Some thoughts on handling WSO issues - for buyers AND sellers

22 replies
This question was posted by a member who had been banned temporarily for excessive and abusive posting about an issue with a WSO. He created a new account and asked this in main discussion. It's a question that warrants a useful answer, so...
what is the best way to deal with a purchased WSO with one year support - if the warrior seller denies to answer support tickets or even reply on this forum?
Support questions do not need to be answered in the forum itself. They should generally be handled through the seller's off-forum channels. Unfortunately, that doesn't always work. And we may not always be able to do much about the problem.

The absolute worst way to handle any issue here is to stalk the seller through one thread after another, posting insults and commenting in threads that have nothing to do with the problem you're discussing. Which happens all too often.

Good ways to handle problems exist, and they work when you use them. The most useful approach is to be sensible and patient with the seller/buyer. If you start off firing nastygrams and obscenities at someone, they may well just decide you're an unreasonable flake and ignore you. That's not always the wrong decision.

The thing to do if you want the mods to look at a problem is to type up a rational description of the situation, with enough details for the person reading it to understand what's going on. Then use the Report Post button.

If it's something we can verify immediately, like someone selling old PLR as a WSO, with a link to where we can see that it really isn't an original product, we'll close or move the thread, as appropriate. If it's "she said/he said," it probably won't get an immediate resolution. We will normally ask the other person for their side of the story. Keep in mind that what you (the buyer) think is a scamming seller might be something else entirely.

Example from yesterday: A member had been following a seller around, posting about how he was refusing refunds. The customer did not contact the seller through any channel but WSO threads, and posted some rather angry stuff. Seller explained to the mods that the customer had bought through an affiliate, and he had contacted the affiliate about the refund.

I explained to the customer what needed to be done and what had caused the hold-up. Suddenly, he became quite reasonable. All he needed was a clear and sensible explanation of the problem and a path to getting it resolved.

Don't ask me why the seller didn't explain that to the customer himself. I have no clue.

Flip side, also from yesterday: A seller had ignored a refund request that was within the stated refund policy. I PM'd him when the customer brought it to my attention after having gone through the seller's non-WSO channel and then through the WSO. Seller did not reply, despite having logged in quite a number of times after I sent that PM. Closed his existing offers until that and several other refund issues were addressed. That got his attention, and the refunds were issued. But it wasn't immediate.

Sometimes there simply isn't anything we can do. Some issues aren't appropriate for us to get into, and sometimes a seller just disappears. In some cases, you'll need to go through other channels, such as the payment system you used to give them the money, or WarriorPlus or JVzoo or whoever.

And sometimes, if you've been running around ranting and screaming and shouting about #*&#*%# scammers, you may have so badly screwed up the situation that we couldn't do anything even if you originally had a legitimate beef.

A note to sellers: Do NOT report a refund request made in your WSO threads with some note like, "This doesn't belong in my thread." If you don't make it clear that either no refund policy was offered, or that you have issued the refund, the request is legitimate and should stay posted. That is to encourage people to handle these things in a prompt fashion. If you don't, you're going to have the problem of cascading refund requests.

Also, if someone leaves a negative review that is within the rules, and includes a brief refund request note in it, that post should not be deleted. If the review is within the rules, the buyer has the right to post it.

Warning: Do not tell a customer that you will only honor your posted refund policy if they remove a negative review. Trust me, if we can verify that as a fact, you will not like the response.

And to buyers: WSO threads are not the best place to submit a first request for a refund. Simple courtesy suggests you use the non-forum channel for contacts that all sellers are required to have. If they fail to reply within 2 business days, then posting in the thread may be appropriate.

Also, look at the email address and name in the receipt you got when you purchased. If those are an affiliate's details, contact the affiliate. Do not start accusing the merchant of being a crook because an affiliate is slow or unresponsive.

And, again, be patient. Folks who think that everything can and should be replied to instantly need to grow up.


Paul
#buyers #handling #issues #sellers #thoughts #wso
  • Profile picture of the author IM Leauge
    Don't do business with that seller ever again.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5497982].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author GMD
    Banned
    Paul, this was a very useful post and many thanks for it.

    A question that I have regards rule "5" listed as a sticky in the WSO section.

    "5. If By Chance You Do Get Scammed By Someone The Problem Is Between You And Them. Not The Forum. Not The MOD's. And Not The Forum Owner. If you get scammed you deal with the person that scammed you. That's just the way it has to be. You have zero protection in here just like you have zero protection on the rest of the Internet. You can charge back on them, you can sue them or you can post about them all over the Internet. Whatever you do is entirely between you and the seller."

    Now obviously this portion deals specifically with getting "scammed". It's clear from the previous rule ("4") if something is shown to be a scam it will be removed by the WF. Yet, in your post, you officially or unofficially (or the WF got involved) got involved in attempting to resolve certain disputes/disagreements/non-response from a few sellers here that had buyers with some issues.

    Rule "5' seems to make it clear that the forum will not in any way get involved -- yet here, we see that there is some degree of involvement.

    In other words: is it or is not okay for members (in this case WSO purchasers) to at some point (last resort?) bring grievances (such as ignored refund requests) to your or the Warrior Forum's official attention?

    Thanks in advance for your reply!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498003].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Kelly Verge
      Originally Posted by GMD View Post

      Paul, this was a very useful post and many thanks for it.

      A question that I have regards rule "5" listed as a sticky in the WSO section.

      "5. If By Chance You Do Get Scammed By Someone The Problem Is Between You And Them. Not The Forum. Not The MOD's. And Not The Forum Owner. If you get scammed you deal with the person that scammed you. That's just the way it has to be. You have zero protection in here just like you have zero protection on the rest of the Internet. You can charge back on them, you can sue them or you can post about them all over the Internet. Whatever you do is entirely between you and the seller."

      Now obviously this portion deals specifically with getting "scammed". It's clear from the previous rule ("4") if something is shown to be a scam it will be removed by the WF. Yet, in your post, you officially or unofficially (or the WF got involved) got involved in attempting to resolve certain disputes/disagreements/non-response from a few sellers here that had buyers with some issues.

      Rule "5' seems to make it clear that the forum will not in any way get involved -- yet here, we see that there is some degree of involvement.

      In other words: is it or is not okay for members (in this case WSO purchasers) to at some point (last resort?) bring grievances (such as ignored refund requests) to your or the Warrior Forum's official attention?

      Thanks in advance for your reply!
      I believe that "Rule 5" is there to make it clear that that the WF isn't obligated to respond. That doesn't mean that they never will. It's simply to set expectations.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498023].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
      GMD,

      We can't actually do anything to force a seller to fix a problem, and we won't get directly involved in the transaction. It's not possible.

      However, we will try to determine if something falls into Rule #4 (removing "scammers"). That process often ends up motivating people to move more quickly to do the right thing.

      Keep in mind that the absolute most the mods can do if someone is believed (note the choice of words) to be operating outside the rules of the forum is to ban them. Anything more than that is completely beyond our ability or appropriate range of action.

      Also keep in mind that people can be banned for a lot of things that are not signs of any unethical or improper behavior in their commercial dealings. The fact is that most bans are for things that have nothing to do with the ethics or business reliability of the banned member.

      The only assumption you can safely make when you see the word "Banned" under a username is that the account involved has been forbidden from posting for some period of time. Nothing more than that.


      Paul
      Signature
      .
      Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498059].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author GMD
        Banned
        Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

        GMD,

        We can't actually do anything to force a seller to fix a problem, and we won't get directly involved in the transaction. It's not possible.

        However, we will try to determine if something falls into Rule #4 (removing "scammers"). That process often ends up motivating people to move more quickly to do the right thing.

        Keep in mind that the absolute most the mods can do if someone is believed (note the choice of words) to be operating outside the rules of the forum is to ban them. Anything more than that is completely beyond our ability or appropriate range of action.

        Also keep in mind that people can be banned for a lot of things that are not signs of any unethical or improper behavior in their commercial dealings. The fact is that most bans are for things that have nothing to do with the ethics or business reliability of the banned member.

        The only assumption you can safely make when you see the word "Banned" under a username is that the account involved has been forbidden from posting for some period of time. Nothing more than that.


        Paul
        Thanks again Paul for that reply: very reasonable and to-the-point!
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498097].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author DennisM
          Paul,

          Thank you the clear explanation! I certainly hope WSO buyers and sellers use some common sense.

          On another note, one thing that drives me nutty are the stupid responses in the WSO thread such as "I just PM'd you" and then "Yes, I just responded to your PM". My only hope is that the insanity will stop because all the WSO seller is doing is padding the post count in his/her WSO to increase page views.

          Dennis
          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498134].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
    Kelly,
    I believe that "Rule 5" is there to make it clear that that the WF isn't obligated to respond. That doesn't mean that they never will. It's simply to set expectations.
    Nope. Rule #5 is literally true. We can't become part of the issue. We have no ability to issue refunds, force delivery, or fix a problem between a buyer and seller. We are not parties to the transaction.

    We can sometimes try to encourage people in a productive path, or find out if a problem is a mistake or a deliberate act in bad faith. Not much more than that. And not always even that much, depending on what's involved. Some (many) things are simply not our business to get involved with at all, in any way.


    Paul
    Signature
    .
    Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498081].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author E. Brian Rose
      Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

      Kelly,Nope. Rule #5 is literally true. We can't become part of the issue. We have no ability to issue refunds, force delivery, or fix a problem between a buyer and seller. We are not parties to the transaction.

      We can sometimes try to encourage people in a productive path, or find out if a problem is a mistake or a deliberate act in bad faith. Not much more than that. And not always even that much, depending on what's involved. Some (many) things are simply not our business to get involved with at all, in any way.


      Paul
      Basically, the Warrior Forum sells advertising space to sellers in their WSO section. If you were to buy a magazine and then order something from an advertisement you saw in the magazine, all customer service issues would be between you and the company you paid money to. You wouldn't call up Us Weekly and ask them where your horoscope calendar is! You may drop them a note about a bad experience, but would you expect them to get in the middle?

      Same goes for Warrior Forum.

      It is much easier to take it to the the company or individual you paid. If that doesn't work or you get no response, take it to the company that processed the payment. It is much easier putting the bulk of your efforts where you know you will get results.
      Signature

      Founder of JVZoo. All around good guy :)

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498399].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author Fernando Veloso
        Originally Posted by E. Brian Rose View Post

        Basically, the Warrior Forum sells advertising space to sellers in their WSO section. If you were to buy a magazine and then order something from an advertisement you saw in the magazine, all customer service issues would be between you and the company you paid money to. You wouldn't call up Us Weekly and ask them where your horoscope calendar is! You may drop them a note about a bad experience, but would you expect them to get in the middle?

        Same goes for Warrior Forum.

        It is much easier to take it to the the company or individual you paid. If that doesn't work or you get no response, take it to the company that processed the payment. It is much easier putting the bulk of your efforts where you know you will get results.
        Brian,

        Why do you always have to be that sharp?

        EDIT: Brian takes the gold medal, but thanks so much to everyone else sharing opinions about this. Paul, as Gail suggested, maybe this could be a sticky in WSO section?
        Signature
        People make good money selling to the rich. But the rich got rich selling to the masses.
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5500076].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author absolutelee
    And, again, be patient. Folks who think that everything can and should be replied to instantly need to grow up.
    Let's highlight this bad boy. Just because a seller isn't responding to a request right at that moment, doesn't mean they're a scammer. They might legitimately be helping someone else, correcting a tech problem, or just taking a nap, which we're all allowed to do. Just sayin'.
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498117].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
      Lee,

      Yup.

      I saw one recently where a seller had marked an offer Closed, months ago. Someone found the buy button in a quoted post on the second or third page of the thread and ordered. He posted a question in the thread after that, and screamed bloody murder about how the seller was a scammer for not replying quickly.

      I was tempted to ban the guy for a month for reckless stupidity.

      Lack of patience and simple courtesy are the biggest reasons for most problems with WSO transactions. Someone gets rude, the egos flare up, and you've got a Dipstican standoff.

      Dumb. And entirely preventible.


      Paul
      Signature
      .
      Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498153].message }}
      • Profile picture of the author zerofill
        See the solution to all of this bickering is... first you take pills so you don't get pi__ed off about text... (legal ones prescribed obviously)

        Then all of a sudden text is just text and you don't have any emotions to flare up.

        See Paul... all fixed... let the world be medicated.
        Signature
        Serp Shaker
        The IM World Will Be Shaken to the Core!
        Join my list at: IMCool.Biz
        New Podcast --> podcast.imcool.biz
        {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498218].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
          Don,
          See Paul... all fixed... let the world be medicated.
          Works for me. Beats the ban hammer!


          Paul
          Signature
          .
          Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498246].message }}
        • Profile picture of the author Troy_Phillips
          If you need a little pill to cure your ill .. check out Doctor Zerofill.




          Originally Posted by zerofill View Post

          See the solution to all of this bickering is... first you take pills so you don't get pi__ed off about text... (legal ones prescribed obviously)

          Then all of a sudden text is just text and you don't have any emotions to flare up.

          See Paul... all fixed... let the world be medicated.
          Signature

          {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498344].message }}
          • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
            "Just Don and his pal Johnny Walker,
            And his brothers Blackie and Red"
            Signature
            .
            Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

            {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498367].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
    Dennis,

    Yeah, that could be annoying, I suppose. If that was the biggest problem we had to deal with in any section of the board, we'd be in pretty darned good shape, though.

    One similar type of post we DO want to be notified of is the "I'll wait for more reviews" comment. Those need to be nuked. Another is the person who complains about the price, but hasn't bought. The only time I can think of that price-related comments are appropriate are when someone who's ordered says it's worth more/less than what they paid or it's pointed out that the price in the WSO is the same as that offered to the public at large.

    And yet another comment that needs to be removed is the "All WSOs are scams/rehashed" garbage. Or the "If this was for real, why would you sell it?" rant.


    Paul
    Signature
    .
    Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498187].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author WillR
    Originally Posted by Paul Myers View Post

    Example from yesterday: A member had been following a seller around, posting about how he was refusing refunds. The customer did not contact the seller through any channel but WSO threads, and posted some rather angry stuff. Seller explained to the mods that the customer had bought through an affiliate, and he had contacted the affiliate about the refund.
    Although they (the buyer) went about this the wrong way, I can see the frustration in someone wanting a refund and being told they have to wait because you (the vendor) are waiting for your affiliate to process that refund. The buyer doesn't care about the mechanics behind it, they just want their money back as soon as possible.

    This just re-enforces the need for people to be VERY selective about the affiliates they are approving. Although it is an affiliates responsibility to refund that buyer, any delay in this process will also have a negative impact on your reputation.

    Thus it is in the vendors best interest to ONLY approve affiliates they know and trust, and also to chase up any refunds that have not been processed within a reasonable timeframe... BEFORE your customer comes chasing you.

    I will usually tell customers... "I have initiated your refund request with the affiliate and it should be processed within 24 hours. If you have not received notification of your refund by then, please contact me immediately and I will follow it up for you."
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498593].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rod Cortez
    Paul,

    A big thank you for posting this thread. I wish everyone that participates in the WSO forum would read it (wishful thinking, I know).

    And to buyers: WSO threads are not the best place to submit a first request for a refund. Simple courtesy suggests you use the non-forum channel for contacts that all sellers are required to have. If they fail to reply within 2 business days, then posting in the thread may be appropriate.
    This is a good reminder since a couple times I've forgotten to follow this (I'm getting better at it). I think the 2 business days is more than reasonable. Over the years I've learned to give it a couple more days than that, only because there have been times when the WSO seller got inundated with support tickets / e-mails/ etc. and they were trying to catch up. They weren't dodging me, they just hadn't gotten to me yet. I have to remind myself that many of the WSO sellers are one-person operations.

    Another seller got extremely sick and when he asked his wife to put an update on the WSO thread, she ended up editing the thread and not saving it. Another seller had a family member pass away and yes, they could have posted on the WSO thread to update everyone, but I could empathize on why they weren't thinking clearly for a few days.

    Yes, patience does go a long way. Also taking a deep breath and giving the other party the benefit of the doubt helps too.

    I no longer use my Paypal funds to pay for WSOs, I use my bank's debit card because of their policy against fraud. Paypal can still process it and my bank will generally back me up if I've been ripped off, regardless of Paypal's position or policies because at that point the funds came from my bank, not Paypal.

    So it's important to find out what kind of protection your financial institution has. My Visa debit card through my brokerage account also has similar protections. Remember, Paypal accepts Visa, Mastercard, Discover, and American Express.

    RoD
    Signature
    "Your personal philosophy is the greatest determining factor in how your life works out."
    - Jim Rohn
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498896].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Paul Myers
    Rod,
    I think the 2 business days is entirely reasonable. Though over the years I've learned to give it a couple more days than that
    Yep. That's why I said "may be appropriate." If an offer catches the WSOTD blessing, three or four days should be closer to right.

    I've seen perfectly reasonable sellers lose it under the pressure of that much traffic, and the support issues that come with it.


    Paul
    Signature
    .
    Stop by Paul's Pub - my little hangout on Facebook.

    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5498931].message }}
    • Profile picture of the author Gail_Curran
      This should be stickied in the WSO section.
      {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5500028].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Anthony W
    Totally agree Brian. There should be a sticky post about WSO etiquette and this info should be included.
    Signature
    Looking to buy Facebook accounts. PM me!
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5503461].message }}
  • Profile picture of the author Rod Cortez
    I just had someone in one of my chats today tell someone else to use the helpdesk and I had to point him to this thread here since the help desk is not used to report WSO issues between buyers and sellers.

    The thing to do if you want the mods to look at a problem is to type up a rational description of the situation, with enough details for the person reading it to understand what's going on. Then use the Report Post button.
    Use that red triangle that's underneath everyone's name / moniker / pen name / whatever / to alert the mods.

    RoD
    Signature
    "Your personal philosophy is the greatest determining factor in how your life works out."
    - Jim Rohn
    {{ DiscussionBoard.errors[5503462].message }}

Trending Topics