Amazon surrenders to nationwide state sales taxes.

17 replies
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) introduces legislation that would require online retailers such as Amazon to collect sales taxes. If passed, what impact would this new bill have on Amazon associates as well as online affiliates for any general product or services?

Amazon sales-tax issue taken up by Congress - latimes.com
#amazon #nationwide #online affiliates #online retailers #sales #state #state sales tax #surrenders #taxes
  • Profile picture of the author ChrisGreen
    Amazon is no longer doing business in certain states (i.e., California) where online retailers must collect and pay sales taxes. However, the new proposed legislation extends to nationwide if the bill is passed.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4368773].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author andynathan
    Actually that would be great to for IL affiliates who all got the boot back in May.
    Signature

    Delighfully Inexpensive: The Scientific Formula For Profitable Blogging takes you step-by-step into how to create mind-blowing content that inspires your readers to learn more about your services.
    Scientific Formula For Profitable Blogging Link

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4368787].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author kindsvater
      It will be interesting to see what happens ...

      - I believe it would be voluntary for states.

      - Don't assume California will go along with "standardizing" it's local and state tax collections - especially if it means a possible loss of projected revenue.

      When was the last time California did something like this? Or decreased its taxes to help tax collection in another state? Or has an incentive since it believes Amazon is already on the hook to pay sales taxes?

      - I'm guessing a few members of Congress will hear from the public about a huge price hike solely due to taxes.

      .
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4368879].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JohnMcCabe
      Originally Posted by ChrisGreen View Post

      Amazon is no longer doing business in certain states (i.e., California) where online retailers must collect and pay sales taxes. However, the new proposed legislation extends to nationwide if the bill is passed.
      Actually, I think that Amazon is no longer doing business through affiliates in those states. They're still doing direct sales from their website, which doesn't present the nexus issue.


      If it passes, Amazon will sink a few million into software to calculate sales taxes and compile the reports for submission.

      They'll shave a bit off the discounts they offer, and be on their merry way.

      The ones that will get hurt are the small Internet sellers - the product creators, small ecommerce companies, etc. who would have to collect the same state and local taxes as the big boys with a tiny fraction of the resources.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4368885].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ladywriter
    My guess is that everyone would register their business in one of the 'safe' states--would that still be possible?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4368884].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author timpears
    It has been the law of the land, until recently, that unless you have a physical presence in a state, you are not required to collect sales tax on orders shipped to a state. US Supreme Court Decision 1992. I couldn't find the case this time, but I have posted it previously. They held that it was an undue burdon to make them collect sales taxes for other states.

    Now having an advertising contractor in a state can hardly be considered a physical presence. That would be pretty flimsy.

    I don't understand why Amazon lawyers haven't found that case to dispute these states claims instead of dumping the affiliates.

    Ah, I am just amazing, I found it. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota, 504 U.S. 298 (1992)

    So as far as my non legal mind can tell, all of these laws, including this proposed one are unconstitutional. I would just show them that case and say read it and weep. But then I am not a lawyer so what do I know. Maybe the SCOTUS is not the supreme law of the land, even though the Constitution says it is. Of course, I have heard that the Constitution is out of date. Who knows?
    Signature

    Tim Pears

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4368925].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Ephrils
    I think it's voluntary by the state too. Amazon will keep moving until it finds somewhere safe to do business though, and doesn't seem to mind pulling the plug on other states to prove it's point.
    Signature

    Two Signature lines for rent.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4368936].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author myob
      Taxes were not intended to be a voluntary contribution. In California it has been required for at least six years to pay retail sales tax on all internet purchases. The sales tax must be remitted when filing state income tax. Law makers tried to make Amazon the tax enforcer, but that didn't work out too well either.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4369061].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author onegoodman
    I believe CA is the exception. It impact Amazon badly and that is why it had to go with the wind.

    If it was a state with lower sales, wouldn't even bother
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4369080].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Cool Hand Luke
    Misleading thread title.

    Amazon has not 'surrendered" to anything, and their readiness to drop affiliates shows that they aren't going to let this happen without a serious fight.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4369096].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author HeySal
    I would imagine if such a law went through that paypal and other processors will just set up a tax box on their shopping carts so merchants can keep track of what they owe, and everyone will pass the taxes on to the purchaser - where they have always been up til this time. If it was done that way, there would be few hassles for merchants other than fewer sales here and there on larger ticket items that tax would make a large difference in the price of the item. They'd have to at least give merchants a means to know which state sales came from. How can you be charged a sales tax if you don't know from where the sale originated?
    Signature

    Sal
    When the Roads and Paths end, learn to guide yourself through the wilderness
    Beyond the Path

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4369159].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author ChrisGreen
    Cool Hand Luke,

    Amazon is compromising (surrendering) to a "a simple, nationwide system of state and local sales tax collection, evenhandedly applied to all sellers, no matter their business model, location or level of remote sales." This quote (according to LA Times) appears in Amazon's letter to Senator Durbin (and Conyers).
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4369171].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Cool Hand Luke
      Originally Posted by ChrisGreen View Post

      Cool Hand Luke,

      Amazon is compromising (surrendering) to a "a simple, nationwide system of state and local sales tax collection, evenhandedly applied to all sellers, no matter their business model, location or level of remote sales." This quote (according to LA Times) appears in Amazon's letter to Senator Durbin (and Conyers).
      Compromising and surrendering are hardly comparable terms.

      Also, as other analysts have pointed out, Amazon is doing this so that they can not only bargain for a LOWER tax rate, but to make sure that ALL online retailers, including the small guys and other big guys have to pay an equal rate; in effect, making sure that none of the other online retailers find a leg up in this situation.

      Basically, they are negotiating to still be on top; not even close to surrendering.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4369376].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author yukon
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Cool Hand Luke View Post

        Compromising and surrendering are hardly comparable terms.

        Also, as other analysts have pointed out, Amazon is doing this so that they can not only bargain for a LOWER tax rate, but to make sure that ALL online retailers, including the small guys and other big guys have to pay an equal rate; in effect, making sure that none of the other online retailers find a leg up in this situation.

        Basically, they are negotiating to still be on top; not even close to surrendering.
        Exactly!

        It's not really about paying tax.

        Amazon is worried about the buyer (us) having to pay the same price at Amazon & other stores (online & offline) like Walmart, Target, Best Buy, etc...

        The problem that Amazon has is, they dominate online because of zero tax. If they was forced to pass on the state tax for each customer, well, you sank their battle ship!

        That tax puts them on a level playing field, which is bad news for them.

        Amazon put all their eggs in one basket, they never built offline stores. Zero tax was their reason for lower prices.

        Amazon - Good luck with that.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4369428].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author PPC-Coach
    Amazon dropping affiliates had nothing to do with them having to collect sales taxes. It had everything to do with affiliates earning a living in certain states and paying taxes on that income which was produced by amazon commissions.

    Amazon still sells stuff in CA. They just wanted to reduce the tax the government gets from affiliate income in that state.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4369296].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author dvhantiques
    I wonder if the bill gets passed if Amazon will reinstate the affiliates in all the states that it dropped?
    Deb
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4369423].message }}

Trending Topics