your blog (there is a method to the madness).

      So here is what Google and most search engines do when it comes to duplicate content. They usually view the content that was posted first and the site it was posted to as the original content and assumes all other content is duplicate content. So the trick to doing what you are doing is be sure to post the content on your site first and give it a little time before you post it to article directories like e-zine article and the like.

      I would suggest you give your articles at least a week to be crawled by Google's spiders before you consider posting it elsewhere. I hope this helps your Article Marketing Efforts.

      Happy Writing!
      thanks for the tip I have only been submitting to ezine articles so far, and I find that it is taking about a week before they accept my articles, so with that end being out of my control, all good!
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4163575].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author DanielDeus
    Angela,

    Don’t forget to make maximum and further use of your articles by spinning them AND manually checking them. We do this for all our articles and reuse them to get more published and get more visitors and more backlinks.

    I would recommend The Best Spinner to this end, which you can do a Google search for or use thebestspinner.com. It is by far the best of the spinner software tools.

    Then spin and submit to alternative article directories and other systems like blog posting networks. MyArticleGroup.com is a good start if you want to improve your search engine rankings in this way.

    Good luck

    * Daniel Deus
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4163622].message }}

Trending Topics