Tier1: Spun content or duplicate content, what would you prefer

by nik0 Banned
10 replies
What would be more effective for your backlinks like article's and web2.0's, spun content or duplicate content?

Unique content would be ideal ofcourse but when your into authority niches and have to rank thousands of pages it can become very costly to use unique content for all the backlinking.
#content #duplicate #prefer #spun #tier1
  • Profile picture of the author DarrenHaynes
    If your talking purely about getting link juice from those articles then this is an interesting experiment on the subject case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/
    Signature
    TheSpinningTop.net
    Buy Paragraph, Sentence, and Word Spun Articles
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5363954].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nik0
      Banned
      Originally Posted by DarrenHaynes View Post

      If your talking purely about getting link juice from those articles then this is an interesting experiment on the subject case-study-links-from-unique-vs-duplicate-content/
      EDIT: Reading the blog now and it does seem like a legit case study indeed.

      In fact it's pretty logical cause Google indeed filters pages with duplicate content, in the past I've seen that non indexed or de-indexed links still count but they carry much less weight then indexed pages.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5365450].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Paul Laughton
    For me it's spun content everytime. Although it's not fun to do.....even if you have the tools to do it. This is something I outsource, really don't like doing it.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5363998].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nik0
      Banned
      Originally Posted by Paul Laughton View Post

      For me it's spun content everytime. Although it's not fun to do.....even if you have the tools to do it. This is something I outsource, really don't like doing it.
      Maybe you set yourself too high standards with spun content as in manual spinning to produce readable content? When using TheBestSpinner I first select favorites and after that I use autospin. That takes less then a minute to get it unique to 60-70%
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5365429].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Awesomo
    definitely spun content over duplicate ones...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5364011].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Bananaprod
    I agree with Awesomo and Paul Laughton, spun content over duplicate, any day.
    Signature
    BananaProd - Web-based sales automation system:
    Sell your products on your website in 7 minutes flat...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5364015].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author zamzung
    good spun content of course... although I would rather go with duplicate content than with bad spun content...
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5365503].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author nik0
      Banned
      Originally Posted by zamzung View Post

      good spun content of course... although I would rather go with duplicate content than with bad spun content...
      Thats a bit of the reason I started this thread. How advanced is Google nowadays to identify bad spun content vs good spun / unique content. Lately I read more and more threads that seem to indicate that Google caught on bad 1 minute spun content.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5365540].message }}

Trending Topics