4 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}
4 {{ upvoteCount | shortNum }}

New question for top syndicators! ::)

by ymest
3 replies


Hello dear friends,

Since swapping from article directory marketing to article syndication marketing, I have been writing much longer and much qualitative articles and I can testify that it does work much better.

Now, I have a question relating to two niches that were " built" with shorter articles and in fact I didn't build a site but used a simple re-direct! Needless to say that the results were....poor! I made a few sales...just a few!

Now, there are about 50 articles in each of these niches and I am wondering if I should take these articles, some still do get views and re write them partly or entirely to get to the level of syndication that I am looking for.

Or should I just forget about them altogether?

If I do decide to re write them I will of course build websites and ditch the re direct but I just wanted your opinion on this.

Worth it or not?

Thanks in advance!

Regards!

Yoan
#people #question #syndicator #syndicators #top
  • Profile picture of the author ymest
    No one answerrrringgggg : :
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4676450].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by ymest View Post

    there are about 50 articles in each of these niches and I am wondering if I should take these articles, some still do get views and re write them partly or entirely to get to the level of syndication that I am looking for.

    Or should I just forget about them altogether?
    Never easy to decide!

    I was in this position a couple of years ago when I switched from "article directory marketing" (with which I'd been about as "successful" as you, by the sound of it ) to article marketing by syndication.

    I abandoned quite a lot of mine. But that was comparatively easy for me to decide, because I'd also been promoting several high-gravity ClickBank products with vendors' opt-ins on their sales pages ( ) and once I came to understand that there was no realistic future in that, I was quite pleased to see the back of them.

    I hadn't actually done any "direct linking" ... but there it is (was).

    If these are articles in EZA, you can, if you want, just change the resource boxes and send them to a squeeze page instead, if that helps? "Edits" like that are now handled within one business day by EZA and they no longer take the article offline while they're doing it. But then again, it is technically "re-submitting" the article, and that means that they have to accept both the article, under current editorial guidelines, and the squeeze-page link. I'm not sure this necessarily helps you? And might not be what you had in mind, anyway?

    If you can realistically re-use them by re-writing them to "syndication quality" and want to make websites for them, you can always remove them from EZA and re-submit new articles based on them, I suppose ... but it's quite a lot of work (and presumably for niches not exactly dear to your heart?).

    If by any chance these are not in EZA, then it's an easier decision, in a sense: you can leave them alone and still re-write them in a new/different/improved form and then submit them to EZA (under the same names/pen-names as their "originals", of course). And you can arrange other syndication for them yourself, if available, anyway?

    Ultimately, it depends on how much work you want to put into it and whether in the long run that time/energy/effort is better spent on other things, I think?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4677198].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author ymest
      Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      Never easy to decide!

      I was in this position a couple of years ago when I switched from "article directory marketing" (with which I'd been about as "successful" as you, by the sound of it ) to article marketing by syndication.

      I abandoned quite a lot of mine. But that was comparatively easy for me to decide, because I'd also been promoting several high-gravity ClickBank products with vendors' opt-ins on their sales pages ( ) and once I came to understand that there was no realistic future in that, I was quite pleased to see the back of them.

      I hadn't actually done any "direct linking" ... but there it is (was).

      If these are articles in EZA, you can, if you want, just change the resource boxes and send them to a squeeze page instead, if that helps? "Edits" like that are now handled within one business day by EZA and they no longer take the article offline while they're doing it. But then again, it is technically "re-submitting" the article, and that means that they have to accept both the article, under current editorial guidelines, and the squeeze-page link. I'm not sure this necessarily helps you? And might not be what you had in mind, anyway?

      If you can realistically re-use them by re-writing them to "syndication quality" and want to make websites for them, you can always remove them from EZA and re-submit new articles based on them, I suppose ... but it's quite a lot of work (and presumably for niches not exactly dear to your heart?).

      If by any chance these are not in EZA, then it's an easier decision, in a sense: you can leave them alone and still re-write them in a new/different/improved form and then submit them to EZA (under the same names/pen-names as their "originals", of course). And you can arrange other syndication for them yourself, if available, anyway?

      Ultimately, it depends on how much work you want to put into it and whether in the long run that time/energy/effort is better spent on other things, I think?

      Thanks Alexa!

      Yes they are EZA articles and of course HIGH GRAVITY PRODUCTS WITH OPT INS....hahha I think the solution is simple here, at least for one of them which I no longer want to work on anyway! I haven't made sale for months in this particular niche but it still gets quite a few views...and I guess the vendor is getting the opt ins....my fault! May decide to delete them all!

      As for the other ones, I am thinking of re writing them for syndication. I have found the right product for it and I do have a much better knowledge than in the other niche so....Just need to work more....

      Thanks for you input anyway!

      Yoan
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4677439].message }}

Trending Topics