ClickBank Refund Slap

33 replies
In the new Clickbank regulations they are now penalizing venders with over 15% refund rate charge back of 1% and blacklisting perishers that serial refund? How do you feel is it a Good thing or bad thing.
#clickbank #refund #slap
  • Profile picture of the author George Wright
    They create an environment that encourages serial refunders then punish the results of their own doing. I got a $250 product price limit way back when they were hard to get, however I never used my account because CB always worried me.

    George Wright
    Signature
    "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4893868].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
      Originally Posted by George Wright View Post

      They create an environment that encourages serial refunders then punish the results of their own doing. I got a $250 product price limit way back when they were hard to get, however I never used my account because CB always worried me.

      George Wright
      Interesting, How do you You feel that Clickbank is create an environment that encourages serial founders? Are you referring to there auto refund approve proses?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4893996].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author George Wright
        First off I should add, I fully understand why CB has certain rules, CC slaps and all.

        It's just that they have always (as long as I can remember) been so famous for easy refunds with notices to that affect with each sale etc. that crooks disposed to get free products have been encouraged to do so.

        I too agree it's about time they find a way to punish or stop the serial refunders, it's just that they should have been doing this since day one when they started making it easy to refund.

        I just chose not to play in their sandbox because as I said the whole CB setup worried me. It probably was a wrong decision on my part, maybe I left a lot of money on the table. Perhaps with this new rule I'll sell a few things throgh them.

        I hope my first response did not sound like I was anti CB I have purchased a lot from them. I just haven't sold a lot through them yet.

        /damage control

        George Wright

        Originally Posted by Clint Faber View Post

        Interesting, How do you You feel that Clickbank is create an environment that encourages serial founders? Are you referring to there auto refund approve proses?
        Signature
        "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894285].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
          Originally Posted by George Wright View Post

          First off I should add, I fully understand why CB has certain rules, CC slaps and all.

          It's just that they have always (as long as I can remember) been so famous for easy refunds with notices to that affect with each sale etc. that crooks disposed to get free products have been encouraged to do so.

          I too agree it's about time they find a way to punish or stop the serial refunders, it's just that they should have been doing this since day one when they started making it easy to refund.

          I just chose not to play in their sandbox because as I said the whole CB setup worried me. It probably was a wrong decision on my part, maybe I left a lot of money on the table. Perhaps with this new rule I'll sell a few things throgh them.

          I hope my first response did not sound like I was anti CB I have purchased a lot from them. I just haven't sold a lot through them yet.

          /damage control

          George Wright
          Thanks for the clarification, we can all be misunderstood at times (Hint Alexa Brat lol). Stopping the serial refunders is more on the venders but is now encouraged and supported by clickbank.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894318].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Jon Patrick
            Originally Posted by George Wright

            I too agree it's about time they find a way to punish or stop the serial refunders, it's just that they should have been doing this since day one when they started making it easy to refund.
            I've never really had to worry about my refund rate, as it's always stayed well below the danger zone. But then again, I'm not in the internet marketing niche. I could see it being a big issue there.

            I definitely think they should establish standards for buyers, too. If a buyer racks up a certain number (or percentage) of refunds on the products they purchase, they should be blocked from making further purchases. When someone is just going around getting free product after free product, it becomes obvious at some point that this was their intention from the start.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894383].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
              Originally Posted by burningdrive View Post

              I've never really had to worry about my refund rate, as it's always stayed well below the danger zone. But then again, I'm not in the internet marketing niche. I could see it being a big issue there.

              I definitely think they should establish standards for buyers, too. If a buyer racks up a certain number (or percentage) of refunds on the products they purchase, they should be blocked from making further purchases. When someone is just going around getting free product after free product, it becomes obvious at some point that this was their intention from the start.
              Yes I agree with you and feel the same burningdrive
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894460].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author George Wright
              Originally Posted by burningdrive View Post

              I've never really had to worry about my refund rate, as it's always stayed well below the danger zone. But then again, I'm not in the internet marketing niche. I could see it being a big issue there.

              I definitely think they should establish standards for buyers, too. If a buyer racks up a certain number (or percentage) of refunds on the products they purchase, they should be blocked from making further purchases. When someone is just going around getting free product after free product, it becomes obvious at some point that this was their intention from the start.
              RE: The quote above in red. That's a great point. Buyers of Pain Relief Methods, Dog Training ebooks, Knitting patterns, etc. are probably much less likely to ask for a refund than buyers of MM products.

              Thanks for the reminder.

              George Wright
              Signature
              "The first chapter sells the book; the last chapter sells the next book." Mickey Spillane
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4896806].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
            Originally Posted by drunkenmonkey View Post

            Do you honestly think CB is gonna enforce the >15% refund rates?

            That would wipe out virtually ALL the BS MMO products, TV to PC crap and all the crappy "Clean your PC" and "Check This number" products on there.

            Clickbank would lose more money most here (me included) could shake a stick at PER day than most vendors/aff's make in a month.

            Yep, I can really see them enforcing that one...yawn.
            I think You misunderstand. They are adding a FEE if your refund rate is over 15% I do thing that they will yes enforce that. I feel it is there goal to get rid and make better out of the "junk" that may be on Click Bank.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894413].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
              Originally Posted by drunkenmonkey View Post

              @ Clint Faber: Don't think for a second I'm a CB noob I know exactly how this stuff goes down.

              They've been saying 15% for a frikkin eternity....it's nothing new even though you may think so.

              In fact a Vendor buddy with one of the highest converting products on CB that is NOT MMO complete and utter BS is literally laughing all the way to the Bank right now on the back of this...you know who you are.

              And long may it continue....
              I only was saying that you may have misunderstood what CB is doing now that's all. I was saying nothing about you being a "noob" it is vary apparent that you are quite informed on this topic.

              "laughing all the way to the Bank right now" Nice lol
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894528].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Thomas Michal
                Some people need to read better it doesn't say you WILL be penalized it says you MAY there is a big difference there...


                Quote frome the TOS:

                Starting October 17, 2011, vendor accounts with a refund rate over 15% and/or chargeback rate over 1% over the past 60 days may be subject to additional fees or penalties

                Obviously if someone sold 3 products and one person requested a refund CB wouldnt penalize them because their refund rate was 33%
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894622].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author jamjar919
    About time IMHO
    Signature

    Feel free to ask me any IM related questions or add me on skype :D
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4893922].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
      Originally Posted by jamjar919 View Post

      About time IMHO
      Can you tell us a lill bit more about your opinion?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894012].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by Clint Faber View Post

    In the new Clickbank regulations they are now penalizing venders with over 1% refund rate
    This is incorrect. (And entirely implausible, too!)

    This thread contains accurate information.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894055].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
      Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      This is incorrect. (And entirely implausible, too!)
      After I clarify that it is 1% charge back and 15 refund. How do you feel that it is Incorrect and implausible?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894222].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author J Bold
        Originally Posted by Clint Faber View Post

        How do you feel that it is Incorrect and implausible?
        Because they are penalizing vendors with a refund rate of 15% or higher. Not 1%. Are you kidding? 1%? That's standard.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894272].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Clint Faber View Post

        How do you feel that it is Incorrect and implausible?
        It's 15%, Clint, not 1% as you stated.

        "More than 1%" would be ridiculous, clearly. Any vendor can have 1% refunds just by having a couple of unwise affiliates, or a bad day, or a following wind - that's outside the vendor's control, and it would be crazy to penalize him for it. Which is why they're not doing that.

        Look at the link I posted above, Clint. There's a link in that thread to the official announcement on ClickBank's website, which will show you that you have this whole thing rather significantly wrong at the moment!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894274].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
          Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

          It's 15%, Clint, not 1% as you stated.

          "More than 1%" would be ridiculous, clearly. Any vendor can have 1% refunds just by having a couple of unwise affiliates, or a bad day, or a following wind - that's outside the vendor's control, and it would be crazy to penalize him for it. Which is why they're not doing that.

          Look at the link I posted above, Clint. There's a link in that thread to the official announcement on ClickBank's website, which will show you that you have this whole thing rather significantly wrong at the moment!
          Miss typed the 1 and meant 15 (dang you are a Pit Bull lol) You may have seen that it was already corrected. I had a chat with the clickbank rep before this change announcement. Thanks for helping me out with that Girly girl.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894394].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Black Hat Cat
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Clint Faber View Post

        After I clarify that it is 1% charge back and 15 refund. How do you feel that it is Incorrect and implausible?
        She didn't say your correction was incorrect, she said your initial comment was incorrect. She even quoted in her response what she was referring to.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894404].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
          Originally Posted by Black Hat Cat View Post

          She didn't say your correction was incorrect, she said your initial comment was incorrect. She even quoted in her response what she was referring to.
          Yes I understood () let me help you understand my statement. I was asking if there was any thing more after the changes that she disagreed with.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894438].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Frank Kerley
    Personally I think it's a good thing...tired of the extremely high refund rates on my ClickBank Acct... Seems like the products are lacking something.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894057].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
      Originally Posted by Frank Kerley View Post

      Personally I think it's a good thing...tired of the extremely high refund rates on my ClickBank Acct... Seems like the products are lacking something.
      Are your referring to refund rates on your Vender or Affiliate ClickBank account?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894248].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author thekaver
    its can be a good thing!

    but not everything is as black and white as that!

    for example if a guy happens to buy 5 products on clickbank within a 1 month period that all turn out to be absolute rubbish so he asks for a refund! should that guy be penalised?

    the same way for if a vendor is a vitim of serial refunds its not fair he sould be penilised!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894132].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
      Originally Posted by thekaver View Post

      its can be a good thing!

      but not everything is as black and white as that!

      for example if a guy happens to buy 5 products on clickbank within a 1 month period that all turn out to be absolute rubbish so he asks for a refund! should that guy be penalised?

      the same way for if a vendor is a vitim of serial refunds its not fair he sould be penilised!
      Do you feel that the vender should not hold the right to blacklist and not sell to you done the road?
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894263].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Stefan Vee
      I hope it won't encourage vendors NOT to reply to refund
      requests from customers who are unaware of Clickbank's
      DIRECT back-door.

      But sadly, I think it will encourage them. Customers who
      kindly ask for a refund aren't the ones who are responsible
      for charge-backs.

      The serial refunders are the winners here, not the occasional
      refunder as many vendors balancing around the 12, 13, 14 %
      refund rate simply won't respond anymore.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4895156].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author rts2271
      Most of the big MMO vendors on CB have left CB. Clickbanks auto-refund policy created this mess, their lack of vetting their vendors made it worse, their marginalizing their affiliates by placing this burden on their backs decimated their backbone and their coming in and fixing the barn doors after the horses have bolted is about as strong of a business move as the band playing on the deck of the Titanic. CB may not die from this but there growth model was just set back 3 years and they will certainly not recover in the immediate future. To many affiliates are moving on to other more lucrative systems or launching their own through products such as idev and confusionsoft. The golden days of CB are over.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4895168].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Clint Faber
    All in all I think it is a good thing for everyone.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894485].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Daniel Roach
      Originally Posted by Clint Faber View Post

      All in all I think it is a good thing for everyone.
      I agree, particularly good for Clickbank's image. I don't know about anyone else here but I've always seen Clickbank as a reputable company that was good to their affiliates but ultimately facilitated the sales for a lot of crappy products.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4894590].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Isaiah Jackson
    about time in my opinion nobody wants serial refunders.

    second if a guy does buy 5 garbage products in one month its probably a good thing that has been stopped so he doesn't fall into the "cycle of doom"
    Signature
    Send Emails, Get Paid - My business summarized in four words. For the how-to go here
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4895185].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Jon Patrick
    Originally Posted by Stefan Vee

    I hope it won't encourage vendors NOT to reply to refund
    requests from customers who are unaware of Clickbank's
    DIRECT back-door.
    That wouldn't be wise of those vendors. When I read over ClickBank's recently updated terms, they specified that vendors must provide an email by which buyers and ClickBank staff can receive a non-automated response within 24 hours. A bunch of emails from buyers telling ClickBank that they can't reach a vendor will surely be noticed.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[4895469].message }}

Trending Topics