Need some help with my Ezine article

7 replies
I want to submit some ezine articles and haven't done so for a while, since all the Google changes anyway. I am writing for syndication but at the same time I am wondering if Ezine Articles still rank on 1st page in Google?

I guess I will need to build backlinks to them but wondering if this is still worthwhile in order to rank in Google? If it is, then any suggestions on the best way to do this would be appreciated

Thanks!
#article #ezine
  • Profile picture of the author AnniePot
    Are you planning to publish those same articles on your own blog or website first? I hope so

    After they are published and indexed on your own website, if you looking to get them syndicated, Ezine Articles is still a great place to publish them. All the Panda update has done (from my own publishing perspective), is make the process even more worth pursuing.

    Top quality, focused articles are still doing well on Ezine Articles. I find those I write between 1,200 and 1,500 words succeed the best.

    If you are really interested in syndication, you should also contact some of the places you would like to work with directly with a link to your articles. It always helps to "sell" yourself.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4511816].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by Moneyland View Post

    I am writing for syndication but at the same time I am wondering if Ezine Articles still rank on 1st page in Google?
    You'll be very pleased to know that they almost never do, for realistic keywords. Thanks to the latest Google algorithm change.

    Gone are the days that we have to worry about EZA outranking our own site for our own keywords. It's much easier for us to rank our own sites, now.

    Originally Posted by Moneyland View Post

    I guess I will need to build backlinks to them
    To the copy of the article on your site, if you want to, of course.

    You're surely not intending to build backlinks to an article directory copy?!

    Don't forget that saying "I have a 25% click-through rate from EZA" is just another way of saying "I lose 75% of my traffic at EZA". It's easy to imagine that you're "getting traffic from an article directory" when what you're really doing is sending your traffic (i.e. traffic arising from your own backlinking campaign) to an article directory - and therefore losing most of it.

    Have a good read of some the threads where this is all discussed. Like this one.

    It's also explained further - here, here, here, here, here, here and so on.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4511836].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author twonny
      Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      You're surely not intending to build backlinks to an article directory copy?!
      So you really wouldn't suggest using UAW or something similar to link back to your website and your article directory copy?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4511860].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
        Banned
        Originally Posted by twonny View Post

        So you really wouldn't suggest using UAW or something similar to link back to your website and your article directory copy?
        I wouldn't suggest using UAW or something similar, no; not at all.

        There are a few hundred threads here with titles like "Article Marketing Is Dead" and "Article Marketing Doesn't Work". The members who start off those threads (and many of those who join in the conversations) are all actually talking not about article marketing at all, but about article directory marketing. They have the name wrong (typically, I suspect, because article directory marketing is the only part of article marketing of which they're really aware), but their conclusions are entirely right: what they're doing really doesn't work, for most people, most of the time. And there are very good and valid and logical reasons for that. And what they're really doing usually comprises trying to use article directories for their own traffic and/or their own backlinks. And the way they're usually doing it comprises spinning and/or submission software. All of which I would avoid like the plague.

        All articles in all article directories are published on non-context-relevant, PR-0 pages. 100,000 of those backlinks and $3.50 will get you a cappuccino at Starbuck's. Seriously, even before Google's "Panda update" SEO textbook writers were saying that one would typically need something between 50,000 and 100,000 of those backlinks to confer the link-juice equivalent to one backlink from a relevant authority site. That vague, large number's very clearly a lot higher, now that Google has - thankfully, finally - knocked the article directories senseless from the SEO perspective (as even their owners are so openly complaining).

        There's no downside at all to using a mass-submitter to plant backlinks to your own site, but there's precious little benefit, either. And to do it to build backlinks to an article directory copy is ... well, I struggle to be polite about that idea. It's "not an optimal method of article marketing", to put it very mildly indeed. It's not just a waste of time - it's worse than that: it's something that can actually damage your business.

        Key question: when a potential customer finds one of your articles by putting one of its keywords into a search engine, what do you want him to find: the EZA copy (from which you get 25% of the traffic, perhaps, 30%?) or the copy on your own site (where you get 100% of it)? A bit of a no-brainer, isn't it?

        "Building backlinks to your backlinks" is not what article marketing's about: it's about getting high-quality articles in front of highly targeted traffic.

        Further information ...

        This very good but very long thread explains in detail why it's so important to publish articles on your own site first, before submitting them anywhere else (and a lot of the indicental chat in it touches on other "basic article marketing questions").

        This one explains a lot of stuff about "spinning" and why most professional article marketers think it's a waste of time, and based on fallacies and mistaken beliefs about "duplicate content".

        This one explains why it's seriously bad news to create backlinks to article directories.

        This one explains a bit more about article directories and writing for syndication.

        This one is about "unique content" and a bit about link-juice, I think.

        This one is about writing for syndication.

        And in this excellent little article an expert writer/marketer explains "duplicate content" to perfection.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4512095].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Psst
    Banned
    Originally Posted by Moneyland View Post

    I want to submit some ezine articles and haven't done so for a while, since all the Google changes anyway. I am writing for syndication but at the same time I am wondering if Ezine Articles still rank on 1st page in Google?
    EZA articles may rank but put your articles on your own site/blog and get them indexed there first. This is what I learned from this forum (mostly from these people --> Annie, Alexa, tpw etc). At first, I wasn't very much interested in the concept but nowadays I'm more inclined to do like that.

    Thanks!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4511910].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Richard Van
      Annie and Alexa have beaten me to it again.

      Thank you both again for saving me writing too much except for this, OP...

      .....listen to Annie and Alexa.
      Signature

      Wibble, bark, my old man's a mushroom etc...

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4511945].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Newbie Japan
    Moneyland - konichi wa


    As you can see, I am a brand new member on this forum and a Newbie to IM, too.


    However, as a very stubborn and determined newbie, I tinker with the info from the Gurus until I can get it to function well enough for a newbie.


    Thus,


    I do not know how relevant the following information will be for your purpose but back in 06-04-2009 Jack Duncan provided a very helpful way to gather some very useful information from Google and ezinearticles.


    You will see from my notes that a few adjustments had to be made to make it functional in August of 2011.


    Of course, Jack suggested this on his video, so I hope the little alterations I made will work for anyone who applies them presently.


    If not, play around with the words, numbers, etc. until it delivers what you are aiming for. (See the video(s) he has on the following post.)


    Jack Duncan – Warrior Forum 06-04-2009, 12:38 AM
    Google Niche Research Loophole


    Jack used the following:


    site:ezinearticles.com "This article has been viewed 2000..199999" "Article Submitted On: * *, 2009"


    Then he added a word at the front:


    wedding photography site:ezinearticles.com "This article has been viewed 2000..199999" "Article Submitted On: * *, 2009"


    I went to Google.com and typed in the same as above and got from Google the following message:


    Your search - wedding photography site:ezinearticles.com "This article has been viewed 2000..199999 ... - did not match any documents.
    Suggestions:
    Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
    Try different keywords.
    Try more general keywords.
    Try fewer keywords.


    Since I did not get the same results as Jack, when I emulated his process, I used my Virgo tendencies to fiddle around with the phrase by adding or deleting words or numbers until I got it to work.


    The process I used was:


    I went to Google.com and typed in wedding photography with Jack’s original phrase of:


    wedding photography site:ezinearticles.com "This article has been viewed 2000..199999" "Article Submitted On: * *, 2009"


    I then removed from the phrase the word Article and the following appeared:


    Your search - wedding photography site:ezinearticles.com "This article has been viewed 2000..199999 ... - did not match any documents.


    Another no go.


    So, applied some more dissecting to the phrase, such as removing the following:


    “This article has been


    That did the trick!


    Got the following:

    (web site) ... that's not to suggest that they aren't used for fashion or wedding photography.

    Submitted On January 28, 2009. Viewed 12794 times. . . .

    Note: Sorry I can not show you the site I discovered since it seems I need to have at least 15 post on this forum before I am allowed to do so.

    BINGO!

    I got what I set out to discover, e.g. the number of views the ezinearticle has. (Viewed 12794 times)


    To Conclude:

    As a complete Newbie to IM and this forum, I do not know what was done between 06-04-2009 and August 2011 that caused the following phrase to not work for me:


    wedding photography site:ezinearticles.com "This article has been viewed 2000..199999" "Article Submitted On: * *, 2009"


    But, while removing the word Article and the phrase “This article has been from the original in Google, I could access the first step of the information and move on to the other steps Jack showed us in the two videos on his post.


    What I take away from this experience as a complete Newbie is:
    - Do what Jack suggest by fiddling around with the phrase.
    - Look at the different ways other sites state the phrase.
    - Do some deep breathing exercises before getting frustrated or beyond.
    - Let others know what the outcome was from experimenting and not giving up.


    Thank you Jack because you provided me with another valuable learning opportunity.


    Arigato,

    Newbie Japan
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4518861].message }}

Trending Topics