Few Questions About Article Marketing and Article Syndication

29 replies
DONE - If You'r Mod/Admin, Please delete this thread
#article #marketing #questions #syndication
  • Profile picture of the author Home Easy Earn
    There are hundreds of article directories you could submit to and whichever marketer you ask will give you a different list of top 10 article sites, but they all agree ezine articles is probably still the best one to start with.

    ArticlesBase.com
    Buzzle.com
    ArticleAlley.com
    GoArticles.com
    SearchWarp.com

    My advice would be to read about the Google Panda update and how that has affected article marketing, so check the information you are learning from and if it is older than April 2011 then learn about the Panda update.

    Yes I would agree that posting the article on your website to start with is a good idea. I would then if I was you rewrite the article to have a different article to add to ezine articles.

    For the top 10 article sites apart from ezine articles I would make sure that each article is spun or rewritten to give you a unique article for each article site.

    For other ideas on using articles and how to write them I would recommend Learning Article Marketing where there is a lot of free advice about article marketing.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5139549].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Hardik Jogi
      Originally Posted by gaz59 View Post

      There are hundreds of article directories you could submit to and whichever marketer you ask will give you a different list of top 10 article sites, but they all agree ezine articles is probably still the best one to start with.

      ArticlesBase.com
      Buzzle.com
      ArticleAlley.com
      GoArticles.com
      SearchWarp.com
      ArticleBase.com, Goarticles.com receives decent traffic but the main question is - Do people search for syndicating articles on those websites?

      Also Buzzle doesn't allows any external links. Thus, main use of buzzle can be only if many website owners/ ezine editors are looking for syndicated content on buzzle.

      Originally Posted by gaz59 View Post


      My advice would be to read about the Google Panda update and how that has affected article marketing, so check the information you are learning from and if it is older than April 2011 then learn about the Panda update.
      Yeah i have been reading many articles after post panda update. Article syndication, according to me now is the best traffic generation method as serp changes too often.

      Originally Posted by gaz59 View Post


      Yes I would agree that posting the article on your website to start with is a good idea. I would then if I was you rewrite the article to have a different article to add to ezine articles.

      For the top 10 article sites apart from ezine articles I would make sure that each article is spun or rewritten to give you a unique article for each article site.

      For other ideas on using articles and how to write them I would recommend Learning Article Marketing where there is a lot of free advice about article marketing.
      Why do i need to rewrite the article if EZA accepts directly the same article that is posted on my website? Also rewriting takes a lot of time.

      Google said duplicate content is when you post the same article twice or more on the same website. Posting same article on EZA is called article syndication.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5139647].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Hardik Jogi
      Originally Posted by gaz59 View Post

      For other ideas on using articles and how to write them I would recommend Learning Article Marketing where there is a lot of free advice about article marketing.
      Website that you recommended has not been updated since many months
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5140481].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author JB Jiles
      Banned
      Originally Posted by gaz59 View Post


      Yes I would agree that posting the article on your website to start with is a good idea. I would then if I was you rewrite the article to have a different article to add to ezine articles.

      For the top 10 article sites apart from ezine articles I would make sure that each article is spun or rewritten to give you a unique article for each article site.
      What would happen if a person were to skip the spin? Would that be calamitous??

      I don't understand. Why spend the time to write something, anything original for a site that someone else owns? Please clarify.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5140551].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Hardik Jogi
        Originally Posted by JB Jiles View Post

        What would happen if a person were to skip the spin? Would that be calamitous??

        I don't understand. Why spend the time to write something, anything original for a site that someone else owns? Please clarify.
        Creating exclusive content for any other website is not a good strategy. I agree.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5141520].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author NicoleBeckett
          Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

          ArticleBase.com, Goarticles.com receives decent traffic but the main question is - Do people search for syndicating articles on those websites?
          I've had great success getting things syndicated from both of those websites. If I were you, I'd test out a few different article directories, and see which ones give you the best results.

          Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

          Also Buzzle doesn't allows any external links.
          Exactly... when you publish something on Buzzle, you're not dealing with a true article directory. I can't even imagine how Buzzle is getting writers, now that they've outlawed links.


          Originally Posted by JB Jiles View Post

          What would happen if a person were to skip the spin? Would that be calamitous??
          It would actually be calamitous to spin it! As has been discussed in countless threads here, you're not "punished" for publishing the same article on different sites. There's no reason to spin anything. And, aside from being a waste of your time, every spinner I've ever seen just turns content into mush - and that's definitely something you don't want people to associate you with!

          Originally Posted by JB Jiles View Post

          I don't understand. Why spend the time to write something, anything original for a site that someone else owns? Please clarify.
          If you're getting syndicated, you're not just writing for someone else's website out of the kindness of your heart You're writing to get the exposure (and the links). Sure, other websites will get to put your article on their website free of charge, but in the process, you're getting your name, your link, and your expertise out in front of targeted traffic.

          Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

          Creating exclusive content for any other website is not a good strategy. I agree.
          There's a big difference between exclusive content and syndicated content. Exclusive content is something that you write specifically for just one site, and in some cases, it can be a really wise move.

          Here's an example:

          I've started doing some writing for SiteProNews. They give me two options when I publish an article - exclusive rights to it (meaning it hasn't been published anywhere else first), or just the "normal" syndication (meaning I can take an article from my site and publish it there).

          I always choose to make their articles exclusive for one very big reason - exposure. On SiteProNews, exclusive articles get featured on the home page, Tweeted on SiteProNews' Twitter account, and sent off to their email subscribers. If you choose the "normal" syndication option, you don't get any of those benefits. So, to me, it's worth my time to write an article exclusively for them, because it's going to wind up in front of a ton of eyeballs (that wouldn't necessarily see it if it was just published on one of their inner pages).

          And, as an added benefit, once the article is published on SiteProNews' home page, dozens upon dozens of other websites syndicate it. I wouldn't get nearly that much syndication if the article wasn't front-and-center on their home page.
          Signature
          Sick of blending in with the crowd? Ready to stand ahead of the pack? The right content writing services can get you there...
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5141623].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author rooze
            Originally Posted by NicoleBeckett View Post


            Here's an example:

            I've started doing some writing for SiteProNews. They give me two options when I publish an article - exclusive rights to it (meaning it hasn't been published anywhere else first), or just the "normal" syndication (meaning I can take an article from my site and publish it there).

            I always choose to make their articles exclusive for one very big reason - exposure. On SiteProNews, exclusive articles get featured on the home page, Tweeted on SiteProNews' Twitter account, and sent off to their email subscribers. If you choose the "normal" syndication option, you don't get any of those benefits. So, to me, it's worth my time to write an article exclusively for them, because it's going to wind up in front of a ton of eyeballs (that wouldn't necessarily see it if it was just published on one of their inner pages).

            And, as an added benefit, once the article is published on SiteProNews' home page, dozens upon dozens of other websites syndicate it. I wouldn't get nearly that much syndication if the article wasn't front-and-center on their home page.
            Exactly! - that's my one big beef with the 'must appear on your website first' advice that is so prevalent. I've written for WebProNews and had some fantastic results from stealthily worded articles designed to build confidence in the author and have people check into the author's services.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5141924].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author JB Jiles
              Banned
              Ooo, didn't know directory of ezines was a one time fee only. That's welcome news.

              What about preposterous niches like gynecomastia, are there chances of getting on newsletters via Directory of Ezines with this kind of topic? Or would it be better to simply rank the site for highly searched keywords and be done with it?
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5141977].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author myob
                LOL! There are such ezines listed. I write a lot on medical topics, but that is not one of them.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142056].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
                Banned
                Originally Posted by JB Jiles View Post

                What about preposterous niches like gynecomastia, are there chances of getting on newsletters via Directory of Ezines with this kind of topic?
                Yes, there are, actually.

                Take care with keywords, for that one, just in case you weren't aware: the spelling you have above is US only, and the rest of the English-speaking world spells it differently, if that's relevant?
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142101].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author JB Jiles
                  Banned
                  More welcome news for me! If there are ezines that touch on man boobs, then there must be an ezine on just about everything. Today is my most fortunate day!

                  Good lookin' out, as they say in the slums. They may say it in American prisons too, I think. Can't say for sure though. What I do know is that man boobs is spelled differently in different parts of the world. This much I know now, and thanks for this and the other information to the responders above.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142195].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author JB Jiles
          Banned
          Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

          Creating exclusive content for any other website is not a good strategy. I agree.
          I was interested in reading feedback about people's experience with directory of ezines dot com. I'm aware of the service and how much it costs, but I have not read much in this setting regarding others' success or lack thereof using the service, which costs about $200 yearly, I think. One thing I know for certain, you can expect an onslaught of emails from the owner of the service if you are curious and decide to sign up for preliminary information. He stays in touch!
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5141645].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author myob
            Writing articles is a resource-intensive process for me and my staff, so I make sure they are leveraged for maximum exposure through syndication. Exclusive content is never considered as an option in my marketing model. Having said that, the Directory of Ezines has been a valuable tool for many years in sourcing niche ezines for article syndication. It is by far among the most important assets for the serious writer, and the "onslaught of emails from the owner of the service" are not at all onerous for the benefits received. I have often recommended the DOE here in this forum, and would encourage anyone here to invest the one time $197 lifetime membership fee.
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5141792].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
              Banned
              Originally Posted by JB Jiles View Post

              What would happen if a person were to skip the spin? Would that be calamitous??
              Far better not to spin, than to spin.

              http://www.warriorforum.com/main-int...necessary.html

              http://www.warriorforum.com/main-int...-articles.html

              Originally Posted by JB Jiles View Post

              Why spend the time to write something, anything original for a site that someone else owns?
              Well, I suppose it could in theory be worth doing if they really had an enormous amount of highly targeted traffic for your exact niche, and you couldn't reach those people any other way, and they would (for some strange reason?) publish only "previously unpublished" content? It's certainly not something I'd be in a hurry to do, though, in principle. I like my own new content to be published and indexed on my own site before it goes anywhere else, really.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5141825].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JB Jiles
    Banned
    Nicole, please write about how goes things with directory of ezines? Do you utilize that site regularly? And if you don't use the website for spreading out your writing, what are your reasons for not using the website?
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5141688].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author NicoleBeckett
      Originally Posted by JB Jiles View Post

      Nicole, please write about how goes things with directory of ezines? Do you utilize that site regularly? And if you don't use the website for spreading out your writing, what are your reasons for not using the website?
      To be honest, I've never used it. I have heard some great things about it, though. Unfortunately, I'm not as proactive with my syndication as I should be. When I've got alot of paying clients waiting, my own article marketing takes a backseat. Luckily, I've been fortunate to get alot of "passive" syndication through article directories and the like.

      Thanks for bringing it up, though! The next time I've got some downtime, I'm going to check it out
      Signature
      Sick of blending in with the crowd? Ready to stand ahead of the pack? The right content writing services can get you there...
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142191].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
    Banned
    Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

    1) Is there any other article directory where i should publish my article expect EZA?
    I submit almost all of mine to either GoArticles and/or ArticlesBase as well (and always have done). My own experience is overwhelmingly in favour of EZA, out of those three, I have to say, but I know that Nicole's done well from GoArticles and/or ArticleBase too, and that's a good enough reason for me to persist with them. Besides, I feel more comfortable with two article directory copies than one, to be honest - otherwise it would be a real nuisance for me if EZA ever happened to close down overnight!

    Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

    2) I have to publish my article on my website first --> Google indexes it --> then submit to Ezine. Main goal of doing so is helping my website become an authority site in the eyes of google. Correct?
    I must say that has absolutely nothing to do with my reason for doing so at all. Article directory backlinks confer almost no linkjuice at all. I'm putting my articles into EZA for publishers to find.

    Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

    Any other E-book or Product that you recommend for learning more about article syndication?
    Turn Words Into Traffic

    Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

    6) Is directoryofezines.com really worth it?
    For me, yes.

    Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

    7) How do people respond to your article? I mean by subscribing to your email list etc?
    They visit my site, via the landing-page ... usual sort of thing: some opt in, others don't ...

    I have no forum, so I can't comment on that question.

    Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

    8) How is article distribution service of isnare.com and thephantomwriters.com?
    The Phantom Writers is owned by a Warrior. I've had clients who have used it and certainly been happy that they did. Isnare, I think, is more or less dead: http://www.warriorforum.com/main-int...-any-good.html
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5141785].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Hardik Jogi
      Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

      I submit almost all of mine to either GoArticles and/or ArticlesBase as well (and always have done). My own experience is overwhelmingly in favour of EZA, out of those three, I have to say, but I know that Nicole's done well from GoArticles and/or ArticleBase too, and that's a good enough reason for me to persist with them. Besides, I feel more comfortable with two article directory copies than one, to be honest - otherwise it would be a real nuisance for me if EZA ever happened to close down overnight!



      I must say that has absolutely nothing to do with my reason for doing so at all. Article directory backlinks confer almost no linkjuice at all. I'm putting my articles into EZA for publishers to find.



      Turn Words Into Traffic



      For me, yes.



      They visit my site, via the landing-page ... usual sort of thing: some opt in, others don't ...

      I have no forum, so I can't comment on that question.



      The Phantom Writers is owned by a Warrior. I've had clients who have used it and certainly been happy that they did. Isnare, I think, is more or less dead: http://www.warriorforum.com/main-int...-any-good.html
      Thanks for the detailed response.


      Do you have any experience with submityourarticle.com?

      I have 4-5 niches in mind. Do you think a newbie should go in 4-5 niches directly or should concentrate on 1 only?

      Can i put a linkback of the original article url (of my website, in the resource box) while submitting the article to ezine because i have seen matt cutt's video and he was telling to put a link back to the original article while syndicating it so that google knows which one should be given higher priority.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142228].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
        Banned
        Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

        Do you have any experience with submityourarticle.com?
        I don't; sorry.

        Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

        I have 4-5 niches in mind. Do you think a newbie should go in 4-5 niches directly or should concentrate on 1 only?
        I always think 2 is a good number to start on! I started with 1, myself, and got lucky with it. But if you pick 1 and happen to pick a bad or "less-good" one, it's going to be a bit of a waste (though there'll still be some "learning gain" from it) and 2 maybe gives you a better chance? I think 4 is too many: you'll be dividing up your time too much and maybe never quite get off the ground for ages? This is all very subjective, though, and others may well disagree with me.

        Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

        Can i put a linkback of the original article url (of my website, in the resource box) while submitting the article to ezine
        I strongly urge you not to. I know nobody who does this. It's a really good way to lose traffic! I'm aware of the Matt Cutts comment you refer to and have seen that, too. (He doesn't quite word it as "higher priority"!). The reality is that if you always simply have your content published and indexed on your own site first, your site will be the long-term cumulative beneficiary of all those initial indexations, as a huge number of us here can confirm.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142292].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Hardik Jogi
          Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

          I don't; sorry.



          I always think 2 is a good number to start on! I started with 1, myself, and got lucky with it. But if you pick 1 and happen to pick a bad or "less-good" one, it's going to be a bit of a waste (though there'll still be some "learning gain" from it) and 2 maybe gives you a better chance? I think 4 is too many: you'll be dividing up your time too much and maybe never quite get off the ground for ages? This is all very subjective, though, and others may well disagree with me.



          I strongly urge you not to. I know nobody who does this. It's a really good way to lose traffic! I'm aware of the Matt Cutts comment you refer to and have seen that, too. (He doesn't quite word it as "higher priority"!). The reality is that if you always simply have your content published and indexed on your own site first, your site will be the long-term cumulative beneficiary of all those initial indexations, as a huge number of us here can confirm.

          Some days before i saw one of bill's (tpw) post and he said that the rank in google will ultimately depend upon how many backlinks (high pr and contextual) that url has.

          So if many people syndicate my EZA's article, they will put a link of article url. Thus, that page may get lots of link juice and may be it gets transferred to my main article url (on my website) because of 2 reasons :

          1) Link of that article is there on the page
          2) Google knows that this article was syndicated and thus passes 100% link juice to the main url.


          I may be wrong also.
          Your point of losing traffic is also important. Thus, won't take that risk.

          Thank you for all the help.
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142356].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author JB Jiles
            Banned
            Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

            Some days before i saw one of bill's (tpw) post and he said that the rank in google will ultimately depend upon how many backlinks (high pr and contextual) that url has.

            So if many people syndicate my EZA's article, they will put a link of article url. Thus, that page may get lots of link juice and may be it gets transferred to my main article url (on my website) because of 2 reasons :

            1) Link of that article is there on the page
            2) Google knows that this article was syndicated and thus passes 100% link juice to the main url.


            I may be wrong also.
            Your point of losing traffic is also important. Thus, won't take that risk.

            Thank you for all the help.
            Hardik, you ask nice questions! I have one for you, if you'd be nice enough to answer, I'd like that. How would whatever Google has set up to rank pages be able to determine that content has been syndicated? Maybe the content that surrounds the links, is that what you're thinking? Possibly that other pages on the site that has republished your content also have related content to the words that are in your articles and links?

            I also don't understand how 100% or what other particular percentage of link juice is sent back to your main URL because of this or that. I'm totally lost on that. Can you help me out a little with this?
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142427].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Hardik Jogi
              Originally Posted by JB Jiles View Post

              Hardik, you ask nice questions! I have one for you, if you'd be nice enough to answer, I'd like that. How would whatever Google has set up to rank pages be able to determine that content has been syndicated? Maybe the content that surrounds the links, is that what you're thinking? Possibly that other pages on the site that has republished your content also have related content to the words that are in your articles and links?

              I also don't understand how 100% or what other particular percentage of link juice is sent back to your main URL because of this or that. I'm totally lost on that. Can you help me out a little with this?
              Let me explain you with an example :

              I write 1 article, publish it on my website - mywebsite.com/article1

              Now i publish the same article on eza - ezinearticles.com/article1

              Now many website owners will syndicate my article and put a link back to ezinearticles.com/article1 (my website's landing page will also get link but not the article page)

              Thus, if i have put the link in resource box while submitting article to eza, it will have 3 benefits :

              1) Google will know that mywebsite.com/article1 is the original and ezinearticles.com/article1 is syndicated

              2) If many people build links on ezinearticles.com/article1 , then my original url : mywebsite.com/article1 will get some % of link juice or may be 100% of link juice because google knows that this is the syndicated article and original one is on my website.

              3) My articlelink will also get direct link juice from contextual website.

              As i said, i am not 100% sure about the benifits. If we take traffic loss into consideration, we should avoid it.
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142477].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
                Banned
                Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

                many website owners will syndicate my article and put a link back to ezinearticles.com/article1
                Why do you think this, Hardik? :confused:

                I have over 1,600 articles in EZA, and that isn't what usually happens to me when people syndicate them.

                It would be terrible for me if it did, because it would enhance the ranking of the EZA copy and eventually raise the potentially huge problem that that might outrank my own site!

                Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

                if i have put the link in resource box while submitting article to eza, it will have 3 benefits :

                1) Google will know that mywebsite.com/article1 is the original and ezinearticles.com/article1 is syndicated
                Well, I've already explained above why that isn't actually a "benefit", because it's something that will happen anyway.

                Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

                2) If many people build links on ezinearticles.com/article1 , then my original url : mywebsite.com/article1 will get some % of link juice or may be 100% of link juice
                That's a bad thing compared with the alternative of your landing page getting that link juice, not a "benefit", for all the reasons explained above.
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142527].message }}
              • Profile picture of the author JB Jiles
                Banned
                Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

                Let me explain you with an example :

                I write 1 article, publish it on my website - mywebsite.com/article1

                Now i publish the same article on eza - ezinearticles.com/article1

                Now many website owners will syndicate my article and put a link back to ezinearticles.com/article1 (my website's landing page will also get link but not the article page)

                Thus, if i have put the link in resource box while submitting article to eza, it will have 3 benefits :

                1) Google will know that mywebsite.com/article1 is the original and ezinearticles.com/article1 is syndicated

                2) If many people build links on ezinearticles.com/article1 , then my original url : mywebsite.com/article1 will get some % of link juice or may be 100% of link juice because google knows that this is the syndicated article and original one is on my website.

                3) My articlelink will also get direct link juice from contextual website.

                As i said, i am not 100% sure about the benifits. If we take traffic loss into consideration, we should avoid it.
                I am probably just slow on the uptake, but this actually hurt my brain trying to successfully process what's above, so I'm just going to try and forget about it, if it's all the same to you. I just can't figure it out and I am pretty accepting of the fact that there are things I'll never understand.

                Question for you, though. How come you do not want to get traffic from Google? What have they done to you to ignore them in such a manner?
                {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142553].message }}
                • Profile picture of the author Hardik Jogi
                  Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

                  Why do you think this, Hardik? :confused:

                  I have over 1,600 articles in EZA, and that isn't what usually happens to me when people syndicate them.


                  It would be terrible for me if it did, because it would enhance the ranking of the EZA copy and eventually raise the potentially huge problem that that might outrank my own site!
                  I have very few articles in EZA and when i check the websites those who have syndicated them, i see they have stripped off my resource box and just put the ezine url of the article. However, all of them are auto blogs.



                  Originally Posted by JB Jiles View Post


                  Question for you, though. How come you do not want to get traffic from Google? What have they done to you to ignore them in such a manner?
                  Nothing against google. Infact my current websites receives 4000+ visitors daily from google which is about 95% + of the total traffic. Thus, i just want to diversify more and reduce the google share to about 40%.
                  {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142584].message }}
                  • Profile picture of the author JB Jiles
                    Banned
                    Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

                    I have very few articles in EZA and when i check the websites those who have syndicated them, i see they have stripped off my resource box and just put the ezine url of the article. However, all of them are auto blogs.
                    When I think of Ezine Articles, I just think of it as one resource to get some initial traffic and possibly as a means of getting my content on other sites that hopefully can drive some targeted traffic. I think the success of using Ezine Articles is going to depend on 2 things. The first is the niche selected, and the second is the quality of the article, and that is very subjective.

                    Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

                    INothing against google. Infact my current websites receives 4000+ visitors daily from google which is about 95% + of the total traffic. Thus, i just want to diversify more and reduce the google share to about 40%.
                    I think an ideal situation would be to have a nice distribution of both search engine traffic and traffic in which a person becomes a whiz at syndicating content on other sites that have the ability to drive targeted traffic, not just those ineffective auto blogs.

                    Depending on how many sites you have, 4000 visitors per day could mean you have a very proven way of driving organic traffic through SEO. I don't see why you wouldn't want to build on that while at the same time becoming a pro at getting your content syndicated. This way your 40% goal of Google traffic could very well be much more than the amount of Google traffic you are experiencing today.

                    What I don't understand is where the initial traffic comes from when relying soley on syndication. Do you? Just the article directories?
                    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142688].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Alexa Smith
            Banned
            Originally Posted by hardik jogi View Post

            So if many people syndicate my EZA's article, they will put a link of article url. Thus, that page may get lots of link juice and may be it gets transferred to my main article url (on my website)
            Look beyond that, Hardik.

            The purpose of linkjuice is to get decent rankings, isn't it? And the purpose of having decent rankings is to get traffic from Google, yes? So you're doing that to attract traffic. Now, the question is: which page do you want your traffic arriving at - your landing page, or a page on which you happened to publish an original copy of an article for SEO reasons?!

            Also, if you have 50 different articles, that linkjuice will be divided between 50 different original copies on your site. How high will each get in the SERP's compared with how high your landing page will get if all 50 sets of backlinks from relevant sites point back to that?

            Also, put yourself in the position of a potential customer. What are you going to do if you read an article on the site or blog of somewhere you visit, and it interests you enough to read the resource-box and click through, and you find yourself reading another copy of something you've just seen? As Seth Godin says, you have about 5 seconds to grasp and hold somebody who arrives at your website. You're not going to do it that way, are you?

            Don't do this ... don't even think about it!
            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142446].message }}
            • Profile picture of the author Hardik Jogi
              Originally Posted by Alexa Smith View Post

              Look beyond that, Hardik.

              The purpose of linkjuice is to get decent rankings, isn't it? And the purpose of having decent rankings is to get traffic from Google, yes? So you're doing that to attract traffic. Now, the question is: which page do you want your traffic arriving at - your landing page, or a page on which you happened to publish an original copy of an article for SEO reasons?!

              Also, if you have 50 different articles, that linkjuice will be divided between 50 different original copies on your site. How high will each get in the SERP's compared with how high your landing page will get if all 50 sets of backlinks from relevant sites point back to that?

              Also, put yourself in the position of a potential customer. What are you going to do if you read an article on the site or blog of somewhere you visit, and it interests you enough to read the resource-box and click through, and you find yourself reading another copy of something you've just seen? As Seth Godin says, you have about 5 seconds to grasp and hold somebody who arrives at your website. You're not going to do it that way, are you?

              Don't do this ... don't even think about it!
              Agreed to your point about potential customer's view. Won't do it. (or even think of it)

              I know i need to focus on the main part about getting traffic from syndicated content and not to think about google traffic.. (and it's even more difficult to not think about it when current websites receives 4000 visitors daily from only google)
              {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142489].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author JimDucharme
    Regarding question 7...

    I like to use Feedburner - I find it a very effective way to keep people coming back to my personal blog when new content is posted. I think many people under-value RSS for this. There is a WordPress plugin which will add a subscription box and CTA to your posts and it seems to work well. RSS or email, the first thing you have to do is simply ask them to sign up. If your value prop (good useful content which adds value to one's day) is solid, don't be afraid to put a subscription box at the bottom of your posts and in the header and ask people to subscribe for more great content.

    Consider using a sub request box that stands out and or nice shiny graphical buttons along with that strong call-to-action. Also, there are lightboxes/pop-ups, I'm not a huge fan of pop-up/light boxes but some of the stats I've seen sure seem to suggest they work for driving subscriptions.

    Regards,
    jim
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5142742].message }}

Trending Topics